City
Whatever happened to the Etobicoke RT?
Heading to the airport via Kipling station a few weeks ago, I noticed an area on the south side of the upper level opposite the bus loading area that appeared to be an empty trackbed and roughed-in platform. It was obviously nothing to do with the subway below - the bed was too narrow anyway - so what was it?
It turns out the inaccessible area visible through plate glass windows from inside the station is the only piece ever built of a planned Etobicoke light rail line. By extending the Bloor-Danforth line east to Kennedy and west to Kipling, the TTC once planned to provide connections to two LRTs that would bookend the route and serve the less dense areas beyond with lower predicted ridership.
As we now know, the Scarborough RT would be the only one of the pair constructed. Kipling station's full potential, and perhaps raison d'etre, would be lost somewhere along the way.
In the late 70s, the TTC began work on what would be the final extension of the Bloor-Danforth subway line. At a cost of $110 million, 75 per cent of which came from the province, one stop was added in each direction to Kipling Avenue and Kennedy Road.
In the east, the line would connect with the Scarborough RT and create a transit hub for passengers to switch to other forms of surface transit. In the west, Kipling would also hook up to an LRT and provide connections to GO trains and regional busses. The circular "Kiss'n'Ride" drop off area would make pick ups and drop offs by car easy ("kissing is encouraged but not mandatory," according to promotional material.)
Realistically, extending the line to Kipling was never as easy to justify financially as the Kennedy extension. If you think about it, the Bloor-Danforth line could still easily terminate at Islington today and provide similar services and connections. Several local bus routes were altered to start or end at Kipling at the time.
As James Bow from Transit Toronto notes, adding a stop in a low density area like the middle of Kipling Avenue never really panned out for the TTC. Mississauga transit still prefers the location of Islington station for its hub and GO riders could just as easily board a subway stop earlier if the necessary infrastructure was in place.
So what would a west-end LRT have looked like had it been built? According to Scott Haskill, a senior transit planner at the TTC, the Etobicoke RT would have run north on the Kipling hydro corridor to Pearson then east on the Finch corridor toward York University.
Presumably the system would have looked similar to the Scarborough RT. Local stops could have been included at Burnhamthorpe Road, Rathburn Road, Eglinton Avenue, Highway 401/427, Islington Avenue, Weston Road and Highway 400 if this had ended up becoming the final route.
Interestingly, the east end RT was originally conceived to use ALRVs - the double, articulated streetcars shown in the illustration above - but the arrival of the high-tech, driverless ICTS vehicles, which were backed by the province, convinced the TTC to modify the route mid-construction. The strange single track at Kennedy, different to what is shown in the plan above, is proof of this last-minute design change.
Since the province managed to get ICTS cars in Scarborough, it's therefore pretty safe to assume the vehicles would have been used in Etobicoke too.
In the end, the TTC never pursued the Etobicoke RT as a viable transit line and it joined the long list of abandoned or never-developed ideas the commission probably tucks away in a dusty desk somewhere. Other stations have similar "future-proofing" for services that have yet to arrive; there's an extra tunnel without track at Kipling for access to an unbuilt yard and the Sheppard and Spadina stops have knock-out panels for access for new connections, should they ever arrive.
Next time you're at Kipling imagine hopping on a rapid transit vehicle instead of cramming onto the airport rocket bus.
ETOBICOKE RT MAP:
View Etobicoke RT in a larger map
MORE IMAGES:
Notice of bus route changes with the new Kipling station
How the TTC map looked with Kipling and Kennedy but no Scarborough RT
Aerial photo of Kipling station on completion. The LRT track bed runs along the south side of the building
Leaflet from the opening day of the Scarborough RT
LRTs - rapid transit for the 1980s?
--
Images: City of Toronto Archives.


Discussion
25 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Google maps show how *easily* FAST transit could be built to the outlying areas. Just a quick glance at the map shows that North Etobicoke/Rexdale, the Finch E-W Corridor and Central Scarborough/ Malvern could be accessed with minimal fuss.
But yet we have nothing. Again.
Monorails, perhaps?
Here's why I believe why these Hydro Corridors would never work for RT. 1. Noise. People would complaint how noisy to have rail vehicles ruing till 1am in the morning. Then they'll grind the tracks at night while it's located within 50m of many homes. 2. The cost of grade separation. LRT in the 80's were designed to be fully grade separated. There isn't a rail corridor beside the route unlike the SRT. That means all the overpasses had to be built. 3. Access to the Stations. Only a few stations will be built within a major intersection. You'll ended up having more Midland/McCowan stations where the total use does even reach 6,000 daily because they are located in the worst place ever. Most people in Toronto would take a bus to the subway/RT instead of walking to the stations. Probably a surface LRT is much more suitable. 4. Demand. Ridership in central Etobicoke remains low. The 46 Martin Grove bus serves the neighbourhood around the hydro corridor till Eglinton. This bus doesn't get a lot of ridership since the 191 existed to grab all the people from the north. The 48 Rathurburn/50 Burnhamthorpe gets even less riders. The 192 Airport bus gets a decent amount during busy seasons, but that's still not enough for RT. 5. Hydro company. They generally dislike that fact that their corridor is being used for public transit. They think the line would get in their way and fear public safety. They also charge a leasing fee for transit use.
I was taking a look along the proposed route above in Google Maps and I noticed the last stretch lines up very well with the upcoming Finch LRT. Here's a crazy idea--how about extending that LRT along the route of this defunct Etobicoke LRT, connecting to the airport AND the Crosstown LRT, and ending up at Kipling station? Is there enough ridership now to justify this?
I am not a native of Toronto but i can tell this city is lacking something more important - visionaries.
http://picasaweb.google.com/111087824614272064562/UTDCLRVsAtSacramentoRTAndUtahTransitAuthority#5513123638311245650
UTDC was the train-building corporation owned by the Ontario government and built streetcars, subways, and RT trains for the TTC exclusively during the 1980s. It is the same company that built the SRT cars.
RE-READ Mark's comment V E R Y S L O W L Y and T H I N K about what he is actually saying. OK, children, back to Grade Two reading lessons and a puppet show after recess!
Are people really this dumb?
You are aware that the Vancouver skytrain is the same technology as the SRT right? You know they built subway trains for Turkey right?
The idea was for the Province to keep the money from developing and building TTC vehicles in Ontario while making more money by selling them elsewhere. No exclusivity anywhere! That would be bad for business!
Also, no Downsview.
In addition, better pictures. Some of the pictures are impossible to read.