Sunday, February 12, 2012Cloudy -7°C
MB Toronto

Morning Brew: TTC Blue Ribbon Panel Announced, Coyote Attack in Pickering, Councilor Paula Fletcher Apologizes for Outburst, Proposed Oakville Power Plant Protested, Leafs Trade Ponikarovsky to Pittsburgh

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / March 3, 2010

snow torontoThe blue ribbon panel aimed at assessing problems with, and devising solutions for, customer service at the TTC has been announced. I'm impressed by the diversity, proven track records, and skill sets represented by the panel, which includes Tyson Matheson of WestJet Airlines, Matt Blackett from Spacing Magazine, along with other recruits that have ties to the student population and/or have extensive marketing experience. The panel will explore issues related to employee training and hiring criteria, the commission's complaint process, and a customer charter of rights.

People taking their dogs for walks at dusk or dawn, especially in areas on the fringes of the city or near forested areas, should be prepared to encounter coyotes - and they should be considered hungry. Yet another case of a pet being attacked (and in this case, likely eaten) has been reported in Pickering.

A public consultation session at City Hall on Monday night, pertaining to the city's 2010 operating budget, got rather out of hand when councilor Paula Fletcher let her temper get the better of her. She's since apologized for her actions. See video of her shouting match, in which she accuses a participant of being a plant from a Newstalk 1010 radio show hosted by John Tory, below.

Oakville residents don't want a power plant in their backyard. Somewhere between 500 and 1000 demonstrators showed up at Queen's Park to call for the province to cancel plans to build a 900-megawatt gas-fired plant in an area within 350m of affluent areas with residential homes and a school. McGuinty says it's safe, but they're not convinced.

Passengers traveling between Toronto and Montreal by train may see delays continue into today, after a freight train derailed yesterday afternoon. 26 cars jumped the tracks near Morrisburg, and thankfully no casualties were reported.

And the struggling Maple Leafs made one trade of note before the NHL trade deadline, sending Alexei Ponikarovsky to Pittsburgh in exchange for forward Luca Caputi and defenceman Martin Skoula. Who got the better in the deal?

Photo: "Snoww" by AshtonPal, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

Discussion

23 Comments

jamesmallon / March 3, 2010 at 08:16 am
user-pic
A nice change to see a source of pollution built next to 'affluent' homes.
Xavier / March 3, 2010 at 08:20 am
user-pic
If McGuinty says its safe, it must be. Its not like he would ever lie. So while his government has tried to protect us from mix breed dogs and raw fish, a giant propane repository in a populated area is not something to be feared. What could possibly go wrong?
buster replying to a comment from Xavier / March 3, 2010 at 08:29 am
user-pic
Sunrise Propane was a City of Toronto zoning issue. It had nothing to do with the provincial government.
Joel / March 3, 2010 at 08:44 am
user-pic
Is it just me or are derailments happening far too often? Someone really needs to take charge of the rail issue in this country, because it is embarrassing.
Xavier replying to a comment from buster / March 3, 2010 at 08:45 am
user-pic
Like I said. What could go wrong?

You're splitting hairs and ignoring the bigger issue
Erica replying to a comment from jamesmallon / March 3, 2010 at 08:56 am
user-pic
I wouldn't necessarily call the area near the Ford plant "affluent." It's pretty middle of the road for Oakville. Regardless, they react this way to the building of most unwanted structures. Like the homeless shelter..
RBeezy replying to a comment from jamesmallon / March 3, 2010 at 09:25 am
user-pic
how about next to NO homes? or even better, use a cleaner energy source?
Dawn Mills / March 3, 2010 at 10:28 am
user-pic
Nice to see Paula Fletcher acting like an adult. What is it with the citizens of this city that we constantly elect loud mouths (Rob Ford), blowhards (Adam Vaughan) and bullies (Paula Fletcher) and serial stickmen (you know who)?
You can of course, take long vacations in Spain while garbage piles up (Kyle Ray).
The hours are long but the pay and perks are pretty good...
Why oh why are only dimwits and egomaniacs running?

Colin / March 3, 2010 at 10:37 am
user-pic
Lot's of people through the word "Communist" around, but Fletcher was actually the head of the Communist Party of Manitoba at one point.

It's sick that someone like that could be on Council.
Ratpick replying to a comment from Xavier / March 3, 2010 at 10:51 am
user-pic
YOU are confusing issues and weakening the argument against the power plant.

A base-load power plant needs to go SOMEWHERE, and that somewhere is usually near the people who use the power (or, you can transmit power for hundreds of km and waste half of it in the process).







Nat replying to a comment from jamesmallon / March 3, 2010 at 11:14 am
user-pic
It's not about the fact that it's next to affluent homes. I live in Clarkson, Mississauga (a mixed housing neighbourhood) which is probably a kilometer or two west from site. The area is industrialized. Ford plant, Petro Canada plant, a bunch of other chemical plants on Royal Windsor Drive, St. Lawrence Cement and a lot of truck activity. The air is stressed and yet they're adding on this? It's ridiculous.

Get some facts before making stupid assumptions like that.
Xavier replying to a comment from Ratpick / March 3, 2010 at 11:27 am
user-pic
I'm just pointing out inherent dangers assciated with it.
There's a mandated minimum distance between wind gerneated power sources and homes but there isn't one for natural gas.

Looks beyond your ideology and into the real world
Ratpick replying to a comment from Nat / March 3, 2010 at 11:31 am
user-pic
Nat,

The Oakville Petro-Canada refinery closed in 2005. What's left there is just a fuels terminal (for feeding suburbia's car fleets). The Ford plant is just an assembly facility. Not what anyone would consider heavy industry, by any stretch. But power-hungry just the same.





Jacob / March 3, 2010 at 11:38 am
user-pic
As someone from Oakville, I have to wonder WHY it's being dropped in right next to a residential area. It's not like there's a shortage of empty space in Halton Region. This is going on currently unused Ford land, and Ford is getting paid quite well for it, so I imagine they're one of the parties urging the decision.

Also, the land literally touches the CN rail corridor, and it's quite close to the QEW and 403. If there's ANY sort of emergency, three pieces of critical infrastructure will be completely shut down. No GO, no VIA, no rail freight, no highway commute, no truck shipping.

Overall, it's a half-baked idea.
nat replying to a comment from Ratpick / March 3, 2010 at 11:39 am
user-pic
I'm talking about the one based in Clarkson on Southdown/Lakeshore
Ratpick replying to a comment from nat / March 3, 2010 at 11:48 am
user-pic
Ah, I see. I wonder why the plant would not be located on the site of the old Lakeview GS.
nat replying to a comment from Ratpick / March 3, 2010 at 11:54 am
user-pic
See this airshed study - http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/publications/6768e.pdf
Especially:
Table 3.2
Table 7.1

Those summarize key problem organizations, including the Ford Plant.
nippleholic / March 3, 2010 at 12:05 pm
user-pic
Skoula has subsequently been traded to New Jersey...Pittsburgh got the better end of this deal in the short-term (and probably long-term considering Toronto's developmental system)...
gadfly / March 3, 2010 at 12:33 pm
user-pic
Per Paul Fletcher's outburst: Budget negotiations are stressful, indeed. However, I think the point with the city is that it is getting too far removed from it's core responsibilities (transportation, policing, garbage disposal, etc) and too deep into areas that are, 'frills.' Why is the city involved in subsidized housing, daycare, arts grants and all the rest? Toronto's debt load is going to crush all of us. The trouble is these Councilors spend money that isn't theres and always rely on the Province to bail them out.
With the looming financial crunch that is coming, no way in hell is anyone of consequence going to step forward and run for Mayor. Would anyone on this site want to run the city with the challenges facing it? Councilors need to practice saying one word: NO
Zed / March 3, 2010 at 03:40 pm
user-pic
I swear I heard a pack of coyotes in High Park last night
Zed / March 3, 2010 at 03:44 pm
user-pic
I swear I heard Coyotes in High Park last night
jamesmallon replying to a comment from Nat / March 3, 2010 at 05:48 pm
user-pic
"A nice change to see a source of pollution built next to 'affluent' homes." My point, clear to anyone with a sense of irony, is that it's usually the poor who get shafted with this, and nobody cares: it wasn't that I want anyone to get shafted with it.
Wes Kibble / March 4, 2010 at 10:53 pm
user-pic
People do not want nuclear plants in their back yard, they do not want power plants in their backyard, they do not want windmills in their backyard or to ruin their view of the lake...hey, lets just build a big dam up north and flood farmland or other peoples houses. That way it is not in your backyard, so why should you care?

Power has to come from somewhere people. Why not build it near the people that need it? Kind of like how Toronto residents do not want a garbage burner in Toronto, but it is them that make all the garbage that is trucked out of country. As long as their problem is not taken care of in their backyard, they do not care how it affects other people.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal