Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 24°C
City

National Post apologizes for running transphobic ad

Posted by Derek Flack / September 30, 2011

National Post Transphobic AdThe National Post has apologized for running a transphobic ad from the Institute for Canadian Values that caused widespread outrage. In an extensive note from the paper's editors, they explain that while they believe position promoted by the ad is worthy of debate in an open society, it ultimately crossed the line. "Where the ads exceeded the bounds of civil discourse was in their tone and manipulative use of a picture of a young girl; in the suggestion that such teaching "corrupts" children, with everything that such a charge implies; and in their singling out of groups of people with whose sexuality the group disagrees," the apology reads.

As for how the ad managed to get into the paper, the note isn't particularly specific (which isn't that surprising). "The National Post has procedures in place for vetting the content of advertising, especially advocacy advertising. The procedures are intended to ensure that such ads meet a standard of tone and respect that is consistent with furthering constructive dialogue about important public policy issues. In this case, those procedures were not followed. An ad that should not have run in its proposed form was allowed to run."

The direct apology comes near the end, when the editors explain that the paper will not run the ad again. "The fact that we will not be publishing this ad again represents a recognition on our part that publishing it in the first place was a mistake. The National Post would like to apologize unreservedly to anyone who was offended by it. We will be taking steps to ensure that in future our procedures for vetting the content of advertising will be strictly adhered to."

Kudos should go to the paper for admitting the mistake and apologizing in such lengthy fashion.

Discussion

4 Comments

John / September 30, 2011 at 05:11 pm
user-pic
The Post has revised the apology from its original wording, which read, "singling out of a specific group of people <i>who have made choices about their sexuality</i> [emphasis added] with which the group disagrees." It is not clear if the writer of the original apology believes that sexuality is a choice, or that demanding not to be bullied at school by homophobes is a choice.

Anyway, the ad was a lie: Dalton McGuinty told the Toronto Sun board today that religious parents should have the right to exempt their children from classes where they might be taught not to torment their classmates with homophobic insults. Somehow, the Liberal believe our schools can accommodate both the bullies and the bullied.
ife / September 30, 2011 at 06:25 pm
user-pic
what idiot is confused by transgender folk?
Benedict Harris / September 30, 2011 at 08:30 pm
user-pic
Fun fact: The image in the ad is a stock photograph. You can't use stock photography like this. That little girl is now permanently associated with this borderline immoral advertisement. I contacted the stock photo company and they are investigating. I hope stopcorruptingchildren.com gets sued for everything they're worth.
Mr. S. / October 2, 2011 at 09:09 am
user-pic
If you're confused, you're still thinking. Oh...

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal