Eat & Drink
The great Toronto poutine challenge: the smoked meat poutine
The first thing that should be known about a Caplansky's Delicatessen smoked meat poutine, is that it foregoes gravy in the traditional sense.
I know, I know. How dare they! Don't they know that a poutine has three simple ingredients? How difficult is it to get three simple ingredients right? Don't they know that the beauty of a great poutine is in the delicate symbiosis between potato, curd and gravy? What arrogance! What guile!
But fear not, it's still "gravy", but it's smoked meat gravy. It's thick, chunky and pink.
Now, even I have dismissed so-called poutines that gamble too recklessly with the recipe. I'm no traditionalist; I can handle a little creative licensing, but to blatantly ignore one of the main tenets of construction? Surely this is unacceptable.
But come on people, this is Toronto - two-thousand-and-ten! Is this not a city known for its acceptance? It's diversity? Is there not room for a culinary conquistador like Zane Caplansky to sprinkle a little of his personal touch into this great tradition?
I admit, had I known there would be no gravy in the traditional sense; I might have skipped over this place. I blame my own poutine prejudices, I'm glad I didn't though - here's why:
Fries
One of the things that has led to Caplansky's success at his College Street location is his uncompromising attention to quality. This extends beyond the smoked meat he's known for and into every detail of his establishment - fries included. The base for this poutine is a generous pile of perfectly golden, crisp, skin on french fries. There is nothing to critique about them, they're soft and light inside, they maintain their delectable potato flavour, with a light seasoning of salt - they're perfect. 5/5
Gravy
So the smoked meat gravy that sits atop those perfect potatoes is not the most visually appealing thing in the world. In fact, it kind of looks gross, but rest assured, that is the same smoked meat that gets piled high in between slices of rye bread on their sandwiches. It's not gravy per se, more like a smoked meat sauce. For once though, I'm going with the purists. It's good, but without real gravy, it just doesn't feel like poutine, and this is about poutine. 1/5
Curds
The focus on quality that led to those excellent fries carries over to the curds too. I've eaten a lot of curd over the course of the past week and while they've been tasty, only Poutini's have squeaked. Caplansky's curds squeak. This is no small achievement either; cheese curds can lose their firmness and squeak within a day or two of production. These curds are fresh. 4.5/5
Portion
This is going to come off as a little backwards, but I have a complaint about the portion size of Caplansky's fries and it extends to the poutine as well. They're too big. Really, please introduce a smaller size as well. These portion sizes can hardly be described as "sides," especially for diners who are going solo. It's just wasteful. That being said, I would also like to thank you for the generous amount of smoked meat in your sandwiches. 4/5
Price: $6.00
Total Score: 14.5/20
It's not that Caplansky's lost points on a technicality here, it's just that, there are certain things one expects when the word poutine is used. I'm open to additional ingredients, but omissions are hard to justify. Poutine gravy should be in the beige to brown colour range, not salmon or coral. Even still, they do everything else right. With top-notch fries and curds, they're still in the running.


Discussion
32 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
The concept is simple--don't try to get too far away from the origins of poutine.
they should try a slab of ham with poutine or even better a wobbly pile of spam!
As a side note, it does look like a pack of stray cats barfed on top of the fries.
Ugh...but yeah, put it right next to mussels for "foods I enjoy eating but refuse to look at too closely!"
Just why exactly are you trying to review food???
Is this some sort of ironic attempt to turn Toronto's fascination with poutine into some sort of sick joke for the rest of the country to laugh at?
Seriously Dude...Stop trying to pass yourself off as having an understanding of cuisine. You're clearly proving the exact opposite with every attempt!
Perhaps instead, you could develop a voice that plays on your obvious culinary ineptitude, and admit that you don't really know what you're talking about, and then take the Reader along on your personal learning process from there on out...That might be worth reading at least.
Best of Luck in all your future pursuits Luke
Charitably
Jo
Sorry Luke
Best Luck
I am enjoying the series a lot.
Dude, is posting his opinions on a Blog about Poutine not writing for the New York Times.
Luke has also scraped together some of the last unique morsels that can be said about the once humble now rock star status comfort foods that I pray isn't headed towards an Axl Rose finish.
"That is the most disgusting looking poutine I've ever had the displeasure to view. It looks like spam or cat food on top."
Bleh, I agree.
Looks more like poutine that someone ate, then barfed up on their buddy's plate of fries.
It's called food styling, BlogTo. At least try to make the lighting more appealing next time.
I had a terrible poutine at Fran's the other night, except it serves me right for going to Fran's. To be honest I still have yet to find an exceptional poutine in Toronto, but I think the best poutines actually come from the least expected places.
p.s. Melissa, I think a latte is calling you at Yonge and Eglinton. You can then go shopping at the Gap you're so boring. And by "drivel" I'm just going to take that to mean "super fantastic greatness".
Although this poutine is quite scary to look at and isn't very traditional, it was nice to try a different take on the poutine with some thought put into it.
Lastly, fries 'n curds with no chicken-based gravy is simply fries 'n curds and whatever crap you throw on top it (e.g. chili fries tho' it also doesn't have curds.) Don't call it poutine.
Maybe what's annoying you, is the fact that no one's interested in following the link that you've been spamming each and every poutine review with. Don't take that out on Luke, his articles and "voice" have made for great, enjoyable reading.
Its food, not a restored 1939 Buggati about to get judged at Concours...
1. For those of you who have said things like "ugh, look at it, why is Caplansky straying from the concept of good poutine," then you're sort of missing the point. IT TASTES DELICIOUS. (Not to mention, in the times I've seen their poutine, it hasn't looked that meaty/chunky. Nevertheless, why are they straying from the "concept" of poutine? TO MAKE IT TASTE EVEN BETTER!)
2. For those of you who are complaining that blogto.com is writing about poutine/food... don't worry. I've notified the authorities about the people who have taken you hostage and are forcing you to read articles like this one against your will. I'm sure they'll be breaking down your door any second now to drag those dastardly criminals away.
3. Seriously. The writer of this article raves about how freakin' good the poutine is. Those who have actually tried it and posted comments here have raved about the taste. Therefore, those of you whose comments are "I'd never try that!" are ... well, sorry, but you're kinda dopes. But, this is the internet. Guess I shouldn't expect anything different.
-k.
p.s. No, really. This poutine is outstanding. And the scary thing? It's not even the best thing on Caplansky's menu...
Damn good dish even if it's not "poutine"!!