Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 24°C
City

That time Toronto filled in the harbour

Posted by Derek Flack / July 28, 2011

Toronto Harbour Infill Reclaimed LandOften when I'm digging through the archives for one of our visual histories posts, I'll stumble upon interesting photos unrelated to the subject at hand. Sometimes I make a note to pursue them later, and other times I think they're intriguing enough to get started on something right away. Such was the case when I found the photo above, a shot of freshly reclaimed land alongside the Toronto harbour in 1926.

I've long known that most of the land that currently exists below Front Street is the result of landfill, but I'd never seen any photographic evidence of the undertaking. It was just one of those things that happened in the past that's not particularly important. In some sense that remains true, but seeing this image compelled me to look for more like it, and, of course, some before and after shots.

In the early 1920s, the Toronto Harbour Commission made good on a plan hatched years before to fill in a portion of the harbour, which eventually gave rise to Lake Shore Boulevard, the new street that can be seen in the above photo. Subsequent projects dating as late as the 1950s extended the city even further south into the lake. For my money, the most interesting way to track this expansion of the city is via the relationship of the Harbour Commision Building to the shoreline. When it was built in 1917, it sat right on the water. Today it's more than a half a kilometre away.

Check out the photos.

BEFORE

The harbour in 1883:
Toronto Harbour 1883

Yonge Street Dock 1906:
Yonge Street Dock

Aerial of the waterfront in 1918:
Toronto Aerial 1918

Harbour Commission Building 1920:
Harbour Commission Building

Harbour Commission Building 1920s:
Harbour Commission Building

Dredging the Lake:
Harobour Commission Building

AFTER

Harbour 1920s:
Harbour Commission Building

Harbour 1926, post-infill:
Harbour Commission Building

Harbour area in 1928:
Harbour Commission Building


The waterfront from the Royal Bank 1929:
Harbour Commission Builidng

Waterfront aerial 1938:
Toronto Aerial 1938

Harbour Commission Building 1980s:
Toronto Waterfront 1980s

The changing harbour:
Toronto Waterfront
Photos from the Toronto Archives

Discussion

19 Comments

Dave / July 28, 2011 at 03:13 pm
user-pic
I live on Front & Bathurst and it always amazes me when they dig up 24" x 24" logs buried tens of feet below the surface.

Imagine if anybody was to propose this today? They would be laughed at and label crazy.

the lemur replying to a comment from Dave / July 28, 2011 at 03:27 pm
user-pic
Why, because it'd be considered technically impossible somehow, or just unnecessary? It might be feasible along parts of the eastern waterfront that are still industrial and not really in anyone's backyard, but I guess the question would be why the city would want to, and how much it would cost.
Touchdown replying to a comment from the lemur / July 28, 2011 at 03:46 pm
user-pic
Doug Ford has already designated those lands for his NFL though.
the lemur replying to a comment from Touchdown / July 28, 2011 at 04:09 pm
user-pic
If he wants a stadium, maybe he can get a privately funded island built to put it on.
j-rock / July 28, 2011 at 04:18 pm
user-pic
Amazing. I used to live in Japan, and land reclamation is a phenomenon that I actually spent a lot of time investigating while I was there, because the Japanese practice it on such a large scale. Yet, I was pretty much unaware that it had happened to the degree that it did here, in the place that I'm from.
Aeudet / July 28, 2011 at 04:54 pm
user-pic
If we reclaim another 200m, we can build ourselves an actual waterfront.
Torontonian / July 28, 2011 at 05:21 pm
user-pic
Old Toronto maps showed a line going from
the windmill at Gooderham & Worts distillery
along the water to a building in Fort York.

It was called the Windmill Line and was the
southerly limit for development into the
harbour.
hendrix / July 28, 2011 at 06:02 pm
user-pic
I wonder what this means for construction on the waterfront. In other words, is the deep ground absolutely soaked with water from the lake? Cuz I live at 18 Harbour Street, in a new condo from Pinnacle, and in the bottom parking level you can see bad water leaks. They actually put a small ledge barrier at the base of the wall and the parking spot, with rocks, I presume to stop leaks from coming into the parking spot.
DaJohnner / July 28, 2011 at 07:02 pm
user-pic
they could build either a large area for families (ie-park) or build a superhighway to relieve congestion....assuming the cost is reasonable.
Adam Sobolak / July 28, 2011 at 09:49 pm
user-pic
In the 1928 photo, is that the skeleton of old Union Station under demolition, or the present Union Station's ancillary west-of-York facilities under construction?
gadfly replying to a comment from Aeudet / July 28, 2011 at 09:57 pm
user-pic
Actually, there was an article in the Star about a decade ago (I wish I had kept it at the time!) detailing a plan put forward by a consortium to build an expressway along the Humber Bay, sunken under the harbor itself. One of the possibilities was having the concrete casements just above the surface of the water, hugging the shoreline and have it over-filled as parkland, trails, etc. The proposal was shot down before it ever got off the ground because the city (apparently) didn't like the idea of the consortium getting the land rights under the Gardiner (which they also proposed to tear down). I think Rosie DiManno wrote the article and she expressed disappointment that the city never even looked at the proposal, which wouldn't have cost the city a dime.
It struck me (and her) that the city would be getting 3 huge benefits out of the proposal: a ton of new parkland, a shiny new (out of view) expressway AND getting rid of the eyesore (something we can ALL agree on) that is the Gardiner.
Pity.

Cool pics, BTW. Wish I'd taken more shots of the city during my frequent trips to the island in the mid-70s.
pomegranate / July 28, 2011 at 11:00 pm
user-pic
There are also some nice shots of the pre-Harbourfront waterfront (1975-1985) at the City of Toronto Archives, although they're not scanned: http://bit.ly/pD7JYf
Dan D / July 28, 2011 at 11:16 pm
user-pic
I kinda shiver when I see pictures of Toronto's history. I love this city.
the lemur replying to a comment from Adam Sobolak / July 29, 2011 at 12:28 am
user-pic
My guess is it's the old station being demolished, since the current station was completed the previous year. I don't know when the facility west of York was built, but it doesn't seem like the right distance for that in the photo, assuming it was taken somewhere around the current Bay/Lake Shore area.
the lemur replying to a comment from gadfly / July 29, 2011 at 12:29 am
user-pic
That does sound like an interesting proposal, although it raises the question of who this consortium was, why they wanted the land rights under the Gardiner and what they would be doing with them in exchange for building all that stuff.
gadfly / July 29, 2011 at 08:09 am
user-pic
I've tried to find the article. It had to be prior to 2003 because I haven't read the Star since then. (Mark Richardson and I parted ways over at the Wheels section due to some spectacularly inaccurate writings he did.)
I am almost positive it was Rosie who wrote it. She related a meeting she had had with some 'movers and shakers' who put forward this credible idea. Obviously, the land rights under the existing Gardiner would be worth hundreds of millions, but then constructing the tunnel under the harbor and the tear down of the Gardiner would themselves cost into the billions.
I don't know what sort of leverage the city would have, given the costs and the benefits 'as-is' to the city. I am sure certain easements, public land could have been negotiated into what land the consortium ultimately received.
The trouble was, the city wouldn't even look at it. Dismissed it out of hand.
Mark / August 2, 2011 at 11:39 am
user-pic
hi derek

do the archives have no good photos of the waterfront between 1938-1980s?

just wondering because i have aerial photos of the waterfront circa 1969 (almost identical view to 1938 pic) from my grandfather

also what is the process of acquiring photos from the toronto archives?

thanks
Joe G / August 12, 2011 at 10:16 am
user-pic
This is not actually unusual. Most of Boston is built on landfill erected over the past 200 years, as you can see on this interactive site: http://www.iboston.org/rg/backbayImap.htm

I wasn't aware of the extent of landfill in Toronto, though. Thanks!
Greg / December 5, 2011 at 11:28 pm
user-pic
The Harbour Commission Building actually uses the American spelling "Harbor". At the time, that must have been a surprise and I bet there is a story there.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal