City
The Worst Roads for Cyclists in Toronto
There's plenty to choose from when making a list of the worst roads for cyclists in Toronto. Be it fast moving traffic, rough road surfaces, lack of bike lanes, tough climbs, or the always tricky streetcar tracks, this city presents numerous challenges for those who commute on two wheels. But, of course, some roads are worse than others.
Now that it's August and I've been regularly on the road for three months or so, there's been countless opportunities to crash, curse and bemoan the state of many streets throughout the city. Although lacking the desire to be scientific about it, I thought that I'd put together a list of the roads that I think pose the greatest difficulty and danger to cyclists.
At beginning of the commuting season this spring, the Toronto Star's map of the week feature highlighted the frequency and location of over a 1000 traffic accidents involving cyclists. I remember thinking this was a great idea at the time. But, I wasn't overly convinced by the patterns it showed.
For one thing, so many accidents involving cyclists don't go reported. Beyond this, colliding with a car is only one of the many ways to crash a bike. I've seen some pretty nasty wipe-outs occur from people getting their wheels caught in streetcar tracks. And most of the time people are eventually able to continue on without reporting the incident.
Bearing this in mind, I think anecdotal evidence reigns supreme when it comes to such a list. So, without further ado, here are my nominations for the worst roads (in alphabetical order).
Any street that crosses on/off-ramps to a major highway
This might be a no-brainer, but most cyclists have had the unenviable experience of having the road they're riding on turn into an on-ramp. More times than I care to remember, I've had to choose between getting on a highway (not good) and crossing traffic that's speeding up to do so (perhaps worse).
Bloor Street West (to Keele)
With similar characteristics to the ride along Yonge, Bloor West can get pretty scary in areas. Compounding the the difficulty is the presence of parked cars. Dodging opening doors while not getting hit by passing traffic often involves more than skill -- it takes luck.
College Street
Just because there's a bike lane doesn't ensure safe riding conditions. While it's a good start, other problems can arise: not vehicular traffic, but other cyclists! The daily train of riders along College has a relatively slow pace. Should you be in a rush or want to pass, be prepared to occupy the path of passing cars and aware that you might not make it back into the 'peloton.'
Eastern Avenue (heading west between Jarvis and Coxwell)
Veteran commuters may know to avoid this stretch by taking the Queen St. bridge over the Don Valley Parkway, but having tried taking Eastern, I feel compelled to share just how hair-raising an experience it was. Cars coming off the Don Valley whiz by as you're stuck trying to move into the right edge of their lane. Not easy.
Queen Street West
Any street with streetcar tracks and parked cars poses potential dangers for cyclists. After all, there's only so much space to work with. Now factor in a lack of a dedicated bike lane, and you have accidents waiting to happen. Queen East isn't that much better, but the road's in better shape and the traffic is often not as heavy.

Roncesvalles Avenue
Awful pavement and road conditions, parked cars, street car tracks, unpredictable pedestrian hipsters, this is something of the perfect storm when the street is busy. Forgetting the danger factor, I despise the constant vibration I get from the crappy pavement.
Spadina (south of College)
During evenings, this is actually a pretty good route up and down the city. But, when the many streetside markets are in full force and shoppers and delivery trucks abound, it becomes a bit like an obstacle course.
Steeles Avenue
Speed of traffic is the culprit here, plus highway crossings at the 400 and 404. Even though most of the reported bike accidents come from the downtown core, many streets on the outskirts of the city are just as dangerous, if not more.
St. Clair Avenue West
With seemingly endless construction, poor road conditions, confused drivers, buses driving in streetcar tracks, this is just a plain old mess. Even in areas that have been completed, the narrow lanes don't leave much room for riders.
Yonge Street (south of Bloor)
With no bike lanes, plenty of traffic, and pedestrians regularly stepping into the street, the ride up and down Yonge is always eventful, just not always in the good way.
Lead photo by wvs, second by draughtsmon , both of Flickr.
Map from The Toronto Star.


Discussion
61 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
It took me about 5 seconds to pass and we were approaching a red light anyway but the man driving medical patients around had to intimidate a cyclist. I wonder if he would have picked me up if he had hit me. I gave him an earful at the next red light.
These are often pretty bad. But usually once you get to know how the lanes are configured, you can make it a bit easier by staking your ground, switching to the appropriate lane early enough, and watching everything around you. For example, when I cross the 427 on Burnhamthorpe Rd. on my way to/from work, I know that I should stay out of the right lane, as it is for highway on/off traffic.
* Bloor Street West (to Keele)
This is actually a pretty good cycling street, if you don't ride in the door-zone. Stay at least a metre from the car doors, and you're fine. You should never have to dodge open doors. And there are no streetcar tracks in the way either... Mind you, the railway underpasses between Lansdowne and Dundas can be hair-raising as motorists speed through there... but again, take the lane and let the motorists slow down and/or change lanes to go around. Lastly...the section between Dundas and Keele is the *best* part of Bloor with very wide lanes that are in many ways better than inferior bike lanes in other parts of the city.
* College Street
I don't really worry about other cyclists in the bike lane here. It's the narrow door-zone bike lane in many parts of it that is the worst. Stick to the left edge of it and you should be OK. It's also also always filled with parked cars...so watch for that. Also...so what if you can't get back into the peloton because the bike lane is full? Nobody says you *must* ride there. More space for cyclists if some of us get out into the bigger lane. :)
* Queen Street West
Yeah...tricky to stay between the door zone and streetcar tracks. If you're using the door-zone to pass cars on the right, do so *very* carefully and slowly. And don't be a jerk....stop for open streetcar doors.
* Roncesvalles Avenue
It's being dug up, re-paved, and re-jigged right now. Will be interesting to see how it turns out....especially in winter with the added bump-outs. in its existing configuration, it's generally a pretty good cycling street if not for the horrible pavement.
* Spadina (south of College)
When the delivery vehicles and double-parked cars take up the right lane, it can sometimes turn it into a nice wide defacto bike lane, because the motorists avoid it. Just have to be careful when passing the double-parkers. I wish they would get rid of the annoying fake bike lane "edge stripe" and either put in a proper bike lane or widen the curb lane.
* Steeles Avenue
No comment...have never cycled along here, except to cross north-south. But most major suburban arterials suffer from really fast motorists.
* St. Clair Avenue West
There's always room for cyclists, if you take the lane. But when it's jammed up, it's more difficult to pass when the lanes are narrow.
* Yonge Street (south of Bloor)
I've never found this to be so bad...it's just annoying with all the stop lights.
Second danger zone on my ride home is the Danforth Aqueduct going West. Holy Moly, that on-ramp is a nightmare. I often opt to Walk across. it's insane.
The Danforth isn't too bad, but it's easy enough to find a route running parallel from Broadview to my place at Jones.
Thanks for this list, it's just pure luck that I survive the commute some days.
Jarvis also goes without saying.
I'd add Front Street West, particularly eastbound. Drivers in a rush to get to the Gardener or Bayview, parked cars, and so cut, potholey, and cracked I hate to even signal lane changes since it requires taking a hand off the handlebars.
Pottery Road. Requires taking the whole lane, since shoulders are non-existent and the road is in such bad shape. Circling around the DQ parking lot at the top of the hill until the westbound light turns red makes it easier, but still a lot of drivers get POed. Eastbound (uphill) would be suicidal.
I used to climb Pottery Road quite a bit. It wasn't that bad. Of course I was 20 pounds lighter then, but it doesn't get that much traffic so it's really not that bad.
having said that, i'm appalled by the self-righteous attitude of a lot of cyclists. if u want to be treated with respect on the road, u have to respect the laws of the road. street signs apply to us as well as cars. common sense plays a big role as well. yesterday i was at King and Bathurst. a car had his signal light on prepared to make a right turn. a pair of cyclists approach from behaind and attempt to squeeze in between him and the curb to continue straight. they start yelling at the car. they had no right to. the car was there first and was signalling. they should've waited or passed on the left. jerks like those cyclist make us all look bad.
before we start waving the "drivers are assholes" banner, we should look in the mirror. i would bet i have encountered more asshole cyclists than drivers riding my bike to work.
Even on streets with bike lanes, the reason the bike lane becomes dotted at intersections is because cars are allowed to enter it to turn right. Cyclists can wait for the car, or pass it on the left. It's pretty simple and greatly reduces your odds of a crash. From the car's point of view, the bike is coming out of nowhere, illegally.
Basically any major artery road North of Bloor (and South for that matter) is a problem road for Toronto cyclists. Drivers not only are not used to seeing cyclists here, there is also a general belief that cyclists SHOULDN'T be there at all. I can't even count the number of drivers who have motioned for me to get off of the road and on to the sidewalk when cycling along Keele, Bathurst, Steeles and Jane.
Take in to consideration the few cyclists I do see are on sidewalks, blowing through intersections and not setting a good example for anyone, and well, I basically feel like a lone wolf up there.
One thing I have noticed, is that since my daily commute is at the same time, I'm starting to see the same motorists over and over. And they are seeing me. I'm getting more room from them, but the tailgating pick-up driving contractor behind them leaves me nothing.
Yeah, Avenue Road is horrible biking. The cars travel too fast and there's no respect for cyclists. Don't even bother unless you want to get crushed. But Spadina south of College I actually find fun--the obstacle course through Chinatown is a neat challenge. As long as you don't run over a pigeon.
King Street also needs a bike lane, mornings are terrible....
There would be road inspectors would actually ride bicycles, not trucks, to notice where these potholes are.
If it recently rained, expect to have to dodge big puddles along the route. Why don't they fix this already? Enough bikes take the Don Trail route and unless you plan to continue on down to Lakeshore, there's no easier way to get to Bloor St.
It's bad enough having to keep up with the cars whizzing by at 80 km/hr. I usually ride right ON the line at the edge of the road to give enough space between myself and the cars. YMMV (but only slightly).
And then you have to do it all over again, except twice as fast when you go back downhill. 40-50+km/h speeds are great fun on the road, except when you're simultaneously racing cars to the gaps between crevasses in the tarmac.
the traffic is too fast,there are many big trucks due to fuel deopts and the like
and the sidewalks are deserted. You may see a couple of pedestrians every kilometer or so
with wide open sidewalks it is much too tempting to takr the easy way out
If you unwittingly find yourself heading eastbound on this stretch you end up forced to merge with streetcar tracks. It doesn't even look like there is nearly enough room to fit your bike between the scaffolding and first rail. (I didn't even try. I got off my bike and walked it down the sidewalk).
You could try to ride in the middle of the right lane, but then you'd have to get yourself across the street car track while riding parallel to it.
Other nominations are any intersection where you're trying to make a left hand turn where street car tracks cross. Spadina and Queen, Bathurst and Queen, etc. It takes a lot of concentration sometimes to ensure you don't end up wedged in the web of streetcar tracks and sometimes that concentration is better spent focusing on the pedestrians crossing, the traffic,etc.
More than once I've realized I had to adjust my angle going through the intersection, but being surrounded by cars end up being faced with some very difficult decisions in a very short amount of time. Thankfully, I've been lucky. Avoiding turning left at these interesections is the better way to go.
I would bet that Glenn de Baermaker (sp?) has some excellent survival stories.
We have a long way to come in this city, but I think the cycling movement is making progress. I will echo the sentiment of others: please PLEASE cyclists, obey the rules of the road, if you don't you just make it worse for the cycling cause.
But wait, "worse than meaningless"? Yes, because there's safety in numbers. The massive number of bikers on College Street makes it very hard for drivers (and getting-out-of-car-ers) to ignore the fact that there are cyclists all around and you need to watch out for them.
Bad map. Bad.
well if you think about it a lot of 905ers are coming into the city for work and do you really think they are accustom to seeing bikes on the road?
Take College St. It takes me at most ten seconds (less, on average), to find a gap in auto traffic that allows me to merge safely and pass the slow-moving bike train. And I really can't understand the frustration with slow cyclists and the suggestion that they should speed up or move to side streets. How is this different from dumb drivers' fuming about how all of these cyclists should get off the road and out of their way? If there is anything frustrating about College, it's the multitude of traffic lights... but that goes for most downtown arterials.
Or, why does Steeles get a special note? Are any major roads in that area much better? Heck, one can hardly tell them apart, let alone rank them.
Some choices in the comments are also surprising. There is nothing scary about the Bloor-Danforth bridge. Plan ahead, change lanes early when there is no one behind you - and you'll be just fine. There is also nothing scary about passing right turners on the left: they typically are close to the curb and there is lots of space between them and the other lane of traffic. But if you are scared for any reason, you can always stop and wait behind them, you know...
"I live up north by york u and there is NO way i ride on the road (finch/keele/jane/steeles)"
I used to ride to York U every day Mon-Fri, and always on the road. Only once in many many trips did I have anything that qualified as an "encounter" with a motorist: he was unhappy that I was on the road, and honked as he passed (he passed safely, I might add). Big deal. Major arterials north of Eglinton are not that great for cycling, but they are not impossible to cycle on. BTW, that poor cyclist who got killed at Keele and Finch (an intersection I rode through many, many times) apparently was riding on the sidewalk.
such fun trendy people...
Ten times worse is when they can't hear that you're passing them because they have headphones on. (Why do so many cyclists think it's perfectly reasonable to war headphones while cycling? It's unbelievably dumb.)
When I am doing a right turn I often these days try to block the bike lane. There are still idiot cyclists who try to go around and straight. I do it for cyclist safety. I am watching the pedestrians and oncoming traffic. It is very stupid to go straight as you go through my blind spot and I really don't expect you there. Even if I see you there I just don't know what you are going to do - go straight or let me go. I understand that everyone is in hurry these days, but please wait a moment till I make a right turn (if I came first) and then continue on your way.
Going with a bike on a highway is illegal!
In the end adding more bike lanes simply won't solve Toronto traffic problem. Toronto is too big to have everyone just ride a bike. The public transit should be better. Simply now, it takes me less time to drive to certain places (if longer distances) then taking the TTC. In downtown I can probably walk faster then streetcars in rush hour.
I cycle on all these roots, nothing touches Dufferin. If it had Street Car tracks, there should be signs for cyclists to not ust it, like the bridge over the DVP and on river on Eastern (head to up to Queen or down to the bike lane beside Lakeshore to avoid injury!
Even they're not as reckless as the average bike messenger.
The hipsters while slow, seem to be going on the wrong side of the street half the time, and generally break most of the rules of the road with a sense of entitlement. Again generalizing, there is plenty of hipsters that ride just fine.
And Roncesvalles does have the worst pavement in this city.
Almost killed myself the other day
Warning- HUGE POTHOLE - going south on dufferin (down the hill) just after the intersection at Davenport. It's a killer you can't see this huge pothole waiting for you.
It may add a few minutes to your commute, but you can avoid a lot of risk by choosing lower traffic volume routes, wider roads, etc. Most major roads have the problem of potholes and cracks on the sides, so you have a choice of a bumpy ride or riding with the cars. As much as I love taking up a lane, in some places you are just asking for trouble as the traffic moves so much faster than you. The solution, if you can, is to find better routes. The cycling map is free, available at any bike shop, and it updated regularly (it is also available on-line). The city is doing work all the time, and you never know when a bad route will become a good one. They recently finished off their work on Annette West of High Park and it is a beautiful ride now, wide and smooth.
When you are on major routes like Steeles in the North of the city, you often find that the sidewalk traffic is non-existent, so you can ride the sidewalk fairly easily. I commute to York from Downtown four days a week on average, and I take one of several routes that involve periods on major roads like this. My rule is that if there is not much traffic (traffic moves in packs on fast roads, there can be lulls) I'll ride on the road, but only if I have an exit point somewhere (e.g. a ramp or a crossing road) that I can use if necessary. I found the exit points on my route by riding the sidewalk a few times. Do check your tires periodically for glass though, major roads produce lots of glass.
The other option besides the sidewalk is to find parallel roads nearby. When I'm going East on Steeles just past Islington I go south to Garyray and ride across, it is a wide industrial road and there is lots of room. When I'm going East on Steeles just past York I go on Allness to Supertest, then through G. Ross Lord Park to Drewry. These roads are lighter in traffic (not empty mind you), wider in places, and eminently manageable. When going North you can pick roads that are more cycle friendly, like Scarlett, which has prominently displayed signs indicating that the road is also to be shared with cyclists.
Another option, if you are doing a major North/South commute is to pick up either of the river trails, up the Don or the Humber for the majority of the trip and then go East or West as needed to get where you are going. The Humber is particularly good for this, giving you easy exits on to Eglinton, Lawrence, Finch, etc. Admittedly it takes more time, but there are no cars, few pedestrians, and during the week a manageable number of cyclists. Look at it this way, if you are willing to go to the gym for 1-2 hours a week, then why not add an extra 15-20 minutes to your daily commute to get to one of the river trails and then have a safer ride? My route to York varies, but it can be anywhere from 80% trails to no trails at all, depending on what I'm in the mood for. There are also a lot of short haul East/West or diagonal trails you can use depending on where you start from: Smythe Park from Rockcliffe to Scarlett, G. Ross Lord Park, High Park, the Moore Park Ravine, the Belt-Line Trail. Combining these with low traffic and bike lane roads reduces traffic risks considerably.
As one of the spandex clad set (though I ride a mountain bike with road tires, not a racing bike), I can say that I agree with many of the posters here that many Toronto cyclists, no matter what they wear, do remarkably stupid things on a bike. To me this is simple physics, a bike weighs a lot less than a car, and if you get into a collision then the best of luck to you. You should cycle to save your ass, not to prove you are right. For example, I'm not sure what the traffic rules are for the situation where you are waiting beside a car that wants to make a right turn, but for me the distinction lies in who was there first. If I get there first then I get to go first. But if someone pulls up and has their signal on I wave at them to get their attention and tell them I'm going through. That usually does the trick. When I pull up to the intersection and the car is already there I give them the turn, and sometimes I wave them through so they know I'm not going to try to jump them at the light. When it comes to situations like these, I don't much care who is right and who is wrong, I don't want to end up sucking my food through a straw in a hospital somewhere, warm in the knowledge I was “right.”
In general I am willing to wait for cars if the drivers seem impatient or distracted, I sometimes pull aside and let the traffic “pack” pass and then rejoin traffic if I'm not comfortable with the situation. I trust my gut at all times. I always wear a helmet, and as for music, my rule is that on trails you can crank it up and have fun, but if you are in traffic it should be off, or at least low enough that you can hear the tires on the road beside you. A mirror is also a must, I check my mirror constantly to keep tabs on the traffic coming up behind me. I also have wide, thick tires on the bike to help with gaps, cracks, small bits of glass and other such things. I still vividly remember the fellow on Lakeshore who was riding on a racing bike with thin tires. He managed to turn his front tire (maybe while doing a shoulder check) and it got wedged in the sewer grate slats (that are offset to avoid trapping tires). I know that thin tires = speed, but I'm not in that much of a rush.
Cheers,
Ian
In fact if you were to make a post of favourite cycling streets in Toronto I'd probably pick Queen despite the door zone issues.
http://wvs.topleftpixel.com/
My biggest annoyance in cycling Toronto is generally mindless cyclists & pedestrians!
-SHOULDER CHECKS: I hardly ever see cyclists perform regular shoulder checks! I wish there was a mandatory training course for this. If you can't bike in a relatively straight line while looking back over your shoulder for 2 seconds, then in my view you fail!
-LOOKING BOTH WAYS: Pedestrians that never look both ways, or if they do, they need to look multiple times as they cross the street. It seems like most make their move after a quick glance and then using their ears to listen if cars get close. Obviously they can't hear a cyclist unless the bell is ringing.
-COMMUNICATION: Cyclists need to use more than just hand-signals to work together with other traffic. EYE CONTACT, HEAD SIGNALS, POSTURE, POSITIONING OF YOUR BIKE. All these things are communication. I use head signals a lot in low-low speed situations and everyone gets it. I jerk my head way into the direction I want to go, flick up my head and eyebrows a little, and boom, I usually get a window to make my move.
-LATE CROSSINGS: Pedestrians who decide to start crossing the street when the walk counter is almost finished and/or the yellow light comes up. They are completely oblivious and I suppose they see the GREEN traffic light, they think they're okay. In practical traffic reality, when the walk signal says DON'T WALK this is the special time for turning cars to make their move because most straight traffic has gone through already. What happens with a late pedestrian crossing? The car gets stuck in the middle of the intersection when the light changes, people everyone gets pissed off. All because of what? A late pedestrian. Then the pedestrian has the nerve to get offended when they're honked at! There are certain groups of people I see who are notorious as late pedestrians, I've seen it millions of times in my 25 years as a cyclist here in TO. If I were to angrily talk about these groups of people I would be called names. All I will say is, with any general road safety educational campaigns, some extra emphasis needs to be put on educational campaigns in schools, hospitals, retirement homes, immigration centres, and embedded on the screens of iPhones and Blackberries.
-CYCLISTS TAKING THE EXTREME RIGHT: If a car is turning-right at an intersection, and is slowly & cautiously creeping his way through (nothing wrong with that, otherwise he'll never make the turn), why is it that approaching cyclists, from the rear of the car, feel the need to pass this car on the extreme right? All they are doing is disrupting the flow of what's going on in that intersection. You are annoying the pedestrians who are in the walkway, and also making the car driver extremely nervous. Why don't you SHOULDER CHECK, see if there's a gap to PASS ON THE LEFT, otherwise STOP and wait your turn. In this situation you are in the same lane as the right-turning car, and in practical reality you have no right to be passing that turning car on the extreme right. Yet you have the gall to ring your bell are the right-turning car, as you pass? I feel so embarrassed by you, I feel like I have to apologize to the car driver on behalf of all cyclists.
-CYCLISTS SWERVING INTO TRAFFIC WITHOUT LOOKING: Again another reason to be shoulder-checking. If you have to dodge a pothole, parked car or a car door... you can certainly make a move into the next lane ONLY IF THERE'S A GAP and you can relatively match speed. So many times I see cyclists swerve into traffic without looking. Cars behind them end up swerving out or braking hard, creating potential collisions. The mindless cyclists just keeps pedaling away completely oblivious to the mess they make behind them. And you don't necessarily have to be traveling the same speed as the cars. As long as you have enough speed to make it back to the right before you start disrupting traffic flow too much. Generally if you had enough momentum going in, and you did a shoulder check and used body language that you are going to pull a move the car driver will work with you and decelerate for you to make your move. It all happens naturally and flowing IF EVERYONE COMMUNICATES.
EDUCATION damn it. Why aren't there posters all around to re-educate EVERYONE on using their EYES and BEING AWARE.
-CYCLISTS WITHOUT LIGHTS OR WORKING BRAKES: You guys are terrible because these are almost one-time equipment solutions. Go get your brakes fixed and learn how to tune them. And at night on a sidestreet, NO ONE CAN SEE YOU. Not even other cyclists. You make everyone nervous.
If you make a turning signal when no traffic is around, all you are doing is proving that you do not use your eyes and look around. Because if you looked around before you signaled, and didn't see any traffic for miles, who are you signaling to? Why do you need to signal in that case?
You may be making a hand-signal, but you are freaking dangerous, GET AWAY FROM ME.
Yet another reason to shoulder check.
"the reason the bike lane becomes dotted at intersections is because cars are allowed to enter it to turn right"
Yes and no. Those are there for the car to pass through yes, but the car still needs to yield to the cyclist when passing through that lane. Primarily that line is there for cyclists leaving the lane to turn left. You'll notice the intersections with bike boxes do not have the dotted line even though rights are permitted (on green lights).
If you're in a car, always yield to a bike.
If you're on a bike, always yield to the pedestrian.