Arts
Is City Funded Media Redundant?
Late last year, the city very quietly changed their livewithculture.ca website from a catalogue of listings to a blog, although they've only just gotten around to publicizing the change recently. It's a refreshing surprise for anyone - which would mean almost everyone - who was unaware that the city's branded cultural promotion initiative went much beyond street banners downtown and a few subway ads.
Christopher Jones is the principal voice of the renovated site - he has the title of Cultural Affairs Officer (Acting) and has written the majority of the site's posts, which have, at least since the new year began, profiles of the owner of Soundscapes and an artist who collects family photos and films, as well as features on a dance company, Elvis Mondays, and family day at the Gardiner Museum. He admits that the blog looks like a one-man band, though he says he's excited about receiving new posts this week from other workers at the city's cultural affairs department, and is actively looking for artists and arts organization employees to contribute.
"I would love to have people who are on the inside of the culture sector," Jones says, "so they could reveal the inner workings of culture in Toronto. I want people with a point of view - I think a lot of arts journalism suffers a little bit because writers are hemmed in by the format of the vehicle for which they're working. What I love about blogging is that you get more of the voice of the writer, and I think that can really add to the content."
Livewithculture is very much a part of David Miller's mayoral legacy - a city initiative to increase the profile of the arts that lost steam as the banner campaign got less fresh and traffic to the listings-based website had dropped by half. Jones said that despite this, the site still ended up with a high Google ranking whenever he did searches for artists, which led to the blogging brainstorm - a blog veteran himself, Jones got approval for the revamp, after which it took just two months to build the redesigned site, which went live in September.
According to Alexa, livewithculture.ca gets very little traffic, and page views have actually been declining since the revamp.
Here's what its traffic looks like compared to blogTO and Torontoist:
The city's role in online publishing got a bit of friction this week with the launch of Yonge Street, Spacing veteran Shawn Micaleff's web magazine, which attracted criticism from city councilors only just informed of the city's financial sponsorship of the site. Ward 34 councilor Denzil Minnan-Wong in particular wondered why tax money should have gone to help pay a third party to cover city stories, telling the National Post that a press release should suffice - "Communicate that way and that costs nothing."
It's an evergreen issue in Canada, and it informs criticism of everything from the CBC to the very existence of the CRTC - why government should compete with private industry, never mind have such a heavy hand in its regulation. With two city blogs already covering arts, news and culture, there's no shortage of arts coverage online, and while livingwithculture.ca can certainly carve out a space for itself, it won't be with posts about Soundscapes, for instance.
Jones is quick to insist that council voted to approve funding for the livewithculture.ca site, and adds that he has no budget to pay outside contributors, and that the only expense in producing the blog is the labour by city employees like himself. "We hoped that this would be a little bit innovative. Around here we really subscribe to the whole idea of the creative city, so we thought this would be a great way to morph something we already had."
There is, of course, an inherent danger in soliciting contributions from artists and arts workers: creative people don't - and shouldn't - choose their words too carefully, and while controversy would probably attract the page views and buzz Jones would love to see, it would also attract attention, much of it unwelcome, from elsewhere in the city bureaucracy, not to mention its critics. To that end, Jones says that while he's eager to find artists who can write, he isn't looking for a fight.
"The goal of the blog is certainly not to be controversial - it is to elucidate and illuminate the arts sector. I would have a conversation with potential bloggers about the piece they want to bring forward, and if it becomes clear that they have a point of view or an axe to grind then we probably would take a pass on it. Controversy's not what we're looking for, though it doesn't mean it has to be boring or static."


Discussion
36 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
and i read blogto too. the more the merrier.
Your argument does not make a whole lot of sense. First, i wouldn't say that "everyone" is looking for government money. However, like you say, it is a "peculiarly Canadian assumption" because it is true when applied to the arts and culture in this country and in particular in this city. True, there is more independent and corporate money being put into Art and Culture in this city, but you cannot deny that there is a strong history and legacy of public funds being used towards the Arts. As such, why is this such a surprise or an issue? Hence my comment.
This piece reads like "hey wtf why didn't the city approach us?! Aren't we the coolest cats in town?! wtf!". Hence my comment.
@DS couldn't agree more. Maybe this is a chance for this site (which I do read, but less and less) to get a bit more serious about its title of blogTO and actually start covering Toronto.
For the latter, I can only state that it wasn't, and hope (vainly in your case, I presume) that we'll be taken at our word. As to the latter, there are a lot of reasons to abjure public money in creative endeavors, among them a desire to avoid the mantle of either public art or unofficial propaganda. What I find amazing is your in ability to overcome a basic cynicism about our motives. Hence my comment.
agreed
Case in point (and as a disclaimer I have nothing to do with Torontoist or any other toronto media organization or outlet, I just like to stay in touch with my city) have a look at this article:
http://torontoist.com/2010/01/publisher_of_yonge_street_torontos_new_weekly_explains_his_business.php
Objective, a good point to explore, an interview! Step up your game. And by your game, i don't mean just yours, but the staff.
Scott S. - yes, less grousing and complaining, for sure, but does that mean criticism is to be discouraged? There is, I think you'll agree, a difference.
But funding a media property like livewithculture.ca, Yonge Street or something else is a different story. My main concern centers on value for dollar spent. How many people need to read the post about family day at the Gardiner to make it qualify as a good use of tax dollars?
Have any metrics/benchmarks been defined to help measure success? In a city the size of Toronto, if 10,000 people read the post is that a good return on investment? If only 50 people read it is that considered a waste of money?
Tim, how is that different then any other corporate sponsorship of arts and culture? Why would the city do something like livewithculture or youngestreet by themselves? And what it would it cost us? Is that what you would rather see? If it is, it doesn't make sense since as you said, your main concern is value on dollar spent.
How do we know if this is money well spent? Here's an idea, go find out and write about that. I would be interested in reading what you find out.
As for accountability, given the nature of the web, if this is a waste of money we will find out soon enough.
http://www.cbc.ca/arts/story/2004/02/02/culsite020204.html
Why shouldn't the city take a more direct approach to informing residents of what's going on? Now, if only they'd allow comments so a community and feedback network can grow...
i agree with many comments here that blogTO is the first place i've seen either of these websites, so at least some good has come from this.