Tuesday, May 21, 2013Partly Cloudy 18°C
City

New condo proposed on top of University office tower

Posted by Robyn Urback / January 18, 2013

toronto condo 480 universityEither we've run out of decent spots to build new condos, or the corner of University and Dundas is just too good a spot to pass up. The City of Toronto has received a rezoning application to build a residential tower on top of an existing office at 480 University Avenue.

toronto condo 480 universityPresented as "The Icon" by Amexon Developments back in May (real original name, guys), the building will see a total of 55 storeys — 37 storeys of residential added atop an existing 18 storey tower. If approved, the new tower will house 453 residential units, many of which will face the joys of 24-hour, multi-lane traffic.

toronto condo 480 universityProximity to the subway station is an undeniable perk, but University Ave. isn't exactly a hub of residential delights. That probably explains why most of its towers are office spaces or commercial in nature. Unless the existing tower at 480 University is grounded with some sort of mega-existing foundation, I think we can anticipate a pretty major overhaul to make this structure capable of supporting another 37 storeys.

toronto condo 480 universityThe project obviously seeks to make better (read: $$) use of prime real estate without displacing corporate offices currently on site. And though it's not unusual to see at-grade retail or a few commercial levels in a new condo project, this "Icon" will essentially be two towers in one. It'll make for a superb commute to the office for those who choose to work where they play, but otherwise, residents will be left with suits and corporate luncheons as their stand-ins for neighbourhood perks.

Discussion

20 Comments

asdfsdg / January 18, 2013 at 09:45 am
user-pic
creative use of space. This intersection is prime for additional density.
terrible / January 18, 2013 at 09:57 am
user-pic
What is that white shit at the bottom?
Paul / January 18, 2013 at 10:12 am
user-pic
I've always wondered why the city doesn't push this type of building more often. Not so much downtown, but for the big-box retailers who have the massive one-story stores.
Simon / January 18, 2013 at 10:26 am
user-pic
The big box format relies on oodles of cheap land and free parking. A mixed-use tower would drive it out of business (as it should).
Bill / January 18, 2013 at 12:08 pm
user-pic
Speaking of parking.. I can see building ON TOP of the existing tower, but they can't dig out another 4 stories for parking...?
theZube / January 18, 2013 at 12:10 pm
user-pic
"Proximity to the subway station is an undeniable perk, but University Ave. isn't exactly a hub of residential delights. That probably explains why most of its towers are office spaces or commercial in nature."

I would think zoning explains why most of its towers are office spaces or commercial in nature. But there are condos being squeezed in beside the Zurich tower near the SE corner, and there have been apartments literally right behind this NW corner for years, not to mention all the apartment space starting one block both east and west. The Grange is right there, too.
Mon / January 18, 2013 at 12:55 pm
user-pic
Love the bottom forest design. That area needs some more art!
Rex / January 18, 2013 at 02:29 pm
user-pic
Great idea. Doesn't displace office tenants (we're building too much residential and not enough places for people to work), and puts a tower on a corner that can actually handle the density with both subway and streetcar lines.
Guest replying to a comment from terrible / January 18, 2013 at 02:36 pm
user-pic
That "shit" is a redesigned podium designed to look forest-like, taking cues from the tree lined University ave. This type of streetscape friendly design is a welcome addition and really helps improve the overall look and feel of the avenue. Do you even try to do any research before asking stupid, overly agressive questions or are you just completely ignorant?
Boppity replying to a comment from Guest / January 18, 2013 at 03:30 pm
user-pic
Actually, that thing is a horror because it narrows an extremely busy sidewalk to its tiniest conceivable width. Road construction? Snow? Tough shit, pedestrians and traffic! We need our "streetscape friendly design", so now you have nowhere to walk.
asdfsdg replying to a comment from Boppity / January 18, 2013 at 03:49 pm
user-pic
bopitty just got really mad. chill out dude. Especially considering you dont know what you're talking about. The design features of the building will not infringe on the sidewalk... You wont be losing any of your precious public space.

Now chill out dude.
neilson replying to a comment from Boppity / January 18, 2013 at 04:01 pm
user-pic
actually; actually, the development is just going to re-clad the existing concrete support structure. There will be just as much sidewalk as before, with the added benefit of no two tonne steel structural members falling and killing boppity. OH THE HORROR!
More condos? / January 18, 2013 at 04:18 pm
user-pic
Honestly, what is going on? I'm not against condos. I think they are a great option for those who don't need the space of a house and want to live closer to city centers. But with the rate condos are going up all over Toronto, not just downtown, it makes you wonder: are there really *that* many people moving to Toronto? Or, more precisely, are there really that many people moving to Toronto who can afford these condos with their skyrocketing prices and maintenance fees?

The same thing happened in some European cities very recently (in particular, Dublin). I can see that, in five years, Toronto will have built an incredible number of condos that are only semi-occupied, leading to a big slump.
me / January 18, 2013 at 04:37 pm
user-pic
BlogTO claimed recently that 100 000 people a year are moving to Toronto. Of course, then again, that WAS stated by....er.....blogTO.....so....well.....lol.
Laura / January 18, 2013 at 04:58 pm
user-pic
The white forest design on the bottom would be spectacular.

From the renderings, it looks like the sidewalk would actually be opened up a lot since it seems the entry into the subway would be moved inside the building instead of down that treacherous little staircase. I hope it goes through!
seanm / January 18, 2013 at 05:29 pm
user-pic
The white forest design is very interesting, but the remainder of the building is pretty average. In fact, it looks like a cheapened knock-off of the superb Four Seasons a little bit north. It'd be nice if the architect carried the motif up the tower to some degree, tying the base into the rest of the structure. Take a look at the new TCHC building in Cityplace or Theatre Park along King St W to get a sense of what could be done here.
JP / January 18, 2013 at 07:37 pm
user-pic
Don't see any problems with this. Cool/weird podium. I like it.
Aaron / January 18, 2013 at 08:15 pm
user-pic
Most of the junk being proposed these days will never see the light of day. The few that are eventually built will go through the usual design bait and switch, cheapening, and profit-maximising value engineering as the 100's of POS econoboxes that have been built to date.

In the very near future, a lot of questions are going to be asked about all the shit that has been built over the last decade and all the streets that have been murdered by sterile podiums.
reed / January 19, 2013 at 09:41 pm
user-pic
Your all fucked in the head down there assholes, I pray the city starts burying you mother fuckers on top of each other 1 day.
Father Dunn
me / January 20, 2013 at 01:22 am
user-pic
Personally, I'd LOVE to live in that area.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal