City
Rebuilding effort on Queen Street leaves much to be desired
Earlier today Urban Toronto reported on what appears to be the first obvious indication of what the post-fire rebuilding effort will look like on Queen near Bathurst. The lot had been sitting mostly empty until construction began on a new home for Duke's Cycle in February of this year. And while it's still difficult to get a sense of what the structure will look like based on what's been built so far, a rendering depicting the finished product has popped up on the site in the last few days.
Pictured above, the proposed building is a less than inspiring re-addition to the neighbourhood. Not only does it pay little heed to the architectural heritage of the area, the three-storey storefront is rather bland.
Urban Toronto labels the building of the proposal a "regrettable piece of trash" that "abandons the facade to a never-was vaguely historical and meaningless ornamentation which has neither function nor aesthetic merit."
This might be taking it a bit far, but is it too much to ask that the building utilize the red-brick of the original exterior?
As sad as it was to lose the original buildings, events of this kind challenge cities to respond with innovative solutions for the re-integration of new structures into existing neighbourhoods. In other words, the empty lot on Queen Street was an opportunity to rise to the occasion and do something worthwhile with the empty space.
Unfortunately, it looks like that's not going to happen.



Discussion
27 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
It seems those people are usually too expensive for this city. If only we could find a way.
Aside from the fact that the brick (likely precast brick I suppose) is lightly coloured instead of red, is it really a poorer design than any of the buildings around it?
It's great to see the building replaced with another low-rise mixed-use building that will blend in to the streetscape.
Would people rather see an ultra-modern building here? Or some faux-historical tacky building with fancier ornamentation to make the facade less "bland"? I'm not crazy about either of those options and I think this building will do a good job as a compromise.
If they rebuilt the facades of all the burned down buildings and put new windows on, it would look kind of like the MARS building at College/Uni. Kind of cool but not a historical treasure. Just a smart updated building with a slight nod to the past.
iurban / AUGUST 6, 2010 AT 12:52 AM
why don't they donate the property to habitat for humanity. and then build a cafe where the poor could work to pay off the morgage. but i don't think the wannabe urban, iphone texting, purse dog walking, psuedo loft living kids would really enjoy that in there back yard.
--------------------
Ah, so the guy who owns the building should DONATE IT to Habitat for Humanity? He isn't allowed to make money off a multi million dollar asset he probably worked very hard to obtain? It f'ing burned to the ground and you want him to rebuild it and then just POOOOF give it away? Righhhht. Get back to us when you have a clue.
The one thing I don't like by the looks of the rendering are the doors which seem to be the standard Canadiana commercial door out of a catalogue. A better canopy for the office entrance in the middle, and some nice door treatments for the retail shops would be the biggest improvement to this as shown at this time.
Seriously though, this seemed like an opportunity for something with character and it failed miserably.
There are definitely bigger architectural atrocities out there. If you want to vent your spleen, take a look at what Pizza Pizza has done to the Sterling Bank Building at 260 Church St (at Dundas St E):
http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&q=%22pizza+pizza%22&sll=43.654987,-79.376607&sspn=0.022418,0.055661&gl=ca&ie=UTF8&radius=1.67&split=1&rq=1&ev=zi&hq=%22pizza+pizza%22&hnear=&ll=43.656299,-79.377044&spn=0,0.055661&z=15&layer=c&cbll=43.656404,-79.377088&panoid=wHMMctp0gOP-PhVc-4PerQ&cbp=12,243.55,,0,-10.4
An exercise .... look at any brick wall and count every 6 or 8 rows and you should find 2 short bricks. If so, this is brick masonry and is holding up the building structurally. If there are no such "header" bricks, it is likely a veneer brick wall.
http://www.zimbio.com/Model+houses/articles/2/Brick+Houses+Solid+Masonry+vs+Brick+Veneer
The term veneer confuses people because they think of wood veneer of 1mm, and imagine brick veneer must be only 1cm thick and tenuously pasted onto walls.
Did you really just call Toronto's Victorian buildings ugly?