Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 24°C
City

The route the Toronto subway might have taken

Posted by Derek Flack / November 5, 2011

Jacobs and Davies Toronto Subway 1910Although Toronto would get Canada's first subway in 1954, plans to bring underground rapid transit to the city had been in the works for some time before construction began on the 12 stations that made up the original Yonge Line. As Mark Osbaldeston explains in his recently released book, Unbuilt Toronto II, one of the reasons the City was eager to build a subway was to diminish the stronghold of the privately-owned Toronto Railway Company (TRC), which had signed a 30 year lease to run streetcars in Toronto back in 1891.

I won't lift the entire story from Osbaldeston (you should buy his book!), which examines the ill-fated plans to build a more thorough radial railway network in Toronto at the expense of a subway system, but it's worth pausing on the subway plan of 1910 if only for the sake of historical curiosity. After the issue of provincial approval for a Toronto subway was endorsed by Toronto voters in the 1910 municipal election, the province played along by passing a bill to allow the city to proceed with its plans.

Two months later, city council would commission New York engineering firm Jacobs and Davies to put together a study of Toronto's transportation infrastructure. Although the report defied public sentiment in claiming that the TRC did an adequate job of accommodating the city's needs, the firm also included a proposal for a future subway, which it argued would be needed soon enough.

Depicted on the map above, Jacobs and Davies plan consisted of three distinct lines: one in the west running from Dundas and Keele, a central line up Yonge to St. Clair, and an eastern route starting at Broadview and Danforth. After initial construction was complete, a connecting line across St. Clair could be built to tie the whole system together.

Needless to say, the plan would never come to fruition. By 1915, a report written the City's Commissioner of Works R.C. Harris and others would stipulate that Toronto didn't require a fully fledged subway system and that resources should be spent on the type of "semi-rapid transit" that radial railways could provide. That's an intriguing bit of local history Osbaldeston has dug up for us given that Harris has often been credited as a forward-looking genius for the inclusion of the subway deck on the Bloor Viaduct, which was completed in 1918.

The Jacobs and Davies subway plan may have been short-sighted in thinking of St. Clair as the northern terminus of Toronto, but had its more east-west friendly proposal come to be, Toronto would likely have something much more akin to the grid-like subway coverage that cities like New York and Paris enjoy. One can always dream, right?

Map from the Toronto Archives (red highlights added after the fact). For a larger version, check out my Flickr page.

Discussion

9 Comments

rick mcginnis / November 5, 2011 at 02:28 pm
user-pic
That is one strange, meandering route, but it's worth noting that it was probably designed for 1910 traffic and demands. That it ends at the Junction at the western extreme is interesting - we know it as a sleepy, slightly run-down neighbourhood undergoing a revival after years of decline, but before WW1 it was still a vital area - my mom in Mt. Dennis considered it more of a shopping destination than Queen and Yonge, the city's real downtown - built around a massive train hub. Also interesting that the eastern end ends roughly around Don Mills, and that the downtown portion follows Front, and not Queen, later assumed to be the "natural" route of a downtown line, alas never built.

This is the sort of thing worth remembering when city officials talk about "usage" and "demand," since these things shift and change over time, and sometimes very swiftly.
Ian / November 5, 2011 at 04:08 pm
user-pic
"That is one strange, meandering route, but it's worth noting that it was probably designed for 1910 traffic and demands."

Indeed, and its worth carefully examining the street grid as of 1910 as shown in the map -- with that lack of what are now familiar thoroughfares (i.e. University, Bay, Dundas) I imagine it would have been unfathomable at the time what our current travel patterns would be.
RG / November 5, 2011 at 04:39 pm
user-pic
I LOVE BLOG TO.
Thanks for bringing another of this great City's fascinating stories to light!
W. K. Lis / November 5, 2011 at 05:06 pm
user-pic
Another consideration to remember is the speed limits or the speed people were accustomed to at the time was much slower than today. A galloping horse would be called speeding. Automobile top speeds, for example, were expected to travel at 10 mph (16 km/h) in the city, not the 50 km/h (30 mph) we expect today. The Subway curves shown in the map would be taken at what we would call slow speed, would have been at a fast speed back in 1910.
the lemur / November 5, 2011 at 11:53 pm
user-pic
It seems like a very different and mysterious city from that map: no Dupont as we know it, College seemingly projected to High Park (I'm guessing Grenadier Rd would have been that western end), the existence of a Queen & Dundas intersection and most tantalizing of all, St Clair crossing the Don Valley to Pape!
Chris / November 6, 2011 at 08:18 am
user-pic
Having the subway go up Spadina would have been a good choice at the time. The current distance between the University and Yonge line is too close south of Bloor.

@Rick
Usage may shift and change over time, but you can almost guarantee that traffic will not decrease at any particular point along the subway line. Development around subway stations normally only increases in density.
rick mcginnis replying to a comment from Chris / November 6, 2011 at 09:35 am
user-pic
Chris - you mean the the "Build it and they will come" theory. That usually works, but it's a hard political sell, especially these days. The city is still suffering for green-lighting Sheppard over other routes, and while Sheppard may one day have the density needed to make it worthwhile, it's a long-term project that does no favours for a mayor or councillor who can only plan as far ahead as the next election. The people planning the subway in 1910 were obviously hoping to build for the densities they had at the time.
Jason Paris / November 8, 2011 at 03:01 pm
user-pic
Interesting how a DRL-like line pre-dates an east-west line.
Rob replying to a comment from Jason Paris / April 16, 2012 at 12:44 pm
user-pic
My thoughts exactly!

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal