City
Occupy Toronto Protests
The Occupy Toronto movement has set up shop at St. James Park near Church and Adelaide streets, where thousands are participating in a variety of peaceful demonstrations. The crowd departed King and Bay shortly after 11 a.m. to make their way to the previously unspecified location for the occupation, which will continue indefinitely.
Thus far the atmosphere has been more enthusiastic than combative, as participants rally against everything from unfettered capitalism and corporate greed to Native land rights. As was anticipated, the causes represented here are myriad, though spontaneous chants identifying the crowd as the 99% have proved something of a unifier.
Update (October 16th, 12:00pm):
Check out our post on day two of Occupy Toronto for more updates/info.
Update (October 16th, 1:30am):
Here's what the scene looked like around midnight at St. James Park. Although I tweeted that there might be 50-75 tents, after a full walk-around I think the number is closer to 100. There were a few hundred people spread out across the park when I left at 12:30 a.m. The mood was upbeat as demonstrators clustered around the tent city and gazebo eating turkey stew and winding down. Along with a fair bit of weed smoking, I also spotted volunteers picking up garbage, folks debating religion, political theory and geneder (in)equality. All in all, good stuff.










Update (10:30pm):
Video of the percussion group that formed in St. James Park today:
Update (9:30pm):
Five things we've learned so far about Occupy Toronto:
- 1. The media presence has been huge so far, forming its own occupation on Adelaide Street to the north of the park. Keeping attention on the occupations as it continues beyond its first weekend will be key to its continued momentum.
- 2. This is not the G20. Was it ever going to be? Although CP24 reported that two people were arrested earlier today, there was no sign of riot cops or Black Bloc tactics. On the contrary, the cops have been remained in the background and the demonstrators have kept it all peaceful.
- 3. The protests do lack cohesion — but only to a point. While groups clustered in various areas around the park, by the time the General Assembly came around things pulled together for a bit. One way of reading the formation of factions is that they're demonstrative of the participants' belief that occupation will be around for the long haul and thus don't feel intense pressure to make it all happen in one day. You can expect the disparate messages about things like 9/11, the local food movement and Native land rights to fade as the occupation continues.
- 4. Police will not issue tickets for those who sleep in the park overnight. What we don't know is if this will still be the case after the initial crowds have given way to the remaining die-hard demonstrators.
- 5. It's not a cliche to say that today was just the beginning. Although there was a solid turn-out that hovered at around 2500-3000 as people came and went from St. James Park, the test of the protestors' resolve will begin in the wee hours tonight and continue into the coming days. Should it all fizzle out by midweek, Occupy Toronto will be but a blip on the radar — but it's way to early to say which way it'll go.
Update (8:45pm):
Some more photos from today courtesy of Tom Ryaboi and Scott Snider:
This dude was Mr. Personality all day (and loved the media attention)
Black bloc or medical volunteer (hint: the latter)
The embrace
Not the G20, but memories...
I think that sign should say Karl Marx was right
It is Kevin Clarke!
Update (7:00pm):
Here's a few #OccupyToronto tweets:










Update (6:00pm)
Some observations, courtesy of blogTO photographer Scott Snider:
- The crowd was, in general, older than I anticipated. I thought it would be mainly students and those in their early 20's, but if I had to guess I'd say the average age was closer to 30.
- There were some organized groups (Socialists; Marxists; Unions) but individual participants made up the majority
- The mood was very buoyant and light throughout the day
- The most compelling faction/area for me was the open mic set up at the north end of the park. People stood up to tell their stories and engage in short discussions of what brought them out today. Two examples: a middle aged man who had an adverse reaction to prescribed medication who now has to support his family on $400 a week WSIB claim and a senior whose pension was "stolen" by corporate malfeasance. Most seemed to be spontaneous declarations by "plain folk" who were fed up with the status quo.
- The police presence consisted mostly of bike cops; who seemed to bend over backwards to keep out of the way and were generally happy to chat with the demonstrators. I didn't spot any confrontations.
- By mid-afternoon there were 25 or so tents set up around the park, with a concentration in the east end.
- There really were a wide variety of causes being espoused, but the basic message was as follows: "the system is broken and we need to take back control from multinationals."
Update (5:40pm):
Here's the livestream:
Update (5:00pm):
Here's a bunch more photos of the scene at St. James Park this afternoon. We'll share some additional written observations in a bit.
A tent city is set to go, but how full will it be at 4:00 a.m. tomorrow morning?
Thems be some fine accomodations
Book sale!
The best vehicle for a protest against capitalism: the Segway
Naturally, a host of socialist and communist groups made an appearance
The drum circle was actually quite impressive
Artist Joel Richardson was on hand with some artistic signs
Food station
Hmmmm. Who's representing the indie coffee joints at this protest?
At long last, the port-o-potties!
Hey! Is that Kevin Clarke with the Stanley Cup?
Occupy Tree-O
Update (2:30pm):
Here's our first roundup of photos of the protests, with plenty more to come later today and tonight.











Photos by Tom Ryaboi


Discussion
57 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Yes there have always been poor people, but in different periods there are less or more of them and they can suffer less or more depending on the policies in place.
We can certainly do better than we're doing today, and I know that because we've already done it. Your tired cynicism is not based in reality. Poverty is solvable.
That's not darwinism. That is rewarding and socializing their failure. Smaller banks that worked fairly and wisely could have sprung up to replace them, but that isn't what happened. So don't go attacking the poor as lazy bums and accepting the status quo under such poorly thought out pretenses.
Wall Street doesn't produce anything. They just gamble. They lost at the table and got their money back. There's life being unfair, and then there's life being retarded. The system is retarded. if these protests can scare these banks and merely assure something like that bailout never happens again, they have more than done their job and have more than contributed to society.
Most human beings are sufficiently creative. Capitalism doesn't care about creativity unless it generates money.
This is a contradiction. They were better off and suffered just the same? No, it was the former. And numerous countries, from Japan to France, to the Nordic countries have maintained higher levels of social equality than us, and we do better than the US. Policy matters, and in a world with a $70T per year economy, it is possible that each and every human could have their basic needs met and more. There really is enough food and shelter for everyone, we just distribute it badly.
We escaped the malthusian cycle sometime in the mid 1800s, and we don't have to go back unless we choose to. Birth rates fell in all the richest countries, and even in the poorer ones. Malthus was wrong, but ironically the belief in his ideas can be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
People need to realize that "corporations" are the people.. It isn't corporate greed, it is human greed. If you can solve that problem, then maybe you can make things change.
The reality is that all humans have and never will be equal. I am in university and have competed athletically. Competition is everywhere and is extremely fierce. It is always survival of the fittest. This is why I personally do not give money to the homeless that are begging. It's not because I resent them or think they are trash. It's because they aren't doing anything productive by sitting there begging for money all day. Similar activities would be watching TV, surfing the web, etc. How about enrolling in social programs, improving your marketable skills, and building your personal brand. Come out and compete against me. I've noticed that it has become a tendency for people to grow really weak, many avoid struggle that involve changes in their lifestyle and that is how you stay at the bottom.
<i>"look at what the bailouts did: They saved the asses of giant companies that should have died as punishment for the risks they took, but were decided were 'too big to fail'"</i>
The reason for the bail outs, has absolutely nothing to do with allowing those companies to go unpunished, instead it was about preventing a world economic disaster that would actually have been far more devastating and long lasting to the 99%.
<i>"And everyone else paid for it"</i>
Actually almost all the TARP loans have been repaid with interest. Both American and Canadian taxpayers are actually net gainers.
Most of human history is much more about cooperation than competition. The "fittest" were the people who worked together in families, tribes and ever larger groupings. The individuals who couldn't cooperate, lost. Society is better off if we help that homeless guy get back on his feet than we are if we leave him to starve or freeze. Best of all would be that we don't allow anyone to become homeless in the first place.
Our taxes are subsidizing your education. You drive on roads paid for us, and eat foods kept safe by government inspectors, and don't have to worry about getting sick or injured thanks to the rest of us. You think you stand on your own, but it isn't true. But that's ok, none of us do. It's just better if we realize it.
MIKE CHECK!!!
Occupy Toronto?
OCCUPY TORONTO!!!
Is filled with?
IS FILLED WITH!!!
a bunch of lemming losers?
A BUNCH OF LEMMING LOSERS!!!
Repetitive chants?
REPETITIVE CHANTS!!!
Are used to brainwash?
ARE USED TO BRAINWASH!!!
The weak minded?
THE WEAK MINDED!!
Next march Cherry Beach?
NEXT MARCH CHERRY BEACH!!!
Just because it has always been so, does not mean it always has to be.
It is that kind of thinking that was used against the civil liberties movement when they believed the system should be changed. Imagined if they were deterred by that. Every innovation in the world has met with the same resistance.
See you on the front lines tomorrow... I will be there with my wife and kids.
Greg
this is not about love. this is about greed and mistaken identity.
Village people's perception of survival is much different than ours. Their competition was against nature and their survival was literally: life or death. Furthermore, villages had just enough people to effectively operate. The world is overpopulated and unemployment is actually a natural element to any economy. Humans are currently (and unfortunately) rulers of Earth. Thus, our competition is now only each other. Everyone is different; and consequently, such is the same for their levels of success.
If the desire is a utopia with perfect equality, the first step would be demanding the government to become communists so we can all have equal and identical rights to resources (house, food, money, technology). Unique strengths, skills, and differing levels of effort and hard work should all earn the same award.
Our reality is unfortunate, but it is what it is and the best we can do is provide access to facilities for self-improvement which already exist. From what I can manage to remember, I don't believe there are any corrupt barriers between the lower and middle class. The opportunity is there, it is up to the people to take it.
Lastly, I believe that if you dissect your life and examine it. Where you are now should be somewhat reflective of what you have done in the past.
Village people's perception of survival is much different than ours. Their competition was against nature and their survival was literally: life or death. Furthermore, villages had just enough people to effectively operate. The world is overpopulated and unemployment is actually a natural element to any economy. Humans are currently (and unfortunately) rulers of Earth. Thus, our competition is now only each other. Everyone is different; consequently, such is the same for their levels of success.
If the desire is a utopia with perfect equality, the first step would be demanding the government to become communists so we can all have equal and identical rights to resources (house, food, money, technology). Unique strengths, skills, and differing levels of effort and hard work should all earn the same award.
Our reality is unfortunate, but it is what it is and the best we can do is provide access to facilities for self-improvement which already exist. From what I can manage to remember, I don't believe there are any corrupt barriers between the lower and middle class. The opportunity is there, it is up to the people to take it.
Lastly, I believe that if you dissect your life and examine it. Where you are now should be somewhat reflective of what you have done in the past.
Here's what I can't understand. Inside of his social darwinist theory, how does a complete tool like him survive? Grifting?
the people that are effected the most are the working families. Which don't have time to sit around in a park and sing songs. No they have to work and support their families even on a weekend. These people do not represent me in any way.
Maybe someone can help me out, what do they wish to accomplish with these protests?
I just dont understand this?
Also, for god's sake, why are they sleeping in a public park? City Council just voted to set back the time table for it's Tree Canopy increases, and people on the left are risking damage to one of the best parks downtown?! Go camp out in the actual Financial District if you must! Ironically, some of the people who most benefit from St. James Park are those from the Salvation Army place on Jarvis a block away. The people being kicked out of the park are exactly the people most hurt by rising inequity. If anyone has a right to protest, it is they. But of course, if they camp out somewhere, it won't be in expensive tents, and they won't be able to broadcast their exploits to the whole world via the cameras on their iphones.
We wanted to play Occupy TO to support people putting economic injustice on the agenda in Canada. It's not fair that a few people earn such a large proportion of the money.
Everyone else works hard too and should not be getting poorer every year when banks, oil companies etc have record profits year after year. This has been a dramatic, historic shift in Canada in the last 20 years where the top couple percent of income earners are getting richer faster than ever, while everyone else's incomes stagnate or lower. It's not right, it's not good for our economy or society, and it needs to change.
Solidarity to all supporters of OTO, and thanks for blogging about it, blogTO!
When I first heard of this movement I was unsure of the point, because Canada's financial sector is fine and fairly regulated. But now that they have moved away from Bay Street and are protesting greed in general I hope they help make changes.
The scepter of the wicked, a.k.a. of the Viking hoarder races of the Free (I should say GREED) World.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norse_funeral
The scepter of the wicked, a.k.a. of the Viking hoarder races of the Free (I should say GREED) World.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norse_funeral