Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 21°C
City

What's Next for Eastern Avenue?

Posted by Rick McGinnis / November 26, 2009

Gale's Snack Bar, an Eastern Avenue landmarkToronto has been criticized by visitors as being a sloppy city, and while that flies in the face of years of (mostly self-directed) propaganda about our civic orderliness, it's a hard charge to deny, especially when you walk or drive down a street like Eastern Avenue. To the north, there's the tightly packed homes along Victorian streets, and to the south, the remnants of portside industry, some of it still working, much of it repurposed into warehouses and studios for film, design and photography.

The houses were built for workers employed nearby, but they're long gone, and real estate values are becoming more in line with the standards set by Leslieville and Riverdale. It's a neighbourhood in transition, and conflicts are inevitable, such as the recent one over a plan to put a big box retail complex anchored by a Wal-Mart on the spot occupied by the now-shuttered Toronto Film Studios at the foot of Pape. It was opposed by a vocal group of locals and rejected by the Ontario Municipal Board earlier this year, and while there's still debate about what exactly happened, it put a momentary spotlight on a part of Toronto that embodies the city's past and future in just a dozen or so blocks.

Toronto Film StudiosThe studio site was rumoured as a potential depot for the LRT fleet that we're supposed to be acquiring, but councilor Paula Fletcher says that plan is off the boards. She was grateful to see the Wal-Mart plan defeated as well, and says that, at least for the near future, the film industry has precedent over anything else that'll be happening on the south side of Eastern.

"I don't think people realize the depth and degree of this being the centre of the film industry in the city," Fletcher tells me. "That's the lens through which everybody looks through development. The big box proposal became a nightmare for everyone because it closed down the film studio and looked like it would make trouble for the film industry as well -- it didn't look like the kind of employment that should be put into these lands."

Eastern Avenue under constructionWith much of the area zoned as employment lands, the houses on busy thoroughfares like Eastern and Carlaw are stuck in a sort of zoning limbo -- too hard to sell to aspirant new owners, but hard to repurpose for anything else. Still, Fletcher has hopes that a new employment study just being started by the city will eventually lead to more flexible zoning, especially as the OMB also rejected a planning study that proposed loosening things up when they killed the big box.

The vacant Hell's Angels clubhouseOlder industries aren't exactly gone -- the sweet smell of baking bread still pours from the Weston building at Booth, but Lever has closed down near the foot of Broadview, and things are changing -- the Chinese World Journal newspaper recently vacated the old Consumer's Gas building at 415 Eastern, Urbacon, a commercial design firm, moved to Lake Shore Boulevard, and glitzy interior firm Yabu Pushelberg took a long-term lease on Booth Avenue. These are signs of the area's future, just as much as the vacated Hell's Angel's bunker clubhouse is a remnant of its past.

It's been almost three years since Derek Finkle and his wife Julie Mitchell moved their businesses to Eastern. He runs his literary agency out of the building that houses Parcel, her marketing company -- an industrial space on a prominent corner, right across from Gale's Snack Bar, a neighbourhood landmark and probably the most quintessential diner left in the city. Derelict for ten years, Finkle and Mitchell had to gut the building, which once housed an illegal duck egg farm, but they don't regret it at all.

"Why do business here? We're only a block away from what's going on up the street (on Queen.) Obviously we got this property for a pretty good deal -- we had to sink quite a bit of money into making it habitable, but however this area transforms, I don't think its value is going down."

The Tasty RestaurantA few blocks west, Tommaso Conti opened his Italian trattoria nine months ago, and is downright bullish about Eastern. "We have the best people in the neighbourhood," he tells me, "and I say thank God. We've been pretty lucky, no headaches, no drunks, no bullshit -- nice, nice, nice."

He says that at least 30 per cent of his business is from the film studios nearby, and he'd like to see more. "I want it to be 99 per cent of my business. The company from England, Pinewood, will take over the whole thing anyway. It's nice to see people from overseas making money in the neighbourhood -- like I did!"A hoarding - vacant space near Pape

Discussion

45 Comments

Gmania / November 26, 2009 at 11:31 am
user-pic
I visted the variety store featured in the third photo this morning. Walking on Eastern feels like walking on the side of a highway, but I think it's an interesting street. I enjoy the residential/industrial vibe. And Tom at Tommaso's Trattoria is a great guy serving great food.
Jeff / November 26, 2009 at 11:31 am
user-pic
first, the article you point to ('sloppy city') actually celebrates the 'messy urbanism' of Toronto. It's not a slight at all. Second, what's wrong with a little entropy in the city? Not every neighbourhood has to be managed to death, does it? I like chaos, it's far more interesting than the bland, orderly, uptight streetscapes you see in many parts of this city. As long as it's not dangerous, a little decay/messiness can be a good thing.
Rico / November 26, 2009 at 11:37 am
user-pic
Lever is gone. Much to do on Queen in Leslieville.
rick mcginnis / November 26, 2009 at 11:45 am
user-pic
Rico - you're right; I completely forgot about the strike and the bankruptcy earlier this year. The plant still seemed to be running when I walked by, but I might have mistaken mist for smoke. The post has been corrected.
Rico / November 26, 2009 at 11:47 am
user-pic
Pretty cool eh? Well, I'll look for your email and forward something to you that you might like.
rick mcginnis replying to a comment from Jeff / November 26, 2009 at 11:49 am
user-pic
Jeff - the Spacing piece was more of a celebration than a criticism, it's true, but I've read at least two pieces in the last month or so complaining about the city's untidy appearance, especially when you get out of the centre. I frankly don't see it as a problem - who wants to be Brasilia? - but I can see why some might. While photographers do love shooting in ragged areas like Eastern, there's a reason why official city tourist imagery always relies on the same five or six locations within a mile or so of city hall (Eaton Centre, entertainment district, Bay Street Fork York, etc.) Not even New York sells itself with pictures of The Bronx.
Jon / November 26, 2009 at 12:24 pm
user-pic
Lever's not really doing business at the foot of Broadview.
Ratpick / November 26, 2009 at 12:24 pm
user-pic
Hopefully the city will one day be able to do something about a certain stench that plagues the entire area (I ain't talkin' about BREAD). I've often thought that the street signs should say Sewage Village on them.
Rico replying to a comment from Jon / November 26, 2009 at 12:27 pm
user-pic
Joh. They went bankrupt. They're closed. Kaput. Finito. Even moreso than the stinking Leafs.
Rico replying to a comment from Ratpick / November 26, 2009 at 12:33 pm
user-pic
That is the sewage treatment plant at Leslie south of Lakeshore. They are pushing to start up incineration again, which was implemented by the moronic NDP. If you think it stinks here, go downwind of the plant in the Beach on a Summer day. That whole area could apply for a weight-loss clinic label. It's horrible. Smells like an NDP caucus meeting.
Just sayin / November 26, 2009 at 12:49 pm
user-pic
Another skid row piece.
Film Worker / November 26, 2009 at 01:27 pm
user-pic
Rick,

Sorry for the long post, but Paula Fletcher misled you BADLY with her claim: "The big box proposal became a nightmare for everyone because it closed down the film studio and looked like it would make trouble for the film industry as well..."

The big box did NOT close down the studio, but developer greed and Fletcher's and the City's ineptitude did. Going back to 2004 when TFS was awarded the Megastudio (FilmPort) rights, TFS immediately applied to rezone these employment lands, so effectively the construction of the new studios was linked to the removal of the old ones. TEDCO could have just removed the rights from TFS, since the Megastudio was supposed to benefit from its proximity to the Studio District, not rip out its guts at 629 Eastern. But the fix was in, and TEDCO and Fletcher placed their bet on TFS.

Given that the original rezoning app had a residential component, Fletcher must have been promised some low-income housing component as an NDP voting-bloc treat, since it was Fletcher who chaired the flurry of community meetings to show drawings of the multi-storey condo/retail complex that was originally planned by TFS. Remembering those meetings in late 2004 and early 2005, residents were furious that they weren't handed drawings (just shown on a projector), and weren't allowed to ask questions. By the third meeting they revolted, especially us film industry folk who didn't want to lose the studios, and Fletcher took notice.

By the summer of 2005, it was clear that both local residents and film people were taking aim at Fletcher, and at the fact that the rezoning and loss of studios were definitely linked to the Megastudio. Fletcher panicked, and asked TFS to put their rezoning app on hold until the Megastudio got approved. Ken Ferguson did so, and even promised us in an open letter that TFS had no plans to close down their older studios (even though behind the scenes he told TEDCO he was going to close them anyway so he could funnel the business over to the Megastudio, and he even asked TEDCO for help in the rezoning process!). But in the end, Fletcher was left with egg on her face right after the Megastudio was approved in September, because TFS then escalated their rezoning app to the OMB, removing it completely from the purview of the City, claiming the City was taking too long.

So Fletcher had a very prominent role in this disaster, especially by helping in the closing of the studios and opening the door to Big Box, but with 4-year councillor terms, who can possibly remember all these things? I'm certain she'll be re-elected anyway.

Meanwhile, many bread-and-butter films are being made like back in the 1980's...squirreled away in cheap and dirty warehouses, because almost nobody can afford to shoot at FilmPort.

Paula just shoots off these comments to newspapers and blogs, thinking no one will notice, like the time she promised in a Mirror article to "move heaven and earth" to find relocation space for the Marine Terminal Studios that her pal David Miller shut down as a favour to his architect pal Jack Diamond. Well Paula, film people DO remember, because when it comes to places that we need to work in, we remember EVERYTHING.
Rico replying to a comment from Film Worker / November 26, 2009 at 01:36 pm
user-pic
Um, wrong. Selling a property is called an exit strategy. You don't ever keep an investment without an exit strategy. Business 101. It's not greed, it's how the owner makes money. I'm sure you don't work for free, so don't expect those that house YOUR business to do it for you. The approach by a new buyer can make anybody close up current leases or let them expire. And another thing: if the film industry is making so much money, why can't they just get their own act together and achieve some real estate for themselves, and not rely on funding from every angle? Seems questionable. Third, locals want business to go in there, not low-income housing. Leslieville has more than enough low end bullshit to deal with already. You can remember everything you want. At the end of the day, it's money that talks, sunshine. It's the locals that live here that made a stink about it. Filmies will not control lower Leslieville, nor will they own the Docklands.
Erica replying to a comment from Film Worker / November 26, 2009 at 02:00 pm
user-pic
I agree Rick,
Had Paula Fletcher not whipped the local 'NIMBY'S' into a foaming at the mouth frenzy in their misguided and misinformed opposition to a SmartCentres development, things would have turned out for the better and could have given Eastern Avenue a new lease on life.

But like everything else in life, be careful what you wish for because now they the NIMBY's got exactly what they deserved, an empty boarded up lot, grafitti galore and real eye sore

In my humble opinion Eastern Avenue is comparable to a third world country and nothing will change, not now, not in 10 years from now, not ever. Keep taking Paula Fletcher.


Rico replying to a comment from Erica / November 26, 2009 at 02:12 pm
user-pic
Big Box implementation is your only concept of "a new lease on life" for Eastern Avenue? Wow, Suburbanobs read blogTO! Leave development of prime land to those that know what they are doing, and are actually from Toronto.
Mark replying to a comment from Film Worker / November 26, 2009 at 02:31 pm
user-pic
Just a quick semantic clarification, Film Worker. This statement--"TFS then escalated their rezoning app to the OMB, removing it completely from the purview of the City, claiming the City was taking too long."--is a bit misleading. TFS didn't "claim" that the city took too long. There is a very specific, legislated timeline within which city council must either approve or deny any development application. After this period (either 6 or 9 months, I can't quite remember), the applicant can appeal the city's lack of decision to the OMB. It's not a subjective claim that the city has taken its time and often (though not in this case) developers that aren't looking for a huge fight will make such an appeal to remind the city that they're dragging their heels.
Film Worker replying to a comment from Rico / November 26, 2009 at 02:50 pm
user-pic
Actually Rico, YOU are wrong.

A Proponent responding to a City RFP trying to gain development rights on City lands MUST follow the guidelines of that RFP, and the agency who issued the RFP must follow the guidelines it set out in order to properly fulfill their economic development mandate, which in this case, was to help the film industry GROW, not to remove affordable studios to build expensive ones.

A private business owner's proper "exit strategy" would have been for TFS to simply sell their old studios and walk away, or try to rezone them independent of their conditional promise to build new studios on City lands ONLY IF the City and Fletcher assisted them in erasing the employment designation on those lands. Clearly, proper execution of a business exit strategy is NOT what happened here.

What happened at 629 Eastern Avenue was as corrupt as it gets, and nobody can deny that. TFS tried to trade up one space for another on the City's dime, in this case old studios on Eastern Avenue for a 99-year lease on 50 acres of prime waterfront land, plus over $25 million in taxpayer construction subsidies.

And if you actually live in Leslieville Rico, sadly you have a short memory of what the film industry did for this neighbourhood. The first big film studios here were actually the stimulus for many of the antique shops, bookstores, bistros and cafes that sprouted over the past twenty years that turned an otherwise bland part of Toronto into a vibrant one. It was film production that was reponsible for bringing much of Eastern Avenue out of your so-called "low-end" category.

There are few industries like ours, with such a huge spillover spending effect on job creation, car rentals, catering, hotel, lumber and paint sales, etc... Provincially-commissioned studies show that every dollar of tax rebate to film producers produces over $1.50 in new spending, unlike any other industry that receives government support.

It's not about "control" of the area, my friend, its about good quality jobs, spillover spending, and economic growth, all from film production.

My point is, thanks to Fletcher's active participation in the matter, we have been set back 20 years.

Cynthia / November 26, 2009 at 02:52 pm
user-pic
I think we're not only "messy" at times, but we also need some improvement when it comes to sophistication. Unfortunately, I think our politicians don't want anything to do with that. I think they're satisfied with being mediocre!
Erica replying to a comment from Rico / November 26, 2009 at 02:54 pm
user-pic
What-ever-rrrrrrrrr Rico,
Eastern Avenue missed the boat!
What 'Big Box implementation'(jeeze such big words)are you talking about? Is that what Paula Fletcher told you? LOL!!
Rico / November 26, 2009 at 03:01 pm
user-pic
Your limited thinking precedes you! He doesn't have to respond to any RFP. You called him a greedy person because he's wanting to sell his investment. The only busy film house on Eastern is the one right behind Price Chopper. And I reiterate that cashflows from the film industry should be used to help that industry grow, not subsidies. I do live in Leslieville, and I haven't forgotten as my Father was chair of the Canadian industry that overlooked all that stuff, some time ago. The presence of a film industry was not the reason Toronto-East is here. Far from it. But nice try. This is 2009 and property values are what they are regardless. The development potential for Leslieville and Docklands is massive. Best in the city. And good quality jobs don't go to industries that need help. You get involved with politicians, that's exactly what you're going to get. Downtown East is poisoned because of 50 years of City Counsellors taking kickbacks. Most of them were not from here. Adam Vaughan on the radio today, is a breath of fresh air.
Rico replying to a comment from Erica / November 26, 2009 at 03:04 pm
user-pic
Um, Erica, pay attention. "No Big Boxes in Leslieville" ring a bell? Eastern Avenue has been waiting for a very long time to have a future. In fact, most of the land east of Yonge Street sits so very short due to the same reason of either the City paying to clean it up, or any development business plan taking that into financial consideration. And implementation isn't a big word for people who went to school. Push over the rock you live under.
Film Worker replying to a comment from Rico / November 26, 2009 at 03:42 pm
user-pic
No, I called him greedy because he DID respond to an RFP to grow the film industry by building new studios, only to convince the City that he NEEDED to close down the old studios in order to do it, all the while saying "But at some point, EVERYONE'S gonna want to be down at the new studios in the Portlands". You can see the lying snake-in-the-grass in full living colour, flip-flopping in front of the camera, at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxzPsAWI8Ug

Nice to see his partners in crime, Miller and Fletcher, too.

And to correct you again, Eastern Avenue has TWO very busy studio facilities, one that hosts the hit tv series "Flashpoint", and one fronting Eastern off Heward hosting the hit tv series "Being Erica". And Booth Avenue is 15 seconds away with a big studio, so this was, and still is, Toronto's Studio District.

FilmPort is an overpriced white elephant, almost completely useless to the mainstream film and tv industry here, and was really just a ruse for the big prize: 99-year development rights on the most prized land in Canada: The Portlands. At least that's something we agree on.

I think you underestimate how many of your neighbours moved to Leslieville to be close to the Studio District, and how many shopkeepers miss the 629 Eastern Avenue studios being open.

Adam Vaughan WAS a breath of fresh air when he opposed the Home Depot on Queen West, but his transformation to Miller-ite became complete when he caved, saying that H.D. had made "Significant concessions" to the design...whatever, more NDP doublespeak...
Rico / November 26, 2009 at 03:54 pm
user-pic
So a counter-proposal was made. It's his right to do so, and given his experience, he would pretty much be an expected involved party. So he's guilty of trying to become involved? He owes the City or anybody else nothing. He made his proposal as a business person, and the City reacted. It's the City that broke the guidelines, not this guy. Who else was making a bid? Why did that not go anywhere if there were alternatives? When someone makes a counter-proposal, you listen all the same. This is a fine case where Canadian protectionism is demonstrated to be alive and kicking. Let the business roll as it should. That's the stuff that employs people anyway. If the demand isn't there for lesser films, so be it. I don't know anybody down here that's in the film biz. I know one person who lives in the Junction that's in the biz, and the Beach. I know people that have left the film biz.
Film Worker replying to a comment from Rico / November 26, 2009 at 04:05 pm
user-pic
"Who else was making a bid? Why did that not go anywhere if there were alternatives?"

You said it yourself: "50 years of City Counsellors [sic] taking kickbacks"

Take a minute, watch the youtube video. Yes the City was wrong to pursue his bid, but he's not innocent when as a major film industry stakeholder, who I might add was on the Mayor's Film Board at the time of this deal (major conflict of interest), he promises the ENTIRE INDUSTRY he will keep the old studios open, and then promptly closes them to leave them abandoned once the 99-year Portlands lease is in the bag.

You protest too much in favour of this developer / scam artist.

You know him, perhaps? Probably not, he has few friends left.

I guarantee you that Toronto is the only City in North America with 250,000 square feet of empty studio space with a lock on the gate - every other City is trying to build what we have sitting right there.


Rico / November 26, 2009 at 04:12 pm
user-pic
Sure. Then find somebody with an alternative. If there's nobody there, then the next best thing is exactly that. The City broke its own approach, but what alternatives did they have? My point here is that he isn't greedy, he's just respecting his options for his own business. If the promises didn't go through, then he's in breach of contract, and burn the whole thing up, and go legal on him, including costs. This kind of stuff isn't anything new, nor is it cloudy. I protest in the name of good business. Either the City can't defend its actions, or this guy is simply breaking a civil presentation in agreement with the City. I will always defend someone with ownership of assets in Toronto. If they break the law, or miss the concept of business (a "win/win" for all sides in a relationship), then I do expect them to be told to go F their hat. If we can't rely on the legal system providing a suitable environment, then we turn into a legal system at the cost of all business. Beyond all this, are you really surprised with our City Council? Those people wouldn't know business if it sat on their face. Perhaps this guy with the closed studio land knows this better than Toronto voters do. Council is made up of lazy pushovers that have few options elsewhere. If it wasn't this story, it would be another one. Quite often it's several other stories of their incompetence.
Chris replying to a comment from Film Worker / November 26, 2009 at 04:16 pm
user-pic
Rico and Film Worker: Nice debate you two. Good to see the name calling kept to a minimum.

At the very least, it seems you two agree that City dropped the ball, one way or the other in regards to Eastern Ave.

I also live in the neighborhood, not too far from the studios and a number of my neighbors are actors or otherwise work in the industry. I haven't lived in Leslieville long enough to be able to comment on who's responsibity for its attractiveness as a neighborhood, but I do have to say that the creative types who live and work in the area and the various film shoots in the neighborhood definitely enhance its diversity, which is one of the things I love about (that, and the great restaurants and shops).

Cheers :)
Film Worker / November 26, 2009 at 04:20 pm
user-pic
"Quite often it's several other stories of their incompetence."

Something else we can agree on. Stories like a Home Depot on Queen West, a Leon's in the Roundhouse, a bland box-shaped view-obstructing office building resulting from no architectural competition on Queen's Quay beside Redpath Sugar, or hey, even a 99-year lease on 50 acres of Portlands property !


Rico / November 26, 2009 at 04:25 pm
user-pic
I drive down there a lot, and it's really not too far from me, and I hope to shove my business into one of the smaller buildings down there. I'm not put off by that stuff, because I have an eye for potential for real estate. Leslieville is an excellent example of what is possible. 40 years of driving and boating around the waterfront has seen huge change. Right now it's in a state of change, that's all. I see potential, whereas Queen's Quay west of York is a true bad-land.
Erica replying to a comment from Rico / November 26, 2009 at 04:34 pm
user-pic
Ummm Rico, Erica went to skool, the one with the big rock out front where we hid under after skool. LOL!

Serious dude, the reason why you are not getting any new developement on Eastern Avenue is because there are too many NIMBY's out there to deal with and that's not kool.
Rico / November 26, 2009 at 04:39 pm
user-pic
There's enough space to go around, and everybody wants all that land to be completed. The TTC LRV line was just announced ahead of TTC actually saying "yes", and it's in the Docklands. Don't you worry, things will move. Pan-Am, TTC upgrades, all this will take shape. I do not know which rock you hid under...because you were hidden!
Erica / November 26, 2009 at 04:54 pm
user-pic
About that rock Rico,good one dude! We'll just have to wait and see what and if Pan-Am and the TTC LRV line will do to develop Eastern Avenue. Thanks for your positive posts Rico.
Rico / November 26, 2009 at 05:05 pm
user-pic
I'm excited by everything going on in Leslieville. Every notch makes it more up to date. More people into this fine hood, which can bring mucho business.
Mark replying to a comment from Film Worker / November 26, 2009 at 05:18 pm
user-pic
I'm curious, Film Worker, why you think a retail store locating on a retail strip like Queen West is "incompetence". I'm not on the attack or anything. Just honestly curious about why you feel that way. Home Depot isn't even moving in anymore (if in fact you're referring to the Queen + Portland site). Now it'll be a grocery store I think, but either way: retail on a retail strip, on a lot that used to be a surface parking lot. In your mind, what should go there?
Film Worker replying to a comment from Mark / November 26, 2009 at 05:40 pm
user-pic
Just a general abhorrence for big-box-style retail among smaller, unique, character shops. I hold the same feelings for WalMart a stone's throw away from our Leslieville shops. Those monstrosities belong in the 'burbs. Smart city-building involves supporting medium and small businesses, not squashing them.

Thrilled to hear the Home Depot thing went away.

But Leon's in the Roundhouse...still shaking my head! C'mon, the city REALLY couldn't find a better place to suggest putting a furniture store, with all of the buildings the city owns downtown?

Jokes_ame / November 26, 2009 at 07:12 pm
user-pic
Interesting debates happening b/w Film Worker and Rico.

I actually live on Eastern Avenue, and I find that the new developments of Parcels, and new businesses going on Booth are quite refreshing addition to this "stone's throw" again from all the action of Leslievile. I'm proud to say I live in the "studio district".

Yes the TFS up and left, and no more WAL-MART is great, but they really need to do something with the land at 629. It's quite an eyesore, I hope when the recession is over and we are back into things, another studio can start to rebuild on that land.

In response to actors/artists living in the area. It's true, there actually were lots of film industry folk that lived around this area, and the spill over was great for the small unique restaurants.

Although there is more a traffic issue on Eastern, now that the Gardenier is long gone. But I am glad they have a bike lane.

BTW: GALES is still the best, steps away, and always so friendly. Dave is the best.
Mark Dowling / November 26, 2009 at 11:41 pm
user-pic
I'm hearing the railway yard by Lever Bros. at Don Roadway/Lakeshore is soon to go. Presumably the line itself will remain for a while but this may have some implications for the neighbourhood.
Rico replying to a comment from Jokes_ame / November 27, 2009 at 03:02 am
user-pic
I SOOOOOO want to hit Gales. Here's a story: I migrated early one day to hit the Canary, only to find it closed (2 days late or something like that). I responded by going to Jimmy's, where the fallout story happened because of the H/A clubhouse. Some of them were in there with me talking about the explosion in the wall that was on the news. What a morning, and without coffee! Anyway, there's a site that can help respond to the Leslieville movement: leslieviller.com. Join up, talk about schtuff.

Mark, sorry to not directly address your post: The yard East of the DVP service road? That is a sugar inventory yard, for the most part. But all of that is now gone, isn't it? I'm trying to map out how that complete spur is functioning/challenged, and I can't get the gist of it. Anyway, thanks for the heads-up. I maintain a Google Earth development map, and that is a new update.

Slow but sure, we'll turn Toronto into our hood(s).
Mark replying to a comment from Film Worker / November 27, 2009 at 08:40 am
user-pic
It was some months ago that Home Depot backed out of the lease they had signed with RioCan (the Depot lost millions doing so). After that, RioCan decided to split what would have been Home Depot's space in half and look for two smaller tenants, one of which will be a national grocery chain, though I can't recall which one. Don't know what's happening with the other half of the space. However, the development isn't your typical big-box. It's actually a mixed-use development: condos on top of a couple stories of retail, including the two larger retail units and multiple smaller units for shops more in line with the size of your average Queen West store.

So the Home Depot wouldn't have looked like your typical big box. It would have looked more like, but obviously not identical to, Manhattan's so called "urban big box" Home Depot:

http://trunkt.googlepages.com/homedepot.jpg
Councillor Adam Vaughan / November 30, 2009 at 05:27 pm
user-pic
Just for the record;

Home Depot made no concessions and in fact is not the proponent of the project on Queen st W. At one point HD was the sole client of the proposed development. Before taking office there had been no negotiation between the residents and the developer. After winning the election a community process was established. The project changed as a result. What had been a stand alone retail project with surface parking at the outset, was trandformed into a 9 store project on two and a half floors with underground parking and four and a half story condo on the south side of the lot.The residential condos include family sized units and two of the commercial units (at grade) will be delivered to the Toronto Arts Council to be used by emerging artists as stores or galleries. Home Depot is no longer the tenant, a grocery store is.All of the at grade commercial units comply with the Queen St heritage guidelines in terms of frontage and floorplate size. The community was engaged and supported the project in the end in large part because it was transformed from a stand alone big box store and instead it was designed to fit in and support the local residential community and the business strip.
Sharon / September 27, 2011 at 03:34 pm
user-pic
This blog solved a mystery for me. When driving on Eastern Avenue on a recent visit to Toronto, I passed the restaurant in the 5th picture down. The sign appears to say "East Restaurant". I was intrigued by it, but did not stop and was unable to explain the exact location to anyone. Does anyone know the address of this place and what the actual name is?


Rico replying to a comment from Sharon / September 27, 2011 at 04:35 pm
user-pic
It's not a restaurant. It says "Tasty Restaurant". I think a dragon lives there.
Rico replying to a comment from Sharon / September 27, 2011 at 04:36 pm
user-pic
It's not a restaurant. It says "Tasty Restaurant". I think a dragon lives there.
not interested / September 27, 2011 at 04:44 pm
user-pic
these pictures are dark and make Eastern look shitty and depressing

In fact, Eastern is the opposite

shouldve chosen a better day to take pics
the lemur replying to a comment from Sharon / September 27, 2011 at 05:04 pm
user-pic
Tasty Restaurant, NW corner of Eastern and Booth.

Whoever's deleting comments, stop it, FFS.
Rico / September 27, 2011 at 05:05 pm
user-pic
It takes several minutes for comments to appear.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal