Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 25°C
Eat & Drink

This week on DineSafe: Amaya, Chabichou, Columbus Bakery, Mariko, Mt Everest Restaurant, People's Eatery, Vogue Supper Club

Posted by Robyn Urback / November 29, 2011

DineSafe TorontoThere are a few steadfast rules of Toronto dining. First off, reputation is everything — just ask Pusateri's. The fable of the scorned, expectorating server may be an exaggerated one, but should be taken seriously nonetheless, and the value of the open kitchen should never be underestimated. Despite the measures taken by the scrupulous city diner, those on the outside can never really know what goes on in the kitchen. And as someone who has spent a summer or two working in the restaurant industry, I know.

For those not privy to the inner workings of their favourite spots, there's Toronto Public Health carrying on regular investigations. In most cases I'd say ignorance is bliss, but DineSafe findings are certainly the exceptions. So brace yourself for bad news about your choice Toronto spot, here are some notable yellow cards (and one red) handed out this week.

Amaya Express
Inspected on: November 24
Inspection finding: Yellow (Conditional Pass)
Number of infractions: 10 (Minor: 4, Significant: 3, Crucial: 3)
Crucial infractions include: Inadequate food temperature control, failure to protect food from contamination, employee fail to wash hands when required

Chabichou
Inspected on: November 25
Inspection finding: Yellow (Conditional Pass)
Number of infractions: 8 (Minor: 6, Significant: 1, Crucial: 1)
Crucial infractions include: Inadequate food temperature control

Columbus Bakery
Inspected on: November 23
Inspection finding: Yellow (Conditional Pass)
Number of infractions: 3 (Minor: 1, Significant: 2, Crucial: 0)
Crucial infractions include: N/A

Mariko Japanese Restaurant
Inspected on: November 24
Inspection finding: Yellow (Conditional Pass)
Number of infractions: 11 (Minor: 1, Significant: 6, Crucial: 3)
Crucial infractions include: Inadequate food temperature control, failure to protect food from contamination

Mt Everest Restaurant
Inspected on: November 22
Inspection finding: Yellow (Conditional Pass)
Number of infractions: 9 (Minor: 2, Significant: 6, Crucial: 1)
Crucial infractions include: Inadequate food temperature control

People's Eatery
Inspected on: November 22
Inspection finding: Yellow (Conditional Pass)
Number of infractions: 2 (Minor: 0, Significant: 1, Crucial: 1)
Crucial infractions include: Failure to protect food from contamination

Savoy Pub
Inspected on: November 22
Inspection finding: Yellow (Conditional Pass)
Number of infractions: 6 (Minor: 3, Significant: 3, Crucial: 0)
Crucial infractions include: N/A

Vogue Supper Club
Inspected on: November 24
Inspection finding: Yellow (Conditional Pass)
Number of infractions: 4 (Minor: 2, Significant: 2, Crucial: 0)
Crucial infractions include: N/A

Hot Dog Vendor: 250 University Ave
Inspected on: November 24
Inspection finding: Red (Closed)
Number of infractions: 11 (Minor: 2, Significant: 6, Crucial: 2)
Crucial infractions include: Operator fail to wash hands when required, operator fail to prevent a rodent infestation

Discussion

12 Comments

cosmosuave / November 29, 2011 at 12:46 pm
user-pic
Scratching my head on this one... How does one not notice rodents in their hotdog cart...

Hot Dog Vendor: 250 University Ave
Inspected on: November 24
Inspection finding: Red (Closed)
Number of infractions: 11 (Minor: 2, Significant: 6, Crucial: 2)
Crucial infractions include: Operator fail to wash hands when required, operator fail to prevent a rodent infestation
not eating here / November 29, 2011 at 01:02 pm
user-pic
Camros Organic Eatery on Hayden Street also had a yellow. Was inspected Nov 18th, From the dine safe site;

INADEQUATE FOOD TEMPERATURE CONTROL; FAILURE TO ENSURE / PROVIDE FOR PROPER EMPLOYEE HYGIENE / HANDWASHING; IMPROPER MAINTENANCE / SANITATION OF NON-FOOD CONTACT SURFACES / EQUIPMENT; FAILURE TO PROTECT FOOD FROM CONTAMINATION

found it suprising from an organic eater
Brandon replying to a comment from cosmosuave / November 29, 2011 at 01:58 pm
user-pic
Was wondering the same thing, but if you read the rest of the details on the DineSafe site, that's just the beginning of it. Thankfully it got shut down, though something tells me more vendor carts should be checked as well now.
Mondayjane / November 29, 2011 at 02:21 pm
user-pic
Gross. The health standards is a checklist and has been in place for a decade. I mean, how hard is it?
AD / November 29, 2011 at 04:39 pm
user-pic
Just because it's organic, doesn't mean it's clean or uncontaminated. Bacteria and germs don't care whether the eggs or meat or GMO free! You'll still get sick!
Shawn / November 29, 2011 at 05:24 pm
user-pic
Is this the first article of its kind on this site?

If so, I think its a great idea.
Shawn / November 29, 2011 at 05:30 pm
user-pic
Holy shit....


Every singly place on this list, except for Columbus Bakery, Savoy Pub, and Vogue Supper Club are multiple offenders.

Mariko was even closed down in December because of all their infractions....


Its amazing how many restaurants are lax (and I've been to more than half of the places listed here).

I really wish the previous test result was displayed more prominently. Maybe have two signs displayed, one for the previous and one of the current. This way conditional passes and closes are highlighted after they are passed, rather than just being a small checkbox.

And I REALLY wish the city would penalize places that pretend their renovating when they're actually closed (re: Massimo's Pizza, the McDonalds by Sherbourne station, etc.).
eater / November 29, 2011 at 10:26 pm
user-pic
Multiple offenders are the worst. You just KNOW that if their history is yellow/green/yellow/green, etc., the place just isn't clean and safe. Unfortunately, there's not much the City can do, AFAIK. I had a place like this near my work and I called the City and spoke to one of the inspectors. He admitted there was a flaw in the system and that they could close these places, at the city's discretion, even without immediate danger but with enough bad history of repeat offences. But, he said, they rarely do it.
Moi / November 30, 2011 at 11:23 am
user-pic
It should be either YEAH or NAY
Either a restaurant is GOOD or BAD

Aja / November 30, 2011 at 12:37 pm
user-pic
Check out Caplansky's...always the worst!
Alvin Gongora / November 30, 2011 at 02:37 pm
user-pic
C'mmon Columbus Bakery! You can do better. When it comes to bread I go all the way out there from my East end hideout.
Richard replying to a comment from Aja / November 30, 2011 at 10:25 pm
user-pic
Wow, its pathetic that such a well known place has so many violations over the last two years.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal