City
The transformation of Toronto's skyline from 1880 to today
There's few more obvious ways to track the growth of a city than by charting the transformation of its skyline. Perhaps this is especially the case with a city like Toronto, where developments have seemed to come in major stages, whether this be the rise of the Royal York Hotel in the late 1920s, the Toronto Dominion Centre in the late 60s or, of course, the addition of the CN Tower in the mid-70s. And even if such documentation fails to tell an in-depth story about the nature of the city, it remains intriguing to examine the process by which Toronto grew up on a macro level.
The photos below speak mostly for themselves in this capacity, but a few provisos are worthy of mention. In a perfect world, an exercise like this one would compare depictions of the skyline from the same vantage point so as to give the most accurate representation of its growth. Unfortunately, however, this is not strictly the case with the images below. While an attempt has been made to be consistent, there is quite a bit of variance from one angle to another.
This is noteworthy because certain vantage points from the east and west tend to make the skyline look more populated (as they include buildings not generally seen from more direct angles like Toronto Island). Nevertheless, with a sharp eye, comparisons can still be drawn from decade to decade -- particularly during those periods in which major additions make their appearance on the skyline.
But, enough preamble. This isn't supposed to be a scientific comparison, so much as a visual demonstration of the profound development Toronto's core has experienced over the last 130 years or so.
(When the specific year in which an image was taken/produced is unknown, I've used the decade as a label).
1875

1893

1910s

1920s

1930s

1940s

1950s

1967-9

1973

1987
1999

2007

2010

What it might look like in 2014
The above image was created by Scott Dickson and posted on Urban Toronto a while back. Dickson took to the task of rendering the skyline with buildings scheduled to be built in the upcoming years. For a high resolution look at his images (one of which is labeled), please follow the link.
All images but the first and last two are sourced from the Wikimedia Commons under a Creative Commons licence. The second last photo is from steve colwill of Flickr and the last is by Scott Dickson.


Discussion
34 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
http://tinyurl.com/26jhfp2
http://tinyurl.com/2cku54d
ps. beautiful article
Good eye!
Why not? Those cities are amazing, and are plenty distinct from each other. Toronto can be another great city, yet still be distinctly Toronto.
Your right, its just inverted not doctored.
These fixable boo-boos aside, I really appreciate the montage. Thanks for the effort!
What I'd like to see is a late 1974 pic, with a partial CN tower and First Canadian Place still under construction. I've never seen that moment captured in a photo.
The transformation between 1966 and 1976 was rather pronounced. It's funny how when I was a teenager in the 1980s the skyline really impressed me, and now any pre-1990 picture looks "empty." I'm sure the 2007 picture will look similarly empty ten years from now given the rate things are happening right now.
Now I'm feeling old. :)
Ed, I think as long as the CN Tower is standing, Toronto will be distinctively Toronto.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/markdint/3470353105/
Toronto? Bland. Or, perversely ugly on occasion.
At the very least, link the photo above to the original source with proper attribution. Cheers.
:/
I don't agree with some of the comments about Toronto's architecture. Some of the newest buildings in the city are quite spectacular, but we can do so much more with interesting materials, innovative design features and public art. What is even more important to me is the public space around the buildings and the amenities that invite the public to use and enjoy the space. Those are elements we need to promote.
Thanks again, Bill Freeman
Huge changes in the 20's but what is really tragic is the difference between the mid 80's and now when the wall of hideous condos went up and blocked the city off from the waterfront.
Our "world class city" got world class political corruption and mismanagement.
i wish toronto can be half as nice as chicago!!!
In more recent times though you'll find more variety (and better, at least in my opinion) architecture in Toronto.
Chicago also has some grand streets (and parks as other have mentioned), something Toronto doesn't too well. Having said this, I do find Toronto has more in the way of interesting and vibrant neighborhoods around the core.
For something that Toronto has done 'right' surprisingly, I urge everyone to check out sherbourne common / sugar beach. It really puts HTO park on the central waterfront and every other public (or even private) project in Toronto in recent times to shame. They did an excellent job here and the attention to detail is amazing. It's too bad there isn't a similar project in the core. By the looks of it I don't have high hopes for the NPS revitalization.
As long as our moronic city leaders start providing adequate transportation/utilities for the growth at some point, and as long as the architecture isn't awful, vertical growth like this is a great thing.