Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 24°C
City

Twitter reaction to Rob Ford's Occupy Toronto warning

Posted by Derek Flack / November 9, 2011

Occupy Toronto Rob FordTick tock. Rob Ford appears to have started the clock on the Occupy Toronto movement, expressing his dissatisfaction with the protesters during a press scrum earlier today. "We've had a peaceful protest, but I think it's time we asked them to move on," he told reporters. "I'm here to represent the businesses and taxpayers in the city and I'm getting numerous calls. People have told me they've had enough. I think it's the right thing to do."

Look out. When Ford "gets calls," some form of action is not far away — for better or (mostly) worse. A briefing note distributed earlier this week signaled that the mayor's patience was wearing thin, but as of yet, there's no concrete plan to end the occupation. Ford did, however, indicate that he's looking to set up a meeting with police chief Bill Blair "as soon as possible."

Perhaps Blair, who's reputation is still recovering from last year's G20, will offer cautious advice, but it's anyone's guess at this point how this is going to turn out. So, naturally, we put the question out to Twitter: should Occupy Toronto stay or go? Here's what some of out followers and other folks had to say.

Discussion

48 Comments

steve / November 9, 2011 at 02:20 pm
user-pic
why are all of RoFo's 'calls' only in support of his views?
Jon / November 9, 2011 at 02:27 pm
user-pic
I agree with ford... Toss these people off our park. The other 99% would like to use it. Have the campfire and hot dog roastings somewhere else.
MrPotato / November 9, 2011 at 02:34 pm
user-pic
Does anyone know what their agenda is yet? If not GTFO of the park you hippies!
Ravi / November 9, 2011 at 02:45 pm
user-pic
I hate Rob Ford. I think he's an idiot. So it pains me to say that I actually agree with him.

Occupy Toronto is nothing more than a bunch of Homeless people and Hippies camping out on city property.

The idea behind Occupy Toronto is great, but the execution has been piss poor and embarrassing. Time to move on.
Mack / November 9, 2011 at 02:45 pm
user-pic
To Jon and MrPotato: There are hundreds of people willing to brave the canadian winter in tents to change our country/planet for the better, for YOU. Put a pause on the negativity and go visit the protest before you make any more comments. Or, you know, google.
Please / November 9, 2011 at 02:52 pm
user-pic
I find it hilarious that you think this group of imbeciles and drug addicts actually represents what the majority of people think.

AIM Coffy / November 9, 2011 at 02:53 pm
user-pic
They may try to evict the revolutionaries but they can't evict the revolution. Global Revolution to give the final push to end Colonialism and Capitalism. 'First they ignore us then they laugh at us then they fight us then we win' When Injustice becomes Law Revolution becomes Duty. If you are looking for leaders, look in the mirror, if you want demands then ask yourself, what changes do you want? then join us.
LOL replying to a comment from Mack / November 9, 2011 at 02:53 pm
user-pic
Wow a Twitter pic, how cute.
canadaforever / November 9, 2011 at 03:01 pm
user-pic
I'm glad to hear that this disgusting homeless circus is going to end.
Michelle / November 9, 2011 at 03:09 pm
user-pic
If any of you actually read others' comments, please try to understand something: the occupants ARE NOT all homeless or hippies. See 99Faces.org. And so what if they were? What have we come to when the worst crime you can commit is to not have a job...
Mack replying to a comment from LOL / November 9, 2011 at 03:11 pm
user-pic
Adorable, right???
Johnnieg replying to a comment from Ravi / November 9, 2011 at 03:18 pm
user-pic
Time has come to go...sorry.It started out well,then just kinda fizzled.No leadership.No strong message.
Greg / November 9, 2011 at 03:22 pm
user-pic
End this... It's gone on too far. Last hugs, weenies and songs.
Clear Out / November 9, 2011 at 03:24 pm
user-pic
these people don't represent anything about me, or the problems I face. I also can't stand rob ford, and no way am I a conservative. But these people have not had one clear message and have not had a very big appearance on bay street or anywhere else besides st. james park. They had their chance, and they blew it. Time to clear out the park.
Polling / November 9, 2011 at 03:34 pm
user-pic
Nanos polling shows 60% in favor of Occupy, 30% against, 10% undecided.

So it's the astroturfers in the BlogTO comment section that are unrepresentative. The public is firmly behind the Occupy movement.
LOL replying to a comment from Mack / November 9, 2011 at 03:34 pm
user-pic
Sure, but it should probably read something more along the lines of:


"The 'Occupy' demonstrations are a rapidly growing fad with no common agenda or goal other than to go camping in the middle of a city park and whine about our problems that are easily solved with gainful employment."

I think that would be more truthful.
Jess replying to a comment from Jon / November 9, 2011 at 03:49 pm
user-pic
This is such garbage, they are organizing and coming to common demands through actual democracy and you clowns dismiss it. Keep living the dream in your temp jobs, with your incredible debt and falling equity.
You should actually go down to a few meetings down there and find out what it's about before you start commenting. There's a reason less than 50 per cent vote, it's because we know the system doesn't work.
scott / November 9, 2011 at 04:03 pm
user-pic
I don't understand why they care if they have to leave the park. They've had a month to prepare for this possibility; in that month, from every indication, they've formed a remarkable community. Why would anyone believe that that community is going to end just because they can't live in tents in a park? So they leave, either going somewhere else or taking their movement's organization online. There's no reason they have to stop being an organization, and realistically, if they're not using up all their energy trying to survive the winter, they'll have a lot more energy to come up with some actually effective course of action. If they're smart, and there does seem to be some indication that they are, they will resist for a while, and if the pressure becomes too much, they'll peacefully pack up and move on to their movement's natural next stage. Hopefully with better media strategy this time, because their PR has been mediocre at best so far. The whole "occupy" idea is a copycat idea from OWS; who's to say that they can't alter that part of the plan? Imagination and leadership work wonders. They have enough soft support at this moment, and it's really up to them if they're going to squander it and destroy their movement or use that support as a base for something bigger.
michelle / November 9, 2011 at 04:22 pm
user-pic
What Im yet to hear (and I'd love for someone like Mack to weigh on this) is what the connection is between camping in a public park and facilitating the kind of dialogue and effecting the kind of change that Mack's twitter graphic suggested the goal was.

I've been to St James Park and I am completely opposed to everything that Rob Ford stands for, yet I didn't come away thinking like I'd seen some dramatically impressive experiment in grassroots democracy. It was a bunch of people, some well intentioned, some well educated, some mentally ill, some just on the general margins of society, all camping out and having a pretty good time. hey. more power to them -- seems like an enjoyable laugh for a lot of them.

and you are right, mack, that the public in general supports the 'goals' of the occupy movement, but that is very distinct from supporting the methods being used. and occupying public spaces, preventing them being used by others, for extended periods of time, does not seem to have the broad support of the public. and unless you can give me a very solid reason why the only way you can effect the change you are seeking is through occupying public spaces and preventing their use by others, i don't see you gaining the broad support of me or many others for your methods, rather than your goals.
Mark / November 9, 2011 at 04:30 pm
user-pic
Much like their parents should have said years ago, the city needs to tell these entitled misfits to get out and find a job. That would be producing a better society. Moreso than camping in a park ever will.
thumbsdownonpolls replying to a comment from Polling / November 9, 2011 at 04:53 pm
user-pic
The same people who said steven harper was not going to get a majority in the last election. Real reliable source, sure is.
Aydin / November 9, 2011 at 07:16 pm
user-pic
Nobody in this city cares about Occupy TO because the issues that have galvanized Americans don't really apply here - or at least, not to the same degree.

Our corporations don't have nearly as much control over our democracy, as our government does not see corporations as people. Our well-regulated bankers did not take the same stupid risks that American bankers did, and ruined their economy (and went unpunished for doing so). And we did not start two costly wars while cutting taxes.

Occupy Wall Street has earned the general public's attention and respect because they are pushing forward bi-partisan, populist messages, that can lead to definitive changes. Changes such as the overturning of Citizens United supreme court ruling, the prosecution of bankers who broke the law, and the creation of a financial transaction tax. All of these issues are polling well, and the numbers have only gone up since the movement began.

Again, here in Toronto, other than a show of solidarity to our neighbours down south, the general citizens just doesn't think that OUR protests are really worth it.
Jay / November 9, 2011 at 07:57 pm
user-pic
The City of Toronto and the local residents have been more than accommodating to the Occupy Toronto group. They have allowed them to break countless bylaws without interjecting. They have given this groups ample time to make their point. The City has has resources made available to this groups as well.

It's time for this group to now be accommodating and clear out of the park and take down all of their structures. They should not have to be forced out. They should be planning their exit already.
Jason / November 9, 2011 at 09:50 pm
user-pic
All this talk about "allowing" people to protest makes me wonder if we're destined to become a totalitarian society. People should be allowed to protest on public property as long as they want. They are the ones who have to sleep outside in the cold. If only to show that we still have some freedoms left, let them protest... or soon we won't.
Nadim / November 9, 2011 at 10:42 pm
user-pic
We all remember that this isint Canada anymore. Dosent surprise me.

To all those -go get a job!- people outhere, please never, ever, EVER complain when Harper uses your tax dollars for wars overseas or if an accident happens at the pipeline and it created a environemental disaster. Don't ever complain about jobs being shipped overseas when you call a customer service. Or when you loose your job to china.

Some people try to make changes happens and all you can do is call them drug addicts or misfits?

The homeless and drug addicts arent created by the 99%! You just want them to dissapear and not attack the real probllem. We should all just go back to watch reality tv and do what we are told.
Stotu / November 9, 2011 at 10:52 pm
user-pic
I'm sorry I was unaware the reason for the GLOBAL MOVEMENT was such a secret?!?!?! With google and youtube at your fingertips is it really so hard to read between the lines? We are protesting tyranny, bought politics, and injustice. Weeding out the bad ones so to speak and bring about a new way of life that doesn't consist so much around 1% of the population owning half of this country. Holy F**K me sideways I never even went to college and I knew that! Its not astro physics! I'm behind them 200% and if they are willing to brave the cold in tents to prove a point then god bless them and I pray more people like them are born every day!
M. replying to a comment from Mark / November 9, 2011 at 11:19 pm
user-pic
@ Mark, have not noticed the job rates? Have you? And that's going to get worse.

Get a job, how 1970's.
Tim / November 10, 2011 at 07:30 am
user-pic
They were about to spell received wrong in their sign and then clearly corrected it......tell me again why you've been able to squat in a park for a month with no job t go to? What a joke....go tell your stories in your theatre somewhere else.
Lol replying to a comment from michelle / November 10, 2011 at 08:01 am
user-pic
I would say the importance of occupation is that history shows that when something stops the news moves on and we all forget. A kardashian gets divorced or a belieber gets prego and important discussions are forgotten. By staying in the parks they keep the wall street/ k street corruption conversation in the media. I think there is a real fear that if the occupation dies the media will turn this back into a less unions less social services discussion. You know, the entire dialogue leading up to the occupation.
Lol replying to a comment from Aydin / November 10, 2011 at 08:04 am
user-pic
Would you say that what happens in America has no bearing on Canada? This it isn't our country it isn't our business is a cop out. America and Canada are closely tied. America's economy is important to canada
Roxanna / November 10, 2011 at 09:46 am
user-pic
Not to be rude, but maybe they're part of the "99%" because they are unemployed. The rest of us with debts and money issues are out working/going to school to get better jobs. Maybe they should go and get themselves a career that can help this whole global movement in a better way than hogging up the park? Not being a total pisser, just my opinion.
data replying to a comment from M. / November 10, 2011 at 11:47 am
user-pic
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/canada/unemployment-rate

Unemployment rate is trending down and remains well below historical levels, even in this crappy environment.
Andrew / November 10, 2011 at 12:35 pm
user-pic
Too bad Mel's not around to get them some plywood...
G / November 10, 2011 at 12:54 pm
user-pic
It infuriates me when politicians say it's their job to represent taxpayers! Sadly, it seems to be a growing trend in all levels of government. They need to be reminded that it is their job to represent CITIZENS. As an elected official, Rob Ford is just as accountable to the protesters as he is to businesses and taxpayers.
Mack replying to a comment from Roxanna / November 10, 2011 at 01:26 pm
user-pic
Roxanna, you're missing the point. YOU ARE THE 99% working your butt off in a job that probably underpays you to pay off (I'm assuming) student debt that shouldn't be so large in the first place. And if it isn't student debt maybe its money you spent trying to consume and own as much stuff as possible, an attitude we've been taught from the minute we were born.

If you were to actually visit the protests you would discover that actually most of the people who are occupying or just hanging about supporting it DO have jobs. Personally, I spend as many of my days off from my part time job (I'm a college graduate, mind you) supporting the movement.

Just because some people have the ability to empathize does not mean they are all jobless, homeless, hippies.
Sabrina replying to a comment from Mack / November 10, 2011 at 02:03 pm
user-pic
THANK YOU Mack for posting that reply to Roxanna, holy crap. Finally someone with some sense
MrsPotato / November 10, 2011 at 02:30 pm
user-pic
i seriously don't understand how these people can do this.

Don't they work???
Do they leave during the day, and return at night??
Mark replying to a comment from M. / November 10, 2011 at 03:12 pm
user-pic
I notice a lot of help wanted signs and now hiring signs, right here in Toronto. They may not be glamourous or what you want but there are jobs waiting for someone who wants to work. Easier to sit in a park and collect welfare though I guess.
Alex replying to a comment from MrsPotato / November 10, 2011 at 03:37 pm
user-pic
Maybe they have night jobs. They're out there trying to cause change. If you don't think Canada needs the Occupy movement, why don't you go look at the bonuses Air Canada executives got, while their employees agreed to no raises or anything for years so the airline could get back on its feet. Then when the airline was doing well again and the employees wanted raises they got stiffed. They go on strike, and the government forces them back to work and the arbitrator awards them the deal they had rejected. When the government is not only not stopping this sort of rampant executive overcompensation, but helping and rewarding it, what is left to the citizens but to protest?

By Rob Ford's logic, if enough Toronto citizens called him on the phone and asked him to resign, he would?
MrsPotato replying to a comment from Alex / November 10, 2011 at 04:37 pm
user-pic
But i still don't understand, how they can have jobs, but sit in a tent all day/night?

I hope their EI is on hold during this~!!!!!
Mike Vettese / November 10, 2011 at 07:05 pm
user-pic
Why not Protest against government fat cats, any one making over $50,000 Per year, get with it all federal and provincial employees! You're time has come you are now making to much money! Riding the shirt tails of the average Joe and bleeding them dry,
GM Ford Chrysler all reinvented
Private sector the same
I say burn all the legalized mobsters at the stake
Or better yet gas them!
Stop sucking us dry!
Mack replying to a comment from MrsPotato / November 10, 2011 at 11:38 pm
user-pic
Mrs Potato Head I think you have some of your pieces mixed up.
What I don't understand is how you can make such a gross generalization?? How do you know that EVERYONE at the protest is in their tents ALL OF THE TIME??
People come and they go. Some support the movement from their homes, some are staying in the park, some are coming to the park during the day and going home at night, some go to work during the day and return to their tents at night. Do you need me to explain this further? A trip to the protest would clear things up for you.
Crc replying to a comment from Roxanna / November 10, 2011 at 11:54 pm
user-pic
Mack put it nicely but I'll reiterate.

A number of the protesters are students, seniors, contract workers, part time workers or have the flexibility in their work schedules (ie writers, freelance professions).

Theyre in the park to affect change. So that hard working people like you don't have to suffer through mountains of debt and other money issues. Giant auto corporations get bailed out by your money and pay their CEOs millions in bonuses.

You are being rude, a pisser and just plain lazy by saying "get a job!"
Alex replying to a comment from Crc / November 14, 2011 at 10:14 am
user-pic
You can't use the auto corporations as an example, because they paid all that government money back. I don't know if the American banks ever paid their government back though.
Paul / November 15, 2011 at 03:00 pm
user-pic
I'd like to point out the irony of occupying St James park, considering how much work the church does helping to provide for the poorest in Toronto.

To be honest... I really do think that moving on is in the best interests of the protesters. Change gears and find a new way to bring your message.

Also, soon enough it won't just be the City the protestors will have to worry about. When the temperature drops further it would be extremely risky to continue in the park,
Paul replying to a comment from Nadim / November 15, 2011 at 03:44 pm
user-pic
It's called an election, friend. If you don't like the way things are going then organize and vote accordingly.
electric replying to a comment from Aydin / November 15, 2011 at 10:24 pm
user-pic
Aydin, repeat after me... baa baaa Baaa.

You're an idiot for thinking corporations don't have considerable control over the government. Take a look at Rogers, Bell and the CRTC.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal