Tuesday, February 14, 2012Cloudy 1°C
MB Toronto

Morning Brew: office towers killing birds, billboards on the Gardiner, elderly couple struck by truck, TTC executive fired, police board refuses to make cuts

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / March 9, 2010

sunset skyscrapersTwo highly-reflective, 17-storey office towers at highway 401 & McCowan are a death trap, killing hundreds of passing birds each year (including White-throated Sparrows, Golden-crowned Kinglets, Nashville Warblers, Ruby-throated Hummingbirds, Ruby-crowned Kinglets, Dark-eye Juncos, etc.). The problem has caught the attention of environmental groups Ontario Nature and Ecojustice, who are taking the building's managers to task under the Environmental Protection Act and the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. Turning off lights at night, and hanging decoys in the windows only partly solve the problem, and it's unlikely that replacing all of the glass on the building is going to a solution easily achieved.

Driver safety on the Gardiner Expressway is being pitted against the rights of businesses to erect billboards for advertising. In advance of new, stricter billboard laws, a flood of applications for new approvals is being observed, many requesting the rights to put up large, flashy, digital, illuminated signs between highway 427 and Royal York Road. I suppose it won't be a huge safety concern during rush hours (given that cars are barely moving in that area during those times), but being distracted by giant screens while traveling at high speeds is far from ideal.

An elderly couple were struck by a truck on Yonge Street near Maitland (south of Wellesley) yesterday, required extraction from under the vehicle, and are in critical condition. Every day in Toronto, several pedestrians are involved in collisions with motor vehicles, but this year continues to be far worse that usual in terms of the number of fatalities that have resulted. This particular incident has prompted those familiar with the area to question the relatively great distance between two controlled crossings.

The TTC has fired an executive and severed business ties with his girlfriend - an amateur photographer who he helped land a $50,000 contract to shoot photos of the TTC's public meetings and streetscapes. This conflict of interest appears to be being dealt with swiftly and strictly, but the scenario may force the commission to revisit its policy, which is "...only as good as the individual who is asked to adhere to it."

Also in TTC news (and in case you missed it yesterday), GPS tracking of additional TTC streetcar routes is now live. No more aimlessly waiting in transit shelters in blistering -40oC winds!

And the Toronto Police Board and the City of Toronto are on a collision course over spending and the 2010 operating budget. The City is looking for the police to cut $5.9 million from its $892.2 million operating budget, but as it stands, the police are showing a $37.4 million increase in operating costs over their 2009 budget. Something's gotta give here, and it may be that some of the 258 planned new recruits are among the cuts required.

Photo: "what a day" by E-Lite Photography, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

Discussion

5 Comments

gta_dweller / March 9, 2010 at 10:59 am
user-pic
Billboards are a lot more dangerous during rush-hour than off-peak. When traffic is flowing, taking a second or two to glance at a billboard won't be detrimental - after all, the cars are moving at a more or less constant speed.

However, rush-hour, although slow moving, has plenty of stop and go, and that's when accidents occur.

Perhaps if billboard companies could be held responsible financially for accidents caused by drivers distracted by them, it would change the situation.
gta_dweller / March 9, 2010 at 11:02 am
user-pic
Not sure if my post went through, but basically, it's a lot more dangerous to be distracted by billboards during rush hour than during off-peak hours. That's because rush hour sees plenty of stop and go, and when drivers are distracted, they, well, don't stop.

How about introducing financial responsibility to billboard advertisers/owners for accidents caused by drivers distracted by them?
keven replying to a comment from gta_dweller / March 9, 2010 at 12:46 pm
user-pic
If the driver is that easily distracted, perhaps they could revoke their driver's license, cause what you're saying is actually pretty scary.
jimmy replying to a comment from gta_dweller / March 9, 2010 at 01:53 pm
user-pic
Perhaps if billboard companies could be held responsible financially for accidents caused by drivers distracted by them, it would change the situation.
---------

Why don't you run along and kickstart your campaign against sunsets and clouds.
gadfly / March 9, 2010 at 05:08 pm
user-pic
Although it sucks to be run down by a vehicle, we can't put 'controlled crossings' on every single block. Egad, if that's the case, let's just return to the horse and buggy! Trucks, cars, buses, taxis, people - everyone has to get around in this city.
I guess it's just easier to slap up a speed bump, reduce speed limits put in yet another damned cross-walk, all in the name of 'safety,' rather than doing something about the underlying causes of our L.A. style traffic in a pisant town of 2.4 million.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal