Saturday, May 26, 2012Partly Cloudy 21°C
City

Solve our Budget Problems - Beautify the City

Posted by St Dan / November 14, 2005

Billboards, billboards everywhere - are they the solution to Toronto's budget crunch?
They're everywhere. Nearly ubiquitous, especially in the downtown core, they are considered an eyesore at best, and an oppresive private encroachment onto public space at worst. They are billboards, and if Toronto city councillors are serious about using new powers to be given to us by the province, they could be the key to a balanced civic budget.

The new City of Toronto Act, set to be proposed by Queen's Park next month is to give Toronto a whole host of new powers - everything from putting speedbumps on the road without asking McGuinty for permission, to the ability to tax cigarettes or extend bar hours. While nothing in any draft I've seen indicated that the province is explicitly giving the city the power to tax billboards, the willingness to concede a point such as that is clearly there - should Mayor Miller push for it.

Unlike a Toronto-only sales or business tax, Hogtown would not have to worry about shoppers or companies rushing out en masse to the hinterland north of Steeles - if billboards are to do their job for the advertisers, they need to be around places frequented by lots of people, not low taxes - and if a few of those monstrocities do decide it's no longer cost effective, all we're losing is one more visual blight.

Looking North-West at Dundas Square, billboards blot out the sky
By putting a tax - perhaps 10% for standard billboards, 15% for illuminated ones, and 20% for those video monstrocities - on the rental price of advertising on a billboard, advertisers will be forced to think twice before cluttering our city with their signage. With the money raised from the thousands of billboards out there, the city would be one step closer to financial probity. We would no longer have to worry if police are more necessary than transit, or if recreation centres are more vital than shelter services.

The question is not do we want a well-off city or a beautiful one. The question is don't we deserve both? The answer is that we do, and that a billboard tax is the way to do it.

Discussion

10 Comments

Fen / November 15, 2005 at 12:37 am
user-pic
The city makes peanuts from the existing ads plastered everywhere, so it would be a nice change to stick it to those companies. But, back in reality, City Hall will tax *us* to death wth the new powers before they tax precious Viacom (or any other company who owns billboards).

We mustn't upset the advertising gods.
kiam / November 15, 2005 at 03:23 am
user-pic
Yeah, but what can Viacom do to the city? Go away? I'd be OK with that.
morecowbell / November 15, 2005 at 09:17 am
user-pic
Can we tax posters too? They encroach on my space a heck of a lot more.
St Dan / November 15, 2005 at 11:48 am
user-pic
Kiam: Exactly. It's a win win situation. Worst-case scenario, every single billboard decides to shut down, and we lose nothing but visual clutter (or maybe that's the best case scenario, I'm not sure). Other-case scenario, the advertising stays, but we can afford to fund programmes.

morecowbell: If you mean the community, ground level letter-sized posters, I don't know how you'd do that. Council has already acknowledged that they can't control postering, so I don't see how they'd tax it, even if they wanted to.
JackatM2 / November 16, 2005 at 02:11 pm
user-pic
I want 5 dollars back on every minute I spend on this blog
/pd / November 16, 2005 at 06:16 pm
user-pic
Tax the companies/billboard owners may not work so easily. Afterall, the billboards are owned by ad companies who "lease" out these boards to which company buys space. However, the right to put up a billboard is via a process which the city council ratifiesm I.e the ad company has already paid city hall for a 3yr contract w/city hall.
St Dan / November 17, 2005 at 01:19 am
user-pic
pd: As the permit process for billboards is already tragically cheap and porous, taxing the leasing is probably the best and easiest way to go about it. It would take a lot of lawyers to get out of the 3 year leases with city hall, but slapping on a 15% tax on all leases would instantly generate income.
JackatM2 / November 17, 2005 at 12:51 pm
user-pic
I wonder which agecny media planner placed the Trident poster there?
colin / November 18, 2005 at 07:00 pm
user-pic
if there were no billboards, models couldn't have the dream of having their photo blown up to 30feet tall that gets them through their work-day at starbucks.
St Dan / November 19, 2005 at 02:37 am
user-pic
Colin... which Starbucks are you going to???

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal