Monday, February 13, 2012Partly Cloudy -2°C
City

Morning Brew: Use those Cell Phones While you Can, Strike Saves Money, Smitherman to Stay Put?, Cat Police too Powerful?, Sundin Retires and Body Worlds Returns

Posted by Joshua / September 30, 2009

King Street WestPhoto: "King Street West, One Headlight" by Toronto Creative, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):

Be sure, while driving, to use those cell phones and other hands-on electronic devices while you can. Toronto Police have been advised to expect the new law banning their use while behind the wheel to kick in between late October and late November. It's the classic seat belt debate all over: should you stop using your phone because it's safer (then stop now!), or because it's the law (it's fine 'til November!)?

The so-called garbage strike seems like a long time ago, but the city figured out they saved $33.2 million on garbage - $36.1 million overall - giving councillors some money to argue about how to use. Most suggest the money should roll into next year's operating budget but Councillor Doug Holyday wants a rebate to all residents. By my math residents would get a max of about $14, which hardly seems worth it to me. He's probably just annoyed the city wants to raise garbage fees by a few bucks per household.

Well is he or isn't he? Premier McGuinty assured us yesterday that the mighty Minister Smitherman is "not going anywhere," something somewhat confirmed by Smitherman himself who says he's busy running two big government ministries. Somehow all this has just amplified speculation that the provincial heavyweight will be running for mayor in Toronto next year. Expect an announcement in January, and endless speculation about Smitherman's motives until then.

Telemarketers are ignoring the do-not-call list and thumbing their noses at the CRTC, ignoring the fines sent their way. Yet the CRTC bends over to protect the telemarketers' names. We're to expect four more names of violators this week, but really, how hard would it be to go public right away and really enforce a rule? Does the CRTC really think the public say, "oh no, really, I want all the calls! Please don't hurt these telemarketers!"

Mats Sundin is hanging up the skates for good, according to Swedish reports announcing his retirement. Sundin's accomplishments include 4 gold medals - one Olympic, 3 Word Championship - but no Stanley Cup (go Leafs!). But we'll see if he's really just channeling Brett Favre and decides to start playing in month or two.

The Star's very own Joe Fiorito has two cats not in the window (and apparently trained to stay away from doors), but the 'cat police' found him out anyway and he's none too pleased that they may have been peeping in his windows to do it.

The mind-boggling and amazing Body Worlds exhibit returns to the Science Centre in just over a week. Last time around, in 2005, the Centre anticipated mass demonstrations about real bodies being on display, but instead got mass attendance. All I know is that the Body Worlds exhibit I saw is among the most incredible things I've ever seen.

Discussion

20 Comments

Mat / September 30, 2009 at 08:55 am
user-pic
I think Sundin is done for good. I would also like to thank the media for not subjecting us to a second summer or will he or won't he (retire). Or should I thank Dany Heatley instead for giving the sports reporters something else to talk about.
DS / September 30, 2009 at 09:00 am
user-pic
Sundin's done and he's thanked Toronto for being his second home. Perhaps we should thank him for his sportsmanship and persistence instead of snarking at him.

Xavier / September 30, 2009 at 09:00 am
user-pic
I guess since the cat police foind out peeping charges don't stick in Ontario they fell that they have the go ahead to invade people's privacy
Ratpick / September 30, 2009 at 09:30 am
user-pic
City employees should be sweeping our streets and cleaning rubbish off our beaches, rather than spying for indoor cats.
Onegirl / September 30, 2009 at 09:37 am
user-pic
So the City manages to collect from cat owners that aren't licensing their pets, but the CRTC hasn't figured out a way to collect from companies that call people on the "do not call" list? Umm... maybe we should get the City to take care of the telemarketers and the CRTC to deal with those law-breaking pet owners. That way, if they find out about my 'illegal' cats, all I have to worry about is having my name published.
Mark / September 30, 2009 at 09:39 am
user-pic
The city didn't save any money on garbage. The article linked actually says that Solid Waste Management Services costs actually increased by $4.1 million during the strike. Total savings through the strike were pegged at $36.1 million, minus the garbage expenses but plus the $1.2 million saved by Toronto Water, for a total of $33.2 million saved.
Eric replying to a comment from Ratpick / September 30, 2009 at 09:49 am
user-pic
Or if they feel there is a true need for pet law enforcement, spend time focusing on people who let there pets crap on the sidewalk and don't clean it up!
Joshua replying to a comment from Mark / September 30, 2009 at 09:51 am
user-pic
Thanks, Mark, for pointing that out. You're right, total savings are only $33.2 million and overall the garbage cost extra, thanks to the $25 million+ for overtime in the cleanup.
Parkdalian / September 30, 2009 at 11:13 am
user-pic
Does anyone know how Richard Dawkins lecture went last night? I heard it was a sell out.
Parkdalian` / September 30, 2009 at 11:38 am
user-pic
Also (sorry) Does anyone agree with Terence Corcoran's agreement that cyclist (*all of them, even families with kids) should be taxed and have liscense plates??

I'm not a courier, but what a load of crap! Visions like these make me mad (*on an otherwise happy day for me)

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/toronto/archive/2009/09/29/time-to-stop-giving-bicylists-a-free-ride.aspx

anon / September 30, 2009 at 12:12 pm
user-pic
The rebate should go entirely to the small number of residents who had no choice but to live beside the temporary dump sites and got shit on by the rest of the city.

meh replying to a comment from Parkdalian` / September 30, 2009 at 12:30 pm
user-pic
Why do idiot columnists write these articles without doing ANY research? If he has simple used Google, he would have founf a G&M story from Sept.24/09:

http://v1.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090924.GEE24ART2257/TPStory/TPComment/

Reasons why bicycle licenening won't work from the article:

"The city has looked at bike licensing at least three times over the years: in 1984, 1992 and 1996. Each time city council rejected it, for several good reasons....Then there is the cost. With hundreds of thousands of cyclists in the city, it would be a massive project to set up and administer a new testing and licensing system, with all the new databases and test examiners required.

The Ontario Ministry of Transportation rejected the notion in 1996, advising the city that "such schemes, apart from being administratively and financially burdensome, do not increase bicycle safety practices."

That's why we don't bother with bicycle licenening: it will cost a lit and achieve little.






ddt replying to a comment from meh / September 30, 2009 at 01:02 pm
user-pic
ah...but yearly expesive plate renewals would pay for all that in a short time...and it may even get bikes off the damned sidewalks..
jeff replying to a comment from meh / September 30, 2009 at 01:10 pm
user-pic
Funny, I read that article especially the closing paragraphs as sarcastic... tongue in cheek.

I believe cyclists should be licensed. They are operating a vehicle plain and simple. Then the police will have greater incentive to stop them. As it is now there is little incentive because cyclists have no obligation to present ID.

You see, I believe most people require an incentive to follow the rules beyond personal decency. And as the vast majority of cyclists I see on the streets daily keep demonstrating they will NOT obey the rules of the road and respect the rights of others such as drivers and pedestrians.

Is it a perfect solution ... no. But it works for the majority of drivers.

I would also charge cyclists under the soon to come cell phone bylaw.
parkdalian replying to a comment from jeff / September 30, 2009 at 01:21 pm
user-pic
Jeff. The only reason we're having this discussion is because toronto lacks the proper infrastructure for cyclists to not ride side by side with drivers.

Fine, liscense and tax cyclists. In return, give us world-standard bike lanes and problem solved! (Not even world-standard... ANY bike lanes stretching the entire GTA will do) I heard they're cheaper to make than roads!
jeff replying to a comment from parkdalian / September 30, 2009 at 01:48 pm
user-pic
I agree the lanes as they exist suck. And contribute to the problem.

BUT let's not rationalize our way out of the obligation cyclists still have regardless of road conditions. They must obey the rules just as they expect others to do.

Frankly I can't see how Debeermaker and Miller can stand up for the disjointed system they have provided cyclists. Further, those cyclists cheering their efforts only make it easier for them to deliver the least. Sad.
MCS replying to a comment from Parkdalian / September 30, 2009 at 02:49 pm
user-pic
I did and it was fantastic. Dawkins's response to Kirk Cameron's argument for creationism (the banana) had the theatre howling.
Parkdalian replying to a comment from MCS / September 30, 2009 at 03:04 pm
user-pic
*People still talking about wack-job Kirk Cameron?? (*Like Palin and her new book?? ;)

Thank our-make-believe-god there's laughter and humour in this world :)
Eric / September 30, 2009 at 11:32 pm
user-pic
I've got a license for me pet cat Eric. Actually, it's a dog license with the word dog crossed out and cat written in in crayon.
ContractorBids / October 17, 2009 at 07:19 am
user-pic
hmmmm I like this post but I would love to see some on how to save on construction costs in this tough market

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal