Get Your Phreak615 On

Posted by Steve
Filed in Tech
April 16, 2008

Updated @ 12:32 PM, 16 April, 2008

So what's the deal? For the last couple of weeks, there have been little snippets of "pirate" video sneaking their way into MuchMusic television broadcasts, which has people all abuzz wondering if someone is actually hacking into a live broadcast.

Credit for the "heist" is being taken by one Phreak615, who is telling the world how brilliant he is in his own blog, literally referring to himself as "the second coming." He claims to play guitar in a band called The Nunnery, but they appear to be the only local act without a MySpace page.

So, how does one hack into a televised broadcast? According to Phreak615, you have to have access. That's right; it's an inside job. "I have direct access to our digital media server," he boasts in his blog, allowing him to hack in with a WIFI laptop from his car when he's not at work.

If this guy's for real, I'd think Much would have a fairly easy time rooting him out. How many tech savvy young men have direct access to the server and aren't at work when the "hacks" occur? There can't be that many.

Of course, I'm sceptical: this is likely some relatively clever viral marketing campaign for some relatively stupid product that'll soon make you wonder why you ever go online. I'm also suspicious why Blogger, owned by Google, would allow a blog documenting criminal activity by the criminal mastermind himself. If he were the genius outlaw he claims to be, why isn't he on a site hosted in a country where investigators wouldn't be able to subpoena his records?

If this guy is for real, then the tech people at Much are even dimmer than their on-air personalities (and that's saying a lot), and Phreak615 needs to say something other than "Hey everybody, look at me!"

Whether he's legit or not, I guess Phreak615 has given Much some much needed relevance; a reason to watch if only to see where he'll turn up next. Who knows, maybe you can be watching when the hoax is unravelled and we find out what they're trying to sell us.

I'm guessing it's an energy drink. What's your guess?

Update:
For more information on the theory put forward by Adam in the comments, watch this video:

Oh, obscene finger gestures from such a pristine girl!

She's referring to a theory put forth in the comments on this page, stating that the whole thing is likely a plug for a new reality show set to air on June 15 (615). Mind you, this is pure conjecture of a journalism student, and not the result of any concrete investigation, but I wouldn't be surprised if they weren't far off the mark.

Have they got it all figured out? Is there anything worth figuring out? Go figure.

Jerrold on April 16, 2008 at 8:57 AM

A who.is domain registry search (which is free for the public to access if they are so inclined) reveals that this domain was started on March 19th by a guy named Phil in Uxbridge, ON.

If this guy were a "hacker", wouldn't he know to use private domain registry instead of public? Or is the domain registry info full of fake info or more clues?

Google searches for the name listed and address listed have me thinking they're fake details (no valid results). And the contact phone number connects to Bank of Montreal. LOL.

Sean C on April 16, 2008 at 9:10 AM

My money is on prepaid wireless. :p

MattAlexander on April 16, 2008 at 9:15 AM

I think the biggest tip off is that he called himself "Phreak615". I mean, there aren't a lot of other people called "phreak" breaking into television broadcasts are there, so why add 615 to the end unless you're just trying to fit in with the internet peeps like lonelygirl16 or whatever her number was.

But let's pretend it is legit, that's a good reason right there for MuchMusic to not stop him: Something is actually happening at muchmusic for once! Think of the publicity! It's like the test pattern for the Truman Show: highest ratings ever.

Sean Galbraith on April 16, 2008 at 9:18 AM

People still watch MuchMusic? huh.

Sean C on April 16, 2008 at 9:19 AM

Ugh, watched the video, what a load of crap. They do an "analogue" type drop in, as opposed to a straight digital cut.

Sheryl on April 16, 2008 at 9:33 AM

Phreak615?

Guess Zero Cool, Crash Override, and Acid Burn were already taken.

Steve on April 16, 2008 at 9:39 AM

Sean - I just want to go on record saying I don't watch Much. This story is the result of a reader tip, most likely submitted by the evil mastermind of this whole thing.

I feel like such a puppet.

Hans Lucas on April 16, 2008 at 9:42 AM

Simple PR stunt by Much Music and i guess that if your writing about it and I'm reading about it then it worked. The reality is that if someone hacked into the broadcast booth you'd hear about it on the national news and the guy would be arrested quicker then you could say 'hoax'.

Steve on April 16, 2008 at 9:52 AM

Following up on that bogus who.is info, it would appear "phreak" is a contraction of the "hacker"'s "real" name, Phil Reaking. But a Canada-411.ca search yields zero results for anyone with that last name nationwide. Could it be that he's wreaking havoc but doesn't know how to spell? Or maybe he smells (reeking) and doesn't know how to spell. Considering how fishy this is, I'm guess it's the latter.

Mark on April 16, 2008 at 9:56 AM

Sheryl: At least he didn't call himself the 'Phantom Phreak'.

Hack the planet! (Hot damn I love that movie)

Sheryl on April 16, 2008 at 9:59 AM

Mark: Guess he wasnt l33t enough to hack the Gibson.

(that movie is one of my guilty pleasures. Still have it on VHS. Hack the planet!) :P

Loozrboy on April 16, 2008 at 10:15 AM

Well it is a vaguely clever marketing stunt... but I wonder how much of the response is also fake. Are the people who post on his blog telling him how awesome he is fake? Are the people discussing it on other blogs fake? Am I fake?

Mark on April 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM

Am I faking my love of Hackers? I sure hope not.

I also hope MuchMusic doesn't own any oil tankers because if the Da Vinci virus is loose...

Sameer Vasta on April 16, 2008 at 10:33 AM

MuchMusic still exists? I just saw a thread discussing how awesome Hackers was and I got excited.

Jerrold on April 16, 2008 at 10:36 AM

Here's something to ponder...

If this is a viral marketing ploy, and MuchMusic is behind it, do they run the threat of legal action being taken against them? Is registering a domain with false information legal/illegal/grey in Canada? Is registering a .com domain with Canadian company who uses a US registrar a loop hole?

Or can anyone legally register domains under fake identities without any repercussions?

Carissa on April 16, 2008 at 11:50 AM

I love the movie Hackers so, so much. I just watched it again a few weeks ago!

Dude on April 16, 2008 at 11:57 AM

The MMVA's are on June 15th? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Sheryl on April 16, 2008 at 12:14 PM

Mark: Faking love for 'Hackers' cannot be done, its impossible. To attempt such and act would make the universe implode. :D


If MM owns any tankers, hopefully someone will save the day with their 'high tech' 28.8 bps modem.

heather on April 16, 2008 at 12:17 PM

funny how the "hacking" shows up in repeat broadcastings.... hmmm? planted in the show, not a live hack. obv a viral marketing campaign that is working, cause it's got all of us talking about it.

Steve on April 16, 2008 at 12:21 PM

Heather, if everyone's talking about its blatant transparency, can you really say it's working. I'd call it backfiring.

Ugh on April 16, 2008 at 12:30 PM

For you people speculating about the whole "Phil Reeking" crap, Phreaking is the slang term used to describe "hacking" telephone lines.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phreaking

This Much Music crap is very reminiscent of the Max Headroom incident that happened in Chicago. That, however, was legitimate. This, doubtful.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Headroom_pirating_incident

Vid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWdgAMYjYSs

Jerrold on April 16, 2008 at 12:41 PM

^^^Thanks for pointing out the obvious :P

We know what phreaking is, and it's already been established that Phil Reaking is the fake name used to register the domain.

Ugh on April 16, 2008 at 1:14 PM

@Jerrold:

Don't assume everyone knows what you know. It's not so obvious to others if you missed these choice quotes

'I think the biggest tip off is that he called himself "Phreak615". I mean, there aren't a lot of other people called "phreak" breaking into television broadcasts are there'

'Following up on that bogus who.is info, it would appear "phreak" is a contraction of the "hacker"'s "real" name, Phil Reaking.'

Adam on April 16, 2008 at 1:32 PM

Wow this post threw me down a huge Wikipedia rathole. That Max Headroom pirate video is freaky.

Elle Driver on April 16, 2008 at 2:02 PM

"Okay? So when I first saw this? I tripped haaard..."

Stoners are so funny when they're disseminating on large media corps and their viral marketing campaigns.

Jerrold on April 16, 2008 at 2:04 PM

It's been a while since I've heard "tripping" used in any context but travel or falling while walking :P

Beatrix Kiddo on April 16, 2008 at 2:39 PM

They may be stoners, but they're clever stoners.

I'd say they're 90% - 100% right.

Phreaky on April 16, 2008 at 2:57 PM

It's also possible that the 615 is a reference to former phreaking... Multi Frequency Telephone system.

"The end of MF phreaking in the lower 48 United States occurred on June 15, 2006."


Also the domain name registration is fake. Its registered to Phil Reaking... PH Reaking... Phreaking.

Though the number left there leads to a Ms. McDougall at a Communications company.

anonymous on April 16, 2008 at 3:23 PM

I've heard that this is just (just?!) an elaborate physiological experiment conducted by someone out of concordia university. Anyone know more about that angle?

If that's the case do they have some kind of immunity if this is just an academic/research thing, or could someone's professor end up in jail over this?

Shannon on April 16, 2008 at 4:03 PM

I wish you would all stop making fun of the fact that I am a stoner- who cares if I used the word tripped.

Jeff on April 16, 2008 at 4:44 PM

I assume you mean psychological experiment?
From Shannon's post above, I'd say it's working.

ButtPlug on April 16, 2008 at 9:32 PM

Folks, FYI June 16, 2008 is the date of the MMVA's. Christ do some Fuc&ing research

Bilbow on April 16, 2008 at 9:37 PM

His address/phone number/info already documented here - it looks legit based on the info
http://diggreponsitory.blogspot.com/2008/04/phreak615-broadcast-hacker-or-muchmusic.html

Chris on April 17, 2008 at 12:40 AM

Adam: Oh God is it ever freaky.... I should not have just watched that before bed.

Ross A on April 17, 2008 at 5:45 AM

To be honest it isn't half a weird as that max headroom stuff, now that is how to hack a national station !!!

This is just a blatant marketing stunt but you at least have to admit it is good marketing, its got all us talking ;-)

Oh and "RISK is good"

forkimified on April 17, 2008 at 2:14 PM

6:15 is the time on the large clock in his videos...

forkimified on April 17, 2008 at 2:17 PM

"funny how the "hacking" shows up in repeat broadcastings.... hmmm?"

no, because if he was actually hacking into the switcher like the blog says, then the hack would go to tape along with the rest of the show.

anonymous on April 17, 2008 at 7:28 PM

Well if the phreak's army has proven anything, it's that freedom of speech reins supreme.

Shannon and the other stoner's voices ring loud:

http://s290.photobucket.com/albums/ll250/thereal5seconds/?action=view¤t=stonerfu3.flv

Jerry Jack Johnson on April 17, 2008 at 7:38 PM

First of all, where's your proof that they're stoners?

Second, even if they are stoners, they've accomplished a Hell of a lot more than you have or ever will.

What they say may not be 100%, or it may not even be close, but it's a very valid theory, which they've taken the time and effort to convey meaningfully. You wasted your time making some uninspired and incredibly moronic "cartoon" that serves no purpose than to make you look like a douchebag.

Bravo.

Stoners: 1
You : - 10000

anonymous on April 17, 2008 at 8:14 PM

I don't have the skill, or the hardware to make a bong talk.
Don't shoot the messenger.

Chris on April 17, 2008 at 9:21 PM

omg has anyone checked this guys last two blog posts? wtf?

Emily on April 18, 2008 at 3:36 PM

Why would he only hack during actual "Much" shows, like MOD or I once saw it happen during the Spring Break program. I'm sure someone at the Much station would notice and have Leah, Matt, or Tim say something while on air maybe. "If you have any info, call ----" Yeah, it's a bit silly to give out your blog address. Probably a scam.

Darkness on April 18, 2008 at 8:07 PM

I believe it's Devon Soltendieck.. think about it abit.

anonymous on April 21, 2008 at 2:21 PM

Hmm... but is Devon in Paris right now?

Bob on April 24, 2008 at 11:38 PM

Phreak is a term given to hackers, more importantly phone hackers. The 615 at the end leads me to believe something is leading up until 6.15 (june 15) and it most likely has something to do with phones (justa guess as i havent kept up with this stupid gimmick nor do i regularly watch much music besides for video on trial)

Cyndi on April 25, 2008 at 12:08 AM

I read somewhere that the 615 could refer to the date of this year's MMVAs. So it could be just a weird way of advertising it.

brianna on April 27, 2008 at 4:26 AM

if that's the case, muchmusic couldn't be any more lame.

angee on May 7, 2008 at 3:15 PM

you guys are idiots.
do you know what's happening on June 15th 2008?
The Annual MMVA's. That's What.

Do you know what June 15th 2008 is in MM/DD/YY?
6/15/08
Sound familiar? Mr. Phreak615.

Michael on May 7, 2008 at 11:09 PM

This is all a big marketing ploy by Much.

615...is 6/15...the day of the MMVA's
the site www.blogspot.com/phreak615 or whatever is owned by Strategic Sourcing Communications.

SSC is a partner of Rogers Communications.

Rogers owns CHUM, which is Much Music.

Nice try Much Music.

faleonenO on September 22, 2009 at 10:00 PM

Speeks the truth in my eyes what do you all think?
Don't Take The Children To the CInema

Add a Comment

Name: Email: URL:
Comment: