Saturday, May 18, 2013Mostly Cloudy 19°C
City

Bike stencils spotted at the site of recent fatality

Posted by Derek Flack / November 11, 2011

Bike Stencils Jenna MorrisonAlong with the makeshift memorial that's been set up at the entrance to the West Toronto Railpath near Dundas and Sterling for fallen cyclist Jenna Morrison, there have now appeared three large bike stencils on the corner where she was struck and killed. Spotted by Martin Reis — as these things often are — we've yet to find out who's responsible for this memorial street art.

A quiet intervention, the stencils appear more about commemoration than just an opportune cry for more bike lanes. These, after all, are merely bike icons that have been painted on the street. No line to denote an unofficial bike lane has been painted, nor are have arrows been painted to denote sharrows. It's touching little tribute, and should make the events of last Monday even more difficult to forget.

20111111-sharrows2.jpg20111111-sharrows1.jpgPhotos by Martin Reis

Discussion

46 Comments

AV / November 11, 2011 at 12:21 pm
user-pic
Yea, sharrows will fix everything.
Matt / November 11, 2011 at 12:25 pm
user-pic
It's a memorial. Don't be so knee-jerk cynical.
Lewis / November 11, 2011 at 12:30 pm
user-pic
These are haunting in some way.
No / November 11, 2011 at 12:31 pm
user-pic
"touching little tribute"...that endangers cyclists and motorists.

Morrison's death was a horrible tragedy without question, but jackasses who take it upon themselves to f with the roads need to go to f'ing jail.
AV replying to a comment from Matt / November 11, 2011 at 12:37 pm
user-pic
I'm not (for once) being cynical, I'm waiting for something that actually prevents the death instead of a tribute after the fact.

I'm tired of seeing ghost bikes and I would think a lot of other people are too.
David Davidson / November 11, 2011 at 12:39 pm
user-pic
Dumb
Matt replying to a comment from No / November 11, 2011 at 12:48 pm
user-pic
How does it endanger anyone? The only effect it could possibly have is to make people more cautious.
Toby Buckets / November 11, 2011 at 12:57 pm
user-pic
I was thinking it would be cool to do this all over the city as a form of protest / cultural dissonance. I image it would drive Rob Ford crazy if we repainted the recently blacked out bike lanes.
Retards / November 11, 2011 at 12:58 pm
user-pic
Bunch of retards posting here. If you don't like it, DONT LOOK AT IT. If only some of you idiots would get run over, Toronto would be a better place.
Mg replying to a comment from No / November 11, 2011 at 01:15 pm
user-pic
...why is it that when someone does something that others don't agree with, invariably the response is to suggest that they should be thrown in jail?
No replying to a comment from Matt / November 11, 2011 at 01:18 pm
user-pic
If you can't wrap your head around the fact that citizens with zero knowledge of street signage or distances required for bike lanes at intersections or any other f'ing thing to do with marking streets with zero authority to make changes to the streets SHOULD NOT BE F'ING F'ING WITH CITY STREETS, then I cannot help you and I leave you to your vigilante ignorance that can get people killed.

I think the speed limit is too low on Bayview. I'm gonna make my own signs that say 90 km/hr and put them up. Surely I know enough about cars and roads to make this decision for the entire city.

Hey wait - look at those handicapped spaces. I want to park there. I'm gonna tear down those handicapped parking only signs. So I can park.

I don't like how people turn left onto Bay from Charles. it endangers pedestrians. In the middle of the night I'm going to stencil a straight ahead only arrow in that turning lane. Because I goddamn feel like it.

etc

etc

etc

DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
No replying to a comment from Mg / November 11, 2011 at 01:26 pm
user-pic
I agree with the law. How about you?

Or are you for random citizens making random decisions about the infrastructure of this city based on their guts rather than, say, knowledge and expertise in making decisions about the infrastructure of this city?
Jessica / November 11, 2011 at 01:40 pm
user-pic
I'm always shocked at the trolls that swim below the surface of Blog TO/Torontoist/Toronto Life blog articles. This is absolutely an appropriate and symbolic act. There really is a divide of not only class, but I would go as far as to suggest species in terms of the people that post here. RIP Jenna and my thoughts are with all of us who were personally touched by this event. Also appropriate for today's date (11/11/11) Lest We Forget.
umm replying to a comment from No / November 11, 2011 at 01:48 pm
user-pic
If people don't know what the freaking road signs mean, then they shouldn't be fucking driving. Period.

Your argument is hilarious! Did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning? LOL!
Yes / November 11, 2011 at 01:50 pm
user-pic
i think No should stop molesting children.
Matt replying to a comment from No / November 11, 2011 at 01:54 pm
user-pic
Putting in the equivalent of a "caution" sign is a lot different than changing the speed limit. It's a minor act of civil disobedience. We can disagree about whether it's appropriate, but it's very obviously not dangerous.
No / November 11, 2011 at 02:24 pm
user-pic
Did you people even look at the vandalized lane?

At how much the bike part takes up?

How that will mean a truck or bus stopped there will actually encroach significantly into the OTHER ONCOMING LANE?

Clueless.

All of you.
Matt / November 11, 2011 at 02:38 pm
user-pic
Yr really reaching there, No. A sharrow is not a bike lane, and no driver is under any obligation to leave it clear--especially if doing so would create a more dangerous situation. The sharrow just means let's share the road and be careful.

You can keep being self-righteously angry if you want to, though.
Road Rules replying to a comment from No / November 11, 2011 at 02:59 pm
user-pic
Since a bicycle is considered a vehicle they are entitled to take up an entire lane as long as they are keeping up with traffic. Anyone who would serve into oncoming traffic to avoid them in non passing lanes would be breaking the law.
Road Rules replying to a comment from No / November 11, 2011 at 03:00 pm
user-pic
Serve is meant to be swerve. Obviously but I figure I might as well point out my typo before people jump all over that slight.
No replying to a comment from Road Rules / November 11, 2011 at 03:20 pm
user-pic
Bike sits in "bike lane" at stop sign.
Truck approaches stop sign.
Truck does not drive in "bike lane".
Truck stops at stop sign.
Part of driver side of truck is sitting in oncoming lane.
I await your complaints.
Rich replying to a comment from No / November 11, 2011 at 03:26 pm
user-pic
I await your Ritalin dose for today. You went flying off the cliff, and then somehow did a double back flip over a rainbow and into a shark's mouth.

In other words, you're a hyperactive douche. Cool it sport
Road Rules replying to a comment from No / November 11, 2011 at 03:38 pm
user-pic
The truck then should wait it's turn behind the cyclist if they do not have enough room to share the lane. If the driver pulls up beside the cyclist not leaving ample room for both cyclist, the truck and oncoming traffic then the truck is engaging in careless driving.
No replying to a comment from Road Rules / November 11, 2011 at 03:43 pm
user-pic
No, that is why experts design roads and not jackasses in the middle of the night with some spray paint and a stencil made from old boxes. The inadequate width of the lane in the photo above is the result of the jackasses, not the city. The city would never construct a road so stupidly, so you can't say drivers are violating the traffic act on a road that hasn't been designed to the standards of the goddamn traffic act.
Road Rules replying to a comment from No / November 11, 2011 at 04:30 pm
user-pic
Actually whether the fake signs are there or not the law still remains the same. Cyclists are allowed to take up an entire lane with or without designated bike lanes. I suggest you brush up on your traffic laws.
dave replying to a comment from AV / November 11, 2011 at 05:00 pm
user-pic
im not tired of ghost bikes. i dont want to see them because i know what they represent. but i guess if you dont like any memorials, that's your problem
seriouisly replying to a comment from Rich / November 11, 2011 at 05:49 pm
user-pic
ah really! i see that the street has a curve, maybe someone put the image of the bike there bc there is a trail just off the street and it can just inform motorists that there are cyclists in that area.(prevent more deaths??) NO needs to get off blog TO and meditate for a few minutes ( angry much) maybe if jenna was your family member you wouldnt be so objective to that. there truly is no need for such a hostile approach to such a minute situation.
seriously replying to a comment from No / November 11, 2011 at 05:53 pm
user-pic
you are a moron, just shut up. sometimes, because of people like you, i believe blogTO should be called BITCH ABOUT THIS to fack! Again JUST SHUT UP
police replying to a comment from Road Rules / November 11, 2011 at 05:58 pm
user-pic
I think that is what the police are trying to figure out who was there first, and who pulled on alongside after.
Mark Bee / November 11, 2011 at 07:23 pm
user-pic
Wow. What an evil bunch of low-life trolls here.
electric / November 11, 2011 at 08:47 pm
user-pic
Umm, the urban repair squad?

Thanks to whomever! Now if the city could fix the curb and install some concrete bollards.

The dundas rail trail is nice, but the entrances and exits are AWFUL.
DaHoffMan / November 11, 2011 at 10:47 pm
user-pic
I believe the commentor No above derives their name as a contraction of 'No clue about rules of the road'.

Trucks have no superior rights to bicycles on the roadway. The rules of the road state that access to roads are on a 'first come first served' basis. If a cyclist reaches the intersection first, they are in no way obligated to yield the right of way, and a truck or other motorist has no 'right' to try to move ahead of the cyclist. Period. I defy you to prove otherwise.

I think you should just go right now and turn in your Driver's Licence to the local authorities because you have CLEARLY demonstrated you lack a basic understanding of rules of the road. Preventable accidents with cyclists happen daily in North America because of motorists like you full of self-entitlement and lacking in a basic understanding of their obligations on the road. Shame on you for berating people here when you clearly have no clue about the law. You are part of the problem - recognize it and do something so the rest of us can share the roads a little more safely!
Ian replying to a comment from Road Rules / November 12, 2011 at 01:14 am
user-pic
So, were there any witnesses to the accident?

Did she pull up next to a truck that was already at the corner signalling a right turn or was it the opposite?
Ian replying to a comment from DaHoffMan / November 12, 2011 at 01:20 am
user-pic
Conversely, if a car is at an intersection, signalling a right turn, a cyclist has no 'right' to move ahead of the car.

If you're travelling straight, pass the car on the left. If you're turning right stay behind any vehicles already at the intersection that are signalling a right turn.

I hate watching other cyclists close calls in this situation.
b / November 12, 2011 at 02:24 am
user-pic
jeeezus.. bikes... cars... someones life was taken all too soon with an unborn child. have some respect please.

Jenna Morrison, may you live forever in our minds and hearts... rest in peace.
Stra replying to a comment from No / November 12, 2011 at 09:43 am
user-pic
The solid yellow line serves a purpose - you're not to cross over it. So if there's a bike at the stop sign, then naturally the car or truck should stop behind it and wait for the bike to make its turn. Stop being so idiotic NO.
Still no / November 12, 2011 at 02:18 pm
user-pic
Stra

People can't go around f*cking with the streets with whatever revisions/alterations they please.

It is dangerous.

If you can't see that, you're an amazing moron.
Yes replying to a comment from No / November 12, 2011 at 02:35 pm
user-pic
Retard. Did you forget to take your meds today?
Yes replying to a comment from No / November 12, 2011 at 02:37 pm
user-pic
Only fucking idiot that is clueless it you, dumbass!
electric / November 12, 2011 at 03:22 pm
user-pic
What's so dangerous about a few bicycle stencils...lol! I doubt Toronto drivers like Still No wouldn't even notice if it wasn't pointed out.
Lol replying to a comment from electric / November 13, 2011 at 10:52 am
user-pic
Hah it's probably just Rob Ford venting his frustrations. The incoherent rants sure sound like something he would write.
ShutUP! replying to a comment from Still no / November 13, 2011 at 01:54 pm
user-pic
Shut the fck up~!
Tester replying to a comment from No / November 14, 2011 at 12:58 pm
user-pic
Dear No, perhaps you could have use visit to a psychiatrist for some anger management? No?
iphone 5 / November 15, 2011 at 03:31 am
user-pic
It is a superb suggestions specifically to these new to blogosphere, temporary and precise information… Many thanks for sharing this 1. A should study report.
GR1 / November 16, 2011 at 01:30 pm
user-pic
THE FUCKING NERVE. I WILL BE OUT THERE TONIGHT WITH my stencil maker AND PUTTING NEON SKATEBOARDS OVER THE BIKES. DO YOU NOT REMEMBER THE SKATEBOARDER WHO WAS HIT TWO WEeks ago?! there is a war on skateboards and it must end NOW. bikers and cars, we are coming back to claim OUR streets.
Edwina Frankford / April 15, 2012 at 01:25 am
user-pic
On aug 31st 2011 i was dragged under the wheels of a mac truck while crossing with my bike on a green light at dundas west and Keele. Later that day my left leg was amputated. My life will never be the same again, but at least I have it, Jenna doesn't. The City needs to make Toronto roads safer.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal