Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 21°C
City

Morning Brew: Carjacking Story Fabricated, Airport Taxi Rule Changes, Religious Rite vs. Workplace Safety, Wasp Population Boom

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / August 18, 2009

20090818_mb.jpgPhoto: "It Approaches" by Jen M32, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):

Remember a couple of weeks ago, when a woman from New Brunswick claimed to have been forced to drive all the way to Toronto at gunpoint? It sounded like a really terrifying and traumatic experience. Police are now saying that it was nothing more than a fabricated story. Charges haven't been laid, but public mischief is what she'll likely face... and rightly so, in my opinion. What a waste of police resources and time!

Unexpected changes have come to the way airport taxis can operate, and have cabbies and politicians calling foul. An amendment to the rules was passed with little scrutiny, allowing airport taxis to pick up fares in the city (en route back to the airport). But city taxis taking passengers to the airport still aren't able to pick up fares at the airport without them being pre-booked or paying the airport a $10 fee. Sounds rather unfair to me. And all of this has a victim rarely discussed - the air quality in our city and suburbs.

A Milton Home Depot manager and a Sikh security guard are in a court battle that is seeing the guard's religious beliefs pitted against safety concerns, and calls into question the requirement for sensitivity to religious beliefs in the workplace. This is one of those cases that makes me wonder if there's opportunity for a business entrepreneur to capitalize on a situation... by manufacturing safety equipment (i.e. hard hats) that can accommodate religious head dressings like turbans. Has anyone done this, or is it not feasible?

An unmarked police car, driven by an on-duty police officer, hit a 13-year old boy who was skateboarding across the street on a red light at Keele and Glenlake yesterday afternoon. The SIU was called in to investigate, but I'm not sure that they'll confirm anything more than what it appears to be - a bad-timing accident. I'm sure that both the boy and the officer are wishing they could turn back time and have another chance to approach the intersection with more caution.

And apparently a mild winter last year is in part responsible for the surge in wasp population this summer. I haven't noticed more than usual (yet), nor to I have much of a problem with them (since I'm not allergic to their stings), but I am wondering what "more [is] to come" from the 680News report.

Discussion

31 Comments

Xavier / August 18, 2009 at 08:45 am
user-pic
I think the issue is the Sikhs are not allowed to put a covering over their turbans.
Hamish Grant / August 18, 2009 at 09:19 am
user-pic
in the UK they have this provision in their Occupational Health and Safety regs:

"THE EMPLOYMENT ACT 1989 - SIKHS AND HEAD PROTECTION
20 Section 11(1) of the Act exempts a follower of the Sikh religion from any legal requirement to wear a safety helmet while on a construction site ("any place where building operations or works of engineering construction are being undertaken"), provided that he is wearing a turban. Accordingly, turban-wearing Sikhs do not have to comply with any duty under reg 6 to wear head protection on construction sites (nor with the general duty under HSW Act s.7 in the same respects.)

21 Section 11(2) of the Act also exempts Sikhs and any other persons from any legal requirements connected with the wearing, provision or maintenance of safety helmets in relation to Sikhs on construction sites. Hence, employers and other persons in control of workers are relieved of their duties to a Sikh under regs 3, 4 and 5 provided that the Sikh is wearing a turban. In the same way, they are exempted from like duties under HSW Act ss.2, 3 and 4

22 Section 11(4) and 11(6) sets out the civil liability position when the above exemptions are in operation, and Section 12 protects Sikhs from racial discrimination in connection with requirements to wear safety helmets. These aspects of the Act are dealt with by the Department for Education and Employment, not HSE

*********************************************************

However it may be possible for a Sikh to wear a hard hat if they are prepared to wear a Pakta in place of their traditional Turban, this cannot be forced, but I have found that by explaining what you wish to achieve and asking for their comments (positive and negative), and listening to what they have to say you can reach a mutually satisfactory agreement.
Also means that their cultural beliefs are still respected."
!! / August 18, 2009 at 09:21 am
user-pic
They should sikh new employment if they dont want to abide by the safety rules in place for their well being.
Mari / August 18, 2009 at 09:44 am
user-pic
I have noticed the increase in the wasp population. Those jerks are everywhere.

And have you ever noticed how much they seem to like meat? I saw one crawl around on my plate then leave with a chunk of pulled pork!

I'm not allergic either but I sure as hell don't want to get stung. I try my best to stay away from them, ignore them, all that but it's getting difficult!
bbzzzz / August 18, 2009 at 09:48 am
user-pic
Wasps?
Are we still allowed to call people that?
Jo / August 18, 2009 at 10:04 am
user-pic
I've noticed a lot of wasps in my backyard. I've rarely had guests over this summer for a barbeque because of it.
Dave / August 18, 2009 at 10:27 am
user-pic
I think that the Sikh's who dont want to wear a hard hat should sign a waiver that releases the taxpayers from paying his hospital bills when something falls on his head.

why should I pay for his stupidity?
koz replying to a comment from !! / August 18, 2009 at 10:30 am
user-pic
Zing!
badbhoy replying to a comment from Dave / August 18, 2009 at 10:43 am
user-pic
So are you suggesting the same for every cyclist that doesn't wear a helmet?
?? / August 18, 2009 at 10:51 am
user-pic
Are bike helmets mandatory under the health & safety act?
badbhoy replying to a comment from ?? / August 18, 2009 at 11:03 am
user-pic
No but it is equally stupid to not wear one. It still doesn't justify not paying for someone's hospital bill as you suggested in your first post. Ass.
?? / August 18, 2009 at 11:06 am
user-pic
Haha, simmer down there sunshine.
Didnt post the first comment.
I wouldnt pay for either ones bills.
Yan replying to a comment from Dave / August 18, 2009 at 11:07 am
user-pic
I agree with every word.
Vic De Zen / August 18, 2009 at 11:10 am
user-pic
I started to suspect the NB woman's story was false when it took such a long time for things to be resolved or for any other evidence to turn up. What a waste of time!
Fredricton replying to a comment from Vic De Zen / August 18, 2009 at 11:14 am
user-pic
Well she is from NB, so shes obviously not very bright.
Jonathan / August 18, 2009 at 11:32 am
user-pic
Damn wasps are everywhere! I haven't been able to get a table at Patis for weeks. And forget about Castor!
Sniderscion / August 18, 2009 at 11:40 am
user-pic
Bees dissapearing, Wasps increasing; Coywolves; what the heck is nature up to?
Reality Check / August 18, 2009 at 12:05 pm
user-pic
Shows the idiocy of human rights tribunals - employer is liable to fines and legal fees if he doesn't force employee to wear a hard hat, but he is also subject to fines and legal fees if he does force employee to wear a hard hat. People who win at human rights tribunals should get costs from the government, while the complainant should be forced to pay the government back (they shouldn't have to pay costs directly, since so many of them are judgment proof and thus innocent parties wouldn't have their costs paid for).

If your religion makes it impossible for you to do a job, then that's your problem. Not too many seriously religious people are stripping, bartending, etc. You don't see many Orthodox Jews running pig roasts. The government shouldn't be getting involved and it shouldn't be possible to take people to court (real court or fake human rights tribunal) over these disputes.
Jacob / August 18, 2009 at 12:51 pm
user-pic
If you don't want to wear something that is required for SAFETY on the job, then don't apply for the job. It should be as simple as that. Making a fuss once you HAVE the job is just silly.

As for the whole taxi/limo debate, all the more reason to get that long-overdue rapid transit line going into there.
Dave replying to a comment from badbhoy / August 18, 2009 at 12:58 pm
user-pic
it certainly does justify not paying the bill, Bhoy ???
its his decision to not follow the heath and saftey act, he's breaking the law out of stupidity.
Kane / August 18, 2009 at 01:03 pm
user-pic
I know a gentleman who works in construction. During a social event he mentioned that he won't hire anyone wearing a turban ever due to the legal issues it can bring forth. HE has no problem with people of other religions, but he is worried about legal issues and insurance issues. Of course he doesn't reject on the basis of religion.
He did have a gentleman apply for a position once without a turban only to show up for work wearing one. No sure what happened with that issue, but he decided that in the future he won't hire anyone that looks like they may wear a turban.

Now this gentleman hangs out with diverse people socially, and is willing to work with pretty much anyone of any sexual orientation and skin colour if no special legal issues arise.

Does this system of tribunals and religious exceptions encourage discrimination ? Sure seems so.
handfed / August 18, 2009 at 01:08 pm
user-pic
What is the location of that spectacular sculpture in the photo?!
Sheryl / August 18, 2009 at 01:11 pm
user-pic
Im not surprised someone got hit at Glenlake & Keele. I've been nearly hit several times at the intersection as well. Not for jaywalking, but by jackasses turning on a pedestrian light and not paying attention to people crossing the damn street.

Andrew / August 18, 2009 at 01:18 pm
user-pic
So just out of curiousity, what do Sikh construction workers wear in India or other countries? Although this case involves a security guard and not someone directly involved in construction, there has to be some kind of option available.
janine replying to a comment from handfed / August 18, 2009 at 01:20 pm
user-pic
That sculpture can be found in the Distillery District...it's pretty impressive in person.
Jonathan replying to a comment from handfed / August 18, 2009 at 01:29 pm
user-pic
The sculpture is in The Distillery. It's even more amazing in person! I highly reccommend going to see it after having a few at the Mill St. brewery. Takes it to whole other level!
Neeson replying to a comment from handfed / August 18, 2009 at 01:46 pm
user-pic
Im pretty sure its a prop from the Chronicles of Narnia movie thats on display somewhere in the city. Probably Yonge/Dundas Sq.
Joel / August 18, 2009 at 02:00 pm
user-pic
Wow that sculpture is awesome! I had heard that some more art was coming in that area, but that looks like an incredible piece of work, beyond my expectations.
Andrea / August 18, 2009 at 04:21 pm
user-pic
I share my new apartment with wasps. Every morning I find at least two flying around my kitchen window. They've gotten more resilient and crafty as time goes on. Usually I spray them with water or a soapy spray but in recent days these methods have failed to work. The wasps play dead, too. I spray, they flail and stop (it's kind of pathetic and I sympathize a little), I think they're dead. Then, minutes later, they're flying again and I'm cursing them (again). I think they're laughing at me.

There's always the swatting method, but sometimes I miss and then duck. This morning I aimed my vacuum cleaner at two little fuckers and hoped that they couldn't fly back out pissed off. Moments later a beer glass fell off the dish drainer and smashed on the floor, causing me to reach for the vacuum cleaner. I figure that if the wasps hadn't already suffocated, the glass shards would have impaled them.
j-rock / August 18, 2009 at 06:09 pm
user-pic
I read the headline about the wasps, and thought "Good. At least now angry white dudes can quit complaining about becoming a 'minority' in Toronto." Oops.
jay / August 19, 2009 at 08:32 am
user-pic
I saw someone wearing a hard hat on top of their turban just the other day. It had an extra-long metallic chinstrap and looked a little awkward, but he was wearing one nonetheless.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal