Monday, May 20, 2013Mostly Cloudy 21°C
City

Sharrows appear on Spadina

Posted by Derek Flack / September 1, 2011

Sharrows Spadina cyclist TorontoIt's been a long time coming, but it appears that the City of Toronto is finally getting around to painting sharrows on Spadina. Last October, some will recall, the City eliminated the curb lane that previously ran between Bloor and Lake Shore Boulevard. This wasn't an official bit of cycling infrastructure, but it certainly gave one a little bit of space and comfort when riding along what is a rather busy thoroughfare. At the time, the City explained that the removal was part of a plan to introduce sharrows on narrower stretches of the street and bike lanes where the road was wide enough — i.e. around Spadina Crescent.

Although no firm date was given for the implementation of the new infrastructure, a post about the situation from the Toronto Cyclists Union indicated that City staff had assured the organization that the sharrows would be in place before the end of season. Good thing they didn't specify which season, because work has only just gotten started about 10 months later.

Spadina Sharrows TorontoSo far the new sharrows can be found on the east side of Spadina between Adelaide and just south of Queen. We're working on getting a timeline on when the rest of the street will be graced by their presence, but perhaps the bigger question is whether or not the sharrows and short bike lane will represent an improvement. While narrow, the curb lane functioned to divide cyclists and vehicular traffic. Sharrows, on the other hand, aim to foster awareness that cyclists and drivers share the same road-space.

It's probably not possible to answer the question until more people get out and try them out, but I would imagine at least a few will be asking, "if it ain't broke, why fix it?"

Spadina Sharrows

Discussion

24 Comments

Ben / September 1, 2011 at 10:19 am
user-pic
No one should have ever rode their bicycle in the old gutter area. It's not a safe road position. The new sharrows promote a much safer position in the lane.
cultureshot / September 1, 2011 at 10:36 am
user-pic
Man, our downtown roads are in poor shape.
curious g / September 1, 2011 at 10:53 am
user-pic
Question: How is a sharrow different than a bike lane?
Jimmysmack / September 1, 2011 at 11:08 am
user-pic
Can't say that's bad. Although the cynical part of me is thinking "great, more parking for delivery trucks!"

Again, it's something!
steve replying to a comment from cultureshot / September 1, 2011 at 11:09 am
user-pic
Agreed. Who was the idiot who authorized an ASPHALT curb, in that last picture?!
bill / September 1, 2011 at 11:21 am
user-pic
The curb lane WAS broken. It placed you much to close to parked cars.
DC / September 1, 2011 at 11:42 am
user-pic
It certainly was broken..mostly because it wasn't a 'standard' bike lane. Also, it forced you into the path of sewer grates and parked cars. The HTA says that a cyclist is allowed to ride in a straight path as to avoid riding over sewer grates and other obstructions. This "bike lane" violated it.

The sharrows will definitely improve riding on Spadina, when it's not blocked with traffic. I definitely feel safer on College where the sharrows were put in.
Brr Food / September 1, 2011 at 11:49 am
user-pic
bikes are for children
bill / September 1, 2011 at 11:52 am
user-pic
The curb lanes WERE broken. The 'safety' of them was a complete illusion. They put you squarely in the door zone when passing parked cars.
mick replying to a comment from Ben / September 1, 2011 at 11:55 am
user-pic
Ben:

Normally I'd agree with you (take a metre from every curb or car), but Spadina is a different beast as the lanes simply aren't wide enough for two cars and one metre for a bike. Too, the street sees a lot of out-of-towners who don't know what sharrows are, but understand that a white line is not to be crossed. I ride the entire length of Spadina both ways every day and have done so for 3 years, and I've been completely sandwiched by cars since the lines were scraped off. Only time will tell if these sharrows are a success, but I don't think they'll work as well as the old 'two foot-wide' solution.
B. Ross Ashley / September 1, 2011 at 11:56 am
user-pic
@curious g, sharrows are shared, bikelanes aren't. @Brr Food, my bike is too big for children! Sidewalk riding is for children. Bicycles are vehicles, get used to it. Bikes were here before autos.
lowrez / September 1, 2011 at 12:00 pm
user-pic
I feel fairly safe on Spadina if I stay between the curb and that phantom black line in the asphalt.
_n replying to a comment from cultureshot / September 1, 2011 at 12:09 pm
user-pic
Oh man, tell me about it. The cracks, and potholes and _bad patching jobs_ are really horrible. Toronto has some of the worst road conditions out of almost every city I've been too.
_n replying to a comment from cultureshot / September 1, 2011 at 12:10 pm
user-pic
Oh man, tell me about it. The cracks, and potholes and _bad patching jobs_ are really horrible. Toronto has some of the worst road conditions out of almost every city I've been too.
Jimmysmack / September 1, 2011 at 12:34 pm
user-pic
Just for everyone's reference the lanes on Beverly St./St. George are an awesome alternate. I've managed to avoid the Jarvis drama and the Spadina "life flashing before my eyes oh god is that suddenly a Mercedes pulling out from behind a meat truck" run most of this summer.
hamish wilson / September 1, 2011 at 12:41 pm
user-pic
Spadina remains as a sad botch job from when Ms. Grier refused to order an Individual Environmental Assessment to include bike lanes since the Metro level of Toronto couldn't find any room on the street for proper bike lanes.
I don't have full confidence in the City to repair this damage, nor in the CU to be adequately pressing for a proper solution, which likely means in parts restriping the entire road as there is about a foot spare room in places near the central median as the yellow line there sometimes varies between being at the curb of the median, and being a foot out, and we need as much space as possible for our safety.
In some places the sharrows may be more of a help; in other spots we needed that line. And what will be done with the pinch point going northbound across Queen where cyclists are squeezed into a tight sidewalk if there aren't sharrows to push the cars towards the left?
And what about Spadina north of College? Since we've had a bike facility erased and not replaced, do we have full ability to ride on Brunswick as safe contraflow traffic without tickets?
Duh / September 1, 2011 at 01:28 pm
user-pic
Why the F would you ride south or north on Spadina in all the a-hole traffic when you can go down St. George or Huron or do a tiny zig zag down some Annex streets?
Fact Check / September 1, 2011 at 01:50 pm
user-pic
Lake Shore is a Boulevard, not an Avenue. Why do locals not know this, or was this blog written in Bangalore? Is proof-reading dead in the digital age of now?
Derek replying to a comment from Fact Check / September 1, 2011 at 02:23 pm
user-pic
I've corrected the mistake. Apologies for ruining your day. Now back to enjoying my adopted city of Bangalore!
BWs replying to a comment from cultureshot / September 1, 2011 at 02:24 pm
user-pic
So true man, so true
Quinn DuPont / September 1, 2011 at 05:14 pm
user-pic
Sharrows are useless. On College St. they enjoy a cozy existence under parked cars. All drivers ignore them without any further thought.
seanm replying to a comment from B. Ross Ashley / September 1, 2011 at 09:29 pm
user-pic
And horse-drawn wagons were around before bikes, but it doesn't mean they should be on the streets either.

But I kid, bicycles are ok. I just wish the city would set up a proper bicycling network, but prohibit bikes from streets that already have cars AND streetcars. Proper bike "highways" on a focused set of streets (the ones that don't also have buses and/or streetcars), with only one lane of car traffic to relieve congestion on the surrounding streets.

I also wish they'd ban street parking on streetcar routes; at least during peak traffic hours.
JM replying to a comment from Duh / September 1, 2011 at 10:32 pm
user-pic
Many Annex streets are one-way, and are designed in such a manner to keep cars from cutting through the neighbourhoods. Things could be much better with the installation of contra-flow bike lanes on these quiet streets. As of right now its virtually impossible to legally bike down these streets because eventually you'll run into a one-way street going the opposite direction (especially north & south)

With all the crackdowns on cyclists lately, expect to be ticketed if you're going the wrong way on a one way street. It's a real shame too because the Annex is the perfect neighbourhood to install contra flow lanes. Cars will stay out and cyclists can stay safer by avoiding main arteries.
Lady Day replying to a comment from JM / September 2, 2011 at 09:21 am
user-pic
Agreed: they really should instal bike lanes and contra flow lanes in the annex. I am unsure why the city keeps shoving cyclists on to roads like Spadina, biking on there is nuts.

In regards to your one way street comment: I've gone the wrong way down one way streets, even in front of cops for the last few years, and never received a ticket.

Maybe I will one day, but the fact remains that going the wrong way on a sleepy side street in the annex is 100 times safer than using Spadina. So I'm willing to take that risk.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal