City
Big changes on the way for Liberty Village (eventually)
On Tuesday night Liberty Village residents and other interested parties got a glimpse at some pretty significant changes that could be in store for the neighbourhood in the coming years. The second of two open houses devoted to Environmental Assessments in the area (the first was back in June), highlights included proposals to build a pedestrian/cyclist tunnel across the Lake Shore rail corridor, the construction of new Dufferin bridges over the Gardiner and rail lines, and the creation of a new street at the south end of the neighbourhood.
Of the three projects, I suspect the first two are the most interesting from the perspective of the casual observer given that the Dufferin bridges are in need of replacement mostly on account of their age, and the overall landscape won't change much when they're replaced (although the Dufferin Gates might be slightly repositioned).
Having never attended one of these open houses before, I was curious to find out what they're all about. My first impression, however, was that the whole thing was a little overwhelming. With no less than 50 informational boards spread in an Ikea-like maze throughout Liberty Noodle, getting a handle on just what was being proposed required a bit of patience. Or assistance. Despite the saturation of info, I'd estimate that the ratio between planning staff and residents was about one to one over the duration of my visit.
I was eventually (and thankfully) drawn into a conversation with Stephen Schijns, a City of Toronto Manager of Infrastructure Planning who guided me through the three proposals. Our discussion centred on the degree to which the pedestrian/cyclist link and new street were both representative of a need to address the insularity of Liberty Village in some way. These projects aim to "retrofit the area so that it connects with the rest of the city," he told me.
The idea for a new street at the southern tip of the neighbourhood actually goes all the way back to the proposal for a Front Street extension, which was first tabled in the mid 1980s. Eventually that plan fizzled, but its legacy (thanks in part to the Liberty Village BIA) might be a local thoroughfare that reduces congestion in an area that currently features limited access points. Although the specifics have been yet to be worked out — i.e. the number of lanes, cycling infrastructure, location of traffic lights, etc. — the overall plan would see it run alongside the railway tracks from Strachan in the east to Dufferin in the west.
A pedestrian/cyclist connection on the north end of the neighbourhood would also go a long way toward making the area more accessible. Quite a bit further along in the planning process, the idea of a tunnel was initially rejected on account of complications associated with private land ownership, but First Capital Realty Inc. has expressed an interest in seeing such a project built on their land (near 1071 King West on the north side of the tracks and the Metro grocery store on the south), which has led to its so-called resurrection. The tunnel is preferred over the construction of a bridge, Shijns tells me, mostly "on account of cost and the fact that it'd be less visibly intrusive."
When asked how much weight public input is given in decision-making on projects like this, Shijns is diplomatic. "Planning isn't a popularity contest" he says, but "we do listen to the concerns of the community." Of the residents that I spoke to, most were enthused with the plans, but disappointed at the how long it'll be before construction might begin. Although the pedestrian/cyclist tunnel and the Dufferin bridge(s) replacement proposals will go to a Public Works committee May 26th, the former project isn't expected to be complete until 2014.
That's a long time to wait, especially considering that these projects have a tendency to drag on, but at least these proposals make sense for the neighbourhood. Not only that, with the swath of condos going up on Sudbury Street to the north, a pedestrian connection to and from Liberty Village will open up the neighbourhood to residents who might not be so inclined to make a visit these days. And that, from an outsider's perspective, is exactly what it strikes me Liberty Village could use most — at little less insularity.
More detailed reports on the above projects are expected to be uploaded to the City of Toronto website in the coming days.


Discussion
22 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Goooooooood luck.
Questions..questions...lack of details.
We can't even get public transit right!
It feels so disconnected to the rest of the area that I avoid going there even though it's a 10-20 minutes away from me depending on where I want to go. Liberty Village feels like a whole other world to me.
PLANNING? That is a joke! If there was any planning in the city, first off they would do the Dufferin Bridge WHILE they have the Gardiner/Jameson bridges f$#king up traffic in the area, not wait until AFTER that is done to make the Gardiner a mess again, AND they would have done something about the Dowling Bridge and that antiquated pilar that cuts the Jameson onramp in half, making it both dangerous and horrible for merging traffic.
Liberty Village is a hell hole and will only get worse. Soon, only those from HK will think Toronto is great.
and
http://www.gotransit.com/gts/en/docs/20110223_Trinity-Spadina_Presentation.pdf
However, I'm all for increased bike access anywhere in this metropolis of ours.
When is the West Rail Path going to connect with LV?
I really think that any conversation about the area needs to recognize that there are 2 distinct 'Villages' - the medium density commercial (formerly industrial) buildings from Dufferin to Hannan, and the high density condo towers from Metro eastward.
Almost all of the 'Condo Village' used to be derelict, post-industrial land with old buildings and a car impound lot. Now there's thousands of people living in an area with shitty road access, but amazing train access.
It's interesting that people seem to have a bit of a hate-on for LV. Everyone I've ever known who's lived there wants to stay - will pay extra for it - and absolutely loves how incredibly convenient it is. It's not finished by any stretch and needs improvement, but in many ways it is the type of neighbourhood Toronto needs to build. It's centrally located, close to everything (waterfront, expressways, public transit, downtown, galleries, restaurants, shopping - seriously everything), and the condo lifestyle is the most environmentally efficient way of living while creating safe and vibrant neighbourhoods. While I'm a huge fan of Jane Jacobs, she was absolutely wrong about tall buildings and I think would acknowledge that if she were around today.
I wish they didn't cram so many condos in to such a small area but other than that, its a pretty good place to live.
The Preferred Option as presented last Tuesday is a complete reversal of the data attained by the City over the past year. For over a year the community has been promised a link located between Sudbury Street and Shaw Street. 78% of people polled preferred a bridge. Reasons for NOT doing a tunnel contradict their current reason for constructing a tunnel. Their previous report indicates that a tunnel is MORE expensive than a bridge. The geometrics actually conflict with the current development started at the Stachen/ tracks intersection which could affect the project’s schedule as it will likely have to be constructed AFTER the Strachen bridge. It was made clear to me last Tuesday evening from a representative of the City's planning department that the decision to have a tunnel was made entirely on the fact that a private developer will assist in the financing of the link only if a tunnel connects their two properties. It is no longer a public access to King Street. It is an access available to the public under the developer's discretion. In other words, instead of an open arch spanning the train tracks with minimal ramping and stairs, the link will be a subterranean tube accessed by at least three levels of stairs and elevators controlled by the private sector. Jane Jacobs would be turning in her grave over such a short-sighted decision from a municipality. Keep in mind that several residential developments in Liberty Village were approved by the City based on cash contributions by the developers to provide a link to King Street. Funds have been attained for this project. Partnering with the private sector can be very productive but in this case it's clearly a decision to cut costs at the expense of our community's desire to have public access to King Street.