Thursday, June 20, 2013Clear 13°C
City

What are Toronto cyclists' worst habits?

Posted by Chris Bateman / July 19, 2012

toronto cyclist riding on the sidewalkToronto's bike riders are a polarizing bunch. On the one hand, most are commuters who by simply not taking a car to work are helping ease traffic on city streets. On the other, some are inexperienced road users without the confidence (and sometimes the knowledge) to properly share the street. Everyone has horror stories - you just have to ask.

Earlier today, we did just that. We had our Twitter followers tell us the worst habits of Toronto's cyclists. As you'd expect, there was a big response. Stories of bikers running red lights, riding on the sidewalk, cruising past open streetcar doors, and using the wrong side of the street abound.

Personally, I would argue that despite the odd bad apple, Toronto cyclists are pretty good about sharing the road. Life on the blacktop is very different without airbags, side impact bars, and crumple zones, and those afraid of mixing it with traffic often resort to making up their own rules to feel safe. Naturally, the bad riders stand out more than the good ones.

In the interest of education, the Ontario Ministry of Transportation has a quick break-down of the road rules as they apply to cyclists. Hand signals and other safety tips are covered in this guide. It's also worth noting that cyclists have the right to use the whole road, though it's good courtesy to keep right if it's safe to do so.

Feel free to add your bad habit suggestions to the comment thread below, but why not tell us how the big issues can be remedied. There are some gray areas too: is carefully proceeding through a red light in the curb lane when there's no road on the right - as on Bloor at Bedford and the Danforth at Donlands - and clearly no traffic okay? Should Idaho stops become official Toronto bike policy? Tell us what you think.

Photo: "So Hip It Hurts" by Jay Morrison in the blogTO Flickr pool.

Discussion

145 Comments

Smugness / July 19, 2012 at 01:26 pm
user-pic
Easy one.
NC / July 19, 2012 at 01:33 pm
user-pic
Not stopping at (major/important/where cars can't see you ... thinking Cambridge and Pretoria) stop signs is my cyclist pet peeve. Otherwise, love cyclists!
the lemur / July 19, 2012 at 01:34 pm
user-pic
Riding on the sidewalk (extra points deducted for ringing your bell at pedestrians in front of you).
Riding the wrong way on the street (esp. in the wrong bikelane).
Riding on the sidewalk so as not to ride the wrong way on the street (seriously, pick another route).
Not signalling.
Running a red light.
Running a stop sign (i.e., without at least slowing down and looking).
Going through the crowd waiting to get on a streetcar.
Making a right and going through pedestrians who are crossing.
Riding too close (behind/beside) other cyclists.
Billy Walsh / July 19, 2012 at 01:45 pm
user-pic
Riding in the middle of the road to obviously disrupt traffic

Riding the wrong way on the street / bikelanes

Ignoring stop signs / lights

Riding on sidewalks / crosswalks

Constantly berating drivers for using the roads as well

Emphasising the TO cyclist handbook guidelines (I have a measurer to see how far from the curb I am!) with no consideration of anyone else / common sense.
Alex / July 19, 2012 at 01:52 pm
user-pic
Running stop lights and red lights.
Wanting to be treated like a car sometimes, and a pedestrian other times, whichever one benefits them most.
Going WAY too fast on trails and paths that have pedestrians on them.
MrsPotato / July 19, 2012 at 01:54 pm
user-pic
THE ASSHOLES WHO RIDE ON THE SIDEWALK.

ASSHOLES.
Stan / July 19, 2012 at 01:58 pm
user-pic
Most of these cycling infractions are being committed by crack heads and bums riding stolen bikes. They have no concern for the law or their own safety and they sure as hell don't care that you're upset enough with their riding to complain on this blog.
CM / July 19, 2012 at 01:58 pm
user-pic
An interesting addition to this article would be going over what cyclist's ARE allowed to do. There are a few tweets about annoying habits which are cyclists rights. It's a good time and place to maybe let drivers know what they should be expecting from law abiding cyclists.
Dan / July 19, 2012 at 02:04 pm
user-pic
Without question seeing cyclist biking on their cellphone. Really what are you smoking? Would love to how you expect to stop quickly or react to anything jumping out in front of you with a phone in one hand. IMO you're just asking to wipe out.
Matt / July 19, 2012 at 02:10 pm
user-pic
How about instead of focusing on the few bad seed cyclists, we talk about how wonderful the downtown would look with half the cars and twice the cyclists (stop-sign runners and all!)?
jae / July 19, 2012 at 02:12 pm
user-pic
Walking to work, I see a lot of everything describe above. In one 20-minute walk, I saw two cyclists go through a stop sign, then another blow through a red light and weave around four lanes of moving traffic. I've also had cyclists weave around me as I'm crossing at a red light. The intersection at Adelaide and Bathurst is getting bad for this.
the moose head / July 19, 2012 at 02:14 pm
user-pic
By far, the worst sin is committed by those who take up the whole car lane unto themselves. I drive and bike myself, so I see both sides of the argument, but the operative word is SHARE. If a cyclist notices a car behind them, they should move aside and let it pass. I have no tolerance for those who ride in the middle of the lane and don't allow anybody to pass them. This sense of entitlement, wherever it stems from, is unforgivable.
The OBSERVATIONIST / July 19, 2012 at 02:17 pm
user-pic
Aggressive bikers. Oblivious Drivers. Accident waiting to happen. Both sides need to accept responsibility and correct the problem.
dont want to smell it / July 19, 2012 at 02:19 pm
user-pic
Smelling like BO after riding your bike to work - by far the worse cyclist habit. Your coworkers suffer because of it.
Scott / July 19, 2012 at 02:19 pm
user-pic
Not asserting themselves when they have the right to do so. Not knowing their rights as a road user or being too meek to stand up for their safety.

Also, not having a unified voice to bring concerns and accountability to governments for infrastructure and enforcement.
2 cents replying to a comment from Stan / July 19, 2012 at 02:20 pm
user-pic
Actually, Stan, most of these infractions aren't 'committed by crackheads and bums riding stolen bikes'. They're committed every day by bonehead regular joes on bicycles who give all cyclists a bad name. Last week I was nearly maimed by a guy on a bike who just flew through the red light/crosswalk on Spadina just south of King. All other traffic is stopped and Mr. Hipster-no-helmet on a 10-speed flies through a red as I have a walk sign and step out to cross. YOU IDIOT! I hope you read this and feel bad. Also, the other day I saw a girl biking on Bathurst at Front start dinging her bell at tourists boarding a streetcar and yelling at them to get off the road so she could ride by. It was a streetcar stop, YOU MORON!! Seriously, all you idiot cyclists that give the rest of us a bad name need to learn the rules of the road.

That said, some commented on this blog saying that bikes who ride by cars turning right are inconsiderate or in the wrong. It should be noted that cyclists who are travelling straight through an intersection actually have the right-of-way over cars turning right, whether they are on the inside lane or outside lane of the car. However, if a cyclist speeds up on the inside lane of a car that's already turning right then expects them to stop... you're not very smart. But if the cyclist is already beside the car and is heading straight, then the right-turning car should yield to the cyclist (just like it should to pedestrians.) Ideally though, everyone would learn the rules of the road and respect them and each other. (Yeah right, in toronto?!)
2 cents / July 19, 2012 at 02:27 pm
user-pic
Also, Bixis: in theory a good idea, but in reality they put a bunch of people riding all over the sidewalks, or riding on the road without helmets, who don't seem to know what they're doing or where they're going or how many people they're holding up in the process. Bad idea.

Can we also have a BlogTO post about all the annoying habits of BAD DRIVERS? Because with everything that can be said about cyclists, more can be said about the drivers in Toronto. They are the WORST! Let's start with Rob Ford. (Hello, suburbanites who want to run over pedestrians and cyclists at every intersection so you can get back to your suburban wasteland. Ugh.)
Jean Doiron replying to a comment from the moose head / July 19, 2012 at 02:33 pm
user-pic
Sense of entitlement? I think my safety comes WAY before your convenience - see the MTO website/Cyclists guide. Many drivers in this city couldn't pass the broadside of a barn... We will all be better off when Toronto cyclists finally get out of the gutter...
Ben / July 19, 2012 at 02:37 pm
user-pic
OK, now let's do motorists
Full Lane / July 19, 2012 at 02:38 pm
user-pic
Any idiot who complains about cyclists not riding close enough to the curb need to brush up on their road rules. Curb hugging is a courtesy most cyclists provide so cars and cyclists can share the road. Cyclists are in fact allowed to take up an entire lane if they so please, as long as they are keeping up with the flow of traffic.
Mcgee / July 19, 2012 at 02:38 pm
user-pic
Cyclists not obeying the laws of the road, like traffic lights, stop signs and 1-way streets.

And this isn't like 10% of people running red lights, whenever I'm on harbourfront, I'm the only one stopping for these red lights.

There was even a guy with toronto cyclist union sticker on both his helmet and his bike who ran multiple red lights... YOU ARE MAKING ALL OF US LOOK BAD. I had to catch up to him and ask him to please stop running reds. He just gave me a "yeah yeah".
Martin replying to a comment from the moose head / July 19, 2012 at 02:40 pm
user-pic
I agree cyclists, as slower traffic, should defer to cars (it's also safer, in general). But cyclists do have the right to take the full lane when it's safer to do so. Riding on streets like Bloor, where cars pass bikes aggressively and closely (I've had my handlebars clipped by passing cars' mirrors), I sometimes find the only way to forestall these close calls is to take the centre of the lane. It may slow down traffic a bit (though on Bloor, not very much, as cars tend to stop illegally during rush hour anyway, which causes a bigger slowdown than anything bikes do), but I don't feel guilty choosing my own safety over costing motorists a few seconds on their commute home. And I don't do this always, or even often.
JLank / July 19, 2012 at 02:45 pm
user-pic
Sadly it's more than a few (although probably not a majority) that ride past open streetcar doors, blow through red lights, and don't dismount at cross walks. It's ultra scary for me living out in Bloor West when a bicycle comes speeding down a steep sidewalk slop at 40kmh when I have my dog next to me and can't hear the bicycle until it basically ready to run us over.
mar replying to a comment from the moose head / July 19, 2012 at 02:47 pm
user-pic
what are you talking about? a bike is a vehicle. pass on the left. you ride close to the curb and you invite drivers to pass other cars on the right. its not safe its not smart.
Chris / July 19, 2012 at 02:51 pm
user-pic
I have a few questions on how a cyclist should deal with some situations. One commenter mentioned:

"Cyclists angrily passing signalling, right-turning cars on the right side."

Aside from the word "angrily," in some jurisdictions cars are supposed to yield to cyclists before a right turn. But I believe that is not the case in Ontario. However, they have to yield to pedestrians crossing the street. So what happens when you are behind a right turning car, it is unsafe to go around their left, and there is plenty of room for you to go through them, and they are not turning right because pedestrians are obviously preventing them? I want people's honest opinions, in this situation, do you consider it okay to pass the right turning car cautiously?

Here's another situation: an empty sidewalk, needing to make a left turn, but it is a busy one way street (say adelaide or something). Instead of riding on the far right side, riding instead, slowly, on the left sidewalk and then making the turn. Technically the cyclist should walk their bike along this sidewalk, but clearly no pedestrians are there. Wouldn't that be ridiculous?

Another situation: around the Annex area, going the wrong way, cautiously, on a one way residential street, to avoid going on a busy, dangerous main street to get to your destination. (There is often no way to avoid these main streets if you actually follow the one way signs religiously).

Another situation: This is one in which cyclists have the right to do it: taking up a whole lane when the other line has parked cars that could open the door at any time and result in a possibly deadly "dooring." I will do this, and if a car is behind me that have to wait until I can move to the side and let me go. Does anyone have thoughts on this?

Okay... here's another: cycling cautiously through a red light that is only a pedestrian crossing, when it is late at night and clearly no pedestrian is there. Technically the cyclist could just walk the bike through it along the sidewalk, but sometimes it is sort of ridiculous when absolutely no one is there. What are your thoughts on this?
Khristopher / July 19, 2012 at 02:54 pm
user-pic
FYI about riding on a sidewalk:

The Toronto bylaw states that riding a bicycle with tire size over 61cm (24 inches) on sidewalks is prohibited, as is riding/operating a bicycle (or roller skates, in-line skates, skateboard, coaster, toy vehicle) on a sidewalk without due care and attention and reasonable consideration for others. The fine in downtown Toronto for not following this bylaw is $90 and aggressive cyclists can also be charged with careless driving.

Source: http://www.toronto.ca/cycling/safety/sidewalk/sidewalk.htm
Steeplejack / July 19, 2012 at 02:58 pm
user-pic
Not signalling. Is that a forgotten skill now? Left arm straight out for a left turn, bent upward at the elbow for a right and again at the elbow but down, for a left. Nothing to it, learned when we were kids.
That and bike couriers who race through intersections against the light. Saw one guy get hit by a car back in 2005 or so: the cyclist started going through the intersection at full speed hurtling south on Bay at Queen when the light was red already! He flew over the car roof, bounced off the trunk and hit the pavement. Almost unbelievably he was able to get up, and walk over and pick his bike up. The poor lady driving the car was shattered though -- in tears, hand over mouth in shock. Then, in a gallant gesture the cyclist flipped her the bird and started swearing at her.
Steeplejack / July 19, 2012 at 02:59 pm
user-pic
For the record as a motorist I also can't abide drivers who don't signal and run the lights too.
OK on Sidewalks But... / July 19, 2012 at 03:01 pm
user-pic
Let me preface this by saying that if a cyclist feels safer and can be respectful while riding her bike on the sidewalk then I am totally for it. That having been said, it REALLY bothers me when cyclists go from acting like a car (driving on the road following traffic signals etc) to acting like a pedestrian (riding on the sidewalk obeying pedestrian signals) and then back again (repeatedly) all to avoid stopping at a red light or cross walk.
cathy / July 19, 2012 at 03:03 pm
user-pic
I was at the Yonge/Dundas intersection last night and not one single cyclist stopped for the red lights during the pedestrian scramble. Not one. 6 cyclists weaving and riding through pedestrians in the crosswalks.

The most annoying things about cyclists? Cops never ticket them for breaking the law.
Roslyn / July 19, 2012 at 03:12 pm
user-pic
Scramble crossing @ Y/D - they never stop at the red lights. They're pedestrians at times, cyclists at others.

Also trying to overcome a vehicle and riding in its blind spot. You're not faster, nor will you ever be, than a car. Take your time and be safe. Cyclists never take responsibility - it's always the drivers fault, when cyclists need to be held accountable for valuing speed over their own safety.

If you don't feel safe on the road, don't bike. It's a sidewalk, not a sideroad.
Antony replying to a comment from the moose head / July 19, 2012 at 03:12 pm
user-pic
BlogTO missed an opportunity here to do some good, besides just driving page views. It's not like this is some original article. We're just going to hear the same stories, personal anecdotes, white-knighting, etc.

It would be interesting, for example, to compare what people think are "bad habits" with what's actually the law. It might also be interesting to discuss how to SOLVE the causes of these bad habits.

But as for this discussion... can we just skip to the festivus Feats of Strength?
Chris replying to a comment from OK on Sidewalks But... / July 19, 2012 at 03:12 pm
user-pic
I am just curious, if you are okay with cyclists respectfully riding on the sidewalk, then what is so wrong with going on the sidewalk, and acting like a pedestrian, then going on the road, like a car? I am not trying to argue with you, but I actually really want to understand why you think this.

My opinion is that there are set rules, but like all rules of the road, no one follows them exactly. How many cars ACTUALLY come to a COMPLETE stop at a stop sign? It's very rare that a car would do this when there is no car coming from the other direction. How many cars ACTUALLY follow the speed limit exactly? My point is that there are rules, but to actually practically ride any vehicle, be it a car, bike, or even to be a pedestrian (i.e. jaywalking) you have to break these rules or you get to a point of ridiculousness.
Dan replying to a comment from Chris / July 19, 2012 at 03:13 pm
user-pic
Chris

For #1 - IMO the cyclist should wait their turn. If they can't go around the car on the left, then that doesn't mean they now can switch to pedestrian rules. They are on the road and should allow that car to turn if they were there first. I've never seen a motorcycle or scooter do that so I don't know why a bike should be allowed to.

#2 - honestly I don't care if someone bikes down a quiet one way residential street as long as they stay well away from oncoming cars.

#3 - A few have noted - it's within their rights to take that lane. When I do it, I'm always keeping an eye for the cars behind me and try to give them room to pass me where/when appropriate. I'm not a sunday driver so I could see how some cyclists lolygag in the middle of the road and that could get annoying.

#4 - I always stop at a red, everywhere, anytime. I've seen people get tickets for running reds with nothing in sight and don't really care to pony up $180 (or something like that). Although I have to admit there are a few spots in the city where I've actually rolled through the crosswalk to avoid the red like haha.
Antony replying to a comment from the moose head / July 19, 2012 at 03:16 pm
user-pic
A concrete example. If you drive, and are often annoyed by people bicycling on your right as you're trying to make a right turn, you can take some actions to correct that!

1) Signal early.
2) When clear, lane-change close enough to the curb that there's no space for someone to ride through.
3) Enjoy your unobstructed right turn.

This has the benefit that you open up space to your left, for people on bicycles to pass you. If you start your right turn from the middle of your lane, then your car ends up diagonal across both bike and curb lanes, and nobody can get through.
YB / July 19, 2012 at 03:18 pm
user-pic
Guess why we sometimes (rarely in my case) have to ride on the sidewalk? Moronic drivers who park on bike lanes. If the only choice is between trying our luck on the full roadway with angry drivers going 5x our speed or inconveniencing a few pedestrians for a block or two, it's a no-brainer.
Chris replying to a comment from Antony / July 19, 2012 at 03:21 pm
user-pic
This is excellent advice! As a cyclist this is one of the things that make me feel absurd waiting behind a car trying to make a right when I clearly could easily and safely pass him or her, and "act like a pedestrian." If there is a bike lane, in order for a driver to legally turn right, I believe they have to signal and make a lane change to the bike lane before doing the right turn (and all the bike lanes have the lines that allow turning into these lines before any intersection that allows right turns).
Chris replying to a comment from Dan / July 19, 2012 at 03:25 pm
user-pic
This is good to know!

One thing that I have actually started doing is this: at those red lights, where it feels silly to be stopped, I just pick up my bike and walk it along the sidewalk, and then continue biking when clearing the intersection. Technically, this is legal, but I feel silly for doing it, as there really is not any significant safety difference between walking a bike and riding a bike slowly. But this is mainly to technically not be ticketable. I am interested in yours and anyone else's thoughts on doing this.
MSPOTatoE replying to a comment from Antony / July 19, 2012 at 03:27 pm
user-pic
Antony, cyclists are the scum of Toronto. They slow traffic and cause accidents.
MrsPotato replying to a comment from Stan / July 19, 2012 at 03:32 pm
user-pic
Stan, yeah, all those crackheads I seeing riding bikes.

WTF.

You're an idiot.
McRib replying to a comment from YB / July 19, 2012 at 03:36 pm
user-pic
when that happens you move out of the bike lane, into the full lane. you dont go on the sidewalk.

if you're such a pussy that you can't ride with traffic, don't ride. Unless you are 10 years old, never ride on the sidewalk. As long as you are confident, it really isnt scary riding alongside cars. Sometimes it can even be exhilarating!

Ace McNugget / July 19, 2012 at 03:38 pm
user-pic
This article states: "It's also worth noting that cyclists have the right to use the whole road, though it's good courtesy to keep right if it's safe to do so."

But this isn't true! copied below from the Ontario Highway Traffic Act

HTA 147 - Slow moving traffic travel on right side
any vehicle moving slower than the normal traffic speed should drive in the right-hand lane, or as close as practicable to the right edge of the road except when preparing to turn left or when passing another vehicle. Set fine: $85.00

That's an $85 fine for cycling in the middle of the lane!
Ace McNugget / July 19, 2012 at 03:40 pm
user-pic
Also, don't like cycling on the road? just get a bike with a 24" wheels and (legally in Toronto) go for it on the sidewalk!
snarky replying to a comment from YB / July 19, 2012 at 03:41 pm
user-pic
"If the only choice is between trying our luck on the full roadway with angry drivers going 5x our speed or inconveniencing a few pedestrians for a block or two, it's a no-brainer."

It's unfortunate that people park in the bike lanes but that doesn't change the fact that biking on the sidewalk is both inconsiderate and illegal. If you don't want to follow the laws then you should not be biking. If you aren't confident in your ability to bike safely, you should not be biking.

You are considered part of traffic. If a car "doesn't feel safe" it doesn't mean they can drive wherever they feel like.
Jen replying to a comment from Chris / July 19, 2012 at 03:45 pm
user-pic
"Another situation: around the Annex area, going the wrong way, cautiously, on a one way residential street, to avoid going on a busy, dangerous main street to get to your destination. (There is often no way to avoid these main streets if you actually follow the one way signs religiously)."

Still illegal. Would it be OK for a car to do this? NO. Cyclists need to consider the fact that they are treated like cars. Do I agree with this? No, but that's the law so deal with it.
YB replying to a comment from McRib / July 19, 2012 at 03:46 pm
user-pic
Hey, easier on the McRibs and heavier on the smarts the next time you decide to type into a box. First off, close your wee little eyes for a second and try to picture what might happen if you are biking on the right beside bumper-to-bumper traffic and, with a truck parked up ahead in your bike lane, you suddenly need to swerve left and around that truck...see the dilemma smart-ass? I'm really hoping you might. But based on your comment, I'm not sure I can give you the benefit of the doubt.

Second, try adressing the actual issue when you reply to a comment. Cars parked in bike lanes. It's a problem. Get it? Nah, I didn't think so...
Marc replying to a comment from Ace McNugget / July 19, 2012 at 03:47 pm
user-pic
No, because the right edge of the road isn't practicable as soon as safety is threatened.

Nice try though.
Ace McNugget replying to a comment from Marc / July 19, 2012 at 03:53 pm
user-pic
The act doesn't mention anything about safety- just that slower moving vehicles (like cyclists) must at the very least ALWAYS cycle in the right hand lane, and if possible on the very far right side of the right hand lane.
YB replying to a comment from snarky / July 19, 2012 at 03:53 pm
user-pic
I actually agree with this, but by that logic, parking in a bike lane is also inconsiderate and illegal. If people who do it don't want to follow the laws then they shouldn't be driving. Does the same logic not apply?

I actually don't condone bikers on the sidewalk, I'm merely trying to illustrate one example of why some may feel forced into doing it. The ones who feel the sidewalk is their alternate roadway are as irresponsible to pedestrians as bad, agressive drivers are to bikers. No argument there.

mike in parkdale / July 19, 2012 at 03:56 pm
user-pic
when a car is turning right, and the cyclist flies up between the car and the curb. Technically the cyclist is passing the turning car, and that should be done on the left side.

I see this one all the time, and usually the cyclist flips out on the driver, when in fact, it's the cyclist who entered the driver's blind spot and tried to pass on the right.

remember this: "left side passing side, right side suicide"
hmm replying to a comment from Stan / July 19, 2012 at 04:03 pm
user-pic
It's really rude to refer to bike couriers as "crack heads and bums."
Paul replying to a comment from 2 cents / July 19, 2012 at 04:12 pm
user-pic
Don't paint Bixi riders with the same brush - I ride Bixi multiple times a day, on main arteries, and i'm always wearing a helmet and never ride on the sidewalk. I do however see plenty of cyclists running red lights on Harbord and hitting the crosswalk to get cars to stop then riding through (my two pet peeves re other cyclists). Also cyclists need to let the person ahead of them know when they want/are going to pass!

I think overall drivers need to learn what cyclists have a right to do and cyclists need a lesson on basic rules of the road. Police should start aggressively fining cyclists who run red lights and ride the wrong way on one way streets.
the lemur replying to a comment from Ace McNugget / July 19, 2012 at 04:14 pm
user-pic
The key word there is 'practicable'. Open to interpretation, but if it's not practicable to ride as close to the curb or edge of the road (because of obstacles, hazards such as broken glass, bad road surface), you are within your rights to move to the centre of the curb lane for as long as you need to until it's practicable to move back towards the curb.
the lemur replying to a comment from cathy / July 19, 2012 at 04:15 pm
user-pic
They do ticket them, but enforcement is sporadic. They'll do a few blitzes a year and that's it.
Antony / July 19, 2012 at 04:18 pm
user-pic
Based on the number of page views and comments this generates, I suggest some more topics for Blog TO that will also "make this city a better place":

1) What are Toronto skateboarders' worst habits?
2) What are Toronto taxi drivers' worst habits?
3) What are Toronto electric scooter-ers' worst habits?
4) etc.

Dan replying to a comment from Jen / July 19, 2012 at 04:21 pm
user-pic
Jen it's not ok for a car to do it because if a car's coming it's blocked of it's right of way. That's why it's not ok for a car to do it. A bike and car can still pass each other on a one way unobstructed. Is it legal, no - but being treated like a car and actually being one are two different things.
The Shakes / July 19, 2012 at 04:23 pm
user-pic
Nothing is quite as annoying as the dipshit cyclists who think they are so cool because they ride with no hands thinking the world is admiring their insouciance, when in fact the world (particularly those behind you) are wishing you'd just hold your fricken' handle bars and ride in a straight line, so they don't end up running your stupid clueless ass over.
Rick Z / July 19, 2012 at 04:24 pm
user-pic
By far the worst habit by Cyclists is the tight spandex clothing they wear as if they are in the tour de france or something? Or do you think chicks dig men wearing tight, logo'd up spandex?

We should have a smack a cyclist day in the city for such foolishness.

Bikes / July 19, 2012 at 04:36 pm
user-pic
I ride downtown every day. I usually try to leave from riverdale area at 7am to avoid car drivers who are late and/or in a hurry. I find the early morning crowd to be much more considerate. Might just be anecdotal. I usually have no problems from drivers who respect that I am keeping pace with traffic and using the right lane.

I generally take up the full right lane when on downtown streets that are congested and / or have a lot of stoplights. As a bike rider, if I stay near the curb it just invites people to come into the right hand lane to pass cars / street cars on the left. As mentioned, this creates some serious danger, especially when there are parked cars, potholes, debris or bends in the road.

A good example of this is at Dundas and Sherbourne (stoplights to an immediate sharp right turn). I try to avoid this street / intersection, but it makes for a good point.

http://maps.google.ca/maps?hl=en&;rlz=1C1CHMO_en-GBCA467CA467&q=queen+and+jarvis+toronto&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&biw=1920&bih=965&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=X&ei=e20IUPCWHIL20gHxoLSYBA&ved=0CE8Q_AUoAg

I'd also like to add that it bothers me when other bike riders do stupid things like run stop lights and disobey laws / rules. It makes car drivers disrespect bike riders.



Stacks / July 19, 2012 at 04:41 pm
user-pic
Here's one for the pediestrians, from a cyclist (and a pedestrian, too, sometimes). When the streetcar is approaching a stop, but not stopped yet, doors not open, please don't walk into the middle of the right lane to wait for the SC to stop and the doors to open. Wait your turn, and I'll continue to stop when the doors are open.

And yeah, don't ride on the sidewalks. Learn some etiquette and safety
the lemur replying to a comment from Rick Z / July 19, 2012 at 04:48 pm
user-pic
Sure, there are few who dress that way, but it doesn't exactly affect drivers and pedestrians, does it?

If you're going to get worked up about that we should be able to slap drivers for playing shitty music or something too.
Alex / July 19, 2012 at 04:56 pm
user-pic
I don't mind cyclists riding on the sidewalks when they go super slow (jogging/running speed) and the sidewalk is wide/empty. I've seen lots of cyclists on the sidewalk around yonge & eg and they've all been very responsible. I don't mind them there at all because they are all going slow enough to be able to stop on a dime and they always go around the pedestrians with plenty of space. The roads around there are a mess because of street parking (why is that allowed at all on main streets?) so I wouldn't want to cycle on them either.
Me / July 19, 2012 at 05:00 pm
user-pic
Riding on sidewalks expecting pedestrians to give way for them. Then they get pissed off when I refuse to and punt them off when they try to hit me.
Rick Z replying to a comment from the lemur / July 19, 2012 at 05:05 pm
user-pic
Ya I hear what you are saying, but it's like, C'mon buddy, not only are you riding on the sidewalk, or blatently disrespecting the rules of the road or cursing at me for being in the bike lane, cause some idiot taxi driver decided to give my new ride a love tap - but you look like a mega ass hat/spandex clown doing so.



Loraine / July 19, 2012 at 05:23 pm
user-pic
The worst problem was once when one tool in a car yelled at me to get off the road - which is more of just a joke, and once someone yelled at me from a rooftop to wear a helmet - as if. I bike all over the city and drive all over the city every day and these are the two worst encounters I've ever had. I wonder....
the lemur replying to a comment from Rick Z / July 19, 2012 at 05:26 pm
user-pic
Sounds like you're looking for an excuse to combine all your annoyances into one. The full spandex brigade aren't the ones on the sidewalk.
Jeffery / July 19, 2012 at 05:30 pm
user-pic
What most people don't understand is that a cyclist CAN take up a whole lane LEGALLY.
If i decide to ride in the middle of the lane it is perfectly legal when there is no bike lane available.
Source: Cam Wolley on CP24 "Know your Rights"
Chris replying to a comment from Jen / July 19, 2012 at 05:35 pm
user-pic
Well, yeah, it is against the law. Of course in traffic rules, no one follows all the rules. Do you think any pedestrian never jaywalks? Do you think every car REALLY comes to a complete stop at every stop sign, even when no other cars are coming in the perpendicular direction? Does every car on the highway go at or below the speed limit? I think the question that I am wondering is this: obviously there are some rules that are okay to break (as in the examples I just gave), and if you didn't break them it would in fact be more dangerous (see the going speed limit on the highway example). I'd like to get an idea of what rules are okay to break with biking. The one way residential street rule seems like a very commonly broken one, perhaps on the same level as going 110 km/h on a 100 km/h highway in good weather. Do you think going the wrong way on a one way street with a bike is of the same calibre of traffic violation as this speeding example?
Ace McNugget replying to a comment from Loraine / July 19, 2012 at 05:59 pm
user-pic
Kudos to the man on the rooftop- you are a moron for not wearing a helmet.
Ace McNugget replying to a comment from Jeffery / July 19, 2012 at 06:08 pm
user-pic
not when it is clearly against the Ontario HIghway Traffic Act. You have to cycle in the right lane and, if possible (i.e. no parked cars, trucks etc.) at the right side of that lane.

Now, as someone who has cycled before (not a cyclist- it's just a mode of transportation and you have to lead a really pathetic life to let that be your main defining characteristic) I understand some of the minor infractions of the law- pulling away at the lights a smidge early to get a bit of speed up ahead of the cars behind you for example. But if you insist on taking up the whole lane yourself, or in conjunction with one or more friends astride the lane, or refuse to wear a helmet/reflective gear or cycle on the sidewalk then you are the problem.
justriding / July 19, 2012 at 06:41 pm
user-pic
There is no need for me to list the many ways that some Toronto cyclists disobey the law and cause inconvenience to others, as so many have made their points already. All of these cyclists (I witness dozens each day while I am riding) are contributing to higher levels of road rage from drivers of all kinds, and create a dangerous environment for everyone.
Licensing with a nominal fee for adults would help to promote safer cycling:
-- requires test about rules of the road and Highway Traffic Act fines

I read the very good and comprehensive free Toronto Cyclists Handbook and realized that there are many ways I can improve my safety level by just following the guidelines that are already in place.
http://bikeunion.to/handbook/
As well, even though cycling is promoted in the booklet as being about being "affordable, healthy and convenient", reading the details reveals that the fines for common riding errors are considerable and cycling can be much less affordable for the careless people.

Let's get the cycling police officers to actually enforce the rules and take some people off the sidewalks and crosswalks, from the running stoplight/stop signs and distribute some tickets. Cycling traffic law offenders need to be made aware of their responsibilities.
justriding replying to a comment from Stan / July 19, 2012 at 06:43 pm
user-pic
Stats to support your ridiculous claims? I see people of all types breaking the rules.
fnord nation / July 19, 2012 at 09:04 pm
user-pic
Damn immergrant cyclists. Send them back!
Daniel / July 19, 2012 at 09:34 pm
user-pic
not a supporter of cyclists on sidewalks but i wonder how many of those "innocent" pedestrians like to dart between cars and pop out right in front of on coming bike/car traffic just to get to point B faster. this is obviously the worst trait of anyone on the road. also, how many drivers out there actually know how to park cars correctly and not 5 feet from the curb? geeze.
Mar replying to a comment from The Shakes / July 19, 2012 at 09:53 pm
user-pic
Omg thank you. That is by far the douchiest thing. The lean back no hands on a busy street is so desperate not an angry guy but when I see it I really do have to fight the desire to see something terrible happen.
Pedestrian / July 19, 2012 at 09:54 pm
user-pic
It's funny you should end the article with this: "is carefully proceeding through a red light in the curb lane when there's no road on the right - as on Bloor at Bedford and the Danforth at Donlands - and clearly no traffic okay?". As a pedestrian, I think that's the worst habit that cyclists have. Just because there's "clearly no traffic" doesn't mean the red light isn't there for a reason: to let pedestrians cross. I've been clipped at three different T intersections along the Danforth, each time when I had the walk sign, by cyclists who went through the red light without stopping or slowing.

I'm firmly in favour of cyclists on the road, of increasing cycle traffic, and of making Toronto more cycle-friendly. I just wish that cyclists would pay more attention to road rules, like signalling and stop signs, so that it was safer for everyone.
Will / July 20, 2012 at 12:04 am
user-pic
License plates on every bike, like we had in the 70's-80's. Make riders accountable for their ride, their bike, their communication with others on the road. You want a part of the road? You need to communicate with all others using the road..
Toronto / July 20, 2012 at 01:16 am
user-pic
No insurance on bicycles, and it's common sense as to why there isn't. not that much responsibility, a bike is not even close to being as much as a car in both price tag and maintenance. Why would someone insure their bike? What, are you riding in the Tour De France lol Most bikes on average low end ,commuting-road, go for around 150-350, that's pocket change compare to a car. If they had more cycling lanes to begin with, there wouldn't be complaints or problems, but the way the city is layed out and designed it does not cater to cyclists and probably never will unless they redid certain parts of the city which is highly unlikely.
Jane / July 20, 2012 at 01:27 am
user-pic
Meh, I don't think the cycling infractions in this city are that bad to be honest. We all bend some rules to suit our commute depending on the situation. And yeah, there's always one dude who's being a jack-off and blowing through lights, but that's a minority. If we had more infrastructure and better road conditions, there'd probably be less issues in general.
cameron replying to a comment from Will / July 20, 2012 at 02:58 am
user-pic
not only are you wrong but you sound like a child, grow up! A simple google search on the history of bike laws concluded that "On February 4, 1957, City Council repealed the bicycle licensing by-law in the City. So no, there were no licensing laws in the 70's and 80's as you claimed.
Even the city officials realize that licensing bikes will never work. These are the reasons listed on the city of Toronto website.
The major reasons why licensing has been rejected are:

The difficulty in keeping a database complete and current
The difficulty in licensing children, given that they ride bikes too
Licensing in and of itself does not change the behaviour of cyclists who are disobeying traffic laws.
Jakob / July 20, 2012 at 03:11 am
user-pic
Much has been said on here already, and I'm not even going to start arguing with YB why it's a good idea to make sure that 2 lanes are not being occupied by 3 vehicles (2 of which being cars).

In my opinion, the most important thing people can do is to not fall into the convenience trap of "but others do just as bad things!". If you complain about cars parked on the bike lane and use that as an excuse to cycle on the crowded sidewalk, that makes you just as much of a douchbag as the douchbag who parked his car on the bike lane. If you're a driver overtaking a car on the same lane without having a free lane at the left, you'd better not be complaining about how reckless and respectless cyclists are towards drivers. If you're complaining about cyclists who cross at the red light but you're happy jaywalking at every possible opportunity, then you're the reason why other people think they can get away with being stupid.

Keep your dignity despite other people being stupid. Making things better always starts with being a good example, and far less with laying blame.
chewy / July 20, 2012 at 03:27 am
user-pic
you truly understand how bad drivers are when you are on a bike. please learn how to drive then cyclists can more easily obey the traffic laws and not have to fend for their lives.
Kyle / July 20, 2012 at 09:16 am
user-pic
Dear BlogTO, it's so very nice of you to give your readers a chance to bitch, whine and moan about cyclists' and their worst habits, but perhaps you could do the same for drivers and their worst habits? In the name of equality, perhaps an opportunity to point out pedestrian's worst habits as well? Just to keep things fair...
Oh The Humanity / July 20, 2012 at 09:35 am
user-pic
Cyclists' worst habit is the same as motorists', pedestrians', skateboarders', rollerbladers' etc; Believing you're the most important person on the road.
Dew / July 20, 2012 at 09:45 am
user-pic
Police officers on bikes who ride side by side which is not allowed. Thanks for leading by example.
Aaron / July 20, 2012 at 10:01 am
user-pic
The worst habit of cyclists is hugging the curb and allowing drivers to speed past them when it's not safe to do so. Take the lane when you need to people.

Oh, and for balance, the worst habit of drivers is passing a cyclist within a few inches only to stop at the red light 50 metres ahead.
Al / July 20, 2012 at 10:19 am
user-pic
Bad habit...cycling at night with no lights (or a poor light).

Bad habit...believing that (in its current state) Toronto is bike friendly! Go to Europe and see how it is to be truly bike friendly.

Worst habit....thinking that everyone else knows the rules of the road and what cyclist's are allowed to do.


Taylor / July 20, 2012 at 10:21 am
user-pic
Immature, confrontational, distasteful and offensive.

Just some of the traits that came to mind as I was reading some of the above comments.

This is where the problem lies. It's not within the entire Toronto cycling community, or the motorists, or the skateboarders. It's the individuals within these "communities".

I am a cyclist and also drive a car, I understand it's hard not to get defensive, but it's this kind of attitude that only fuels the fire between entire communities, rather than holding the irresponsible individual accountable.

Also, when confronting a motorist/cyclist - try taking a different approach. We're all just trying to get around this city with millions of people and less than ideal infrastructure. Whether it be to our low paying part-time job, a class that we're late for, or home, finally. Don't honk aggressively, yell from your window, or kick someone's car... muster up a bit of class and treat each other with respect. Even if the person gets defensive and yells, at least you can feel good about how you handled the situation.

With more modes of transportation available to us than ever before, of course there will be conflicts. But it's how we deal with these conflicts that will make the difference.

Angrily dwelling in "Toronto's cyclists' worst habits" is not going to bring about positive change.
mike / July 20, 2012 at 10:21 am
user-pic
One of the worst habits is the attempt to justify their dangerous, aggressive, and lazy behaviour by saying "well look what cars do" "look what pedestrians do" like a bunch of 8 year olds on the playground.
the lemur replying to a comment from mike / July 20, 2012 at 10:41 am
user-pic
And one of the worst things about being someone who uses a bike to get around (and walking, and transit, and a car) is that no matter how safely, defensively and considerately you ride, there's always someone out there on the road who's willing to assume the worst just because you're on a bike.
tripper / July 20, 2012 at 10:42 am
user-pic
I think this is a worthwhile discussion to have. I cycle daily and I get just as annoyed with bad cyclists as I do with bad motorists.

The cycling activists in Toronto have been great about pushing for our rights and bike lanes and so on. But they haven't been very good about communicating our responsibilities. I guess, as activists, that's not their job. But yes, we have responsibilities. I get the sense that a lot of cyclists (especially in spring and summer) are new and inexperienced and simply don't know what the rules and etiquette are so they just do whatever they think is right. They end up doing a lot of really stupid things.

It would be great if one of our cycling committees and organizations would focus more on education for cyclists. To let us all know what the rules, laws, and etiquette are and how to cycle safely and responsibly in Toronto. It should be a city-wide campaign.

And finally, some cyclists in Toronto go on and on about how much better cycling is in Amsterdam and Copenhagen and other European cities. It's absolutely true. It IS better. They have a better cycling infrastructure and a real cycling culture. But they also, for the most part, obey the rules of the road and follow the rules of etiquette so as not to put their fellow cyclists at risk and to make everything run smoothly. It's a mature cycling culture compared to Toronto's.
Kat replying to a comment from Jakob / July 20, 2012 at 10:58 am
user-pic
Well said.
How many more blogTO articles are they going to run bashing cyclists. Drivers and pedestrians are just as bad - there are nice respectful people, and there are assholes. This translates into the mode of transportation. There are always going to be people who don't know/acknowledge the rules of the road/sidewalk so let's just get over it and find something productive to think about.
jn / July 20, 2012 at 11:00 am
user-pic
For the most part, it seems that people have issue with cyclists and drivers breaking the law, which makes perfect sense. Drivers also have issues with cyclists doing things that are perfectly legal such as taking the lane when they feel it is necessary. This is due to ignorance of the law.

Education would go a long way to helping people behave better whether they are driving, cycling, skateboarding, rollerblading, or driving.

Realization that we are all people, regardless of our mode of transportation, and taking a deep breath, would also be helpful.
jn replying to a comment from Billy Walsh / July 20, 2012 at 11:02 am
user-pic
I think you are taking cyclists' behaviour personally and assuming people's intentions when you cannot know them.
jn replying to a comment from Ace McNugget / July 20, 2012 at 11:25 am
user-pic
Ace,

The law reads "as close as practicable to the right edge of the road", not as close as possible. The cyclist has the right to take the lane, but must move back to the right when they feel it is safe to do so. They must also manoeuvre around potholes, cracked pavement, drains, debris, etc that accumulates at the right edge of the road. Practicable is determined by the cyclist and police as needed, not by an impatient and inconsiderate driver.
jennifer / July 20, 2012 at 12:55 pm
user-pic
Here's a question...When you are in a line of bikes at a red light, and the light goes green, and everyone ahead of you is going slower than you, at what point is it cool to pass? In the intersection? After the intersection?
will / July 20, 2012 at 01:00 pm
user-pic
I think the biggest problem is the bike riders ride with impunity. When I got my motorcycle license they taught us to ride as if we can't be seen, because you often aren't. Bicycle riders often ride as if they have the right of way (which they do) but that only works if they can be seen...If not, then you're always going to lose a battle with a car. If there was mandatory licensing for bicycle riders (like in some countries) a lot of this could be avoided, as a lot of the bicycle riders seem oblivious to keeping themselves safe. There was also an MTV special on bicycle riding where a girl mentioned that sometimes when you're riding in the rain and someone decides to pull out in front of you, there isn't enough room to stop, and I think this highlights my point vividly...Ride as if you can't be seen. If you don't have enough time to stop you're obviously riding too fast. It's like driving in the snow, you won't drive faster than your tires/brakes will allow you to stop, so it would be stupid to do that on a bike just because you think people will be able to see you and give you the right of way. There's also many studies done on the the size of a vehicle and the rate of speed which actually makes it much harder to see bicycles and motorcycles rather than cars. Also combine that with the fact that motorists often don't give it more than a quick glance, and the likelihood of not being seen is actually very high. A lot of people could keep themselves safer if there was mandatory licensing and they were taught these fundamentals.
will / July 20, 2012 at 01:04 pm
user-pic
One thing I can't stand is when two people ride side by side taking up the entire right lane. In the Highway Traffic Act, it says you're supposed to keep to the right (which is the general rule for slower moving traffic), allowing faster moving traffic to go around you...Riding side by side and taking up a whole lane seems a bit oblivious. And I hope nobody takes this the wrong way, because I ride a bicycle (and motorcycle, and drive a car), but I've noticed I do a lot of things that are almost never done, like checking my blind spot when I go around a line of parked cars.
Fed up with crappy cyclists / July 20, 2012 at 01:15 pm
user-pic
Time to license all cyclists! I am a cyclist and I am sick at how some two-wheeled a-holes behave...enough already!

1. 40-year-old retards riding on the sidewalk (it's a $95 fine, or a punch in the throat -- your choice).

2. 40-year-old retards riding on the sidewalk when there is a bike lane right there!!!

3. Cyclists who feel it is their God-given right to plow right through people getting on or off a bus or streetcar: the same rule applies to bikes as cars: remain two metres BEHIND the rear doors UNTIL they are closed, geddit?

4. Cyclists riding side by side, then getting pissy when cars can't pass.

5. Cyclists with their front wheel beyond the white line at intersections, which makes right turns impossible for cars. The line is there for a reason, so stay behind it!

6. Riding the wrong way on a one-way street.

7. Not signalling, or having a clue what signals are.

8. Blowing through stop signs and red lights.

9. No lights after dark.

10. Riding so close to other cyclists that they bump into my rear tire -- f-off!

...and number 11 for eBikes: what the hell are you? Since you can keep pace with cars on Toronto streets, why are you in bike lanes?
RT2020 / July 20, 2012 at 01:25 pm
user-pic
The vast majority of bikers cannot for their own life's sake stick to the right side of the lane. The speed limit is 50km/hr and you are going 8km/hr. Drivers will need room to pass you - why can't you get this through your head??

Other bad habits: Running red lights and wearing disgusting tight spandex shorts.
Chris / July 20, 2012 at 01:40 pm
user-pic
@justriding. Well Said.
Lilian / July 20, 2012 at 01:54 pm
user-pic
Overly-defensive members of the cycling community who (1) insist cycling infractions are just committed by amateur/degenerate/pseudo-cyclists, and not by presumably 'real' cyclists; yet (2) are quick with automatic disdain for motorists (collectively) on issues concerning cyclist accessibility/accommodations/safety.

We have terrible motorists and we have terrible cyclists. Neither is a reflection of the collective, on either side.
I think it's common sense to accept that we're all responsible for cooperating and following clear traffic/safety rules, whether there are designated bike lanes or not.
Lilian replying to a comment from chewy / July 20, 2012 at 02:13 pm
user-pic
I think we all get to understand just how bad motorists can be any time we have to encounter road traffic, period (whether we're fellow motorists, or pedestrians, or cyclists). Pedestrians and cyclists (or basically, anyone not sitting in a 1 to 2-tonne steel/aluminium/glass cabin) happen to be more vulnerable.

I dont cycle as much as I walk/transit/drive (and maybe having to occasionally drive alongside notoriously bad Brampton motorists has made me THAT much more a paranoid driver), but I dont feel safer sitting in my car than I do manoeuvring a cross-walk.

But I would think it's understood that so long as stupid people exist, there will be stupid/dangerous drivers, regardless of the context.
will replying to a comment from Fed up with crappy cyclists / July 20, 2012 at 03:17 pm
user-pic
I almost forgot about the ebikes. Those things are awful, they're in a grey area where riders think they can use the sidewalk, bike lane, ride in traffic, and ride drunk (since nobody seems to enforce it).
the lemur replying to a comment from Lilian / July 20, 2012 at 03:32 pm
user-pic
The difference is that people seem to be quicker to smear the entire cycling community on the basis of the bad cyclists than they are to denigrate all drivers judging by the minority that drive recklessly, inattentively, etc. No one wants to be equated with the worst member of their own group.
Miranda replying to a comment from Fed up with crappy cyclists / July 20, 2012 at 04:34 pm
user-pic
Well said! Thanks :)
will replying to a comment from the lemur / July 20, 2012 at 04:34 pm
user-pic
I think it's important to distinguish that sometimes inattentive drivers aren't actually inattentive, but that bicycles are actually hard to see. I read a traffic study a while back (wish I still had the link) that showed that on a small moving vehicle like a motorcycle, when it moves under a certain rate of speed, the brain quantifies it as standing still, or not visible, unless it moves faster...I assume bicycles would be the same. If all cyclists were taught to ride as if they were invisible, I'd be willing to bet that we'd have much fewer accidents. I can't even recall seeing a cyclist check their blind spot ever (I've probably witnessed it once), but I've seen all kinds of "gutsy" moves where cyclists assume you're going to stop because you have to, even if they're riding through an intersection that i'm turning into, and they have no lights on. Giving the right of way is the "ideal" scenario that solely depends on whether they can see you in the first place.
Miranda / July 20, 2012 at 04:39 pm
user-pic
Cyclists who yak on a cellphone or wear headphones listening to tunes ... how can be aware of their surroundings? How dangerous is that?!

And as many here have said, cyclists who hog the lane but get mad at me when I honk to ask them to move over so I can pass.

I was getting on the King streetcar last year. The streetcar had stopped, the doors were open and I had left the sidewalk and was onto the street heading to get on. A cyclist came whipping by, yelled at me to get out his way and called me a f-king c@#t. What an A-hole!
CaligulaJones / July 20, 2012 at 04:57 pm
user-pic
Saw the trifecta of idiocy the other day: cyclist on a sidewalk, headphones on, texting...

But maybe I'm a bit touchy, just getting over an elbow problem, and getting clipped TWICE this afternoon on a 10 minute walk (Yonge and Finch).

And, no, these weren't crack addicts and bums. They were ultra-fashionable (in their minds, anyway) young'ns who have never, and will never, learn to be respectful.
will / July 20, 2012 at 05:03 pm
user-pic
I found the study I referred to so many times. It makes sense. When a motorist hits a cyclist or motorcycle rider and says "I didn't see them" it's not because they're stupid or blind, it's because of the way the brain perceives a moving object. Stay safe cyclists, and RIDE AS IF YOU CAN'T BE SEEN! http://www.motorcycleinfo.co.uk/index.cfm?fa=contentGeneric.twhhyjzpxapzkouq&;pageId=146841
will replying to a comment from will / July 20, 2012 at 05:06 pm
user-pic
I think you have to copy and paste the link because the BlogTO CMS seems to have missed the last part of the link...
Lilian replying to a comment from the lemur / July 20, 2012 at 06:21 pm
user-pic
@ the lemur,

I dunno about that. Even just speaking as pedestrians, and/or as other motorists, generalizing when we rant and complain about bad motorists has always been par for the course.

Just consider the way we (motorists!) take the trouble to rank and slag off terrible drivers by city/region. (Hell, *I* just did it above when I mentioned Brampton, haha.)

And this is all before even discussing the vulnerability of cyclists around terrible motorists!

I would argue that cyclists are inclined to be 'overly'-defensive because they're operating from a place of disadvantage, to begin with (i.e., the fact that most roads are built without them in mind). It may not strike me (personally) as productive, but it's certainly understandable.
Tony / July 20, 2012 at 06:31 pm
user-pic
Toronto cyclists(including myself) should *SMILE* more while riding, because cycling is supposed to be FUN! Say something *NICE*, rather than cursing everything in your path :D
Kat / July 20, 2012 at 07:50 pm
user-pic
Let's just call it a day and agree that we all hate motorized scooters.
Centurion / July 21, 2012 at 11:52 am
user-pic
Turning corners blindly and not slowing down on the turn, I've almost been run over by a bike on a couple of occasions like this and I've witnessed it many times more.

The central problem as I see it, is that in certain situations where bikers know they are "safe" from cars, many of them take it as carte blanche to take more risks.
Sean Farris / July 21, 2012 at 05:00 pm
user-pic
As an avid cyclist in this city, fellow cyclists make me far more nervous than most drivers. Of course there are obvious issues... cell phones (if I see you on one, I'm yelling at you... nothing is so important that you can't wait 5 fucking minutes to stop and chat), sidewalk riding (obvious), incredibly awkward riders (if it looks like you're mid stroke because you can't keep your bars straight as you haphazardly roll your rusty mountain bike down the road, you shouldn't be riding), etc.

But, my biggest and most intense pet peeve is this... if I pass you once, and roll up to a red light, and you roll up beside me/pass me because the light happens to go green and I have to make an effort again to pass you seconds later, thus causing unnecessary potential traffic issues and the like because you're an idiot... I may very well end up plotting your death. I've already passed you once, you know you're riding slower than I am... what the fuck are you doing!
Michael Young / July 21, 2012 at 05:45 pm
user-pic
On the street a cyclist is a car. Obey the rules of the road. If you have 24" or smaller wheels you are legal on the sidewalk. But the pedestrian has the right-of-way. Always wear a helmet. If you have time to ring your bell, you have time to apply a touch of brake and slow down. If the sidewalk is crowded, get off and walk the bike. Passing at crosswalks and stopped streetcars is not confined to cyclists. I've seen many a driver do the same thing. It's dangerous and could lead to a lifetime of regret.
McRib replying to a comment from YB / July 21, 2012 at 06:31 pm
user-pic
i ride every day champ, downtown and in traffic. if you feel the need to go on the sidewalk then you should not be riding, period.

Who the hell "suddenly" sees a car parked up ahead and needs to "suddenly" swerve into traffic? Someone who isn't paying attention. Keep your eyes open and your wits about you and you'll do fine weaving into traffic.

of course cars parked in bike lanes are a problem. Its inconsiderate and illegal. You know what else is inconsiderate and illegal? riding on the sidewalk.

Why be part of the problem?



Shana / July 21, 2012 at 07:29 pm
user-pic
I wouldn't say it's a habit, but I had a bad experience driving down the highway off-ramp into an added lane in a one way traffic split road at 60kph (speed limit), when a cyclist flew across the road going the opposite way to traffic. He was 5 meters from my car when he came into my field of view. Everyone exiting into one way traffic, is looking ONE WAY for traffic. I nearly had a heart attack.
I've witnessed more than one occasion where a cyclist tried to overtake a car in front that was indicating to change to the right lane, from the car's blind spot. Well, of course the car continued to change lanes, into the cyclist.
Cyclist safety is about the risks bikers choose to take as well as the actions of drivers on the road. It's easy for non-cyclists to underestimate how seriously bikers take their own safety when every day we see individuals choose to disobey traffic signals, not wear helmets or reflective gear, or use their phone or headphones on the road. Respecting your own safety will influence others on the road to respect your safety too.
T replying to a comment from Smarten up! / July 22, 2012 at 10:24 am
user-pic
"If she keeps riding that way she will one day die a much deserved death."

You're a horrible person.
Larry / July 23, 2012 at 04:43 pm
user-pic
+1 on Mark Hollin's tweet above:
@blogTO Cyclists angrily passing signalling, right-turning cars on the right side. #bikeTO

Just so we can all stop having this argument, page 19 of the Cycling Guide:

http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/pubs/cycling-guide/pdfs/cycling-guide.pdf

Right-turning traffic
Motorists don’t always check for bicycles when making right-hand turns, so cyclists need to take extra caution. It’s important to leave space around you for a safety cushion (one meter between you and the curb and you and the vehicle).
When a motorist is making a right-hand turn, cyclists can either stay behind the vehicle or pass the right-turning vehicle on the left by shoulder checking, signalling, shoulder checking again and then passing on the left. Never pass a right-turning vehicle on the right.
cathy martha replying to a comment from Chris / July 24, 2012 at 12:49 pm
user-pic
as a daily, regular cyclist with a ~10km ride each way, through the downtown core, my HONEST response to the scenario of being stuck behind a right-turning car is to STOP, & wait to safely proceed after the car has made their turn, or to SIGNAL and safely pass on the LEFT if it is safe to do so.

honestly, all of your scenarios involve cyclists doing something that is ILLEGAL but more convenient than what they should legally be doing. that means finding an alternate route so as to not bike down 1-way streets, ensuring that your way is clear of pedestrians when pedestrians legally have the right of way, and making an effort to stop at red lights. (i'll admit that i'm guilty of rolling stops at stop signs, but i still only proceed when it's safe for me to do so, not blindly entering the intersection).

if you want motorists and pedestrians to respect you on your bike, you need to recognize that we ALL must abide by the same rules of the road, and that these rules don't just not apply to cyclists because it's less convenient to dismount. these ILLEGAL and BAD HABITS are the reason that the climate is so hostile to cyclists. bike safely, smartly, and LEGALLY and a lot of this back&forth blame will disappear.
Chris McGregor / July 24, 2012 at 01:37 pm
user-pic
What are the yearly stats in Toronto for:

1) Amount of cyclists killed by automobiles,
2) Amount of automobile drivers (while driving) killed by cyclists.

I did a bit of internet research and although I was unable to find data & information on automobile drivers killed by cyclists; there was plenty of data on cyclists killed by automobiles & their drivers.

Thank you,
Chris
Miss Etobicoke / July 24, 2012 at 03:41 pm
user-pic
Some cyclists seem to assume that the rules of the road do not apply to them, therefore making their next move unpredictable to drivers. That is why the rules of the road are there (ie stop at a stop sign) so that drivers can anticipate the next manouvre of the bicycle (or ther driver or pedestrian for that matter) is going to make, and proceed accordingly.

Also, cycling with headphones on!?! Not safe. Cyclists should be focused on the road and ensuring their own safety, not on having the music so load they cannot hear a vehicle approaching (and maybe use the horn to warn them of an unsafe condition?). Just sayin!
Sandra / July 25, 2012 at 02:30 pm
user-pic
Riding on the sidewalk.
Torono / July 26, 2012 at 12:46 pm
user-pic
You Torontonians are so English. Live a little and stop complaining so much. Bend the rules sometimes, it's not a big deal. If no one is on the sidewalk(especially at night) Or there's tons of traffic and you're not getting in anyone's way, ride the sidewalk. Because last i heard, while cyclists "must follow the rules of the road" A bicycle is technically not part of it. It is not ensured, no licsence plate. That would mean that a bicycle has it's own rules of the road. Unfortunately the higher ups in Toronto still haven\t managed to think about this one, must have slipped their minds. Lets put unensured bicycles in a road full of fast ensured cars that stand no chance. It all comes down to cycling lanes people, it's common sense, no cycling lanes=bicycles being part of a road with rules that do not work for them, and until that day comes, if ever, expect accident after accident. One guy thinks he can do what he wants, and the other guy does too, negative and negative, doesn't work.
John Spragge / July 31, 2012 at 10:50 am
user-pic
The law says cyclists have to cycle as close to the right side of the road as practicable. In light of recent constitutional decisions about the Ontario Highway Traffic Act, as well as a wealth of interpretation from elsewhere, the meaning of practicable includes safe; that if a riding practice endangers the cyclist either by directly exposing him or her to a hazard or by encouraging unsafe behaviour from other road users, then it doesn't qualify, by definition, as practicable. And as the person concerned, a cyclist has the right to make the primary judgment; obviously, that doesn't mean I have the right to take up a full-width lane for giggles. But with any sub-standard width lane, meaning most of the traffic lanes in Toronto, any cyclist does have the right to take the secondary (right tire track) or primary (center) position to make ourselves visible or prevent unsafe passing. The courts have already ruled any interpretation of the HTA that denies road users the ability to protect our safety violated the life liberty and security of the person provision in the Charter of Rights.
Jarvis Thompson / August 1, 2012 at 10:10 am
user-pic
I disagree with some of the folks complaining about cyclists who listen to music. Depending on the volume you hear more ambient noise as a cyclist with headphones than someone in a car with the engine noise, insulation, and in many cases music on top of all that.
the lemur replying to a comment from Jarvis Thompson / August 1, 2012 at 10:28 am
user-pic
Yes, but judging by the volume some cyclists have their headphones at, they're not getting everything around them. Besides, if hearing ambient noise is essential to your awareness of the situation around you, the best thing is to have no extraneous sounds going straight into your ears, both in terms of awareness and the potential for distraction.

Just because you (arguably) still hear better with headphones on than someone in a car doesn't make headphones a smart idea.
Ratpick replying to a comment from Jarvis Thompson / August 1, 2012 at 10:38 am
user-pic
"I disagree with some of the folks complaining about cyclists who listen to music ... you hear more ambient noise as a cyclist with headphones than someone in a car with the engine noise, insulation, and in many cases music on top of all that."

And this makes it smart to listen to headphones on a bike?

Your logic does not compute.

Guenther / August 19, 2012 at 09:14 pm
user-pic
If public realize that it's the majority of cyclists, which ignores stop, red light, etc. and not only a few, the authorities would pay more attention to this problem. Please report your experience with a biker.
the lemur replying to a comment from Guenther / August 20, 2012 at 09:18 am
user-pic
It's not the majority. People don't bother reporting problems they have with cyclists because the police can't do anything about something they don't witness, and police don't bother enforcing laws against cyclists (or against pedestrians, or sometimes drivers) unless they are looking to fill a ticket quota by hanging out at an intersection.
Guenther replying to a comment from the lemur / August 22, 2012 at 11:28 pm
user-pic
I can see 20 to 30 people daily who ignore simple rules like stop. Those who cannot believe that so many bikers drive careless, just go to typical "bikers ignore"-spots like Bloor W/Bedford, stay there for a while and count how many bikers ignore and how many care about red light going east. You'll see a percentage of more than 50 ignoring red light.
To put this topic in the spot feel free to report your experince with a biker to "bikeme.lima-city.de". Thanks!
the lemur replying to a comment from Guenther / August 23, 2012 at 09:39 am
user-pic
Your site doesn't load properly. I suggest you stop spamming this site with the link. Besides that, Bloor & Bedford is hardly representative of intersections in this city.
Guenther replying to a comment from the lemur / August 23, 2012 at 10:01 am
user-pic
On every intersection without a connection from right or just a crosswalk with traffic lights I know downtown TO you'll see people biking through, ignoring red light and pedestrians safety.
But ignoring facts is always easier than coping with the ugly truth ...
Oscar Lechat replying to a comment from the moose head / August 23, 2012 at 11:16 am
user-pic
Sometimes cyclists take the whole lane because we don't feel safe when drivers pass us without moving over. I can't trust a motorist to try and pass me at speed within inches.
the lemur replying to a comment from Guenther / August 23, 2012 at 11:46 am
user-pic
Not all of them and not all the time. I cycle all over downtown and I see what the facts are: at every intersection, the cyclists who go through reds and/or endanger pedestrians are in a very, very small minority.

Pedestrians have a lot to answer for as well: many of them seem to think they can cross when they feel like it and expect drivers and cyclists to make exceptions for them. And by far the dumbest thing I see pedestrians doing every day, whether crossing legally or jaywalking, is crossing at an angle so that the farther they get across the street, the more their backs are turned to the traffic coming at them from behind (should be the side). Sheer idiocy.
Guenther / August 26, 2012 at 01:00 pm
user-pic
I agree, there's misbehaviour of all kind of people using the streets. It's interesting to see, how people's affiliation influences their point of view. All of them blame the "others" to cause problems, ignoring at the same time their own misbehaviour. I saw bikers driving without lights at sunset on a one way street the wrong way and yelling to a car driver not giving way for them.
But the common thing of all situations is the lack of responsibility this people have to take. The less fear to be caught in the act and being fined, the more misbehaviour. Yesterday there was a biker on Yonge street, going through red light. 3 police-officers on bikes, right across the street, did nothing. Do you think the biker will stop at the next red light if it's so easy to do what he wants and get away easily?
I know intersections, at which no biker cares about stop. No one stops there. Minority? I don't think so.
Mikky / September 7, 2012 at 10:07 am
user-pic
Went to my coffee-place, 5 mins to go. Saw 7 bikers, 2 of them slewed down a little bit, 5 ignored stop completely. It's so common to ignore stop. No one cares.
Nuxi / September 14, 2012 at 05:49 pm
user-pic
I was sitting in a park near Bloor West, saw what's going at the intersecton next to the park. In only 13 minutes 43 bikers ignored stop, even those with little children! Someone's gonna call Guiness...
Billy / September 16, 2012 at 07:48 pm
user-pic
At the end of the day, everyone makes mistakes, whether it's cyclists, pedestrians or cars. However, the stupidest most dangerous mistakes happen to come from people who do not know the rules of the road or how to drive properly. You don't pass extremely close cyclists and you treat them as cars. It is allowed by law to take up a whole lane as a cyclist. I used to share but now that car drivers are getting increasingly hostile and careless, I always make sure I take up the whole lane. If you don't like it, you can take the bus
Jeff / October 4, 2012 at 10:07 am
user-pic
Cyclists beleiving they have the right to pass a vehicle that is stopped to make a right turn.

If a vehicle is clearly ahead of you, stopped and signalling to make a right turn, they have the right of way. In this scenario a cyclist must either stop and allow the vehicle to turn or pass on the left. If you try to squeeze by the vehicle on the right you are breaking the law...it's called making an unsafe pass and you, not the driver will be charged if their is a collision
Alastair / December 1, 2012 at 02:49 am
user-pic
Read all the comments, and Aaron had one of the best:

"The worst habit of cyclists is hugging the curb and allowing drivers to speed past them when it's not safe to do so. Take the lane when you need to people.

Oh, and for balance, the worst habit of drivers is passing a cyclist within a few inches only to stop at the red light 50 metres ahead. "

Motor-vehicle operators do NOT have a right to pass cyclists.
There is no law, or moral code, that grants motor-vehicles the "right-of-superiority" over cyclists.

A cyclists life is not of less value than yours.
It would be wise to try to conduct your driving life without knowingly and willfully endangering the lives of other people, like cyclists for instance.

If a cyclist is in the right lane, then you MUST wait politely behind, or change lanes and then pass.
The curb side of the right lane is often dangerous for many reasons. Anyone with a reasonable degree of intelligence would be able to see the broken pavement, potholes, etc... on the side of the road and realize "aha, that's why this cyclist is riding in the middle of the lane. I understand now."
It seems that very few people have the cognitive ability to do this.

Cyclists are not subhuman creatures that you have a superior right run off the road into the gutters.

For cyclists: do NOT be submissive to motor-vehicles. Assert your self, and TAKE safety space you need.

ALL: Try not to kill other people through the course of your daily lives.
Steven Polak / December 12, 2012 at 04:42 pm
user-pic
Really if a cyclist breaks the law they are mostly creating danger for themselves, I agree that it is the drivers bad habits revolving around cyclists you have to look out for.
Anonymous Driver / January 15, 2013 at 06:11 pm
user-pic
No bike lane, no bikey!!!

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal