City
Is it time Toronto embraced car-free streets?
We've heard it before, that Toronto should clear cars from Yonge Street, especially around Yonge-Dundas Square due to the extremely high levels of pedestrian and transit traffic, but now there's some evidence that seems suggest these sorts of drastic steps wouldn't necessarily come with the negative impact on businesses that people tend to fear.
Draft findings by the Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium discussed over at Atlantic Cities found customers who arrived at 81 businesses in various locations in the city on foot or by bicycle were in several cases just as likely to spend money compared to people who came by a car.
Indeed, at restaurants, bars, and convenience stores in the survey area those that answered the survey said they were just as happy to splash the cash compared to people with sets of car keys in their pockets. Carless visitors spent less per visit, but they seemed to come more often.
There are some clear limitations to the results: drivers will always spend the most at the supermarket because they have the trunk space to easily carry mountains of groceries home; they will also, hopefully, spend less at a bar to avoid a night in the drunk tank and DUI charges.
What is surprising here is the carless customers polled said they made more frequent stops at local businesses, possibly because it's easier for them to do so given widely available bike parking and the improved chances for an impulse visit based on appearance.
That said, Kelly Clifton, the author of the study, stresses these results came from streets where all modes of transport were allowed. "The majority of customers at all of the businesses still arrived by car," she says in an email, "So while I think that non-automobile consumers are competitive, the automobile still plays an important role for economic vitality — at least for now — in American cities."
"There are exceptions, of course, and one can imagine that this would change with changes in travel costs and improvements to infrastructure and services for non-automobile modes. I think political will to make these changes will come incrementally. But support is building for more walkable and bikable communities."
Emily Badger, the author of the Atlantic Cities post, wonders whether the findings suggest a "green dividend" — extra spending money generated by freedom from a costly automobile — is at work in the results. If it's present in Portland, why not here?
What do you make of these findings? Could certain areas of Toronto like Kensington Market and Yonge-Dundas Square be just as well served by cutting the cord on vehicle traffic? The Distillery is a quasi-pedestrianized area (there's parking on the outside and the entire site is really a destination in itself) yet there's a thriving shopping scene there, especially at this time of year with the Christmas market. Could we copy that concept in other parts of the city? If so, where?
Full report: "Consumer Behavior And Travel Mode Choices" [PDF]
Chris Bateman is a staff writer at blogTO. Follow him on Twitter at @chrisbateman.
Photo: "Bike Gang" by Jackman Chiu in the blogTO Flickr pool.


Discussion
86 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
The city should do more pilot projects on things like this; temporary experiments to see how they would actually work in real life.
The pedestrian centres of European cities are usually the most economically secure areas of the city, as they are so appealing. That said... a mall is essentially a cheap knock-off of this experience, with a roof. Unfortunately the fake pedestrian-space is all owned by one corporation, so it never results in the same unique offerings as true public pedestrianized spaces do.
I agree entirely with Dan about retractable bollards. They're great for keeping cars out during "pedestrian designated" times, and for letting them in at times deemed suitable for deliveries or additional traffic-flow-through needs, such as early am or evenings.
NO
NO
etc.
For every street cars are banned on we should have 5 that cyclists are banned on. Fair is fair.
I'm fine with having pedestrian areas closed to bikes as well as cars (works in Europe as well), and I say that as someone who finds biking the best way of getting around downtown, most of the time.
We can also look at other cities to figure out how to deal with things like deliveries. As I said, retractable bollards allow you to open up the street to deliveries overnight.
We're also talking about small areas that have high pedestrian traffic and high tourist value.
Open your minds people, Toronto does not exist in a bubble. These ideas have been tried and proven in cities all over the world, including in North America (Montreal and New York both have car-free streets).
Cars, cars, cars!
Delivery trucks are not cars, Fordnation.
And I mean why not do it? Most of the places that would be on the list for pedestiran / transit / bike only are already so over-flowing you can't really drive through them efficiently anyways. So what's your loss in the end car drivers? Some high blood pressure?
besides, Toronto may have a slightly colder winter, but has a far warmer summer, and London has grey skies/rain a lot more than Toronto.
in closing, fuck off.
It never ceases to amaze me when I see a mother or father biking, children in tow, on a major street with no bike lane. These people are a danger to themselves and their unwitting children. Our money should go into better funding for transportation not more money wasted on bicycles so hipsters can look cool in front of their friends.
I hope to piss as many of the moustache mafia as one can with the statement above.
Feel free to comment.
P.S. FORD ROCKS!
Cheerio
I find it hillarious all the people saying business will go under. Just like every major city in europe, those pedestrian only areas are completly business free. Right. /s
They definitely should have a trial run on a portion of Queen and also Yonge.
I live in the Yonge & Bloor area. Whenever I drive I never drive through Dundas Sq area. I have no idea why people take that route... Before I even hit College I'm on a side street.
BUT IN 2012 TORONTO STREETS ARE JUST FOR CARS.
Why don't I cycle in winter? I would during the day, for sure. But I don't like cycling at night, after work, when it's dark. I'm a good cyclist, I'm lit up like a Christmas tree, and I wear a helmet, but a lot of motorists simply don't pay attention. I've had too many close calls on my way home from work in the dark and I just don't feel safe.
That way, streets can be pedestrianized all the time or only when it works based on local conditions: perhaps on weekends, all the time in the summer, or in the evenings, for example. Delivery trucks and municipal vehicles would still be able to use the pedestrianized streets, but they would have to give pedestrians the right of way when the streets are in pedestrian mode and drive slowly down that street for a limited distance. It's not unsafe, as this happens in busy parks in the summer like Centre Island where a city parks vehicle like a pickup slowly makes its way down a crowded path. Pedestrians also mix this way with cars even more frequently in mall parking lots, for instance, and nothing ever happens. It may be the only way to go to practical and successful pedestrianization.
What we have now is a combination of sidewalks and roads, a system wherein all parties, pedestrians, cyclists and car users can all use the available space, that is you have a compromise solution and of course the majority of people are happy.
However, the writer of this post doesn't want a compromise solution, he wants a totalitarian solution wherein a large proportion of people will be forced to make a multi-kilometer detour so that a minority of people might enjoy a marginally better pedestrian experience.
Amazing, simply amazing!
Which will probably just be stuck in traffic anyways.
Amazing, simply amazing!
Other than my response, I agree with this idea/concept.
In addition, Queen is close to Richmond and Adelaide, so there should be no concerns about making it hard for cars to get around. Queen Street traffic goes at practically a walking pace on evenings and weekends anyway.
Alternatively, why does everyone think you need to drive downtown? As an avid biker/TTCer/pedestrian and occasional driver, I avoid Yonge/Dundas like the plague. No matter what form of transpo - it is just too congested. If we eliminated cars there, it would make it a much easier and more efficient route for everyone else, and the cars could zoom South along Jarvis or Church just fine.
I really don't see a reason to ever want/need to drive a car at Y/D. The downtown core is very small - just walk.
bad news (for ppl saying "we arnt europe"): uh, the nazis invented the interstate highway system before the US. before that we were all pretty pedestrian over here. we can whatever we want.