Saturday, March 3, 2012Mostly Cloudy/Windy 7°C
City

Ford sticks to his guns on underground transit plans

Posted by Derek Flack / January 26, 2012

Rob Ford Subway PlanIn response to a proposal from Toronto city councillors to redistribute provincial funds for Toronto transit by running the eastern section of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT above ground, Rob Ford has made it clear that he's sticking to his guns on keeping rapid transit underground in Toronto. I suppose that shouldn't come as much of a surprise, but it's worth pausing for a moment on his rationale.

"It's the taxpayers in Scarborough. They were quite clear during my election that they want subways, and I represent what the taxpayers want and that's what we're going to continue to do," he explained in an interview with the National Post. "I'll do exactly what the provincial government wants to do. Last time I checked they're going to build subways. It's started, it's going, and I do what the taxpayers of Scarborough want ... not above ground."

There are a number of questions that come to mind when reading this explanation. The first is whether those living in Scarborough are as committed to underground transit infrastructure as Ford claims. We already know that the cancellation of Transit City will create a nightmare for Scarborough residents in the years ahead, so it's reasonable to ask if the people Ford has pledged his commitment to are, in fact, something akin to straw men.

Where does Ford think the money for the Sheppard subway extension is going to come from? This question has been hanging around for a while, but given that Stintz and Co.'s proposal diverts funds to get this project kickstarted, the fact that Ford is so quick to turn it down must mean that the mayor somehow still thinks he can pay for this subway line via a public-private partnership. Or he's just being bull-headed — take your pick. Isn't it easier to sell the idea that this thing will actually get built into Scarborough if some guaranteed funding is in place and construction is actually underway?

And lastly, what about Finch? If the mantra is to provide service for Ford's suburban constituents, then the current plans ignore one of the areas most beset by gridlock, Finch Avenue West. There are weaknesses in the new plan that's been put forward, but the underlying idea of compromise isn't one of them. Perhaps council as a whole understands this better than Ford, and another defeat awaits him at City Hall. It's too early to tell.

Image from Metrolinx

Discussion

56 Comments

James / January 26, 2012 at 09:54 am
user-pic
Build the Eglinton subway already. I don't care where the funds for Sheppard will come from. I personally think they won't get private funding for Sheppard and they'll rethink extending that subway. Which is a good thing as I don't think Sheppard needs to be extended right now.

So I guess in this regard, I am a Ford supporter; let's get it done.
Al / January 26, 2012 at 09:54 am
user-pic
"pubic-private partnership"

Freudian slip?
Bob But Not Doug / January 26, 2012 at 10:00 am
user-pic
I literally cannot believe that someone so stupid got elected Mayor of Toronto. Thank God council seems to have decided against going down with the S.S. Ford.
DRL / January 26, 2012 at 10:03 am
user-pic
Downtown Relief Line
Downtown Relief Line
Downtown Relief Line
Downtown Relief Line

How many lines do we need feeding into the already over-burdened Yonge corridor? Everytime there's a minor issue, the whole Yonge-Univ. line locks up and it takes forever to decongest.
JM / January 26, 2012 at 10:05 am
user-pic
This line isn't a subway, it's LRT no matter if it's above ground or not. We're spending $8 billion on this and the mayor doesn't even know what it is.

It'd be stunning if it were any other mayor.
jiec / January 26, 2012 at 10:06 am
user-pic
Yes, very surprised. I commented on here a few days ago that I thought Stintz' ploy was to save the Ford crew from an upcoming vote that would bring TC back. I thought it was all orchestrated to make the Mayor appear "somewhat" reasonable.
Can he really be this stupid?
He has absolutely no shot of winning this vote (he may get 10 votes from the radical right). I'm not sure he realizes he's not in the opposition anymore, and sticking to your guns in a losing proposition isn't cute anymore.
Marc / January 26, 2012 at 10:10 am
user-pic
Let's take all the money and build an LRT right on Ford's street just to piss him off for the rest of his life.
Hailey replying to a comment from James / January 26, 2012 at 10:11 am
user-pic
That's a mighty short-sighted take on the situation. Things like this shouldn't be done just to get something done. It would take longer and cost more for less (which is a recurring them with this Ford adminstration). If you want something done quicker with transportation right now, here's a thought: don't bury the line. Contradicting yourself a little here.
Jacob / January 26, 2012 at 10:12 am
user-pic
I'm in Scarborough, and I say just put the stupid thing above ground.

Eglinton here is very wide, and it's mostly a long stretch of nothing but shopping centres with gigantic parking lots. Why we need something as fancy and expensive as a subway to serve Walmart is beyond me.
POFF / January 26, 2012 at 10:15 am
user-pic
Why cant Scarborough just amalgamate with Pickering.

Toronto clearly doesnt want you.
Kieren replying to a comment from POFF / January 26, 2012 at 10:21 am
user-pic
Because Metro's been around since post WWII?

Jacob replying to a comment from Marc / January 26, 2012 at 10:23 am
user-pic
Ford strikes me as the kind of person who *is* going to be pissed-off for the rest of his life. His blood probably boils every time a kid skateboards by his house.
fill them in / January 26, 2012 at 10:25 am
user-pic
We don't need any of this "sub-way". Fill the tunnels, or turn them into roads, as God intended.
jildren replying to a comment from POFF / January 26, 2012 at 10:29 am
user-pic
What the hell are you talking about? You need to explain that one...
Kieren replying to a comment from fill them in / January 26, 2012 at 10:30 am
user-pic
Agreed. Subways remind people of anal sex. Which is, for all intents and purposes, against God's law.
Stephanie replying to a comment from Jacob / January 26, 2012 at 10:30 am
user-pic
Then he calls 911 to protect him from the threatening skateboarder.
Stephanie replying to a comment from POFF / January 26, 2012 at 10:31 am
user-pic
That is actually a great idea.
Bum Secks replying to a comment from Kieren / January 26, 2012 at 10:32 am
user-pic
That's the entire reason I LOVE the subway!
Stephanie replying to a comment from Stephanie / January 26, 2012 at 10:33 am
user-pic
I meant the amalgamating Pickering with Scarborough.
Alex / January 26, 2012 at 10:33 am
user-pic
This is a disappointment, but not much of a surprise. Hopefully it gets put to a vote in council and they go with the new proposal.

I second the downtown relief line calls. The Sheppard subway is already underutilized, if you're going to build a subway build a downtown relief line instead.
Kieren replying to a comment from Bum Secks / January 26, 2012 at 10:37 am
user-pic
Maybe that's why RoFo loves the subway!
steve replying to a comment from Kieren / January 26, 2012 at 10:43 am
user-pic
maybe for your God. Mine is a humanitarian
Rick / January 26, 2012 at 11:07 am
user-pic
Honestly, at this point, just stop changing the plans and get whatever form of transit you're building done as soon as possible. Toronto needs improved transit badly, no matter what it is.
Z replying to a comment from Marc / January 26, 2012 at 11:07 am
user-pic
The Eglinton LRT would have been one block north of his house, above ground, with the no-left-turn (instead right turn + u-turn) situation at the intersection there.

Notice in the revised plans the LRT doesn't extend West past Jane.
JimmySmack / January 26, 2012 at 11:13 am
user-pic
Let's get ROBTARDED!
eric / January 26, 2012 at 11:20 am
user-pic
I said it before the elections and I am sticking to my guns. I'm leaving. We have seen what having extreme left/right politics has produced in the states and it saddens me so much to see our city suffering the same fate.

I for one did not always agree with Miller and his tactics (the garbage strike stung especially living near a temporary dumping site) but he was a reasonable mayor and did achieve some progress in his time in office.

What we have now is a man who was great at pointing out what people hated but has no real concept of what to do now that those angry people have declared him their mayor.

You'll find me up north, telecommuting to work and never fretting about what the ttc could have been.

Good luck.

hendrix / January 26, 2012 at 11:25 am
user-pic
no, Ford probably does not have any plans that will get the shepp subway extended. He's just being bullheaded. Guys like him hate to change plans because they hate compromise. He is definitely not thinking strategically beyond this.
JM / January 26, 2012 at 11:47 am
user-pic
How does this guy have any credibility left at all? His campaign was to cut gravy and not service... whoops... His slogan is Respect for Taxpayers, yet here we have an easy way to save $2 billion and get better transit to more areas and he's refusing. This is not a left or right issue, this is about saving $2 billion+ that our city desperately needs.

It must be quite vexing for the fiscal conservatives out there. He's in his own little world, where only trolls can defend him.
Champ / January 26, 2012 at 11:53 am
user-pic
Ford is right,

underground is the right call.
jennifer / January 26, 2012 at 12:15 pm
user-pic
Anyone else getting really tired of hearing the word "taxpayer"?
Ay yay yay / January 26, 2012 at 12:17 pm
user-pic
It's clear now that the Eglinton LRT will be built (at least partly) above ground. It's just a matter of Ford's PR people coming up with the appropriate spin, so he can avoid looking like the power-waning boob he is.

(Still, knowing Ford, he'll probably just blame "the left-of-Stalin communists" on council. Truly a class act, this guy.)

To me, what's sad is all the wasted time and energy spent fighting this ninny, when the whole time, the crazy expensive of a buried LRT was there for all to see.

It's like the reasonable people on council are constantly having to play defense against Ford's buffoonery. (Scrapping Transit City, the Portlands fiasco, the budget, etc.)

Let's hope we're seeing the start of saner heads prevailing at City Hall, and the beginning of Mayor Middle Finger's sidelining for the remainder of his term.
stavely replying to a comment from jennifer / January 26, 2012 at 12:21 pm
user-pic
I'm getting tired of hearing words from Rob.
M- replying to a comment from Ay yay yay / January 26, 2012 at 12:21 pm
user-pic
he has PR people? maybe he should try listening to them
Subway / January 26, 2012 at 12:22 pm
user-pic
Transit shitty is dead! Rejoices!
steve / January 26, 2012 at 01:07 pm
user-pic
Ford is a fiscal conservative, no surprise that he would have no accounting skills
iSkyscraper / January 26, 2012 at 01:07 pm
user-pic
Rob Ford lacks a college education, bandies about numbers without context and has proven himself incapable of higher-order policy on multiple occasions. He also has little familiarity with transit other than staring at the taillights of a bus or streetcar from the windshield of his car. He travels to other cities only when they are hosting NFL playoff games. That he is less than erudite on the topic of urban transportation policy, or thinking in general, is not debatable at this point.

What is up for debate is why anyone at all still supports the guy. You were hoodwinked, Toronto, maybe by your own doing, but it's time to shrug it off and move forward. Fortunately, Toronto has a weak-mayor system and council should be able to shovel RoFo off to the side like so much dirty snow.

Meanwhile, don't forget the western end of Eglinton. If there is any hope of inexpensive rapid-transit to the airport during our lifetimes, it will be through expanding a surface LRT west along Eglinton to the airport. (See: Minneapolis, Baltimore, Salt Lake, San Jose, Seattle, Dallas, London (City) etc. etc.) If the Eglinton line is kept underground here it will never be affordable to expand further west.
auditorydamage / January 26, 2012 at 01:25 pm
user-pic
What a shitshow. Mr. Respect For Taxpayers seems to have once again forgotten that respect includes honesty and acknowledgement of reality, such as the fact that not one metre of Sheppard subway extension will be built unless some funding magically appears, leaving Scarborough screwed again. The only reason the province is planning for subways is because he unilaterally forced them into such planning by throwing away the entire Transit City project on a whim.

The man has horrible judgment, atrocious organizational skills, and no ability to collaborate with others. He wants to paint councillors as further to the left than Joe Stalin, while he and his allies engage in rhetorical flourishes, authoritarian declarations, and outright falsehoods that would have made Uncle Joe grunt with approval.

2 years, 11.5 months of this idiocy to go.
W. K. Lis / January 26, 2012 at 01:49 pm
user-pic
I want subways too. I want all the TTC routes to be subways. However, it is not cost efficient, especially where the density is as low it is. Light rail is efficient, going underground where space and density warrants it. Transit City should be built, but with maybe some adjustments yes, but built. We could have had construction already started on the Finch West LRT, but Rob Ford phobia has negated that for the time being. We need Transit City now, not when Rob Ford leaves office.

Subways are needed where it is NEEDED, not just wanted. The Downtown Relief Line (DRL) is needed, as heavy rail or light rail, but needed.
garyT267 / January 26, 2012 at 01:54 pm
user-pic
So now, everything will stop, and nothing will get built. The Shepherd line is under-utilized because it only goes a few stops. if it were to connect with something it would do a lot to alleviate congestion. I hate to say it but underground trains makes sense in a cold climate. That being said, out of the core of the city, Eglinton is a big wide street that could support an above ground LRT. Of course, with the number of traffic lights you'd face, it would take you five years to get across the city. How Chicago has such an extensive and inexpensive train network and we fight and moan about lines that never get built is beyond me. We'll still be having this discussion in 5 years. Guaranteed. Regardless of who is mayor.
SLOB HOARD / January 26, 2012 at 02:01 pm
user-pic
Here's the thing people. This may get passed by Council and other levels of government, however we all know that some left wing POS will be elected in three years which is about the same time it takes to scope out a project, complete surveys, draw up plans and get permits for the damn thing. He or she will cancel this and go back to the drawing board.

Bring back Transit City.
Roger MM / January 26, 2012 at 03:38 pm
user-pic
I'd just like to reiterate DRL's statements.

"Downtown Relief Line...
How many lines do we need feeding into the already over-burdened Yonge [and Bloor/Danforth] corridor[s]? Every time there's a minor issue, the whole Yonge-Univ. line locks up and it takes forever to decongest."

The streetcars downtown are a nightmare at any times around rush hour. Over burdened, splitting at the seams capacity, and all we ever hear is talk of expanding further into the burbs to shovel more people onto an already over-capacity subway system. People ride for free on the streetcars at rush hour because the drivers have to open all of the doors, just to make embarking and disembarkation sane. I'd still rather ride my bike though, or walk, than have to be crammed into one of those things like I used to have to do when I worked downtown.

Downtown Relief Line !!!!

Let's elect a mayor who has a brain in his head with real solutions, not this bigoted, rage-o-holic, BBQ, 911-calling Mayor McCheese embarrassment of a person.
Marc replying to a comment from Roger MM / January 26, 2012 at 03:56 pm
user-pic
You forgot fat. That is key.
Love Lamp / January 26, 2012 at 04:25 pm
user-pic
LOUD NOISES!!
Basshat replying to a comment from SLOB HOARD / January 26, 2012 at 04:50 pm
user-pic
A left wing mayor is gong to cancel it? The last two cancellations to significant transit proposals in the G^TA were initiated by right wing politicians (Harris and Ford).

Does Ford actually have the power to prevent changes to the LRT regardless of a council vote or is he just acting out while pouting again?
Jay / January 26, 2012 at 07:38 pm
user-pic
What? Another bunch of posts from the left full of name calling?? Say it ain't so BlogTO!

When someone starts to spout off from the left I think ... Yawn.
Jay / January 26, 2012 at 09:06 pm
user-pic
Sorry, i haven't drank my 6 pack of coors yet. Makes me very moody, if i don't.
Kevin / January 26, 2012 at 09:33 pm
user-pic
Stuff like this makes me wonder if the mayor has some sort of connection to the bus manufacturers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_International

The more money spent putting transit underground when it doesn't have to be the less rail transit actually get's built. The less rail transit that gets built the more routes have to be serviced by buses.
Dr. Shrinker replying to a comment from Jay / January 27, 2012 at 07:11 am
user-pic
More like you haven't had your medication yet, and are quite cranky and obdurate, like most neocons.
Jordan / January 27, 2012 at 10:55 am
user-pic
I personally believe the TTC should focus on improving their current services rather than creating more. In my opinion the subway should operate overnight. The TTC should focus on expanding their Blue Night network as the current services are near pathetic for commuters in the northeast and northwest parts of the city. I personally support an increase in fare if the TTC expands and improves it's current services.
Lorraine / January 27, 2012 at 06:09 pm
user-pic
I live in Scarborough..and i full support Ford in his vision for a subway...we want a subway not surface transport.
Seth M replying to a comment from garyT267 / January 27, 2012 at 06:33 pm
user-pic
Most of Chicago's lines were built almost a century ago (stuff cost less) by private companies (interested in making the fastest, cheapest profit, and not accountable to the public), and Chicago's lines are elevated (much less expensive than a subway). What's unfortunate is that cities that were big before WWII all benefit from huge networks thanks to the ease of construction and low car ownership back then, and once the line is built, even if ridership declines it's still reasonably cheap to run. Chicago's L serves way fewer people daily than Toronto (the 504 King serves more people than a couple of their lines put together), but the lines are still running because building them is the real challenge.
W. K. Lis / January 27, 2012 at 07:08 pm
user-pic
In addition to contacting your local councillor, TTC commissioners, Premier of Ontario, and you local MPP, we should also contact Metrolinx starting at their contact page at http://www.metrolinx.com/en/contactus/
Vote NDP in the next federal/provincial election / January 27, 2012 at 08:50 pm
user-pic
It seems that Mr Ford is showing his true incompetence on the transit file when he commmented recently that Toronto has ran subways for 100 years. Excuse me! The first subway in Toronto opened in 1954 which was....oh lets say.....58 years ago.

Is there anything we can do to keep Mr Ford out of the transit file. We dont need incompetent politicians interfering on progress.

This time dont listen to Mr Ford to anything on the transit file.

I think the real question for Scarborough is: Light rail transit or nothing?

And even if rapid transit does get built, what are the odds that Mr Ford will use it....... 0%.
Scarborough voters!!! / January 31, 2012 at 04:31 pm
user-pic
We want a SUBWAY!!! We don't want to PAY FOR ONE!!! Rob Ford told us he can do MAGIC!!! We are all DRUNK!!!
zencyalonzo / February 1, 2012 at 10:17 am
user-pic
order an imitation coach purses for promotion code
semnZest / February 11, 2012 at 05:16 pm
user-pic
you love this? best fake designer bags online

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal