Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 24°C
City

When the Toronto skyline got its jolt of modernism

Posted by Derek Flack / December 14, 2011

TD CentreAt the outset of the 1960s, Toronto's skyline was positively Buffalo-esque. While marked by majestic old structures like the Royal York Hotel and the Canadian Bank of Commerce Building, approaching the city by boat, one would have also noticed a preponderance what we would now consider low-rise buildings and more than one church steeple that had yet to be obscured by the intense development of the city's downtown core that was about to get underway.

In more ways than one, this process started with the rise of the first and tallest of the buildings that would eventually compose the Mies van der Rohe-designed TD Centre. At 56-storeys, it's monolithic black steel body rose above the tired skyline with a modernist minimalism that was almost completely foreign at the time.

The future may have arrived in Toronto a couple of years earlier with the construction of new City Hall, but from the standpoint of the skyline, the importance of the TD Centre would only be rivalled by that of the CN Tower, which was completed nine years later and has remained the city's most iconic structure to this day.

Although it may not strike the casual observer in such a way today, Mies' masterpiece — composed of two towers and the banking pavilion at King and Bay streets — was about as bold as Toronto architecture got. The stark black aesthetics, its metal construction, and the expansive site upon which it was built (the complex encompasses four standard city blocks) demonstrated a type of vision that Toronto was unaccustomed to heading into the 1960s. Thank you Allen and Phyllis Lambert.

The city has since grown around Mies' towers, lessening their dramatic mark on the skyline, but they nevertheless remain some of Toronto's most elegant buildings.

PHOTOS

TD CentreThe final beam...

TD Centre Toronto1965

Toronto Dominion CentreThe Bank of Toronto Building would eventually be demolished for the TD Centre

20100830-TD-Centre-skyline.jpgRising above the skyline in 1966

2011129-The-Toronto-Dominion-Centre-postcard-(1).jpgThe original Mies complex

2011129-SKYLINE-FROM-LAKE-T-D-CENTRE-NOT-FINISHED-LATE-1960s.jpgAt night in 1966

2011129-POSTCARD-DOWNTOWN---AERIAL-PANORAMA-LATE-1960s.jpgLate 1960s aerial

20100815-toronto1967 (1).jpg1967

TD Centre 1970sSkyline 1970s

TD-1970s-skyline.jpgThe skyline from the Island in the 1970s

20111212-td-office-vp.jpgOffice of the Vice President, 1960s

20111212-td-pavillion-int.jpgInside the Pavillon shortly after opening

20111210-TD-centre-topping-off-the-56-storey-tower-1966-590.jpgTopping off in 1966

Photos from the Toronto Archives (marked at bottom), the Toronto Port Authority, Chuckman's Nostalgia, and from the source material of Mean City.

Discussion

34 Comments

ouch / December 14, 2011 at 09:12 am
user-pic
Good Lord Toronto was ugly back then.
Glen / December 14, 2011 at 09:20 am
user-pic
Kinda looks like Cleveland or Buffalo now!
cosmosuave / December 14, 2011 at 09:29 am
user-pic
The first Death Star...
steve / December 14, 2011 at 09:35 am
user-pic
the TD Centre it is still one of the best in TO. Adding the other three towers were a mistake, ruins the simplicity, spoils the effect. The one slapped on top the the Design Exchange is criminal.
The CIBC tower is a good runner up
iSkyscraper / December 14, 2011 at 09:51 am
user-pic
Every bit as important and powerful as its predecessor, the Seagram Building in New York. No Toronto office building since has avoided its influence, and without TD there would have been no PATH. There might not even be a downtown, since although the TTC had been expanded, GO Transit had just been invented and the Gardiner completed, TD still signalled that the banks and big companies would stay south of Queen and not migrate north, as had happened in New York and many other cities.

Some would argue the original complex (6th image) was weakened by the later TD offspring, such as the bizarre building on top of the stock exchange, but it's still one heck of an impressive collection of midcentury architecture.
Alex / December 14, 2011 at 10:37 am
user-pic
wow, 40-50 years later and they still have the exact same type of chairs/couches. I can't believe it. It's not the same physical chairs, is it? Because they are the exact same looking, but I just don't believe those chairs could last 40-50 years.
Jb / December 14, 2011 at 10:37 am
user-pic
Lots of Buffalo-bashing, but at the end of the day no building in TO comes close to being as beautiful or inspiring as Buffalo's City Hall. Buffalo has lots of beautiful buildings and takes much more pride in its architecture and history than TO does. It's not only about height!
Julia / December 14, 2011 at 10:42 am
user-pic
Reminds me of the obelisk from 2001: A Space Odessey
The picture of the skyline from the Island is a very nice picture! I also like the interior picture, gotta love 60s interior design :-)
Brad Middleton / December 14, 2011 at 10:47 am
user-pic
Of note, there are some very interesting design features for the complex. First, if you look at the corners of all the buildings, they line up exactly with the cement blocks on the ground. this is supposed to immitate a grid pattern like on graph paper.

second, the I beams are visable as protruding out along the sides which is Mies's way of showing the design material (up to that point, most of the buildings were constructed with brick, etc).

The idea is very minimalist. the intent was to create a building which captures a space and then users have the ability to modify that space as they see fit. when the building is empty you can see right thru to the other side.

The buildings are almost identical to the US postal buildings in chicago, designed also be Mies in the exact same form.

Lastly, the chairs you see in the second last picture are called barcelona chairs. if you notice they are still in the lobby to this day. This is because those chairs were also designed by Mies.

chet / December 14, 2011 at 11:01 am
user-pic
Mies designed the chairs
DES_Toronto / December 14, 2011 at 11:07 am
user-pic
My art teacher, Dr. Clubine, back in the 60s loved the new city hall, but he described buildings like the TD Centre as (we had to memorize his description word for word) "boxes standing on end and lying on side." I think he had a point. They're so stark and empty, with no sense of style, no art, not a decorative touch to relieve the dreariness of the straight lines. The TD Centre ushered in an age of dull, unimaginative, depressing corporate architecture. Give me Canada Life Building any day, give me Art Deco, give me gargoyles, I want BEAUTY!
bri / December 14, 2011 at 11:18 am
user-pic
The first picture reminds me of 2001 a Space Odyssey..
Justin replying to a comment from Jb / December 14, 2011 at 11:27 am
user-pic
I would actually agree, Buffalo does have some great buildings, if only they would take care of them. But in the end, I am Torontonian and I believe it's my civic duty to make fun of Buffalo...and Detroit.
Miss Kriss replying to a comment from Alex / December 14, 2011 at 11:29 am
user-pic
They totally are the same chairs! Mies was a real stickler for detail and designed many of the interior elements of the TD Centre as well, including much of the furniture. Even the font was purposely-designed just for this project. And yes, well-made furniture can last more than a lifetime. Don't be fooled by their modern look - these are no ikea chairs!
Ratpick replying to a comment from Jb / December 14, 2011 at 11:33 am
user-pic
Agree.

Only a fool would discount Buffalo's significant architectural heritage.
David / December 14, 2011 at 12:06 pm
user-pic
Sorry we lost the bank building at the sw corner of King & Bay. Much more elegant than the current banking pavilion. But I guess it didn't fit the architect's vision.
Gloria / December 14, 2011 at 12:23 pm
user-pic
"No decorative touch" is sort of the point of modernism ... letting the shapes and voids become the decoration. Straight lines are not dreary when they are used thoughtfully and in consideration of the environment.

And agreed on the Buffalo comments. They have several important buildings, including ones by Louis Sullivan and Frank Lloyd Wright. It's actually a great (and cheap, and close) place to look at innovative American architecture.
Derek replying to a comment from Jb / December 14, 2011 at 12:30 pm
user-pic
Please explain to me how the first lines of this post constitue Buffalo bashing. I know people don't like to read much anymore, but your comment only underscores the analogy. Not only were Toronto and Buffalo's skylines similar in stature, but they were/are both composed of majestic old buildings that are wonderful in their own right. Toronto's skyline has since grown, but that's the whole point of the post.
Dan / December 14, 2011 at 12:32 pm
user-pic
These are my favourite buildings in TO - they may not be the tallest, but every time I'm in the financial district I can't help but stare at them. They're gorgeous.
ife / December 14, 2011 at 02:13 pm
user-pic
It would've been amazing if after the TD Centre they stopped, and instead built the Financial District just outside the city (like how Paris did).
ife replying to a comment from Alex / December 14, 2011 at 02:17 pm
user-pic
Sometime after, maybe 1-2 decades ago, they planned to remove all the Mies furniture and renovate the board room, etc etc and it would've been sad if they ahd done that. But after all the furniture was removed, they decided last minute that it was a huge mistake (thank the lord) and put back in all the furniture. (Thats the story i heard, I dunno if its accurate).
Rob replying to a comment from Jb / December 14, 2011 at 02:47 pm
user-pic
Yeah, that's one thing that I wish Toronto had was a true Deco Style Skyscraper, I appreciate the Renaissance Revival Style of Commerce Court North and I am very thankful for the Mies van der Rohe buildings. Notable additions would be to have a gothic revival skyscraper and a Fazlur Khan tower. International style is King!! I love the T.O Skyline, Although the green glass condos are starting to dominate...
bob replying to a comment from Rob / December 14, 2011 at 03:02 pm
user-pic
The Bank of Nova Scotia building
steve replying to a comment from David / December 14, 2011 at 03:34 pm
user-pic
they are both elegant in their owns styles. the only sour note to the complex is the mall.
seanm replying to a comment from DES_Toronto / December 14, 2011 at 05:36 pm
user-pic
I love Toronto's Deco and neo-classicism as much as anybody, but it's unfortunate your scope of architectural beauty stops short at doo-dads and gargoyles affixed to antiquated styles and thinking.

The TD Centre eschews ornamentation, and its beauty lies in form, arrangement and a mathematical attention to detail. The International style, and to some extent a bit of Modernism, definitely produced some duds, and leave a bit to be desired from urbanity's point of view. That said, the movement ushered in a new way of thinking that produced some of the finest structures ever built by man.

And really, the Victorians were just rehashing a grab-bag of styles from eras long gone by. They weren't necessarily forward-thinking, but closer to the faux-historicists of their day. If there's anything to bemoan, it's the loss of our old Georgian city.
Adam Sobolak replying to a comment from steve / December 14, 2011 at 07:14 pm
user-pic
Actually, steve, the first two additional towers *weren't* a mistake--they were planned for from the start (and fit the Miesian tradition of multi-tower complexes a la Westmount Square in Montreal and the Federal Center in Chicago). But yes, the subsequent two were outliers, and in Ernst & Young's case a bit of a travesty of Mies (though as the current signage controversy proves, it's no excuse to compound the travesty)
jameson / December 14, 2011 at 09:40 pm
user-pic
Such a pathetic square in front of the buildings. Mies really didn't know anything in the least bit about public urban spaces.

Although, anyone who has any notion of tower in the park really doesn't either.
steve replying to a comment from Adam Sobolak / December 15, 2011 at 10:22 am
user-pic
Your right took a walk along Wellington to have a look at the complex, usually only see it from King Street. The third tower does fit in enhancing the courtyard. The fourth feels a bit left out being across the street. The fifth is a travesty, departs from the the previous towers in subtle and obvious ways and looks squeezed in and poorly planned.
jay / December 16, 2011 at 11:57 am
user-pic
Modernism is bane on all cities, it is so anti-humanistic and alienating. Imagine if the Bank of Toronto building had remained...
seanm replying to a comment from jay / December 16, 2011 at 06:59 pm
user-pic
The Bank of Toronto was no saint when it came to urbanism itself; case in point the overwhelming blank stone facade it presented to most of Bay and King Sts. It had some pretty columns, and lovely carvings, but it was nothing exceptional. I'm sure more people are impressed by way of the "ooo it's so old and pretty" aspect though, so it's no surprise to see lament for its loss. That said, the real crime here is your boneheaded, insipid comment "Modernism is a bane on all cities".
linked / December 18, 2011 at 10:30 pm
user-pic
Though I believe the Mies towers are supremely elegant works of high art in their own right, their presence amidst the old world limestone towers represents a loss of aesthetic harmony that is unsettling and tragic yet inevitable.
sadayshelly / December 29, 2011 at 12:10 am
user-pic
you definitely love online for gift
linked replying to a comment from ouch / January 12, 2012 at 10:00 pm
user-pic
You were ugly back then.
samsung vibrant giveaway / March 8, 2012 at 06:07 am
user-pic
I love to read your www.blogto.com men!

samsung vibrant giveaway
samsung galaxy tablet giveaway
samsung epic giveaway
Nintendo 3DS giveaway
motorola droid razr giveaway
LG Quantum giveaway
LG G Slate giveaway

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal