City
Bloor Street church the focus of huge development
The Bloor Street United Church at the corner of Bloor and Huron Street will likely be redeveloped to host the headquarters of the United Church of Canada, a condo tower, and an improved space for church services and other meetings. Like several other proposed and under-construction developments in Toronto, the designs available on the church's website show a mix of angular modern design mixed several historic features of the original structure.
Under the plans currently available online, the original nave will be replaced with a large, glass-walled square space to allow in the maximum amount of sunlight. The area behind the church, currently a parking lot, will form the base of the General Council offices and condominium tower. The appearance and layout shown here is preliminary, but the design is one favoured by the church.
The Bloor Street United Church was selected from several locations in Canada vying for the new headquarters. The lease on the current offices at Bloor and Islington will expire in 2015, which prompted the church to look for a new space. The location in the heart of Toronto and the local congregation were apparently key factors in the decision.
Michael Hilliard, the chair of the church's redevelopment committee, says no matter what happens, the protected facade will remain. "Whatever is ultimately done ... the remainder of the building will be redeveloped into new, flexible, environmentally-sound space, which it currently isn't."
The green features could include LEED designation - an internationally recognized level of excellence for sustainable and eco-friendly buildings - and a green roof on top of the redesigned nave. The architects behind these designs, B+H, are also (partially) responsible for another Bloor street icon - the modern extension to the ROM. The still under-construction Ripley's Aquarium near the CN Tower is also in the company's portfolio.
"Within the congregation, everybody is very excited," says Hilliard. "The outcome of this, we hope, will be a great, new, accessible, environmentally-sensitive space. That's not to discount in any way the attachment many of us feel to our existing building, but at the end of the day we felt that in order to do the kind of ministry we wanted it made sense to make this move."
The church hopes to have the new building ready sometime in 2017, though that could change depending on how the development progresses in the coming months. The church met with the community and local councillor Adam Vaughan last night to discuss the project and initiate the process of getting council approval. If all goes to plan, the builders could break ground within two years.
What do you think of the proposed design?


Discussion
70 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
deal-makers?
It's not perfect, it's not startchitecture, not true historical preservation either, and there are no superrich clients throwing cash at it the way they do in the US or Europe, but it will get built and it will be a plus for the urban fabric of the city. And right on the subway.
Good stuff.
Can't wait until the day comes when our children ask "What's that building?" and we inform them of what it used to be. The child lets out a little laugh and says "people used to be silly back then". Then the parent takes them for a nice big ice cream cone.
If it's not on gonewild - I don't even bother. :)
how does it meet the street?! Is there any retail at ground level?!
and why do people hate the ROM addition so much? never understood that. at least it's not another boring rectangle.
Church buildings are old, inaccessible, and cost a FORTUNE to maintain; the repurposing of the best parts of the design of this building means that the 'character' of the corner will remain, but accessibility, and green building will benefit everyone.
Also, it ruined the dinosaur exhibit. Oooh, bare white walls and bones! The old exhibit had painted jungle scenes at least.
I tell friends from out of town that the ROM is closed for renovations when they express visiting it. Why? Because I'm ashamed of the destruction of the original architecture.
As for the 'united' chuch, looks like the same crap will 'disperse' those of that religion of that church.
Crap again!
I, Don Knotts, have a problem with this.
I always find people who are against any change in architecture to be the types that would save a generic house to stop something new from going up. If cities hadn't torn down, reused, and rebuilt buildings, Manhattan would still be slums, Paris would not be what it is today (most of the city was bulldozed in the 1800s for the current look), and beautiful buildings wouldn't be around today like St. Peter's Basilica in the Vatican, the Louvre, or Grand Central Terminal.
Also with regards to the ROM extension - believe it or not, but I've seen it in several top 10 lists for best and most controversial buildings of the decade and seems to garner praise from out-of-towners. My own family from Manhattan, Sydney, and Malta (whom live inside the walls of a medieval fortress) all liked the addition, and enjoyed the city as a whole.
I think the people like you who are enshrined in their white privilege that were offended by the comment in question should check out this blog and lean about what people of colour do go through on a daily basis: http://www.racialicious.com/
Furthermore, you can't simply say 'hey, let's close this church!'. Firstly, the church building is owned by the church (as a religious organization). It's their building and they can do what they want with it. Secondly, the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms guarantees Canadians the freedom of religion. For the government to legislate the closure of a church because it thinks the idea of religion is 'silly' is unconstitutional.
So when you children ask 'what's that building?' you tell them. And if you pass a mosque, synagogue, or temple of any sort you do the same thing. As you said, it's 2012: the age where we can appreciate and celebrate all history, religion, and culture!
Eat that ice cream now princess Kyle cuz there aint no Baskin Robbins in hell girly-man haha.
I mean that in the nicest possible way Miss Kyle hehe. = )