City
The Distillery District may get a hotel, but not this one
A much buzzed about proposal to build a 34-storey hotel-condo opposite the main gates of the Distillery District was recently sent back to the architects for redesign by the City's design review panel, a group that advises Council on achieving quality architecture and landscaping. The decision of the panel, while not necessarily surprising, raises a few questions about Toronto's willingness to embrace bold architectural projects in historic districts.
A recent recipient of an award from Architecture Magazine, the Rack House D project — cited for its progressive use of materials and "massive, powerful" presence — was turned down over fears that it might set a precedent for other, lower-quality towers around the historic Gooderham & Worts site as well as concerns over its effect on the Trinty-Mill Street area.
The panel had no qualms with the building itself — they praised its "beautiful, world-class" appearance and noted the developer's conservation record in their January 23 meeting — but a majority of panel members suggested the size of the structure might negatively impact the area. It's worth noting the area north of Mill Street was not included in the master plan devised in the 1990s for redevelopment of Distillery and that the building is currently vacant.
The Distillery is underserved by hotels and Cityscape Development, co-owners of the old Gooderham & Worts factory, have been looking at proposals for years, according to an article in the Star, which also draws comparisons to New York's Meatpacking district, an area successfully redeveloped into a fashionable neighbourhood with a thriving nightlife.
Cityscape hopes that by adding a fashionable place to stay, it can boost the number of after-hours visitors to the Distillery. Use of the site for a hotel wasn't itself a concern for the panel — in fact, it was seen as a positive — but this particular design left too many "unknowns" for the members' liking.
In Saucier + Perrotte's original design, the historic whiskey/wine storage building currently on the site would be converted into a restaurant and bar. Floors 2 - 6 of the tower would become a hotel, the rest, floors 8 - 34 would be sold as private condos. Now that the ball is back in the architect's court, one can expect that considerable modifications will be made to the design.
And so we're left with a number of questions. Is the design review panel's decision wrong? Or is this conservative approach the most one prudent given the unique historical character of the area? Should a chance have been taken on Rack House D given the praise the design has received and the fact it preserves and revitalizes a vacant heritage building? As the minutes from the DRP meeting put it, "Does an outstanding design justify the irreversible change to the Rack House D building and the Distillery District's core heritage area?"


Renderings from Saucier + Perrotte


Discussion
11 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
I have a feeling this is more about Toronto architects having a fit that they didn't get the project, than any of the vague gibberish that the article lists out.
hooooooray
The biggest question is, if they have the money to eat up an entire warehouse building, well isn't that more than big enough for a hotel? Even with just a couple storeys added to it.
The CURRENT condo already added has already destroyed many perspective views from with-in the district.
The distillery district, is the largest joined compound of VICTORIAN INDUSTRIAL ARCHITECTURE in North America. It is so special. Impossible to replicate. The only area that really has a strong consistant historic sense in Toronto. The only area, where you could actually feel consistent language instead of scattered accents of history. The key word is also INDUSTRIAL. Scale, is the strongest measure that defines historically industrial area's since they are ether low-mid rise. It is an important part of it's british nature.
There are blank empty lots surround the small, handful of the distillery district compound. They can easily allow high rised condo's to be built on the outside empty lots. This will keep the distillery district feel, strong and unique while allowing a newer collection of architecture 'greatness' as this writer emplies to be neighbouring instead of imposing.
When you impose a high-rise, directly onsite in the distillery, you change the internal views. You cast strong, almost permanent shadow. You feel scale or 'size' more than the walls at grade. The industrial character beneath will just appear as masonry or as you say 'brick' shell of accented shops beneath a glass tower. Which basically will not feel unique. After A few more of these towers pop up, the area will feel like another Yorkville cumberland shop area, surrounded by towers.