City
Toronto city council endorses LRT for Sheppard East
Rob Ford suffered another dramatic defeat at city council today, as his colleagues voted 24-19 in favour of an LRT-based transit plan for Sheppard East. Doug Ford called it a "sad day for Toronto," while the mayor vowed to keep fighting for subways. What exactly the nature of that fight will be remains unclear, as today's vote should finally kill Ford's dream — let's be honest, it was never a "plan" — for a subway along Sheppard East.
"People hate the St. Clair...they hate these streetcars," Ford angrily shouted during today's debate. "You can call them what you want. People want subways folks. Subways, subways." But for all the ire he expressed earlier in the session, the mayor was calmer in his final address to council and when he briefly scrummed with reporters post-vote.
By that point he must have realized that there wasn't much point in putting up a fuss. And besides, as he and his supporters have said all along, this is the type of "loss" they believe they can build a future campaign on. That might sound paradoxical, but Ford will still be able to say to Scarborough residents that he fought tooth and nail for a subway, even if all he did was blow hot air.
Given the divisiveness of the whole subways vs. LRT debate, it's almost hard to believe that the issue has been resolved once and for all, but the reality is there is very little recourse that subway proponents have to alter the decision made today. Toronto has given the province the mandate that it demanded, and it's for LRT-based transit expansion.
Can we just get down to building now?


Discussion
298 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
LRT will NOT provide economic development remotely close to what would happen with a subway.
LRT will meet its capacity in 2030, only 10-15 years after it was initially built. Subways will serve the residents of Toronto for over a hundred years.
LRT is not convenient, NO ONE is going to take LRT instead of their cars, and only people who HAVE TO will take it. Subways ARE convenient, and people will take it instead of their cars.
LRT is something world class cities build to compliment their expansive subway systems and link lines that are not already linked by subways. Though, Toronto is building LRT as the basis of their transit.
The city has been St. Clairized, and we along with our children and grandchildren will all be looking back in 50 years shaking our heads. This is a black mark in the history of Toronto.
Oh wait, it actually looks pretty nice:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k86lBV5824
Also, what economic development can happen with a subway that can't with a LRT? Both need construction jobs. An LRT keeps citizens at street level instead of underground - a bonus for local businesses.
I think the moaning about the "destroyed St. Clair Avenue" has been proven wrong. Everybody's okay, and any business that was 'destroyed' was probably on it's way out anyway.
Meanwhile down at the BEAUTIFUL subway station of Queen/Dundas/Eglinton/any stops on the Bloor-Danforth, perpetually under construction Davisville or Union things are going very smoothly.
Did you plan on taking the subway from Shephard to Bloor this weekend. Oh, you can't, it will be "offline" during what some might call the peak hours. [/rant]
"LRT is not convenient, NO ONE is going to take LRT instead of their cars, and only people who HAVE TO will take it. Subways ARE convenient, and people will take it instead of their cars."
Who and the what now? How is subway more convenient? You have to go into a building (probably no where near where you live or work), pay a fair, go down a flight of stairs (or a flight of broken escalator) and then wait.
How is that more convenient then crossing the street (or walk to the nearest corner), waiting, then paying a fare while the vehicle continues on its merry way?
NOBODY is going to take LRT because it's "convenient." People are going to take it because they don't have cars and it's (slightly) better than a bus. On the other hand, subways are extremely convenient and people will take them instead of their cars. Not happening with LRT.
I take the St.Clair LRT, sometimes just to transfer to the University line. Yep...instead of driving.
Why? It is convenient, service is consistent and my BlackBerry works the whole time.
Commuters seem to make due right now with neither, so buck up.
Build the Eglinton & a Downtown relief subway line AND build LRTs for Finch & Sheppard
As businesses and higher-density housing coalesce around the LRT routes, the tax base will improve, making more funding available for city services, and eventually a full subway if it comes to that - just like Yonge and Bloor-Danforth.
I lived along St. Clair before the ROW was installed. It was pretty grim and crumbling. The street has visibly improved since construction finished. New businesses are popping up, new residential and office construction is taking place.
This is a wonderful day. Finally, council is on record supporting badly-needed transit expansion and recognizes the need to get senior levels of government back into the game. Realistic expansion can be done *now*, and even the tax-averse wing of council realizes that infrastructure funding doesn't drop from the sky. Scarborough will have two new rapid transit lines within the decade; any new funding can go toward other parts of the city that desperately need expansion.
The only losers here are people who stubbornly clung to unfunded slogans and falsehoods perpretrated by people who don't care about mass transit. Ford should have been looking into funding sources for his subway the moment he declared Transit Coty dead, not one week before the meeting that decided everything. Had he shown some forethought and planning, we may never have had to go through multiple contentious council meetings. Ford has no one to blame but himself, and Sheppard subway supporters need to recognize where the fault lies - not with council, which made the most reasonable and effective decisions possible given the economic and political realities, but with a mayor who treated slogans as policy and bluster as planning.
Also, you couldn't be more false about economic development. I used to live at Bayview and Sheppard. By my count, from Yonge+Sheppard to Don Mills+Sheppard, 25-30 new condos have been built over the past 12 years. Why? Because of the subway! They're attractive to developers, they want to build along subway lines. Frankly, if you believe LRT is even remotely close to subways on economic development, you're ignoring the facts.
If you're on the streetcar, it's awesome. You zip along st. clair and are at the station in no time. But if you're walking and trying to cross the road, if you're driving, trying to get north of St. Clair from anything other than a main road or if you're (god forbid) trying to turn left...it's a gong show.
Get as much of this stuff underground as possible. Subways, underground LRT (Boston has that) - I don't care get it off the street, make it easy and make it awesome.
So much of this is driven by dollars. Screw the dollars, let's do what's right.
Kudos to Toronto City Council! Though, shovels have been in the ground for a while on the LRTs. The Eglinton one has been under construction for a few months at least (anyone know the exact date it started?)
It's sad that this is going to be brought up in the next election though, and numerous people will vote for Ford and his cronies because they actually believe all his crap. It just stuns me how gullible some people are. How do they function in normal life without the most basic of critical thinking skills?
His point man on the Sheppard file, Gordon Chong, produced a report that suggested (however dubiously) it could be done, provided Ford was willing to consider using various "revenue tools" to raise the money. Ford refused, and continued on with his belief that the magical money fairy would rain funding from the sky to pay for it. He continued to sound the horn for subways, but refused to consider any reasonable plan to pay for it.
When even his allies on Council from Scarborough, realizing that his "plan" was going to fail, tried, in the last couple of days, to get him to consider even modest measures to raise revenues, which may have been able to sway enough votes to his side - he refused again.
Council was essentially left with 2 choices:
-an LRT line, that, while perhaps not ideal, would be fully-funded, would serve a wider swath of the City, and based on reasonable projections of future population growth in those areas, was at least supportable, or
-extending the Sheppard subway 2 stops, at most, with no plan to pay for that construction, or any future subway growth, and absolutely no willingess to consider any options to use revenue tools to raise the funds to pay for it. Instead, the "plan" was to build it and hope the money will come. - ironically, the very thing that a true conservative would be horrified to hear. Oh and this Sheppard extension would barely do much for folks in Scarborough, unless you happened to leave somewhere near Sheppared and Victoria Park (I guesss it would get you to Johnny's hamburgers more easily), let alone anywhere in the City.
Despite all the rhetoric, misinformation, half-truths and flat out lies, mostly from the Ford side of the debate, that, and the risk of losing the Provincial money already committed if a decision wasn't made soon, was the decision facing Council. Under the circumstances, it was a more than reasonable result.
I know Ford apologists will not want to hear this, but at the end of the day, Ford is the reason the subway side lost. Simple as that. Not because anyone is out to get him, but because he he's too stupid, ignorant and arrogant to lead Council on this file. He thought he could just bully Councillors into voting with him, instead of doing the work to show it could be done, and refusing to open his mind to options that would enable him to get to the result he wanted (i.e. a funded Sheppard subway plan). That, David, is poor leadership, no matter how you look at it.
If the "subway" side had a different advocate, the vote may very well have turned out differently. Ford is truly his own worst enemy now.
I assume you're some entitled Toronto elitist whiner who's never actually taken LRT. Judging by your rhetoric, I would go further and assume you're a car driver.
In Calgary -- where I went to university -- the modal split for commuters is about 50 per cent taking the LRT, 30 per cent car drivers, 20 per cent "others." This video is where I got that statistic. http://blog.calgarymayor.ca/2012/01/video-mayor-nenshis-2012-state-of-city.html
Could you elaborate on how stupid those fuckers in Calgary are for taking the LRT please?
Was your helmet fit to size?
Now don't screw it up, please!
Also, subways will provide MUCH more economic development for Scarborough, and that's an indisputable fact. Stop sugar-coating fancy streetcars.
Follow me here.
The Chong report was a preliminary report on the feasibility of a subway and the potential revenue tools that can be used. It was not a plan - that was to come after the Chong report. Problem is city council rushed a surprise vote last month purposely so that they could vote without a Ford plan. In addition, councilors voted today to defer the Subway/LRT vote to the Fall but that didn't pass. They denied him the time to make one.
It was not that Ford who had no plan, it was that city councilors did not give him the time to make a plan. He was supposed to use the Chong report to help with an overall plan, but he couldn't thanks to council.
I lived on Sheppard, I should know. The ONLY reason those 25-30 condos were built in the last 12 years is because of the subway. Anyone that says otherwise is wrong.
Also, you're ignoring the fact that every single poll done (even the skewed Toronto Star poll) said the taxpayers preferred subways.
Council saw his bet and raised it with concerted action and an actual plan of their own. Ford could have come out of this a winner and instead he came out a whiner.
"David I'm confused there are dozens of condos in liberty village and along king street ... but I can't seem to find the subway that has caused them all to be built. I see a streetcar, but no subway."
Oh, man, David. You're dumb! If you live in Liberty Village & King W, you're within walking distance of pretty much anything. And, even if you take the street car to the downtown core, it only takes 15 min. Even if you added a subway in this location, there wouldn't be much added benefit.
Contrast that with Scarborough where nothing is within walking distance. You either take your car or the TTC. If you want to go downtown, it takes 1.5 hours. LRT isn't going to do much to reduce the commute, and you still have to wait outside in the freezing cold.
Ford started when he appointed Gordon Chong to draw up a report on the feasibility of the Sheppard subway. The plan was to made following the completion of the report. Council did a surprise attack before Ford had enough time to make a plan. It really is a shame because they denied the residents of Toronto a nice new subway.
To suggest that LRT is just as attractive to developers as subways is so stupid.
In Calgary -- where I went to university -- the modal split for commuters is about 50 per cent taking the LRT, 30 per cent car drivers, 20 per cent "others." This video is where I got that statistic. http://blog.calgarymayor.ca/2012/01/video-mayor-nenshis-2012-state-of-city.html
They're currently expanding the C-Train LRT system to the west. One of my friends is very excited for it to come near his house -- he's stoked that he won't have to pay for parking and he can use the LRT to mess around on his phone from the comfort of the train.
Please explain to me why my friend and Calgarians are fucking idiots who don't understand how a world-class transit system works.
So you're saying that Ford is so out of touch that the FACT that the Metrolinx MOU expires at the end of March is a surprise?
Why are you defending him, then?
wow, you left nut hacks are literally insane. After St. Clair, still supporting a system that will literally top out in maybe more than a decade...and why? just because you hate the mayor...insane.
TORONTO NEEDS MORE SUBWAYS
But what the hell kind of urban planning would get a subway on a street with little density at all? That's just so stupid. Toronto needs a Downtown Relief Line, nit a Sheppard Subway extention. Growth should be encouraged closer to the city centre. - its better for the environment, stimulates growth better especially for the local economy, its cheaper to run a dense, compact city, etc etc. The benefits are endless. It is NOT the answer to build a subway so far off the city centre and it is NOT the answer to bring such expensive and expansive infrasctructure in an area that doesnt need it.
It was posted above already, but I'm going to post it again to drive the point home:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k86lBV5824
Everyone else doesn't have a clue what the people of Scarborough go through in terms of their daily commute.
You can't consider his adovocacy of subways without considering the cost matter. Remember, this is the Mayor who claimed there was billions of hidden waste contained in the City budget, only to hire consultants who found nothing of the sort. ford is also the guy who claimed that private money would fully fund any proposed expansion of the Sheppard subway, but of course, had nothing to back this up. Again, I turn to Chong's report, which optimistically suggested that maybe 60% of teh proposed expansion might be funded through development charges, provided you can find developers willing to pay them.
Remember, Ford met with those developers, and claimed they all supported subways but neglected to mention to they had no desire to pay for them.
If it makes you feel better to blame Council, then that's your right, but Ford has had ample opportunity to at least show a willingness to consider other options (i.e. revenue tools) and he has consistently refused to do so. How do you expect Councillors in this climate to vote in favour of an infracture project that will cost billions of dollars, without anything resembling a plan to fund it?
Instead of spending his time formulating a plan to persuade Councillors to his point of view, he instead spent it marching up and down Scarborough screaming that people wanted subways (while conveniently ignoring the issue of how to pay for them), making patently false statements about LRTs (and his down Sheppared expansion plans, for that matter) and disparaging anyone who had a different point of view than his. Despite the efforts of others, including many of his allies, he wouldn't even consider any options to pay for it, that might've helped him win votes. Even Stintz way back when was trying to formulate a plan with other Councillors that would give him subway expansion in Scarborough without completely gutting Transit City - once again, he refused to consider it.
So to address your point - more time wouldn't have made any difference. If anything, he probably would've lost more voters.
Ford has been a fundamental failure as Mayor because he is ill-equipped to lead. He's in over his head, and hopefully the voters of this City will realize that come the next election.
I think we now need to focus our efforts on creating a model of sustainable funding for transit expansion so that we're not in this situation of waiting for a provincial handout to do anything. If Ford wants to show he's a real leader, that's where he'll put his efforts. After all, Transit City should not be the end of things, in terms of transit expansion - we can't just expand in 20 year spurts. It has to be an ongoing process.
NYC density: 10,429.6/km2 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City)
Toronto density: 4,149/km2 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto)
Sheppard density: This requires some math. https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.toronto.ca%2Flegdocs%2Fmmis%2F2012%2Fcc%2Fbgrd%2FCC20_1_app3_14.pdf
Go to slide 9. Now 1 hectare = 0.01 km^2 (http://www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ix=iea&ie=UTF-8&ion=1#hl=en&safe=off&sclient=psy-ab&q=hectare%20to%20square%20kilmoteres&oq=&aq=&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=&pbx=1&fp=bd2f2ed89ed4cbea&ix=iea&ion=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&biw=1618&bih=889).
I'm going to spitball here. But the density over the whole proposed Sheppard Subway corridor appears to be, at best, between 2500-5000 km^2. And it's probably closer to a lower number than the higher range. Downtown's density is closer to above 25000/km^2
Calgary density: 1,329.0/km (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calgary)
Anyway, what I'm trying to point out here is that Sheppard's density is closer to Calgary's than it is to NYC's or Tokyo's. Sorry.
I recently went from the TTC to driving to work because the TTC is such a piece of disorganized, outdated junk. And I'm actually saving money.
How's that for sad?
Hopefully all the subway supporters realize that Sheppard has nowhere near the density required for a subway, and it is not projected to have that density for decades. So even if you did magically find the money for the subway, it would still operate at a loss for at least the next few decades. So remember that your taxes would have to go up to pay to keep it operating. By the time it has the density required for a subway we will probably have a new form of mass transit anyway. 40 to 50 years is a very long time in terms of technology.
Rob Ford: go beat your tribal hate war drums somewhere else.
Maybe we'll be rid of you shortly - or you can focus on reducing labour costs.
I don't think I am going to be able to convince you with mere facts anyway, but you do know that the Chong report called for extra taxes (in the form of parking fees, road tolls, property tax increase, etc.) to fund the subway? Also, it required development fees, and no developer was willing to pay them.
I think the fundamental difference between Ford supporters and everyone else is that Ford supporters don't use transit. They wanted a subway or nothing because both options are fine to them. Everyone that actually uses transit though wanted something, so a subway that had no funding and was never going to be built was much worse than an LRT for the rest of us.
Oh also, if Toronto ever wants to be a world-class city, the transit system needs an entire overhaul.
Carry on, David.
way to kill your own argument.
I LIVED in that neighborhood! I know what's going on.
Are you saying that it is just a mere coincidence that all the condos all of a sudden got built right when the subway was built?
Oh brother.
Toronto is a WORLD CLASS city. We don't deserve 2nd class transit. Why spend all that money and half-ass it? Get the shovels in the ground and dig! Build those 2 subway stops and the rest money will come eventually. Whether it's from taxes/levies, public/private partnerships, or additional government money, it will come.
Scarborough has been waiting DECADES for a subway. To hand them a shitty 2nd class transit system is a huge slap in the face the taxpayers of Scarborough. The downtowners need to WAKE UP!
Just because you WANT it doesn't mean its feasible.
Mr Ford is becoming a lame-duck mayor that he might as well sit down and be quiet. He's a barrier to progress
1) THE MAYOR actually tried to ride a bike once. I made enough cash extracting it to have new twin diesels installed in my yacht. I can tell you this because the non disclosure agreement expired recently and THE MAYOR is desperate for new talking points to distract from his humiliating defeat.
2) THE MAYOR doesn't really hate street cars...just the people who ride them. I know this because the stress created from all that hate requires me to personally excavate his bowels twice a day since the booze that used to accomplish this massive undertaking all seems to go to his fat head now.
Paid for by the Committee to Support Bloated Drunk Conservative Hack Politicians No Matter How Ludicrous or Imbecilic Their Half Baked Ideas Are.
It's an incredibly valid question...
waiting for your genuis
Anyway, if the other people of Toronto like LRTs so much, as a resident of Scarborough I propose letting Scarborough be(returning to buses on Sheppard) and giving all of the trasportation funding to the west end and Central Toronto. It will be much better for Scarborough, for the west end and central Toronto - not so much.
It's just a shame most of the site frequenters are downtown NDP'ers.
Anyhow - just a general note, I get that lrt's and streetcars are technically different things. But, for the majority of people - they look the same and more or less act the same. I think it would actually be to the benefit of most arguments to say they are the same - tell the people in Scarborough that they too can have Queen Street West, College Street, and King Street. The best parts of our city exist because streetcars run along them, not the opposite. So why on earth are people fighting tooth and nail to differentiate these things from streetcars? Besides, it's probably quite infuriating to be shown what's essentially a streetcar - and be told that no, this is something utterly and completely different from a streetcar. It's like being told a car isn't a car just because it has a higher speed limit than other cars - it's madness.
Toronto is different from Calgary, and LRT is not right for Toronto. I can not believe the idiocy that went on in council today. This is 2012, not 1912! Why we are building glorified streetcars in the year 2012 is beyond me. This an archaic mode of transportation that's going to RUIN Scarborough. The residents said they don't want an LRT and would rather have nothing. Of course, the nanny state left wingers wouldn't listen.
What a shame.
http://www.toronto.ca/involved/projects/sheppard_east_lrt/faq.htm#q11
Lest you missed my point, let me put it simply: WE CAN'T AFFORD SUBWAYS! In case you're still scratching your head, here it is again: WE CAN'T AFFORD SUBWAYS! Unless you know of some magic way to come up with the billions of dollars needed, I'm afraid your arguments don't hold any water.
A - it gets a few thousand people per square kilometer more and welcome the demolition of single-family homes and strip malls to make room for condos and townhouses to make that possible;
or B - is willing to pay a hefty tax hike to pay for trains and stations that are empty most of the time.
Pick one.
-The Mayor wants subeays
-TTC GM Andy Byford wants subways
-The 6 Scarborough LIBERAL MPPs want subways
-ALL the PC MPPs want subways
-The PRIME MINISTER wants subways
And most importantly, the taxpaying citizens of Toronto want subways.
Democracy may have won on council, but when you look at it as a whole, the people who want subways FAR outweigh the people want LRT. The citizens (and higher level of government) have spoken.
Just because subways are not affordable at the present time does not make LRTs into a good thing. The two issues are *independent*. The two issues are being linked because of political subterfuge. Don't think that there aren't special interests at work, Transit City already says that Bombardier would be the exclusive monopoly provider of LRT cars.
I think for instance that express buses would be much better than LRTs, why have something that creates congestion for everyone else when you can have buses which don't require hundreds of millions of infrastructure to make work.
we're a 2nd class city, albeit a nice one which i love, that is trying very hard to learn to (finally) join the big boys... however, we have a humongous host of issues to chomp through first (besides transit, i can think of: affordable housing, a proper plan for development and densification, attracting businesses, getting our fair share of provincial/federal tax money, developing some more culture).
i mean, i love toronto but for lordy's sake it's no new york, paris, munich, goteburg, amsterdam, london, tokyo, singapore, or even chicago. all those places have their ducks more in a row than we do.
I'm sure Bayview Village doesn't hurt either. To suggest that the ONLY reason condos
exist on Sheppard is because of the subway is laughable.
Regarding this whole debate - The conflict is over the philosophy of what a "street" is. A more nuanced view of the world these days doesn't treat our urban space as a conduit. It's not as Rob Ford said today about getting from A to B, people should really start thinking about the quality of the experience getting there. That's way I ride my bike. I care about what it's like to interact with the city, and what kind of place I want to live. LRT is the right choice because it's better for the quality of the street life, and that's what good cities have. Great cities aren't about zooming past them in your car. If you hate cities, maybe there is somewhere else you should live. Those of us who love cities are trying to make them more liveable.
Street parking is what ruins LRTs on St Clair. In places there are 2 whole lanes of cars that are stationary - essentially blocking the road. That wouldn't fly in any other densely populated city.
The one good idea that came out of the Ford camp is a parking tax. Miller blew it big time with the vehicle registration tax he implemented. Penalizing Toronto taxpayers while letting 905'ers clog up our roads for free was a big mistake.
Of course, Toronto politics are so dysfunctional that if anything gets built it will be a freaking miracle.
There is a TON of space along Sheppard - for the most part - to widen the road to accommodate the LRT. They're already working just east of Kennedy, and can do that now, while putting the underpass in.
Cost wise, the only way subways would have worked, was if the council (and we know this would never happen...) would have ALL taken pay cuts ... cut the Mayor's salary down to $99,000, and cut councilors down to $59,000.
Cut the TTC wages for collectors, and maintenance by 20% - no collector needs $25+/hr. Cut outside and inside workers wages. Reduce office budgets for Councillors by $10,000 and we MAY be able to afford the subway by 2030.
You forgot Tim Hudak wants subways!
Forget under Harris they wasted $100-million cancelling and the Eglinton-West Subway Project. Actually spending money filling up a hole! But he sure wants subways now.
The thing is, everyone would take subways if offered. But the transit plan voted on today is best for all Torontonians. Not just the people in Scarberia (Which I commute to everyday).
Why do you hate the rest of the city? You know, the people that won't get a decent transit option for probably decades after a mess like Ford wanted to pass...
Deal with it, it's done.
- The Mayor wants subeays
-TTC GM Andy Byford wants subways
-The 6 Scarborough LIBERAL MPPs want subways
-ALL the PC MPPs want subways
-The PRIME MINISTER wants subways
Well I want a subway to my door too. But Ford's buddy Harper didn't offer to pony up $1 billion buck when he made the his quip about wanting subways. And Ford didn't attempt to get the province to pony up the money, even though he's had two year to do so. He's failed at his quest - heck, he wouldn't even endorse his own man Chong's recommendation to implement surcharges or taxes to pay for his socalled plan. In any case, LRTs are better options for these parts of the City. The current Sheppard subway is only at 15% of capacity v. 100% plus for the Yonge and Bloor lines, so if money should go to a subway, it should be for a downtown relief line. Ford should try taking the St. Clair streetcar (not LRT) which does run it its own right of way. He might be pleasantly surprised. And I'm willing to be that the people who're on it don't hate it, as he purports.
Anyone know why Moeser didn't vote? Is he sick or something?
I suggest that in the future, we remove the subway tracks in the Sheppard tunnels and replace them with LRT so that we can have one seamless ride all the way from Scarborough to Downsview. That would be world-class and would befit the density on Sheppard (though judging from David's comments, perhaps I'm underestimating the density on Sheppard). Then we can use the current Sheppard cars on the downtown relief line.
But I re-affirm my point: Of the 25-30 condos that were built, maybe only a quarter of them would have still been built without a subway. Subways = economic development. LRT = closed business (see St. Clair).
Ahem. Since you seem to forget because it was all of 15 months ago, Rob Ford was elected mayor on exactly the platform of living within our means and not having a vision for the future besides saving money today. That was his vision. Period. It was David Miller, George Smitherman, Joe Pantalone who wanted to invest in the future, but Rob Ford would have none of it. Actually, Miller, Smitherman, and Pantalone also wanted to live within our means, but with an eye for the future. Ford and no eye for anything except stopping the "gravy train". Now he wants to build one, with no eye toward the bottom line, and you all defend him. Hilarious.
With Public/private partnerships, sensible taxes/levys, and potentially more government funding, we can have a subway to STC within a decade.
Anyways, what is this "Why do you hate the rest of the city?" hogwash? Do you mean the rest of the city that already has transit? Scarborough has been waiting for a subway for decades. It's time to deliver that to them instead of 2nd rate LRT. In fact, after all the clamoring for a subway, these streetcars are a slap in the face to the citizens of Scarborough.
Of course, for the best evidence that subways do not in any way shape or form necessarily lead to major development, one need look no further than the Spadina extension. Still waiting for those condos to be built around Wilson, Yorkdale, or Glencairn. Yorkdale in particular is situated in an utterly sleepy area of detached houses with absolutely no development of any kind. All the apartment buildings and development (to the extent it has happened) is over on Bathurst.
I should also add that as one who frequently has to wait 20 minutes or more for a Wilson bus to York Mills station, the utter neglect in this debate of improved bus service is quite galling. Why we should spend $1bn to offer Victoria Park and Sheppard a subway station - and continue to swallow even greater Sheppard subway operating losses - when service is often so inadequate elsewhere in the network is beyond me.
But then Rob Ford and his ilk only take transit for PR stunts or to be seen to be "listening" to the "People". Perhaps Ford would like to commute downtown via transit from Bathurst and Wilson for a month.
(Oh, and Scarborough Town Centre already has the RT - soon to be replaced by grade-separated LRT like the Eglinton tunnel - which goes directly to Kennedy. Why should be build a subway to a mall?)
I should add, David, that you might have a different perspective had you ever had the experience of waiting for a Bayview bus in the November rain after transferring off the pointless stubway. I don't fucking care about Rob Ford's claims about what the "People" want. I know I don't want a mayor and "administration" who actually tried to cut TTC operating funding.
Buses have less capacity and actually take up more space than any LRV. And in contrast to rail, they are incredibly bumpy and uncomfortable.
This entire debate is that the plan for Transit City was voted on
And Passed by council in 2009. Why does the next Mayor get to reopen it?
Does that mean that every time we have an election we go back and Re-vote everything? This entire process has been a horrible stain on our city. This Mayor is trying to pit the suburbs vs downtown so he can get re-elected. Well it won't work. Torontoians from Etobicoke to North York to Scarborough are not that stupid. Council listened to it constituants and did the right thing. Toronto and Scarborough will be better off with LRT's.
But maybe you might.
Greater London density 4,932/km2
Toronto has 2.5 subways lines, the Scarborough RT, and commuter trains that mostly run in rush hour only, and the busiest highway in North America. London has a bad highway system, but it has 11 subway lines + the Docklands Light Railway + the Overground + many frequent commuter train lines + a tiny light rail system which isn't very important. Light rail might be suitable for minor feeder lines like St Clair but given that Eglinton/401/Sheppard/Highway 7 etc. are massively congested at all times of day a suburb to suburb subway is badly needed to get drivers off the roads and light rail is totally inadequate.
Hi Jay,
Blob and Rug asked me to tell you your cheque for 2 cents is waiting to be picked up. They know you had your heart set on something you believed was commensurate with your experience as a noted fart catcher but after this fiasco you should be thankful that's all your getting from these guys. They're hot enough to hump. As their proctologist I can tell you these two aholes have been reamed to the max and they've reached their limit. You'd be well advised to have someone pick up your pay unless you'd like Rug to introduce you to his brother's tunnel where "the sun don't shine".
Do you remember in Independence day when the guy survived the aliens because he was in the subway? I'm pretty sure that's worth it to add a tiny amount of underground subway. I mean, think of the people in scarborough. They're people too. ALL THE PEOPLE IN TORONTO WANT SCARBOROUGH TO BE SAVED! I definitely want my tax dollars to go to a subway for scarborough.
Money? Didn't you hear me?? ALIEN ATTACK people!! A street car isn't going to protect you from aliens… Subways and Will Smith are!
... care to explain how LRT will be more expensive to maintain?
The TTC report that Ford requested then suppressed said we're paying $250 million per year maintaining our existing subway lines.
Have you been in any of the existing subway stations lately? A rather large number are practically falling apart... many don't have proper accessibility for wheelchairs + strollers... oh and the ones which do have elevators don't have them working much of the time... or maybe that's what you mean by cheap... build it and then just let it fall apart.
On top of all of that... add the millions per year subsidizing subway that will run well below capacity for decades if not forever... again cheap?
Do you remember in Independence day when the guy survived the aliens because he was in the subway? I'm pretty sure that's worth it to add a tiny amount of underground subway. I mean, think of the people in scarborough. They're people too. ALL THE PEOPLE IN TORONTO WANT SCARBOROUGH TO BE SAVED! I definitely want my tax dollars to go to a subway for scarborough.
Money? Didn't you hear me?? ALIEN ATTACK people!! A street car isn't going to protect you from aliens… Subways and Will Smith are!
Do you remember in Independence day when the guy survived the aliens because he was in the subway? I'm pretty sure that's worth it to add a tiny amount of underground subway. I mean, think of the people in scarborough. They're people too. ALL THE PEOPLE IN TORONTO WANT SCARBOROUGH TO BE SAVED! I definitely want my tax dollars to go to a subway for scarborough.
Money? Didn't you hear me?? ALIEN ATTACK people!! A street car isn't going to protect you from aliens… Subways and Will Smith are!
It also makes no sense at all to say LRTs destroy local businesses. Can you see shops when you're underground? No. Do further spaced apart stations help you find things better than being able too see the street? No. Surface rail is better for spurring local businesses and if you care to argue take a look at Harbourfront, Queen, Spadina, Dundas, Roncesvalles, Parliament, and College and compare that to existing subways, especially your beloved Sheppard subway.
Your arguments are so invalid I question where you get your information from - the Sun?
i know you are slow and all, but we would not be burying a lrt if harris did not cancel that subway. We would not be arguing to completely bury it not all the way to STC.
Maybe they're talking about the areas of the city which have the density to pack larger vehicles during rush hour TODAY aka Queen + King... you know where there is density NOW to support subway vs. areas that have nothing close to that sort of ridership today and probably never will... but don't worry guys... we have a magical money tree... blow tens of millions per year subsidizing half empty trains... no problem... we obviously don't have anything better to spend our money on... infuriating.
Unfortunately It's more of a Rob Ford circlejerk around here. That's the shame. Never two-sided arguements. Just fat RoFo jokes as consolidation for losing Smitherman. Keepin' it classy!
I'll quickly mention that if a city can't afford subways, the correct approach is to not settle for LRT. It's amazing how so many people want LRT because it's cheaper and will be built faster so that LRT supporters can get to and from work faster. This issue is bigger than all of you folks. Subways, LRT's; they won't affect myself one way or the other but I see the bigger picture and a looong time from now when you and I are 6 feet under the city will regret its decision. No money? Then wait.
When you buy a house you want you get it. If it's too much you wait. If it's too much you don't get the cheaper one you saw earlier in the week that you didn't like because you know you'll have to fix it up in a few years. You guys are so near-sighted it's more funny than anything else.
Now carry on with the Ford weight jokes. It's what you folks are best at, or perhaps second best at next to complaining :)
You need a few more doubles there, you sound like one of Blob's high school dropout sidekicks. What's the matter...are Blob and Rug hogging all the booze at your pity party?
BTW...where's Mammo? Why didn't he vote today? Is it my imagination or does Blob look like he's gained about 240 lbs in his ass since yesterday?
Is that classy enough for you?
I really think the divide on this issue is between people who currently use the TTC and those who don't because if you used it regularly you would understand how desparately we need to get something built. And I'm not saying just build anything. LRT is the right choice for Sheppard with the funds we have available and the vast scope of the transit that needs to be built across the whole city. There is so much that needs to be done and so little money. We can't spend what little we have to create density, we need to serve the density that already exists.
Please READ this and learn about LRT, before you open up your mouth again.
Showing historical flip-flopping is a great way to illustrate how flawed our "leaders" are. They go where the wind blows.
By the way David, what do you think of the federal Conservatives' latest attack ads on Bob Rae that go after his time in the Premier's office even longer ago? Are those OK?
I'd just like to know who the developers are that Ford promised the subways to, and what was in that deal. You KNOW that's what is behind all this, right?
1. Actually the Sheppard line does run under capacity and has to be subsidized to the tune of $7 to $10 million every year... aka money that could be better used in beefing up other more deserving areas of the system.
2. Uhhhh when I said WILL "run well below capacity for decades if not forever" obviously I was talking about the non existent subways we're debating here.
"The Subway Stations do need to a face-lift, but I don't understand what that has to do with this debate?"
It's relevant because this notion that LRT is expensive to maintain + somehow subway is cheaper = 100% BS... this isn't set it and forget it from an infomercial... there are tons of really expensive costs involved with keeping a subway system properly maintained.
"I think a lot of people are voting against the Subways because they don't like their mayor"
Well or the mayor made the choice "fully funded LRT that we can literally start building tomorrow" vs. a subway "plan" with no money to pay for it... and in areas where density might never justify that kind of expenditure thus bleeding millions from the rest of the system for decades servicing half empty trains.
"Everything that is outside in Canada all year gets worn down and becomes expensive to maintain in the long run."
Again have you seen the subway lines that we have at the moment? It's amazing how millions of individuals are somehow able to maintain cars which much of the time only service one person but that same sort of expenditure spread over thousands of riders in a year is just crazy + wasteful?
Sometimes I'm amazed how I'm able to deal with my car when I don't have extra vehicles on hand like the TTC and mechanics on hand like the TTC... maybe I'm just a miracle worker?
"The capacity of a Subway train is well above what a streetcar can handle."
I'm sure you realize that the capacity of an LRT train is well above what a streetcar can handle + actually appropriate for the areas we're talking about with their current density AND for future projected density.
Honestly it amazes me how so many people pushing subway in the burbs consider themselves to be "conservative"... if we are going put out huge money for subway put it where the density EXISTS TODAY... that's right no guessing about whether we might be subsidizing the line forever... a downtown relief subway line would open with enough riders to subsidize other parts of the system that are nowhere near capacity... it would also reduce congestion on the existing Yonge + Bloor lines thus making the commute easier for the people using connecting modes aka the new LRT lines.
Subways or nothing is bad idea. Toronto can afford to build a subway on Sheppard, but it would be a poor use of resources to do so. Since transit planning and government decisions are about choosing where best to spend that money, and it has been studied how much capacity Sheppard requires, and what infrastructure costs, it has been decided that an LRT is the better choice. Please have a look at ridership, and which capacity each technology is designed to move. Lots of specific locations and places, in Toronto, and around the world, don't have the need for 30,000 people per hour capacity, and never will. Lots of areas of the city only have the need for less than 3,000 people per hour. In-between, there is LRT.
In terms of growth and density- have a look at the "Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe", the Toronto Official Plan, and Metrolinx "The Big Move". Educate yourself on the policies that are geared toward future expansion of the city, and realize that certain areas of the city are "neighbourhoods" that are actually protected from significant growth.
Not everywhere in the city is going to grow. How do the planners know this? Because they have created by-laws that restrict development in those locations. If the pro Sheppard subway advocates want to grow the heck out of eastern Toronto, you're going to have to get the Provincial government to change their the planning framework, and then re-write the Toronto official plan, and change the by-laws. That's not going to happen, and without those changes - no significant growth is going to be permitted in a stable, low density, zoned as "neighbourhood" area of the city - and nor should it be directed there, I think you'd find that the people of Scarborough don't want it. It's time to call this bluff for what it is.
http://fordfortoronto.mattelliott.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/lrtsubways2.png
http://www.toronto.ca/planning/official_plan/pdf_chapter1-5/chapters1_5_dec2010.pdf
Oh, and when it comes to fixing this Ferrari you're going to get probed in the bum because it's going to cost an arm and a leg. (did no one read the financial analysis report?
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v176/JeffLow/default1/YongeFinchPlazaYongeStreetatFinchca1972Avenuelookingswatthenwcorner.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v176/JeffLow/default1/YongeFinchPlazaYongeStreetatFinchca1972Avenuelookingswatthenwcorner.jpg
If you think about it, if we did have a subway built now, there would also be a bus on service only because the subway wouldn't stop at every stop, which is redundant. Why put unnecessary service? In the long run this will cost more taxpayers money, just to hold up the bus or subway. Where as the LRT has its own designated line and the only thing that is slowing it down is traffic lights. Not to mention, only one service is running through that line.
Honestly, both of them are a bad idea right now because there isn't a full proof design, there are too many flaws with it but if you had to pick one now, I can only see the LRT working. Trust me I would love a subway more than the LRT only because Toronto's infrastructure is severely messed up and if building new modes of transportation is needed, it should be built underground.
Fortunately, I think the Sheppard line will run like the Spadina line. Only because there are a lot of room with Sheppard. St.Clair is just some bullshit excuse people use. Guys, there is a reason why Scarborough is considered the suburbs, not Downtown Toronto.
Lastly, i would love it if they do a fusion of both LRT and Subway, what i mean is that they have some areas built underground but only have the LRT running. Replace the subways in the already built sheppard line with LRTs that way people don't have to transfer from Subway to LRT. Have a smooth transition. Just an idea.
And really, I think that's been the plan, and Ford's motivation, all along. He almost certainly made some promises to developers, in exchange for ???
I'm all for his subway, but it should be waaay down the list of priorities. DRL first.
Also, do you realize Rob Ford is a king in Scarborough and Etobicoe? You can't win Toronto without winning any wards in those two parts, and Rob Ford has that vote sealed up.
We have enough money to build 2-3 subway stops. Do the right thing and get the shovels in the ground.
Also, there's no proof LRT destroys businesses? JUST LOOK AT ST. CLAIR! Many stores closed because they were practically inaccessible. Do we want to St. Clairize the rest of the city as well?
lololololol
You guys are all saying we need LRT NOW. We need to provide a better means of transit NOW. We need to give the residents of Eastern Scarborough out to Meadowvale transit NOW.
Well that's all fine and dandy but what about the future? Subways will better provide what we're seeking here (better transit) for the next 100+ years. LRT will do so for 20 years. When the inevitable happens and the LRT gets torn down in 2-3 decades I'm going to be looking back on this day shaking my head. There's no foresight and no intelligent planning in this city. The whole purpose of this vapid exercise by city councilors was to stick it to Rob Ford, not City Building. It's disgusting.
Yep, construction is hard on businesses. And once construction is over, it's all good, as we'll see on St. Clair.
And by the way, subway construction is even more disruptive than LRT.
Also the Sheppard line would have been built the other way, so as well you dont have a sense of direction, or where anything in the city is, for that matter.
The St Clair line is thriving now and it was some construction issues that caused trouble there. You probably dont even know what its like there, because transit runs well effortlessly.
And no, sorry but LRT will sure as hell last longer than 20 years. Maintenence costs are cheaper not to mention they run on electricity so no need to worry about diesel prices. If you really think Sheppard is going to be some busy metropolis in 100 years your are mistaken. If the city does well it will be more dense and compact, not trying to live off the suburbs. Which means as well, you know nothing about urban planning.
The last thing (for now) is that the downtown, with it's actual population, DOESNT have adequate subway support, with CityPlace, King West, Liberty Village, and other areas becoming more dense. Which reiterates, again, that you really dont know the city well if you think that Sheppard has more people in need of an extra subway than downtown.
Um, read the Toronto Official Plan. The density is being directed downtown by zoning regulations and provincial policies. Proposing that billions of dollars of investment will magically appear in Scarborough is in complete contradiction to the development process. Developer money follows the planning policy guidelines. Until you understand buildings don't appear at random and magically in a few months, you're just going to continue to embarrass yourself with foolish assertions about the future.
unless you find money, you just get what you can afford.
Thank you David, for walking right into it.
St. Clair was a mess because it sits in the middle of a dense neighbourhood. Sheppard was not as bad because it's sparsely populated and there's tons of room for ... dedicated right-of-way LRT.
If the subway construction didn't choke off Sheppard, LRT construction won't either.
Moreover, if an area is so wide open that subway construction doesn't affect traffic, maybe that area should not be priority #1 for new subways. Dig?
his number are dropping here in Etobicoke, because he has not done one damn things for us since he took office. And we are so sick of him yelling about scarboro, he seems to forget where his bread is buttered.
I'd agree with you... where the density justifies it. Right now (and for the foreseeable future barring some extensive zoning changes and demolition work), there's no business case for extending a line that we already subsidize to the tune of $8 / rider into a less-dense area of the city. None.
Why do we pay so much? Because very few people who live on the Sheppard line right now is choosing to take the subway over their car. Subways aren't used for people to go to and from leisure activities; they're used for people going to and from WORK. And unless you work at the mall or NYGH, there's no reason to take the Sheppard line.
Now, extend that eastwards. How many employment hubs are there in that direction? Not many. And we already know that people merely leaving their homes and taking the Sheppard line to downtown aren't enough to sustain it.
I want more subways in this city. We desperately need a DRL. We likely need another north-south line. We just don't need a line on Sheppard, no matter what trolling arguments are parroted this week.
That would be more efficient because the entire city has an easy access to Eglington which means more people would use it.
But reality hits you and money becomes an issue. And sadly people living east of the STC won't benefit from the Subway but may have to pay for it and will still have to make do with the bus.
I however will sympathize for them. As I am a Tax payer that lives close to Islington and the Westway, been having hard times and had to sell my car to keep my house. I could tell you right now that I would love to take ANYthing other than a bus to bloor or have to take one accross Lawrence to Yonge. If im lucky I might get an Eglington LRT to Jane by the time im 65 and ready to retire. (As Im not counting my chickens with the Finch LRT dream)
So yes, my Scarborough neighbours (who live before of close to the STC) Demand your right for a subway! And hopefully my grandchildren (and those non-unionized tax payers who live east of the STC) will be smart and move over there because if they will have to pay for it they might as well be able to use it!!!
This debate of LRT vs Subway was redundant way over a year ago. I think we all can agree that a subway would be nice. But I believe the mayor has mistaken in his plan for the future.
My only question that am still not clear on conserning the LRT is that, Would our surface LRT routes bypass red lights like they do in other cities?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BrsbAVNrIU
Etobicoke + Scarborough = 22 wards
So you can really run council with support from either area if the local councillors are willing to give it. That's probably going to change after the next redistribution. The population of Central-South Toronto has been growing faster than the rest of the city as condomania ensues.
People losing their businesses, people going broke, and people getting their livelihood slashed is "all good" you say?
Oh man.
Also no, maintenance costs for LRT are HIGHER than subways. And another thing you got wrong: The population of Sheppard is growing every year with all the new immigrants. The suburbs are getting more and more populated.
Just because you say things over and over again doesn't make them true you pinko kook.
Unlike when the subway was constructed, you will HAVE TO close down lanes of Sheppard. It's IMPOSSIBLE to built an LRT without doing so. To suggest that LRT construction will be the same as subway in terms of being disruptive t0 traffic is factually incorrect.
Is it so hard to realize that planning for NOW instead of the future will be detrimental to our beloved city? Even now, NOBODY in Scarborough wants streetcars going down the middle of the street. It's an archaic mode of transportation. I fired off an e-mail to Mr. Mcguinty explaining this to him, and I hope he pulls funding for city council's big mistake.
The PC MPPs want subways, Mcguinty's own Liberal MPPs want subways, the Prime Minister wants subways, and the residents of Scarborough want subways. Premier Dad should do something good for once and realize a big mistake like LRT shouldn't be made just because a few whack-job councilors wanted to stick it to Mayor Ford.
Some of us require hard evidence. Not sound bites and bs 'what might be, or might not be' in order to determine where a billion dollars should go. LRT is more expensive than subways to maintain? Post the link, I'm sure we'd all be happy to agree with you if anything you said was coming from any kind of expert consensus and not out of your ass.
I would to address this statement. I know LRT's make more sense, you know Subways make more sense. We aren't going to agree on that one.
I want to know why you think that councilors like Parker, Luby, Stintz, Chin Lee, Bailao, Peruzza are trying to stick it to ford. these guys are people who have voted with Ford on almost everything. lets just start with those 6 because they aren't mushy middle. they are right wing. why, in your opinion, are they trying to stick it to Ford?
If you look at the downtown subway
It is just one loop
I dont know where you get the idea that a subway is easier to maintain and operate than LRTs, BUT HELLO THERE ARE TUNNELS, STATIONS AND EXTRA STAFF, MORE COMPLEX MECHANICS AND FUEL. COME ON.
And no, there population in Sheppard is NOT growing faster than downtown Toronto. Read any study, any statistic or maybe you don't know how.
And again, i should reiterate (even though you don't seem to like that, yet it seems to take persistence to remotely get anything across) THAT SMART URBAN PLANNING CONSISTS OF CREATING A SMALLER, MORE DENSE CITY BY FOCUSING ON THE INNER, DOWNTOWN PARTS OF IT. NOT INVESTING IN EXPENSIVE INFRASTRUCTURE WHERE LESS PEOPLE WILL RIDE IT ON THE OUTSKIRTS OF THE CITY.
The idea you fail to grasp is the city of Toronto has a mandate to serve ALL citizens. Not just the downtowners as you lefties would like to think.
Karen Stintz is a backstabbing b*tch who has a personal vendetta against Ford.
Councilor Luby has scrapped with the Ford brothers before, we know they don't like each other. This was her trying to stick it to them.
Parker, Balio, and Perruza are just fools with no foresight.
This city was getting ridiculous under Miller, and Ford was a much-welcomed change. Unfortunately the power-hungry left on council decided they want to Millerize the city again. Just remember that Pantalone, effectively Miller's proxy in the 2010 Mayor race, got crushed in the election. It was for a reason - Miller was horrible for the city. Now councilors want to go back to that? Good luck getting re-elected!
The developers were made to buy transit passes to give to new tenants. They couldn't give the passes away and asked the city to stop the program.
Condos along transit are not guaranteed transit riders.
At least $1 billion to go from Sheppard to Downsview.
Pipedream.
I just think Ford is even worse...and a hypocrite.
I find it so annoying for me to be considered "left" when I'm rationalizing what is best for the ENTIRE city. Also Your foul language toward Ms. Stintz is inappropriate and does not help or support your argument. As much as I may not care for her myself, you have the take into consideration that the woman has undertaken the challenge of being forced between a rock and a hard place of whchimaera mayor wants and statistics in the reality of making new transit lines. If you can't be respectful, I'm sure you have commented enough on here to get your point across.
I do however have a question for you, what do you suggest to the people that live east of the STC (north east for those actually living on Sheppard) take for their mode of transportation after the Ford's subway is built? The bus? Don't you think building a subway it would be wise to stretch it at least as far as the LRT would go? And then you could create the loop by extending the RT north.
http://www.toronto.ca/involved/projects/etobicoke_finch_w_lrt/pdf/map.pdf
David is right and most of you haven't just dismissed his comments with little reasons. Look at the big cities.. they have subways that is exact to the second.. we have a transit system that fails every morning during rush hour. How are people able to get to work to pay all the taxes the city likes to collect from us?
Also for those whom still think LRT is better than Subway.. take a drive around Sheppard & Meadowvale.. to about hwy 7.. ALL NEW HOMES.. how do these people commute to their jobs? They have to drive.. since it takes them 2+ hours to get to work.. It SHOULD NOT take 2 hours to travel the distance from one end of the city to go to the core! I had to deal with this for 2 years (until I was forces to move downtown).. why? Because I kept having to pay 2 fares since the TTC driver didn't believe I was traveling for 2 hours to get to my destination. NOW THAT IS MESSED UP!
SUBWAY - should have been build 50 years ago..
ALSO, we live in CANADA.. it SNOWS here.. and guess what! the LRT will have issues with the snow just like the SRT.. if they don't keep the snow off the tracks then what will happen?! and if a train gets stuck.. what then??
Looking forward to some new shiny LRTs.
Why is chin lee 'a retard'? which by the way is some pretty language, adds credibility for sure. He wants his ward to have transit. Funded environmentally assessed transit. Not one subway station every ten years in exchange for a bunch of tax increases. Calling the man a retard is not an argument. It's an insult. I think you will be surprised by the results of the next election neither you nor ford speak for that riding.
So Libby is just being 'scrappy' just scrappin' with the fords then? Why didn't she scrap him on any other parts of his agenda.
Parker bailao and peruzza aren't trying to 'get' ford now they just have no foresight? Thank fucking god because those 3 plus Mammoliti showing up could have made a difference. Even moesner. The list goes on. You are trying way too hard to not see sense at this point David.
Christine, that's a load of shit, and you know it.
The real reason why the RT suffers so badly during a Toronto winter is that snow builds up on the power rail which melts whenever a train passes. It then refreezes and builds up until power is no longer able to flow to the trains. The subway network suffers from the same problem, but is better able to handle snow due to trains running more frequently and the power rail being higher off the ground than the RT.
LRTs are not vulnerable to the same problem because the overhead wire flexes as a train passes which causes any ice buildup to break off.
I'm surprised you can even string a semi coherent grouping of words together. With the accumulated brain damage from all that booze and junk food, I'm surprised you can do more than just waddle around and fart all day. Having a moronic gasbag like you as mayor of Toronto reflects more on the idiots who support you than on you and your alcoholic, morbidly obese, wife beating character. SMD you bloated POS.
Also to the bad grammar guy, over the last three decades it's the suburbs that got the subways. Look at the Sheppard line. Look at the subways being built right now.
What local businesses? Which ones? Malls set back 30m from the streets? Because a lot of those malls are pretty scuzzy anyway and would likely close with the gentrification that LRT brings. And how, may I ask, will it provide a headache for divers? This isn't some mixed-traffic streetcar we're talking about, it's a high-performance LRT, fully separate from traffic.
"LRT will NOT provide economic development remotely close to what would happen with a subway."
Here are a couple of things to consider - the first is "Bloor-Danforth", which has had a subway line for 46 years with no substantial development. The next one is "St. Clair West" the intersection of St. Clair and Bathurst has had a subway station for 30 years and only in 2008 did any major development begin to take place. Conveniently, 2008 was when the St. Clair West - Lansdowne segment of the St. Clair streetcar was completed. Subways don't build up density on their own. There needs to be a prior catalyst, and that catalyst is LRT.
"LRT will meet its capacity in 2030, only 10-15 years after it was initially built. Subways will serve the residents of Toronto for over a hundred years."
Actually that's not true. There are many ways of increasing the capacity of an LRT line. Also the Yonge subway has been at and over capacity since the 1980s, up to the point where a parallel line needs to be built for relief.
"LRT is not convenient, NO ONE is going to take LRT instead of their cars, and only people who HAVE TO will take it. Subways ARE convenient, and people will take it instead of their cars."
That's also not even remotely true. Just look at Houston, where nearly 80% of the LRT system's riders use the LRT by choice rather than by necessity. And Houston's system is a like what transit city will be.
"LRT is something world class cities build to compliment their expansive subway systems and link lines that are not already linked by subways. Though, Toronto is building LRT as the basis of their transit. "
The first point is true but the second point is UTTERLY VACUOUS! Nobody is suggesting that we build LRT as the backbone of our transit system! This isn't Portland, or Calgary, or San Diego. We have had a heavily-used subway system for NEARLY SIX DECADES, and for six decades the subway has been the backbone of the transit system. Aside from Eglinton (which will be designed and operated much more like a subway anyway) you can't make the argument that LRT will be the foundation of the transit system without having it shot to pieces immediately.
Would you try knowing some facts?
Fail.
How's this for "on topic"....Toronto's mayor is a prime example of the right wing zeitgeist that worships all things American because it excuses so much over indulgence and raises narrow mindedness to a virtue. Blob and Rug love America because down there being a bloated junk food eating moron is seen as patriotic. As someone who turns 60 this year, and cycles 100-200 kms a week while not eating dead animals or consuming anything unhealthy, I look at someone like Blob or Rug Ford and see nothing but spoiled kids with obvious signs of advanced mental illness.
nevermind that there's no money for subways, nevermind that the ridership does not and will not exist - nope, we want to be the ONLY ones with subways so we're giving LRT to everyone else. How did you hit the nail so squarely on the head? You've got quite the talent!!
The real question is whether Sheppard has the density to support a subway. All studies of future growth in Toronto indicate that it simply doesn't. Vague talk of "skyscrapers" being built along Sheppard isn't good enough. When the TTC originally planned a subway along Sheppard projections of growth in the area were much higher then they've turned out to be, even with the subway that's now there and the growth it has spurred.
And of course, there isn't enough money to expand the subway right now. Mayor Ford didn't even support the parking tax that one of his own allies put forward in council last week, and contrary to what you suggest, there is no more money coming from the province or Ottawa. So how exactly will we found such a project?
Instead of just adding two subway stops to an underused subway, how about building something that will benefit many more Torontonians?
After buying it and READING it, then come back and tell me that this war on obesity is not just anti-fat phobia?
That persecution complex looks good on you. It's so slimming.
Add reading comprehension to the long list of weaknesses that plague the perpetually plump. This book Heavyfoot touts is a perfect example of how the bloated are always looking to blame their lack of self control on someone else or pretend it doesn't exist. The following is copied from the publisher's promo on this self serving screed:
"Is your weight hazardous to your health? According to public-health authorities, 65 percent of us are overweight. Every day, we are bombarded with dire warnings about America’s “obesity epidemic.” Close to half of the adult population is dieting, obsessed with achieving an arbitrary “ideal weight.” Yet studies show that a moderately active larger person is likely to be far healthier (and to live longer) than someone who is thin but sedentary. And contrary to what the fifty-billion-dollar-per-year weight-loss industry would have us believe medical science has not yet come up with a way to make people thin."
You'd have to be practically braindead or high on Fudgicles not to see all the unmitigated horseshit contained in that paragraph:
1) "Yet studies show that a moderately active larger person is likely to be far healthier (and to live longer) than someone who is thin but sedentary." And this proves what exactly?
2) "And contrary to what the fifty-billion-dollar-per-year weight-loss industry would have us believe medical science has not yet come up with a way to make people thin." Would that be the same "medical science" sector that only seems to believe in synthetic pharmaceuticals..the same dangerous crap that kills tens of thousands of people a year? The same crap that has dangerous and deadly side effects because it's unbalanced...much like the greasy, sugary, salty, chemical laden crap that bloated bozos like Blob Ford gobble up in prodigious amounts?