City
Mammoliti to be turfed from city council?
The city's compliance audit committee has unanimously recommended pursuing legal proceedings against councillor Giorgio Mammoliti after a forensic audit of his election finances found his campaign overspent by $12,065, an apparent contravention of the Municipal Elections Act.
The news comes just days after the same team of auditors found mayor Rob Ford overspent on his election campaign by $40,168.
During discussions today, the audit committee heard how Mammoliti's aborted run for mayor may have confused his election team when it came time to file paperwork. The York West representative switched his focus to a seat on council shortly after the campaign period started in 2010.
The Municipal Elections Act contains strict rules on what a candidate can spend on an election. As a citizen seeking the office of councillor, Mammoliti was restricted to $27,464.65
The overspend identified by Froese Forensic Partners equates to roughly 40 per cent of his total budget and centres on misreported spending on an American Express credit card the team used during the campaign.
Late last month Mammoliti claimed he had been followed and his telephone tapped as part of an ongoing conspiracy against him by former and current staff at city hall. So far there has been no evidence in support of that claim.
The committee's recommendation now lies with a lawyer who will decide whether to push for non-criminal charges against the councillor. If Mammoliti is found in breach of the Municipal Elections Act he could be fined or removed from office.
Chris Bateman is a staff writer at blogTO. Follow him on Twitter at @chrisbateman.
Image: Giorgio Mammoliti's Facebook


Discussion
35 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
I'm glad he gets the kick to the curb, hopefully to stay there.
Since the kind people of Ward 7 are apparently too stupid or complacent to toss this idiot out of office, we might need the courts to do it. By the way, if there is anyone from his Ward on this blog - how's that flagpole working out for you?
a) Legal.
b) A fund for developing local amenities. We allow you to build a few extra storeys on your building, you promise to put money for a new park in the area, community center, water fountains, sidewalk planters, etc. Don't pretend it's shady back room dealings. It's a way for locals to profit (via amenities) from the growth of the area they live in.
c) The money is not his to "spend as he likes". Section 2.3 of the Section 37 implementation Guidelines clearly state that money be spent to build durable capital facilities, and anything beyond the list of facilities in the Official Plan must be approved by council.
The only reason Vaughan's ward has more section 37 money than others is because developers *want* to develop in his ward. The same can't be said for say, Agincourt.
Good riddance to Mammo, that guy is a straight up crook and I will be very happy when he's gone. I don't understand how someone like that stays elected, what is wrong with his ward?
You're following the wrong lead. Doug Ford and Sandra Pavan have a slush fund that they've been doling out for years. All she does is troll around in her car all day looking for people to narc on, and narc she does. Like, 20 people a day. Bes thting about it? Doug pays her off and the North Etobicoke Tenants Association get a share too.
http://torontoobserver.ca/2012/11/09/section-37-funds-cause-a-stir-in-scarborough/