Tuesday, February 14, 2012Light Snow Shower 0°C
City

Dupont Station losing its charm due to neglect

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / March 17, 2010

dupont station ttcDupont subway station is my absolute favourite station on the entire TTC subway network. Designed by Dunlop-Farrow Architects and built in 1978, the station is simply beautiful. Its unique orange colour palette, gorgeous floral-themed mosaic tile work by James Sutherland, and many rounded surfaces and finishes (including benches that blend seamlessly into the walls, rounded wall corners, and bubble-like light fixtures) make it a truly special underground design marvel.

But things have gotten a little worse for wear of late, with tiles crumbling, and countless light fixtures either missing covers or having bulbs blown out or both.

dupont station escalatordupont station ttcOne of the station's defining features are its many lighting fixtures, which dot both the ceilings and walls throughout the station at platform level, and all the way up to near street level. Curved fluorescent bulbs fit inside the circular metal mounts that are covered by either plastic or glass (I'm unsure) covers.

I counted more than two dozen of these funky and chunky light fixtures that are missing covers (and have been for quite a long time). As a result, the station is starting to lose its visual charm as it appears to be falling victim to ongoing neglect.

Before readers jump on me and stomp me for expressing what is admittedly a minor problem in the grand scheme of things (we all know the TTC is struggling with major staffing, financial, and other problems), I want to make it clear that my concerns are rather superficial in nature.

But seeing one of the most loved places on our public transit system fall into such an embarrassing state of disrepair is reason for concern, in my opinion. I mean, how much money and effort (or how little, perhaps) would cost to replace just the missing light covers? I've posed the question to the TTC on numerous occasions, but haven't heard back.

dupont station ttc

In addition to the lighting problems, tiling is also is need of patch-up fixing. And makeshift solutions to decay (like this non smoking sign held up by green masking tape) aren't making the situation any better.

dupont station toronto

dupont station tiles

TTC manangement: if you're reading this, let it be known that I'm willing to volunteer a day or two of my time to help with the required labour. I'm almost certain that my volunteering to do union work would be problematic, but I just thought I'd throw that out there anyhow.

Discussion

22 Comments

harmless / March 17, 2010 at 09:58 am
user-pic
it's a pretty unique place, shame that it fell so far. hope you find it some love.

maybe you can settle an ongoing question we have... were those little orange dots individually placed, all umpteen million of them? or were the walls somehow put up in sheets and just the curved corners done the hard way?
jules / March 17, 2010 at 10:23 am
user-pic
i would love to see a time-lapse videos of people tackling the tile grime from one end of the station to the other, floor to ceiling - even if it was just an ad for fantastic.
Christopher / March 17, 2010 at 10:25 am
user-pic
Add my name to the list of ready and willing volunteers.
o_O / March 17, 2010 at 10:37 am
user-pic
Dupont is a gorgeous station. Not only are there "many rounded surfaces," I believe hearing that there isn't a single right angle in the station's design (collector's booth, etc notwithstanding).
Neville replying to a comment from harmless / March 17, 2010 at 10:37 am
user-pic
"were those little orange dots individually placed..."

Tiles usually are attached to a standard-size mesh backing (e.g., by the square foot) so you can tackle large areas. Then these sheets of tiles can be mortared/grouted in place.
Adam / March 17, 2010 at 10:38 am
user-pic
Man I love this station—definitely my favourite as well. It's more reminiscent of Montréal's individual Metro stations rather than anything in the TTC's repertoire.

You're right about the slow decay though. This was my station 10 years ago, and it was the same story then—to say nothing of that strange perpetual scaffolding supporting the ceiling on the main level by the Northwest exit.

The entire subway system needs a major top-to-bottom end-to-end scrub! I bet there are many volunteers who would be willing to do the job, but you're probably right about stepping on union toes.

As for the tiling question: those mosaic tiles come in sheets as you say, but there's no need to do any of it the hard way; the sheets are flexible.
Neville replying to a comment from harmless / March 17, 2010 at 10:39 am
user-pic
And I meant to add that the mesh matrix is flexible to accommodate curves.
agentsmith / March 17, 2010 at 11:26 am
user-pic
I hate to defend the TTC, but it could be that the bubble style light fixtures are so old now that replacement covers are no longer available.
JJ / March 17, 2010 at 11:30 am
user-pic
Very nice piece. It's sad but true that all the little dirty, neglected details make the TTC feel like an institution in decline.

Can we please get a properly-funded transit system? Please?
Roland Butta / March 17, 2010 at 11:52 am
user-pic
The constant tagging of that station by local asshole kids doesn't help matters either.
Adam replying to a comment from Neville / March 17, 2010 at 11:55 am
user-pic
I knew someone would explain that just as I was posting my comment!
Drewpont / March 17, 2010 at 12:01 pm
user-pic
The Spadina Extension (from Spadina to Downsview) all have unique design layouts, Dupont used to be my home station too for a time, it's sad that so many of the stations require so little additional work, that (if done) would create such a huge impact (many, little, huge). The slats in the ceilings of many of the BD stations for example, or at St. Clair West (my current home station) one wouldn't think that replacing said slats would be costly or time-consuming, but that little job would make many of the stations appear to be in better shape.
Even Rosedale is showing it's age (most of the current yellow platform line is a metallic extension from the original platform via multiple cross-beam supports that makes an awful creaking sound when you step on it.

Start a campaign: 69 floor buffers for 69 stations!

nee / March 17, 2010 at 12:03 pm
user-pic
what you rightly point out about that particular station isn't just true of the TTC in general but of the city as a whole. All our infrastructure makes is shabby and half ass and looks like no one really gives a sh*t.. shabby wooden poles everywhere, every surface covered in ratty posters, asphalt patches all over the place.. looks at the grounds at the front of Old City Hall, a disgrace
Richard / March 17, 2010 at 01:17 pm
user-pic
What a disgrace - as JJ says, this is a sign of an institution in sad decline. After safety, maintenance and cleaning should be high priority.

This is just another example of the TTC's lack of care about its users.
cocoa / March 17, 2010 at 02:12 pm
user-pic
Is my memory fuzzy, or has it been bad for a while? I remember thinking it was interesting-but-a-bit-rundown as a kid, over a decade ago.

W. K. Lis / March 17, 2010 at 03:23 pm
user-pic
As mentioned, the light fixtures could be obsolete, the same with the missing tiles.

They could not replace the original tile work on the original Yonge subway, so they replaced them with what you see now.

The problem is replacing the light fixtures and tiles at Dupont Station maybe difficult to replace with the same items, especially if they don't make them anymore. That is why people tend to keep spares of the original tiles, but when they run out do they cover the missing pieces with pictures of their cat?
r-dean / March 17, 2010 at 03:28 pm
user-pic
Thank you for a really nice article. I don't stop at Dupont often - so I'd forgotten how unique it really is, on our transit line. And, at the very least, masking taped up no-smoking signs, should be addressed.
Steve / March 17, 2010 at 04:42 pm
user-pic
I know Brad pops on these forums from time to time -- I would very much like to here his insight as to how/why the TTC has let basic maintenance in stations fall so far below par.
Adam Sobolak / March 17, 2010 at 08:01 pm
user-pic
Re Dupont vs the Yonge line: remember that there's a legitimate current "heritage" argument in Dupont's favour; one that didn't exist (or at least, not deeply enough) when the Yonge line was de-Vitrolited.

And while we're at it, don't forget the whole issue of potentially reinstating Michael Hayden's neon installations in Yorkdale station (might some LED proxy be suitable?); as well as the removal of Rita Letendre's skylight mural at Glencairn (though in that case, it was with Letendre's approval)
JM / March 18, 2010 at 01:49 am
user-pic
Dupont is my current home station, a few weeks ago I actually saw a guy replacing many of the U-Shaped florescent lights that sit in those round holders. There were way more burnt out ones before that happened. Now nearly every one is lit. Sadly I didn't see any replacement covers though, as it's been said before they're likely out of production.


james / March 20, 2010 at 03:28 pm
user-pic
the station is ugly, has always been ugly, and creates a strange/annoying/tornado-like wind tunnel at the exists.
Kam / March 24, 2010 at 09:23 pm
user-pic
I agree, my favourite station in the system - the view from the mezzanine down to track level is a particular highlight.

And I agree that with a little loving care it could be restored to its original grandeur.

Would be nice if they renovated the entrances to make them a bit more welcoming though.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal