TTC claims subway pushing victim was too close to edge of impossibly narrow platform
The TTC claims that the victim of a terrifying subway pushing incident was standing too close to the platform's edge in defence of a $1 million lawsuit filed against the transit agency.
But pretty much everyone who has ever waited for a train on the lower level of Bloor-Yonge station knows that "too close" is a relative statement on such a narrow, cramped platform.
In a video that gave transit riders around the city a good scare, 39-year-old Shamsa Al-Balushi was shoved onto the tracks in the path of an oncoming train, managing to roll under the lip of the platform, sustaining moderate injuries as the train passed just inches away.
Edith Frayne, 45, of Toronto, was later arrested and charged with attempted murder.
Represented by personal injury law firm Diamond and Diamond, Al-Balushi is seeking "damages in the amount of $1 million or some other amount which will be provided prior to trial," after suffering physical and emotional damage from the incident, but the TTC has no intention of taking responsibility for the April 17 incident.
The TTC claims that Al-Balushi "chose to stand close to the edge of the platform and failed to pay due care and attention to her surroundings," a statement that isn't sitting well with the victim and many commenters on social media.
"TTC boldly meeting the challenge of decreased ridership due to COVID-19 with its 'standing anywhere on the subway platform is inherently dangerous' campaign," reads one tweet.
The Line 2 platforms at Bloor-Yonge are already about as narrow as they can be, and during rush hour or even slightly above peak travel times, it can get pretty cramped down there. Standing close to the platform edge is rarely a matter of choice for commuters.
This is messed up. Do better TTC. Next you’re going to thicken the yellow line, there will be no platform to stand on. How many of your new stops planned, have you even considered retrofitting barrier options?— Jason Das (@JDas2k) June 9, 2022
Defending against the lawsuit with a claim that the victim should have taken more care to avoid being pushed is coming across as victim-blaming to some.
JFC.— Golgafrinchan (@shinybaubles) June 9, 2022
You heard it here first, people: if a mentally unstable person pushes you onto TTC tracks & it takes over a half hour to get you out from under the platform crawlspace, it's YOUR fault. 🤬 Un-frickin believable. https://t.co/9uiosHCYA4
The lawyer representing the victim, Darryl Singer, spoke to CP24, telling the outlet, "It's kind of like blaming the rape victim for wearing a short skirt."
This is even worse than blaming the victim of attempted murder of standing too close:— Sean Marshall (@Sean_YYZ) June 9, 2022
“The TTC’s statement of defence also states that Al-Balushi should not have been travelling alone on public transit ‘when she knew or ought to have known that it was unsafe for her to do so.’”
Some seem to agree with the TTC's stance that the transit agency is not liable for what happened to Al-Balushi, but it's once again spurring a discussion about introducing (very costly) platform doors to stations with such safety concerns.
I agree TTC is not responsible for what happened but the issue is the platform is unsafe and TTC with their infrastructure creates conditions this to happen.— Linden 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 ❤️ (@AnnaNikolo) June 9, 2022
The suit alleges that the TTC "did not implement sufficient safety protocols on the subway platform."
The TTC argues "that at all material times, it took such care as in all the circumstances of the case were reasonable to see that persons entering on the premises were reasonably safe while on said premises."
Join the conversation Load comments