Tuesday, May 21, 2013Mostly Cloudy 20°C
City

The Worst Roads for Cyclists in Toronto

Posted by Derek Flack / August 6, 2009

20090806-bike yonge.jpgThere's plenty to choose from when making a list of the worst roads for cyclists in Toronto. Be it fast moving traffic, rough road surfaces, lack of bike lanes, tough climbs, or the always tricky streetcar tracks, this city presents numerous challenges for those who commute on two wheels. But, of course, some roads are worse than others.

Now that it's August and I've been regularly on the road for three months or so, there's been countless opportunities to crash, curse and bemoan the state of many streets throughout the city. Although lacking the desire to be scientific about it, I thought that I'd put together a list of the roads that I think pose the greatest difficulty and danger to cyclists.

At beginning of the commuting season this spring, the Toronto Star's map of the week feature highlighted the frequency and location of over a 1000 traffic accidents involving cyclists. I remember thinking this was a great idea at the time. But, I wasn't overly convinced by the patterns it showed.

cycling accidentsFor one thing, so many accidents involving cyclists don't go reported. Beyond this, colliding with a car is only one of the many ways to crash a bike. I've seen some pretty nasty wipe-outs occur from people getting their wheels caught in streetcar tracks. And most of the time people are eventually able to continue on without reporting the incident.

Bearing this in mind, I think anecdotal evidence reigns supreme when it comes to such a list. So, without further ado, here are my nominations for the worst roads (in alphabetical order).

Any street that crosses on/off-ramps to a major highway
This might be a no-brainer, but most cyclists have had the unenviable experience of having the road they're riding on turn into an on-ramp. More times than I care to remember, I've had to choose between getting on a highway (not good) and crossing traffic that's speeding up to do so (perhaps worse).

Bloor Street West (to Keele)
With similar characteristics to the ride along Yonge, Bloor West can get pretty scary in areas. Compounding the the difficulty is the presence of parked cars. Dodging opening doors while not getting hit by passing traffic often involves more than skill -- it takes luck.

College Street
Just because there's a bike lane doesn't ensure safe riding conditions. While it's a good start, other problems can arise: not vehicular traffic, but other cyclists! The daily train of riders along College has a relatively slow pace. Should you be in a rush or want to pass, be prepared to occupy the path of passing cars and aware that you might not make it back into the 'peloton.'

Eastern Avenue (heading west between Jarvis and Coxwell)
Veteran commuters may know to avoid this stretch by taking the Queen St. bridge over the Don Valley Parkway, but having tried taking Eastern, I feel compelled to share just how hair-raising an experience it was. Cars coming off the Don Valley whiz by as you're stuck trying to move into the right edge of their lane. Not easy.

Queen Street West
Any street with streetcar tracks and parked cars poses potential dangers for cyclists. After all, there's only so much space to work with. Now factor in a lack of a dedicated bike lane, and you have accidents waiting to happen. Queen East isn't that much better, but the road's in better shape and the traffic is often not as heavy.

20090806-Dundas Grace Commuter.jpg

Roncesvalles Avenue
Awful pavement and road conditions, parked cars, street car tracks, unpredictable pedestrian hipsters, this is something of the perfect storm when the street is busy. Forgetting the danger factor, I despise the constant vibration I get from the crappy pavement.

Spadina (south of College)
During evenings, this is actually a pretty good route up and down the city. But, when the many streetside markets are in full force and shoppers and delivery trucks abound, it becomes a bit like an obstacle course.

Steeles Avenue

Speed of traffic is the culprit here, plus highway crossings at the 400 and 404. Even though most of the reported bike accidents come from the downtown core, many streets on the outskirts of the city are just as dangerous, if not more.

St. Clair Avenue West
With seemingly endless construction, poor road conditions, confused drivers, buses driving in streetcar tracks, this is just a plain old mess. Even in areas that have been completed, the narrow lanes don't leave much room for riders.

Yonge Street (south of Bloor)
With no bike lanes, plenty of traffic, and pedestrians regularly stepping into the street, the ride up and down Yonge is always eventful, just not always in the good way.

Lead photo by wvs, second by draughtsmon , both of Flickr.

Map from The Toronto Star.

Discussion

61 Comments

Andrew / August 6, 2009 at 11:42 am
user-pic
Avenue Road from St. Clair to Bloor. Uphill is a piss off, but downhill is just crazy.
Joel M / August 6, 2009 at 11:49 am
user-pic
The most dangerous thing about Bike Lanes is that drivers think that bikes are now forbidden from using their lanes at all. I recently was on College, which is getting very crowded with bikes, and I had to pass. I checked my mirror (there seemed to be plenty of room) signaled, and began passing two bikes by using the driving lane. That's when a driver of a University Health Network bus roars up behind me honking his horn and yelling at me to get out of the driving lane.

It took me about 5 seconds to pass and we were approaching a red light anyway but the man driving medical patients around had to intimidate a cyclist. I wonder if he would have picked me up if he had hit me. I gave him an earful at the next red light.

Vic / August 6, 2009 at 11:58 am
user-pic
*Any street that crosses on/off-ramps to a major highway:
These are often pretty bad. But usually once you get to know how the lanes are configured, you can make it a bit easier by staking your ground, switching to the appropriate lane early enough, and watching everything around you. For example, when I cross the 427 on Burnhamthorpe Rd. on my way to/from work, I know that I should stay out of the right lane, as it is for highway on/off traffic.

* Bloor Street West (to Keele)
This is actually a pretty good cycling street, if you don't ride in the door-zone. Stay at least a metre from the car doors, and you're fine. You should never have to dodge open doors. And there are no streetcar tracks in the way either... Mind you, the railway underpasses between Lansdowne and Dundas can be hair-raising as motorists speed through there... but again, take the lane and let the motorists slow down and/or change lanes to go around. Lastly...the section between Dundas and Keele is the *best* part of Bloor with very wide lanes that are in many ways better than inferior bike lanes in other parts of the city.

* College Street
I don't really worry about other cyclists in the bike lane here. It's the narrow door-zone bike lane in many parts of it that is the worst. Stick to the left edge of it and you should be OK. It's also also always filled with parked cars...so watch for that. Also...so what if you can't get back into the peloton because the bike lane is full? Nobody says you *must* ride there. More space for cyclists if some of us get out into the bigger lane. :)

* Queen Street West
Yeah...tricky to stay between the door zone and streetcar tracks. If you're using the door-zone to pass cars on the right, do so *very* carefully and slowly. And don't be a jerk....stop for open streetcar doors.

* Roncesvalles Avenue
It's being dug up, re-paved, and re-jigged right now. Will be interesting to see how it turns out....especially in winter with the added bump-outs. in its existing configuration, it's generally a pretty good cycling street if not for the horrible pavement.

* Spadina (south of College)
When the delivery vehicles and double-parked cars take up the right lane, it can sometimes turn it into a nice wide defacto bike lane, because the motorists avoid it. Just have to be careful when passing the double-parkers. I wish they would get rid of the annoying fake bike lane "edge stripe" and either put in a proper bike lane or widen the curb lane.

* Steeles Avenue
No comment...have never cycled along here, except to cross north-south. But most major suburban arterials suffer from really fast motorists.

* St. Clair Avenue West
There's always room for cyclists, if you take the lane. But when it's jammed up, it's more difficult to pass when the lanes are narrow.

* Yonge Street (south of Bloor)
I've never found this to be so bad...it's just annoying with all the stop lights.
amy / August 6, 2009 at 12:05 pm
user-pic
I would rate McCaul the worst street by far. There is almost no space between the parked cars and the streetcar tracks, and because it is really touristy there are always people crossing between cars and car doors opening. Honestly, every time I take that street I run into some sort of problem. Avoid!!
Samantha / August 6, 2009 at 12:05 pm
user-pic
I avoid Gerrard just west of Yonge going west. I have often had to hold onto a car to avoid being squished right off the road there, with construction on one side, and cars squishing on the other, i feel lucky to be alive.

Second danger zone on my ride home is the Danforth Aqueduct going West. Holy Moly, that on-ramp is a nightmare. I often opt to Walk across. it's insane.

The Danforth isn't too bad, but it's easy enough to find a route running parallel from Broadview to my place at Jones.

Thanks for this list, it's just pure luck that I survive the commute some days.


Soren / August 6, 2009 at 12:27 pm
user-pic
Toronto is so hostile to cyclists. It's a major disappointment that David Miller and his friends on council haven't created more bike lanes in their 6+ yrs. Sickening to read about millions going to LRT lines while a little paint could move thousands of cyclists safely at little cost or disturbance.
Adam / August 6, 2009 at 12:30 pm
user-pic
As it stands, most streets with bike lanes are pretty horrendous. Sherbourne ranks as the worst in my books, where the bike lane in is in worse shape than the rest of the road.

Jarvis also goes without saying.
Paul / August 6, 2009 at 12:33 pm
user-pic
Eastern Avenue: Do you mean between Jarvis and Broadview? I don't find it that bad in the east end.

I'd add Front Street West, particularly eastbound. Drivers in a rush to get to the Gardener or Bayview, parked cars, and so cut, potholey, and cracked I hate to even signal lane changes since it requires taking a hand off the handlebars.

Pottery Road. Requires taking the whole lane, since shoulders are non-existent and the road is in such bad shape. Circling around the DQ parking lot at the top of the hill until the westbound light turns red makes it easier, but still a lot of drivers get POed. Eastbound (uphill) would be suicidal.

Darcy McGee / August 6, 2009 at 12:51 pm
user-pic
Queen Street. Street car tracks. Blurg.

I used to climb Pottery Road quite a bit. It wasn't that bad. Of course I was 20 pounds lighter then, but it doesn't get that much traffic so it's really not that bad.
Dickie Greenleaf / August 6, 2009 at 12:55 pm
user-pic
i live downtown. i like cars, i own 3; but, i ride my bike to work daily. it's quicker than the TTC and cheaper than driving.

having said that, i'm appalled by the self-righteous attitude of a lot of cyclists. if u want to be treated with respect on the road, u have to respect the laws of the road. street signs apply to us as well as cars. common sense plays a big role as well. yesterday i was at King and Bathurst. a car had his signal light on prepared to make a right turn. a pair of cyclists approach from behaind and attempt to squeeze in between him and the curb to continue straight. they start yelling at the car. they had no right to. the car was there first and was signalling. they should've waited or passed on the left. jerks like those cyclist make us all look bad.

before we start waving the "drivers are assholes" banner, we should look in the mirror. i would bet i have encountered more asshole cyclists than drivers riding my bike to work.
Joel M replying to a comment from Dickie Greenleaf / August 6, 2009 at 01:09 pm
user-pic
I totally agree with the passing right turn thing. Cyclists do this all the time in this city and its just suicidal. If the car is turning right, wait for him or pass him on the left, but don't do this illegal cut off maneuver and get pissed off when the car doesn't see you.

Even on streets with bike lanes, the reason the bike lane becomes dotted at intersections is because cars are allowed to enter it to turn right. Cyclists can wait for the car, or pass it on the left. It's pretty simple and greatly reduces your odds of a crash. From the car's point of view, the bike is coming out of nowhere, illegally.
Duncan / August 6, 2009 at 01:09 pm
user-pic
Now, I don't like to generalize... but I'll do it anyways.

Basically any major artery road North of Bloor (and South for that matter) is a problem road for Toronto cyclists. Drivers not only are not used to seeing cyclists here, there is also a general belief that cyclists SHOULDN'T be there at all. I can't even count the number of drivers who have motioned for me to get off of the road and on to the sidewalk when cycling along Keele, Bathurst, Steeles and Jane.

Take in to consideration the few cyclists I do see are on sidewalks, blowing through intersections and not setting a good example for anyone, and well, I basically feel like a lone wolf up there.

One thing I have noticed, is that since my daily commute is at the same time, I'm starting to see the same motorists over and over. And they are seeing me. I'm getting more room from them, but the tailgating pick-up driving contractor behind them leaves me nothing.
Matthew / August 6, 2009 at 01:12 pm
user-pic
Couldn't agree more about College Street. Love the bike lanes, but frankly, if it's rush hour, and you're a cyclist in the bike lane, pick up the pace. I'm sick and tired of being stuck behind slow-poke leisure riders taking in the scenery while I'm trying to get somewhere on time. Even worse are couples riding side by side, since they're impossible to pass unless you move well into auto traffic. If you wanna take it slow, find a bike path or a side street. Some of us are commuting here. (And no, I'm not one of those spandex-clad speed demons who aggressively tries to outmaneuver everyone else and blasts through red lights. Eff those guys. I'm just looking for a reasonably quick pace in keeping with traffic along a major arterial street.)

Yeah, Avenue Road is horrible biking. The cars travel too fast and there's no respect for cyclists. Don't even bother unless you want to get crushed. But Spadina south of College I actually find fun--the obstacle course through Chinatown is a neat challenge. As long as you don't run over a pigeon.
Nate / August 6, 2009 at 01:41 pm
user-pic
That's a REALLY sick photo at the top.
Sarah / August 6, 2009 at 01:51 pm
user-pic
Get off the computer and go ride your bike!!
Greg replying to a comment from Soren / August 6, 2009 at 01:53 pm
user-pic
If adding bike lanes is virtually costless, then millions going to LRT are no impediment. Even if "thousands" end up cycling, there are many thousands more who will not consider cycling even in good weather, let alone foul. Improved TTC is important, and so are bike lanes... setting up a false dichotomy is unhelpful.
dee / August 6, 2009 at 02:05 pm
user-pic
Dufferin Street south of Eglinton is horrible. I believe the worst drivers are on that street. Plus I've have the unfortunate experience on my bike of seeing drivers speeding to the heroin clinic at Dufferin and St.Clair and causing alot of problems. Almost as bad crazy shopping addicts trying to get to either mall; Dufferin or Yorkdale.

King Street also needs a bike lane, mornings are terrible....
W. K. Lis / August 6, 2009 at 02:08 pm
user-pic
A lot of roads still have potholes in the pavement by the gutter, even though it is now summer. They can come up surprising, sometimes by the storm drains. It is so bad, that I have to tend to keep in the middle or left side of the curb lane to avoid them. They are too numerous to mention.

There would be road inspectors would actually ride bicycles, not trucks, to notice where these potholes are.
dee replying to a comment from Dickie Greenleaf / August 6, 2009 at 02:09 pm
user-pic
I agree with the right turn issue but I also think it signals the need to have own paved lanes (maybe off the roads, next to the sidewalks as in Germany) for cycles so that we are not competiting with the cars and not trying to have a bike follow car rules of driving. Since all cycles know how dangerous is feels to properly go in the middle of the two lanes to go straight and pass the car turning. Or how naked and insecure one feels when on a bike making a left turn at an intersections and you know that the cars have no idea what your signals mean or why you are in the lane. You actually see the fear and confusion in their eyes.
Roger / August 6, 2009 at 02:13 pm
user-pic
If you take the Don Trail and exit at Pottery Road, the route south along the Bayview Extention to Rosedale Valley Road can be treacherous. There's a bit of a shoulder, but it's hardly a bike lane. And the road is broken up in parts and unsafe for bikes.

If it recently rained, expect to have to dodge big puddles along the route. Why don't they fix this already? Enough bikes take the Don Trail route and unless you plan to continue on down to Lakeshore, there's no easier way to get to Bloor St.

It's bad enough having to keep up with the cars whizzing by at 80 km/hr. I usually ride right ON the line at the edge of the road to give enough space between myself and the cars. YMMV (but only slightly).
Martin replying to a comment from dee / August 6, 2009 at 02:25 pm
user-pic
Dufferin has got to be the worst. There's really only one segment (just north of Eglinton) that is free of potholes, all of which seem to have developed in the far-right edges of the road. Lots of handlebar jerking to avoid catapulting over the handlebars, riding uphill all the way along with a 50-70km/h stream of traffic make for some fairly hairy cycling.

And then you have to do it all over again, except twice as fast when you go back downhill. 40-50+km/h speeds are great fun on the road, except when you're simultaneously racing cars to the gaps between crevasses in the tarmac.
Vic De Zen replying to a comment from Nate / August 6, 2009 at 03:13 pm
user-pic
I believe that photo was taken from http://wvs.topleftpixel.com by Sam Javanrouh. He is a regular cyclist (I think).
Koama / August 6, 2009 at 03:20 pm
user-pic
I live up north by york u and there is NO way i ride on the road (finch/keele/jane/steeles)
the traffic is too fast,there are many big trucks due to fuel deopts and the like
and the sidewalks are deserted. You may see a couple of pedestrians every kilometer or so
with wide open sidewalks it is much too tempting to takr the easy way out
Ryan L. / August 6, 2009 at 03:40 pm
user-pic
There is a section of, I believe is Adelaide that is reduced in width due to construction (mainly on the eastbound side).

If you unwittingly find yourself heading eastbound on this stretch you end up forced to merge with streetcar tracks. It doesn't even look like there is nearly enough room to fit your bike between the scaffolding and first rail. (I didn't even try. I got off my bike and walked it down the sidewalk).

You could try to ride in the middle of the right lane, but then you'd have to get yourself across the street car track while riding parallel to it.

Other nominations are any intersection where you're trying to make a left hand turn where street car tracks cross. Spadina and Queen, Bathurst and Queen, etc. It takes a lot of concentration sometimes to ensure you don't end up wedged in the web of streetcar tracks and sometimes that concentration is better spent focusing on the pedestrians crossing, the traffic,etc.

More than once I've realized I had to adjust my angle going through the intersection, but being surrounded by cars end up being faced with some very difficult decisions in a very short amount of time. Thankfully, I've been lucky. Avoiding turning left at these interesections is the better way to go.
Joel / August 6, 2009 at 05:13 pm
user-pic
I'll agree that most out-of-core roads are far more dangerous than core roads. Simply due to the facts that have been stated before-- less infrastructure, higher speeds, lower driver awareness, and the fact that you'll probably be the only cyclist on the road.

I would bet that Glenn de Baermaker (sp?) has some excellent survival stories.

We have a long way to come in this city, but I think the cycling movement is making progress. I will echo the sentiment of others: please PLEASE cyclists, obey the rules of the road, if you don't you just make it worse for the cycling cause.
Anon / August 6, 2009 at 05:17 pm
user-pic
It really really needs to be emphasized that that map is worse than meaningless. The problem with that map is that it just records incidents without any regard to usage. There are lots of accidents on College Street? Well, duh. That's where all the cyclists are. The number of accidents per capita means something. The number of accidents does not.

But wait, "worse than meaningless"? Yes, because there's safety in numbers. The massive number of bikers on College Street makes it very hard for drivers (and getting-out-of-car-ers) to ignore the fact that there are cyclists all around and you need to watch out for them.

Bad map. Bad.
bossman / August 6, 2009 at 05:34 pm
user-pic
you guys should write an article for the best roads or routes for bicyclists
J / August 6, 2009 at 05:40 pm
user-pic
whatever. cyclists are annoying. they need to be put away
chris / August 6, 2009 at 05:46 pm
user-pic
just ride in the streetcar lane on st. clair west...the drivers are too busy eating their big mac at st clair station. it is much more safe than riding in the lane with cars.

well if you think about it a lot of 905ers are coming into the city for work and do you really think they are accustom to seeing bikes on the road?
StueyGrenouille replying to a comment from Joel M / August 6, 2009 at 07:17 pm
user-pic
Actually it can be deemed cutting somebody off. I agree (and practice) that bikes should pass on the left or wait but passing on the left is probably one of the MOST dangerous thing to do because of the speed differential between the cyclist and on coming traffic from behind. What drivers should do (also something I practice) is NOT start turning right until the bikelane and cross walk is clear. It's the law anyhow. Just like you're not supposed to jut the front of your car out into oncoming traffic before making a left turn.
Jackie B. replying to a comment from amy / August 6, 2009 at 08:02 pm
user-pic
McCaul is absolutely terrible for cyclists. Very, very often I see people falling in the middle of McCaul from the streetcar tracks, it's brutal.
pan / August 6, 2009 at 09:31 pm
user-pic
I find the conditions for cyclists on Toronto streets rather poor. Pot holes everywhere, aggressive drivers. I find it difficult to position myself on the road with drivers turning on a red light. Not enough good bike lane. Lanes not cleared in winter. Shame really, it could be a great city to bike around.
chephy / August 6, 2009 at 09:40 pm
user-pic
I think the roads in the post have been picked completely at random. They are not really much worse than the majority of other arterial roads. Some are actually better than average.

Take College St. It takes me at most ten seconds (less, on average), to find a gap in auto traffic that allows me to merge safely and pass the slow-moving bike train. And I really can't understand the frustration with slow cyclists and the suggestion that they should speed up or move to side streets. How is this different from dumb drivers' fuming about how all of these cyclists should get off the road and out of their way? If there is anything frustrating about College, it's the multitude of traffic lights... but that goes for most downtown arterials.

Or, why does Steeles get a special note? Are any major roads in that area much better? Heck, one can hardly tell them apart, let alone rank them.

Some choices in the comments are also surprising. There is nothing scary about the Bloor-Danforth bridge. Plan ahead, change lanes early when there is no one behind you - and you'll be just fine. There is also nothing scary about passing right turners on the left: they typically are close to the curb and there is lots of space between them and the other lane of traffic. But if you are scared for any reason, you can always stop and wait behind them, you know...

"I live up north by york u and there is NO way i ride on the road (finch/keele/jane/steeles)"

I used to ride to York U every day Mon-Fri, and always on the road. Only once in many many trips did I have anything that qualified as an "encounter" with a motorist: he was unhappy that I was on the road, and honked as he passed (he passed safely, I might add). Big deal. Major arterials north of Eglinton are not that great for cycling, but they are not impossible to cycle on. BTW, that poor cyclist who got killed at Keele and Finch (an intersection I rode through many, many times) apparently was riding on the sidewalk.
Andrikas / August 6, 2009 at 10:50 pm
user-pic
Just want to say that all these comments apply to rollerbladers too. At times its justified to go on sidewalks (but I mainly stay on the roads) and then we have the hazards mentioned above amplified by those pedestrians who don't respect bladers. I'm respectful of people on the sidewalk and go at the same pace as those who are walking. But, people don't realized that I can't stop on a dime and that it takes time for me to slow down. Frustrating!
xander / August 6, 2009 at 11:04 pm
user-pic
queen west is a pretty tricky section to navigate, but thats the fun part...
such fun trendy people...
Matthew / August 6, 2009 at 11:06 pm
user-pic
Chephy makes some good points. But I don't think being irked by slow cyclists is akin to drivers wanting bikes off their streets. It's more like being frustrated by the little old lady going 40 in an 80 zone.

Ten times worse is when they can't hear that you're passing them because they have headphones on. (Why do so many cyclists think it's perfectly reasonable to war headphones while cycling? It's unbelievably dumb.)
N / August 7, 2009 at 12:08 am
user-pic
I have no problem with cyclists generally, but the big problem is when they are using a high speed street like Avenue or Mount Pleasant north of Bloor. On Avenue the cyclists think they own the road, so I have to make a dangerous maneuver to avoid hitting them. Since I am going 50 and there is very little space to have a car and a cyclists drive in the same lane, I have to quickly jump into the next lane. Of course, you could argue that we could just drive behind the cyclist at 15km an hour. The traffic jam in that case would be even bigger.

When I am doing a right turn I often these days try to block the bike lane. There are still idiot cyclists who try to go around and straight. I do it for cyclist safety. I am watching the pedestrians and oncoming traffic. It is very stupid to go straight as you go through my blind spot and I really don't expect you there. Even if I see you there I just don't know what you are going to do - go straight or let me go. I understand that everyone is in hurry these days, but please wait a moment till I make a right turn (if I came first) and then continue on your way.

Going with a bike on a highway is illegal!

In the end adding more bike lanes simply won't solve Toronto traffic problem. Toronto is too big to have everyone just ride a bike. The public transit should be better. Simply now, it takes me less time to drive to certain places (if longer distances) then taking the TTC. In downtown I can probably walk faster then streetcars in rush hour.
N replying to a comment from Andrikas / August 7, 2009 at 12:12 am
user-pic
Regarding the rollerblades and bicycles on sidewalk. Well, sidewalk is made for walking. I am not sure if there are any laws, but there should be. There are already enough pedestrians on the sidewalk that your higher speed vehicle makes it more difficult for pedestrians. If you can't use street use side streets for your vehicles. This goes to motorized chairs. Some of those people are flying on sidewalks and behave so ignorant of other pedestrians. Maybe all those "vehicles" should be driven in bicycle lane?
Todd replying to a comment from Soren / August 7, 2009 at 07:35 am
user-pic
Soren - On the positive side, according to Dan Egan, Toronto's Manager of Pedestrian and Cycling Infrastructure, the mandate is that as streets are ripped up for Transitcity, bike lanes will be put in unless they absolutely won't fit. This decision is regardless of whether the street is in the bike plan or not. So Sheppard east should be getting lanes. This, incidentally, is why we have not yet seen bike lanes on Broadview, Millwood, or Overlea. They're still deciding where to put the Don Mills LRT.
that guy replying to a comment from Matthew / August 7, 2009 at 09:29 am
user-pic
My perception is that the spandex clad speed demons as you call them are the people that actually obey the traffic rules. The worst offenders are hipsters with shoulder bags and the occasional cellphone on their hip single speeds.
Sarah / August 7, 2009 at 09:54 am
user-pic
One road I have noticed getting worse and worse it Fort York Blvd. The cycle lanes themselves are actually very good, but with a very busy building site right there they are now full of sand and gravel forcing riders out onto the road and to navigate the big dump trucks. It's an accident waiting to happen.
srasra / August 7, 2009 at 10:04 am
user-pic
I find both the York and Bay Street tunnels under the GO tracks to be quite treacherous, especially York - it has some ridiculous potholes that pretty much span the entire right-hand side of the right-most lane. Plus shifting over two lanes to get under the Gardiner while cars are hitting the on-ramp can be scary!
John Coates / August 7, 2009 at 10:34 am
user-pic
Dufferin and Bayview

I cycle on all these roots, nothing touches Dufferin. If it had Street Car tracks, there should be signs for cyclists to not ust it, like the bridge over the DVP and on river on Eastern (head to up to Queen or down to the bike lane beside Lakeshore to avoid injury!
Matthew replying to a comment from that guy / August 7, 2009 at 11:17 am
user-pic
I don't think the hipsters--with their impractical single speeds and low-riders--can get fast enough to be truly dangerous. It's the gearheads with the fancy cycling outfits and ultra-fast racing bikes that tend to treat people/cars like obstacles while they zoom aerodynamically but dangerously around town. (That's a generalization, like saying that guys with muscle cars are more reckless drivers. But I bet if you looked at accident stats, they are.)

Even they're not as reckless as the average bike messenger.
SeaStarErrin replying to a comment from Matthew / August 7, 2009 at 12:15 pm
user-pic
So true I can't even count how many times I've seen the full cycle-outfit clad dudes wave in and out of traffic dancing and dangerously racing with each other during rush hour, or been cut off by them while biking at a steady medium paced speed (not slow at all).
gadfly replying to a comment from Todd / August 7, 2009 at 12:15 pm
user-pic
Oh, thank God, because the bicycle lanes on Birchmount and Pharmacy are getting over-crowded. We desperately need lanes on Sheppard! Millwood and Overlea are badly needed as well: let's get those nasty cars backed up for a full km, rather than just a half km!
that guy replying to a comment from Matthew / August 7, 2009 at 12:16 pm
user-pic
I still don't see the behaviour you are talking about. The few people i know that are into fast road bikes refuse to ride in the city. The few well equipped people i see seem controlled.

The hipsters while slow, seem to be going on the wrong side of the street half the time, and generally break most of the rules of the road with a sense of entitlement. Again generalizing, there is plenty of hipsters that ride just fine.
joan / August 7, 2009 at 12:21 pm
user-pic
My stats back up your assessment, my two accidents were at Bloor and Keele, and on college, at Grace.
And Roncesvalles does have the worst pavement in this city.
ap / August 7, 2009 at 12:29 pm
user-pic
KEELE - between Saint Clair and Dundas - PLEASE HELP!
Roger / August 7, 2009 at 01:24 pm
user-pic
What's up with all the careless people on bicycles plugged into their iPods while riding around the city? A lot of them do so while riding at night. And without a lights or helmet either. Do they have a death wish?
dee replying to a comment from Martin / August 7, 2009 at 03:35 pm
user-pic
Agreed!

Almost killed myself the other day

Warning- HUGE POTHOLE - going south on dufferin (down the hill) just after the intersection at Davenport. It's a killer you can't see this huge pothole waiting for you.
jamesmallon / August 7, 2009 at 10:01 pm
user-pic
Bad street? How about all of Toronto! Typing here just outside of Tokyo, Toronto is all bad. Funny that in Japan with busier narrower streets, I feel far more safe cycling. So does my 60y old mother-in-law. Would you expect to see 60y old women ride daily for groceries in Toronto; I mean most of them: not hardcore cyclists at all. Amazing how safe streets can be if the culture does not tolerate automotive dick-headedness.
Ian S / August 8, 2009 at 01:57 pm
user-pic
One thing that strikes me when reading these posts and the list of roads is that people might want to think about varying their route a bit. Try leaving for work early a few times and see if you can find alternate roads to keep you off of the Dufferin-like routes. I did this with a compass and a map a few times and discovered routes that were more scenic, interesting and safer (and I discovered some stores that I didn't know existed either). The TO cycling map is a good resource if you want to find routes that are less traffic intensive. I find that the Suggested On-Street Routes (with no bike lanes) are sometimes better than the bike lane routes, as they are less traffic intensive.

It may add a few minutes to your commute, but you can avoid a lot of risk by choosing lower traffic volume routes, wider roads, etc. Most major roads have the problem of potholes and cracks on the sides, so you have a choice of a bumpy ride or riding with the cars. As much as I love taking up a lane, in some places you are just asking for trouble as the traffic moves so much faster than you. The solution, if you can, is to find better routes. The cycling map is free, available at any bike shop, and it updated regularly (it is also available on-line). The city is doing work all the time, and you never know when a bad route will become a good one. They recently finished off their work on Annette West of High Park and it is a beautiful ride now, wide and smooth.

When you are on major routes like Steeles in the North of the city, you often find that the sidewalk traffic is non-existent, so you can ride the sidewalk fairly easily. I commute to York from Downtown four days a week on average, and I take one of several routes that involve periods on major roads like this. My rule is that if there is not much traffic (traffic moves in packs on fast roads, there can be lulls) I'll ride on the road, but only if I have an exit point somewhere (e.g. a ramp or a crossing road) that I can use if necessary. I found the exit points on my route by riding the sidewalk a few times. Do check your tires periodically for glass though, major roads produce lots of glass.

The other option besides the sidewalk is to find parallel roads nearby. When I'm going East on Steeles just past Islington I go south to Garyray and ride across, it is a wide industrial road and there is lots of room. When I'm going East on Steeles just past York I go on Allness to Supertest, then through G. Ross Lord Park to Drewry. These roads are lighter in traffic (not empty mind you), wider in places, and eminently manageable. When going North you can pick roads that are more cycle friendly, like Scarlett, which has prominently displayed signs indicating that the road is also to be shared with cyclists.

Another option, if you are doing a major North/South commute is to pick up either of the river trails, up the Don or the Humber for the majority of the trip and then go East or West as needed to get where you are going. The Humber is particularly good for this, giving you easy exits on to Eglinton, Lawrence, Finch, etc. Admittedly it takes more time, but there are no cars, few pedestrians, and during the week a manageable number of cyclists. Look at it this way, if you are willing to go to the gym for 1-2 hours a week, then why not add an extra 15-20 minutes to your daily commute to get to one of the river trails and then have a safer ride? My route to York varies, but it can be anywhere from 80% trails to no trails at all, depending on what I'm in the mood for. There are also a lot of short haul East/West or diagonal trails you can use depending on where you start from: Smythe Park from Rockcliffe to Scarlett, G. Ross Lord Park, High Park, the Moore Park Ravine, the Belt-Line Trail. Combining these with low traffic and bike lane roads reduces traffic risks considerably.

As one of the spandex clad set (though I ride a mountain bike with road tires, not a racing bike), I can say that I agree with many of the posters here that many Toronto cyclists, no matter what they wear, do remarkably stupid things on a bike. To me this is simple physics, a bike weighs a lot less than a car, and if you get into a collision then the best of luck to you. You should cycle to save your ass, not to prove you are right. For example, I'm not sure what the traffic rules are for the situation where you are waiting beside a car that wants to make a right turn, but for me the distinction lies in who was there first. If I get there first then I get to go first. But if someone pulls up and has their signal on I wave at them to get their attention and tell them I'm going through. That usually does the trick. When I pull up to the intersection and the car is already there I give them the turn, and sometimes I wave them through so they know I'm not going to try to jump them at the light. When it comes to situations like these, I don't much care who is right and who is wrong, I don't want to end up sucking my food through a straw in a hospital somewhere, warm in the knowledge I was “right.”

In general I am willing to wait for cars if the drivers seem impatient or distracted, I sometimes pull aside and let the traffic “pack” pass and then rejoin traffic if I'm not comfortable with the situation. I trust my gut at all times. I always wear a helmet, and as for music, my rule is that on trails you can crank it up and have fun, but if you are in traffic it should be off, or at least low enough that you can hear the tires on the road beside you. A mirror is also a must, I check my mirror constantly to keep tabs on the traffic coming up behind me. I also have wide, thick tires on the bike to help with gaps, cracks, small bits of glass and other such things. I still vividly remember the fellow on Lakeshore who was riding on a racing bike with thin tires. He managed to turn his front tire (maybe while doing a shoulder check) and it got wedged in the sewer grate slats (that are offset to avoid trapping tires). I know that thin tires = speed, but I'm not in that much of a rush.

Cheers,

Ian
Tanya / August 12, 2009 at 05:15 pm
user-pic
Jarvis is pretty much the only downtown street I regularly avoid. Steeles sucks of course, but all of the rest of the roads you mention are not bad for cycling. Eastern has bike lanes from Logan to Leslie; the rest of it is time of day dependent, and there's a little triangle to wait for the traffic coming off the dvp. College I'd complain more about cars and trucks parked in the bike lane than other easy to pass cyclists!

In fact if you were to make a post of favourite cycling streets in Toronto I'd probably pick Queen despite the door zone issues.
LJR / August 12, 2009 at 05:45 pm
user-pic
This article needs a sequel! Ok... so these are bad routes. Now, provide good alternative routes for where these paths go!
electric replying to a comment from Nate / August 12, 2009 at 09:14 pm
user-pic
You can see more of his work at

http://wvs.topleftpixel.com/
Bongo Mongo / July 28, 2010 at 10:56 am
user-pic
(I'm a year-round daily Toronto cyclist)

My biggest annoyance in cycling Toronto is generally mindless cyclists & pedestrians!

-SHOULDER CHECKS: I hardly ever see cyclists perform regular shoulder checks! I wish there was a mandatory training course for this. If you can't bike in a relatively straight line while looking back over your shoulder for 2 seconds, then in my view you fail!

-LOOKING BOTH WAYS: Pedestrians that never look both ways, or if they do, they need to look multiple times as they cross the street. It seems like most make their move after a quick glance and then using their ears to listen if cars get close. Obviously they can't hear a cyclist unless the bell is ringing.

-COMMUNICATION: Cyclists need to use more than just hand-signals to work together with other traffic. EYE CONTACT, HEAD SIGNALS, POSTURE, POSITIONING OF YOUR BIKE. All these things are communication. I use head signals a lot in low-low speed situations and everyone gets it. I jerk my head way into the direction I want to go, flick up my head and eyebrows a little, and boom, I usually get a window to make my move.

-LATE CROSSINGS: Pedestrians who decide to start crossing the street when the walk counter is almost finished and/or the yellow light comes up. They are completely oblivious and I suppose they see the GREEN traffic light, they think they're okay. In practical traffic reality, when the walk signal says DON'T WALK this is the special time for turning cars to make their move because most straight traffic has gone through already. What happens with a late pedestrian crossing? The car gets stuck in the middle of the intersection when the light changes, people everyone gets pissed off. All because of what? A late pedestrian. Then the pedestrian has the nerve to get offended when they're honked at! There are certain groups of people I see who are notorious as late pedestrians, I've seen it millions of times in my 25 years as a cyclist here in TO. If I were to angrily talk about these groups of people I would be called names. All I will say is, with any general road safety educational campaigns, some extra emphasis needs to be put on educational campaigns in schools, hospitals, retirement homes, immigration centres, and embedded on the screens of iPhones and Blackberries.

-CYCLISTS TAKING THE EXTREME RIGHT: If a car is turning-right at an intersection, and is slowly & cautiously creeping his way through (nothing wrong with that, otherwise he'll never make the turn), why is it that approaching cyclists, from the rear of the car, feel the need to pass this car on the extreme right? All they are doing is disrupting the flow of what's going on in that intersection. You are annoying the pedestrians who are in the walkway, and also making the car driver extremely nervous. Why don't you SHOULDER CHECK, see if there's a gap to PASS ON THE LEFT, otherwise STOP and wait your turn. In this situation you are in the same lane as the right-turning car, and in practical reality you have no right to be passing that turning car on the extreme right. Yet you have the gall to ring your bell are the right-turning car, as you pass? I feel so embarrassed by you, I feel like I have to apologize to the car driver on behalf of all cyclists.

-CYCLISTS SWERVING INTO TRAFFIC WITHOUT LOOKING: Again another reason to be shoulder-checking. If you have to dodge a pothole, parked car or a car door... you can certainly make a move into the next lane ONLY IF THERE'S A GAP and you can relatively match speed. So many times I see cyclists swerve into traffic without looking. Cars behind them end up swerving out or braking hard, creating potential collisions. The mindless cyclists just keeps pedaling away completely oblivious to the mess they make behind them. And you don't necessarily have to be traveling the same speed as the cars. As long as you have enough speed to make it back to the right before you start disrupting traffic flow too much. Generally if you had enough momentum going in, and you did a shoulder check and used body language that you are going to pull a move the car driver will work with you and decelerate for you to make your move. It all happens naturally and flowing IF EVERYONE COMMUNICATES.

EDUCATION damn it. Why aren't there posters all around to re-educate EVERYONE on using their EYES and BEING AWARE.

-CYCLISTS WITHOUT LIGHTS OR WORKING BRAKES: You guys are terrible because these are almost one-time equipment solutions. Go get your brakes fixed and learn how to tune them. And at night on a sidestreet, NO ONE CAN SEE YOU. Not even other cyclists. You make everyone nervous.
Bongo Mongo / July 28, 2010 at 11:01 am
user-pic
-CYCLISTS WHO SIGNAL WHEN NO TRAFFIC IS AROUND: YOU ARE STUPID.

If you make a turning signal when no traffic is around, all you are doing is proving that you do not use your eyes and look around. Because if you looked around before you signaled, and didn't see any traffic for miles, who are you signaling to? Why do you need to signal in that case?

You may be making a hand-signal, but you are freaking dangerous, GET AWAY FROM ME.

Yet another reason to shoulder check.
leona f / August 31, 2010 at 09:47 am
user-pic
Queens Quay east of Yonge is also terrible. They have installed a beautiful smooth path, labeled 'pedestrians only', while the bike lane is an obstacle course of potholes.
joe fresh / April 8, 2011 at 02:07 pm
user-pic
Joel M wrote:
"the reason the bike lane becomes dotted at intersections is because cars are allowed to enter it to turn right"

Yes and no. Those are there for the car to pass through yes, but the car still needs to yield to the cyclist when passing through that lane. Primarily that line is there for cyclists leaving the lane to turn left. You'll notice the intersections with bike boxes do not have the dotted line even though rights are permitted (on green lights).

If you're in a car, always yield to a bike.
If you're on a bike, always yield to the pedestrian.
Michael replying to a comment from joan / February 12, 2012 at 09:13 pm
user-pic
After many years of TTC hell, I was looking forward to taking my Miele to work before reading this thread.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal