City
Oxford releases new Toronto casino renderings
Oxford Properties has released a new clutch of digital renderings showing its massive $3-billion casino proposal in significantly greater detail. Where as before the only visual clues the development company had provided showed the project as a whole from the air, these new images give a greater sense of what the company is planning for the Metro Toronto Convention Centre lands should it be allowed to build the sprawling live, work, and play facility.
Perhaps the most eye-catching image features a totally re-worked southeast corner of Front and John streets. In the place of the blocky MTCC, Oxford envisions a 175,000 sq. ft. gambling hall with a floating rooftop pool that looks like something vaguely similar to Chicago's famous Marina City towers, immortalized on the cover of alt-country band Wilco's Yankee Hotel Foxtrot album.
The other parts of the complex look decidedly less like the type of place one would gamble on blackjack or spend a night in front of a slot machine but are still no less visually striking. The angular glass residential and office towers located on the southwest corner of Front and Simcoe will be the tallest on the 11-acre site and will be split by a large podium and food court.
Yesterday, a group of former Toronto leaders delivered an open letter to mayor Rob Ford urging against building a casino in the city. David Crombie, John Sewell, and Art Eggleton warned that "the sales pitch" wouldn't match the reality of hosting a major gambling venue in the city. Ford said he "completely disagree[s]" with their advice.
Meanwhile today American gaming giant MGM and local real estate group Cadillac Fairview Corp. have announced they're joining forces to develop their own resort proposal for the CNE grounds. Rob Ford has previously said that he would prefer any development to take place on the city-owned Exhibition Place in order to reap the most cash.
The company continues to tout a 5.5-acre park straddling the rail corridor to the south of the existing convention centre despite being told in October that it wouldn't own the "air rights" to the space over the tracks simply because it buys the surrounding properties, a snag that put the potentially deal-sweetening green space in question.
In terms of numbers, Oxford expects around 25,000 total daily visitors to the complex and, to cater for the extra traffic, is promising 2,000 parking spaces. Contrast that with the Eaton Centre, which sees 130,000 daily visitors and has a smaller 1,400-stall parking lot. It seems Oxford expects a spike in drivers on Front Street despite the site having good transit links.
To counter the potentially choking effect of 2,000 new vehicles vying for a parking spot on Front Street, a below-grade street is being worked into the plans that will be accessible from five access points surrounding the complex.
The result of extensive public consultations on the topic are due to be heard at city council in March.
No-one from Oxford Properties could be immediately reached for comment this afternoon.
MORE IMAGES:

Chris Bateman is a staff writer at blogTO. Follow him on Twitter at @chrisbateman.
Images: Oxford Properties.


Discussion
64 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Of course Ford is all for a casino. He might get his Ferris wheel after all.
That said, the Oxford proposal for the convention centre is the bolder choice that would do more for the good of the city (to the extent that a casino can do any good at all via citybuilding). Covering the rail corridor, enlivening the convention centre - always a difficult building type for a city core - sucking in tourists, better access to transit.... but it would take a bold mayor who understood cities to pull it off correctly.
Given that we have Mr. sack-of-doorknobs for mayor at present, the CNE will be the do-least-harm scenario.
I could see a casino at the CNE becoming what everyone is worried about where as a casino by Union/Skydome/CN Tower/ACC/MTCC etc. would be just one part of the area, not the entire one.
For one, casinos are built with windowless designs. Several reasons: help casino-goers lose track of time and spend a lot of money, control the space entirely, and reduce cheating opportunities. Imagine someone in a neighbouring condo, with a high-powered telescope focused on a particular dealer. When you should take a hit, they turn their apartment light off; when you should stand, they turn it on. Etc. etc. All sorts of cheating opportunities arise if the outside world can see your gaming floor.
This will not be built. Zero chance.
However, I have trouble believing the suggestion that a casino will destroy Toronto. Montreal, London (England), Berlin all have casinos among many other great cities. And, to be frank, these renderings are incredible. If they can actually pull off putting a park over the railway tracks, that would be a huge boon for the city. In my opinion, those tracks are a bigger barrier than the Gardiner.
This is what the city needs... get over this small town vibe you're desperately holding on to...
Where are the KFC's and Politicians getting envelopes of cash?
And no way they get this tall.
The first image already looks dated.
http://i.imgur.com/fgPZk.jpg
"Las Vegas Sands Rises as Macau Casino Results Beat Forecasts"
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-30/las-vegas-sands-sales-beat-analysts-estimates-on-macau-gains.html
ALSO if your gonna have lots of space around the casino you need things right there like in Vegas for people to do, places to eat, lots of people go down to the casino area not everyone gambles....the whole area should be built up to handle the casino and its off shoots.
Nice bait and switch, back of napkin renders. Just vote 'yes' then see the dreck that they actually build
I'm of the opinion that a casino will bring more good than bad, but these rendering are very underwhelming. The circular Casino building itself looks like it was proposed in the 80's. There doesn't seem to be any flow or connectivity to the complex's design, it's no different than if five different developers were offered their own individual block to do with as they pleased. None of the towers/building complement each other in any way, nor do they add to the skyline in a positive way. This definitely has to go back to the drawing board.
8 casino proposals in January!
14 casino proposals in February!!
Casino proposals will overtake condo proposals in Toronto 2013!
No, seriously ... these renderings actually look really great. Glass casino's strike me as odd as well. Don't they want you not to know the time of day?
I'm all for opening up the CNE for a Casino. They have space, parking and there's no residents in the immediate area.
I wouldn't put a Casino there.
Very excited.
Way too many positives for this project not to happen.
- Construction jobs
- Full time jobs
- Tourism
- Conferences
All the cons (e.g., drugs, crime, etc.) may raise crime, but downtown is pretty safe as it is, so the increase should be negligible.