Thursday, February 23, 2012Mostly Cloudy 1°C
City

Waterfront Toronto releases 2015 Pan Am Games plans

Posted by Derek Flack / January 12, 2012

2012112-community_image_aerial_1.jpgIn a press release issued earlier today, Waterfront Toronto released some of its plans for the Athletes' Village at the 2015 Pan Am Games, including renderings of what the site is supposed to look like when it's all said and done. To be built on the West Don Lands — the area nestled between the Port Lands, Corktown and the southern terminus of the Don Valley Parkway — the project will provide temporary housing for 10,000 participants in the Games before eventually taking shape as mixed-used community.

Included in the renderings below is a peek at some of the amenities that will become part of what some day might become a neighbourhood. There will be a massive, 82,000 square-foot YMCA (which will be used as a training facility throughout the Games), a George Brown student residence, 787 units of what's termed market housing (5 per cent of which will be reserved for affordable ownership), and 253 units of affordable rental housing.

Another tidbit that doesn't get much play in the presser but makes a prominent appearance in the renderings is the presence of the Canary restaurant with restored signage. Last we heard, only the facade was to be preserved, so this would be a most welcome development for the city's heritage enthusiasts.

The press release also includes lots of information about the funding structure for the Athletes' Village and assurances that it will come in on-time and on-budget. "The fixed-price contract between Dundee Kilmer [the developer] and the Province of Ontario is for $514 million, and will be paid in stages at significant construction milestones, to ensure the project's on-time and on-budget delivery," it reads. "The Province will recover approximately $65 million in development costs from future facility operators, for a total net provincial outlay of approximately $449 million."

That's pretty much all there is to know about what's going on in the West Don Lands right now, but you can be sure that there will be a steady stream of updates over the coming months. In the meantime, let's look at the pictures.

Pan Am Games Toronto 2015Athletes' Village looking east (not the Canary Restaurant on the right)

Pan Am Games Toronto 2015Looking west back toward downtown

Toronto Pan Am Games 2015George Brown student residence

Toronto Pan Am Games 2015Ditto

Toronto Pan Am Games 2015The huge YMCA planned for the area

Toronto Pan Am Games 2015Alternate angle

Toronto Pan Am Games 2015Affordable housing (looking kind of shitty, to be honest)

Renderings via Waterfront Toronto

Discussion

38 Comments

ecipecipeca / January 12, 2012 at 06:37 pm
user-pic
The affordable housing does look kind of shitty in comparison with the rest, but not bad overall. I'm glad it's a mixed use community, but they really didn't have to be separate buildings altogether. Why not actually mix different levels of affordability within each building? Am I missing something here or am I really that naive?
Todd Toronto / January 12, 2012 at 06:38 pm
user-pic
Don't get me wrong. I love the Canary facade and I'm delighted that it's being preserved.

But what kind of a city do we live in where the Canary is preserved but [YOU NAME IT] is destroyed?
Ron / January 12, 2012 at 06:49 pm
user-pic
The affordable housing looks like a jail.
seanm replying to a comment from Todd Toronto / January 12, 2012 at 07:00 pm
user-pic
A North American city, most of which have a similar track record of destroying some heritage buildings and saving others. Nothing unique in Toronto's case.
Bob But Not Doug / January 12, 2012 at 07:25 pm
user-pic
If this stuff actually comes in "on-time and on-budget," it will be a first for this sort of thing.
Gravy Train / January 12, 2012 at 08:37 pm
user-pic
Where's the monorail?
barf / January 12, 2012 at 08:52 pm
user-pic
Ahhh, another golden opportunity to make something that stands out on the global architectural stage, but Toronto the shitty says no thanks.
barf / January 12, 2012 at 09:34 pm
user-pic
Ahhh, another golden opportunity to make something that stands out on the global architectural stage, but Toronto the shitty says no thanks.
matts / January 12, 2012 at 09:41 pm
user-pic
Generica.
Shawn / January 12, 2012 at 10:59 pm
user-pic
Call me pessimistic, but as a huge sports fan, who truly cares about the pan-am games enough to justify these expenditures?
iSkyscraper / January 12, 2012 at 11:04 pm
user-pic
Meeting the rigid requirements for athlete housing is not easy, nor is plunking down that many apartments and not having it look like St. James Town. In all honesty, this stands up pretty well compared to the Olympic Village (athlete housing) for London 2012. Seriously, take a look - http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2012/jan/08/athletes-village-olympics-2012-architecture (slide show link on the right side) If it comes out anything like these images I'm quite satisfied.


seanm / January 12, 2012 at 11:31 pm
user-pic
There's some pretty interesting stuff going on here, easily on par with Vancouver's Olympic Village, or as demonstrated, London's village. I often wonder if all these people who detract Toronto's architecture are deluded by a case of "the grass is greener", or if they are hoping for some historicist nightmare rehash of classical styles, to make up for the loss of our old Victorians. Or worse, yet more garish experiments from "exotic" starchitects. Functional Modernism is the way to go; timeless and attractive.
spew / January 13, 2012 at 12:50 am
user-pic
Ahhh, another golden opportunity to write something that stands out on the global blog commenter stage, but barf the boring says "i'd rather be a troll, thanks."
BM replying to a comment from Ron / January 13, 2012 at 07:36 am
user-pic
Yes Ron. We should use taxpayer money to make the affordable housing the best part of this development. Heck. Let's put in a pool and a party room too. Actually, everyone who lives there should get a car too. And not just any crappy domestic car, they can pick whatever they want.
barf replying to a comment from spew / January 13, 2012 at 08:14 am
user-pic
spew - that's how feel about the design. I will gladly debate you if you feel otherwise. The design: It's forgettable. It's ugly. It says nothing. It's boring. It's drab. It's lifeless. It's dated. As someone pointed out, the public housing looks like a jail. Something this shit would never fly/even be proposed in Paris or Amsterdam or Tokyo or any other city with half an architectural brain because the architects would be laughed at. Now you tell us how you feel about the design. Or are you just a troll?
Cole / January 13, 2012 at 08:21 am
user-pic
Wow, I can't believe all the whiners who are already complaining about this project (The Pan Am games are a waste of taxpayer money; the affordable housing resembles a prison; what, no monorail? etc.) Have you seen what's down there right now? Just a pile of dirt!!! I like these plans. Sure they're not perfect but at least SOMETHING is getting built. Come on people..
M_arscott@hotmail.com / January 13, 2012 at 08:24 am
user-pic
Looks great! Pretty exciting! Not a huge sports fan but if it turns that ghost to into this then I can't wait for the pan am games
M_arscott@hotmail.com / January 13, 2012 at 08:25 am
user-pic
Ghost town
steve replying to a comment from Cole / January 13, 2012 at 08:46 am
user-pic
It looks better then the affordable housing being put into regent park. I can only assume that it looks so drab is it has to be built cheap and easy to maintain. TCHC is not going to maintain it. It will rot away like all other TCHC housing. This kind of housing is a failed model, yet we still build highrise ghettos then complain about them when they go terribly wrong.
Shawna replying to a comment from steve / January 13, 2012 at 08:50 am
user-pic
Shush. This is not a post about the TCHC or Regent Park.
Brett / January 13, 2012 at 09:17 am
user-pic
These renderings are just guidelines to show massing and overall layout. I'm not even sure they've decided on which architects will design which parts of the community yet (they're using multiple designers so that each block is differentiated). But the Don River Park that the community is being built around is far along and it looks AMAZING!
Andrew / January 13, 2012 at 09:17 am
user-pic
Way better than a ferris wheel!
chubchub / January 13, 2012 at 11:06 am
user-pic
Before anyone craps more over the design consider the team who are doing the work for Dundee Kilmer and IO: KPMB, Architects Alliance, Daoust LeStage, TEN Arquitectos and MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architect. Pretty good if you ask me.
barf replying to a comment from chubchub / January 13, 2012 at 11:16 am
user-pic
Considering who's working on it, it's even more reason to crap all over it. Talk about phoning it in instead of putting Toronto on the map. Yeesh.
Brett replying to a comment from barf / January 13, 2012 at 11:36 am
user-pic
Like I said, the renderings above are just meant to be placeholders to show the layout of the neighbourhood.
chubchub replying to a comment from barf / January 13, 2012 at 11:39 am
user-pic
Someone needs a hug.
handfed / January 13, 2012 at 11:46 am
user-pic
mono. rail. where is it, you socialists?
barf / January 13, 2012 at 11:50 am
user-pic
Toronto's sad architecture needs a hug
pat / January 13, 2012 at 12:15 pm
user-pic
Is it just me or does the George Brown residence look a lot like the Ryerson School of Business (minus the canadian tire)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/103/302386570_0f43f8cd76.jpg
John / January 13, 2012 at 01:27 pm
user-pic
Can we please send the people responsible for this to Chicago! They might learn something!
John / January 13, 2012 at 01:30 pm
user-pic
@Cole Personally I would rather they put the new LRV facility in this location.
Or just left the natural habitat that was there before this folly began.
George / January 13, 2012 at 03:52 pm
user-pic
I really think the brick building facing the park looks amazing. Love the form and the contrasting materials.
chubchub replying to a comment from John / January 13, 2012 at 04:59 pm
user-pic
John: what part of Chicago do you suggest? The soulless area around Soldier Field, the nice to look at but disappointing Lakeshore East, or the autocentric streets? Perhaps the bombed-out ghettos impress you. Stop being so bloody romantic. Its not all good in Chicago, or New York, or Paris.
John / January 13, 2012 at 08:12 pm
user-pic
@chubchub. The waterfront for starters. Every city has their low points I just dont understand why generic architecture is still being encouraged in this type of development. Sad!
John / January 13, 2012 at 08:21 pm
user-pic
@chubchub is it really necessary to be abusive or is that your style?
John N. / January 14, 2012 at 05:11 am
user-pic
@John. This area is mostly fill and was home to oil tank farms for much of the early 1900's. prior to that it was marsh land and the mouth of the Don River.
James / January 14, 2012 at 11:08 am
user-pic
How about we upgrade current buildings in the city instead of building new!! Why go craz over something that lasts 2 weeks for a lifetime of debt..Stupid...Sports are overrated and so are these plans..
chubchub / January 16, 2012 at 03:23 pm
user-pic
If you consider my tone abusive, then perhaps you should get out of the game. Give us something in your statement to think about. "Sending those responsible to Chicago" says nothing. Most of it was planned over 100 years ago. Where was Toronto at that time I ask. The waterfront you say but what part? It's pretty long and not all of it is fantastic. Navy Wharf? Please. Crass commercialism. Millennium Park? Privately funding.

Give us something tangible to consider.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal