Tuesday, May 21, 2013Cloudy 20°C
City

Ryerson Student Centre set to transform Yonge & Gould

Posted by Derek Flack / April 6, 2011

Ryerson Student CentreWhile it won't necessarily make up for the loss of the former Empress Hotel, the northeast corner of Yonge and Gould will be a lot prettier by 2015, when construction is slated to be finished on Ryerson's new Student Learning Centre. Although the project has been in the works for years, new renderings reveal what should be a stunning addition to downtown Yonge Street and the university's campus.

The seven-storey structure — which will mercifully hide the concrete block that house Ryerson's 1970s-era library behind it — is full of glass and open spaces, and really looks nothing like what one might expect of a library, right down to the fact that it has no books. Designed by the Norwegian firm Snohetta in conjunction with Toronto's Zeidler Partnership, the idea was to create something more akin to a salon, where intellectual and social activity will co-mingle.

There will be 2000 study spaces, a public square on the second level, two floors of retail, and a variety of open lounge-like study spaces. Although it clearly breaks with the three-storey storefronts that line the stretch of Yonge to the immediate north, one suspects that, if anything, the arrival of the Student Centre will help to improve the possibility of further revitalizing this most important corridor.

Read more from the Star here, and check out the renderings below.

201146-ryerson-sc-atrium.jpg

201146-ryerson-sc-circ.jpg

201146-ryerson-sc-lounge.jpg

201164-ryerson-sc-lounge-close.jpgImages via Zeidler/Snohetta architects

Discussion

84 Comments

EricM / April 6, 2011 at 10:45 am
user-pic
Cool! Ryerson has some really neat projects on the go these days.
Hmmm / April 6, 2011 at 10:45 am
user-pic
Not sure why a poly-technical school needs such an elaborate "library".
Bonk / April 6, 2011 at 10:46 am
user-pic
Fast forward to the early 2030's when students call it the "Art Eraser" and lament its numerous design deficiencies.
;)
skeeter / April 6, 2011 at 10:52 am
user-pic
what's with the cum all over the exterior?
rek / April 6, 2011 at 10:52 am
user-pic
Where does the Sam The Record Man sign go?
Marsha replying to a comment from rek / April 6, 2011 at 10:57 am
user-pic
my thoughts exactly.
CK / April 6, 2011 at 10:59 am
user-pic
Is that blue triangle dealie what Zod was stuck in, in Superman 2?
Derek / April 6, 2011 at 11:01 am
user-pic
@rek, @Marsha

I asked Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam if she had been told anything about the future plans for the sign as part of her consultations with Ryerson, and she said that she didn't know specifics, but that we're likely to see smaller parts of the signage reappear before anything is done with the big one.

The official presentation of the Student Centre plans is taking place right now, so it's always possible that some mention is made of the sign, but I agree - I was expecting it to figure in these renderings.
S.H. Carlyle / April 6, 2011 at 11:04 am
user-pic
I didn't see a napping nook for the homeless people. I'm sure they'll make do, but it seems like an oversight.
hendrix / April 6, 2011 at 11:04 am
user-pic
nobody is going to study in those spaces.. LOL.
it's just a big hangout. Hopefully they have some quiet study rooms where students can actually study -- spaces that are insulated from all the noise from the public spaces.
matt replying to a comment from Hmmm / April 6, 2011 at 11:10 am
user-pic
A: It's not a polytech anymore, but an increasingly large university.

B: Who cares? Should they be discouraged from creating exciting building projects?
Malcolm Bastien / April 6, 2011 at 11:21 am
user-pic
Love it. It's ambitious, big, and looks like it'll serve it's purpose.

Biggest concern would be security systems to keep everyone else out. Letting in non-students and downtown loafers would ruin it real fast.
Amanda replying to a comment from Hmmm / April 6, 2011 at 11:23 am
user-pic
Er, get with the times. It hasn't been a polytech for many, many years.
Ralph Malph / April 6, 2011 at 11:28 am
user-pic

It's certainly striking. Speaking of striking, i see a thousand
dead birds a year in this design.
Morga / April 6, 2011 at 11:30 am
user-pic
Love it, can't see anything wrong with this project. Although I am sure the average crusty BLOG TO person will find something to hate.
Ferraa replying to a comment from Hmmm / April 6, 2011 at 11:38 am
user-pic
It isn't a polytech school anymore
Ferraa replying to a comment from Hmmm / April 6, 2011 at 11:38 am
user-pic
It isn't a polytech institution anymore
Jacqueline / April 6, 2011 at 11:42 am
user-pic
Last I heard, the Sam's Sign was in preservation 'storage' and that Ryerson had every intention of reinstalling the sign, in or on, this new building.

Would love it if Heritage Toronto, or Ryerson themselves would speak to this and follow up with their promises.

Time to dig, again....
ROB / April 6, 2011 at 11:43 am
user-pic
It looks like Superman's fortress of solitude. Not a fan of the sterile look.
(.)(.) replying to a comment from skeeter / April 6, 2011 at 11:43 am
user-pic
It looks like birdshit to me.
rek / April 6, 2011 at 11:44 am
user-pic
Even if Ryerson were just a lowly polytech, that's not a reason to quash one of the rare moments this city strives for architectural relevance.
Anna replying to a comment from Hmmm / April 6, 2011 at 11:44 am
user-pic
cus it's a university now, thanks.
Bonnie replying to a comment from Ralph Malph / April 6, 2011 at 11:46 am
user-pic
The comment about the dead birds is spot on. Toronto lies in a migratory pathway and our downtown buildings are already killing fields for millions of songbirds.
Jenn Lyndall / April 6, 2011 at 11:46 am
user-pic
Please note, Ryerson University already has a Student Centre, which opened in 2005. The new building is actually called the Ryerson Student Learning Centre - the names are very similar, however distinct.

It would be great if you could make this correction, because it's confusing to students and members of the Ryerson community.
bumdarts / April 6, 2011 at 11:48 am
user-pic
Unique, fresh, eye-catching, just what the city needs more of.
joe blow / April 6, 2011 at 11:51 am
user-pic
Looks like asscandy to me!
Don replying to a comment from Jenn Lyndall / April 6, 2011 at 11:51 am
user-pic
"it would be great if you could make this correction, because it's confusing to students and members of the Ryerson community."

... apparently because they can't think for themselves. Also, whoever thought having a building called the Ryerson Student Centre on the same campus as the Ryerson Student Living Centre, must've got their education at Ryerson Polytechnical High School or whatever it was called (over 1,000 CityTV employees served!)
scottd / April 6, 2011 at 11:51 am
user-pic
Not a nice interface to Yonge. For all the balther it is basically a big builkding with some chairs and desks. Very high tech. :)
RobFordToronto / April 6, 2011 at 11:53 am
user-pic
Me and millions of people in this city don't give a F%$# about the Sam sign. That tacky thing has no place going anywhere near this building. Its just a damn sign. If you want to see it, theres thousands of pics of it all over the net. Knock yourselves out.
RyeHigh / April 6, 2011 at 12:01 pm
user-pic
Useless poly-tech school.

"Hey everyone look at me..i studied broadcasting then did nothing with my diploma other than call into radio stations and try to win a prize"
RyeHigh indeed replying to a comment from RyeHigh / April 6, 2011 at 12:17 pm
user-pic
"Hey everyone look at me, I got an MBA from Ryerson, or a Masters in chemical engineering, architecture, public policy. Or a PhD in aerospace engineering. I designed the bridge you take the work, and the pacemaker your father has. I'm the social worker at Children's Aid, the journalist at the Globe and Mail, and the economist at IMF".
steve-o / April 6, 2011 at 12:19 pm
user-pic
Looks sharp!

Renderings crack me up...notice on the 2nd one there is a person in a wheelcahir who magically descended that massive block of stairs no problem. Also don't notice any handrails - must be to retain cohesiveness of the "skatepark" design.

Learned all that at Rye High...
evian replying to a comment from RyeHigh indeed / April 6, 2011 at 12:23 pm
user-pic
This isn't a school fair. You don't have to feed us the kool-aid.

We all know the truth.

GO RAMS!
___ replying to a comment from Hmmm / April 6, 2011 at 12:27 pm
user-pic
Ryerson became a University in 1971, before most of you idiots were born... so I don't understand why its former poly-tech status keeps coming up. But if that's all you have to say about it, then I guess it's doing alright.
Kat / April 6, 2011 at 12:30 pm
user-pic
Ryerson grads also hold most high-end creative positions in agencies and production houses in the city.
A+ / April 6, 2011 at 12:32 pm
user-pic
Hmmm / APRIL 6, 2011 AT 10:45 AM

Not sure why a poly-technical school needs such an elaborate "library".
----------

your comment is hilariously stoopid!
A+ / April 6, 2011 at 12:34 pm
user-pic
White furniture + high traffic = nightmare they will regret 2 months later

Is the swirling ceiling light circle thing a winky shoutout to Sam the Record Man?
BECAUSE IT IS NOT ENOUGH OF A SHOUT OUT.
?? replying to a comment from A+ / April 6, 2011 at 12:36 pm
user-pic
Stoopid?

Must be a RyeSchool grad.
ComeFlyAway / April 6, 2011 at 12:38 pm
user-pic
Im pretty sure they just copied the Porter Airlines Lounge.
LOLO SAPUTO / April 6, 2011 at 12:41 pm
user-pic
seriously, everyone bemoaning sam the record man should have bought more records to keep the store open of shut the f*ck up.
emmay / April 6, 2011 at 12:50 pm
user-pic
Ryerson Spaceiversity. Sweet.

Don't go knocking Ryerson people. I'm having a hell of a time there. I wouldn't go anywhere else. I'm not exactly a fan of the design...actually I'm not at all in love with it. BUT don't need to fret, if they say it's going to be done in 2015, what they really mean is 2020.
blarg / April 6, 2011 at 12:56 pm
user-pic
Sounds like there's a lot of Ryerson flunkies posting today or maybe they didn't make it in...

As for the proposed building? Its better than what's there now.
belvedere / April 6, 2011 at 12:59 pm
user-pic
looks like the mother crystal of that hideous rom excrescence.

and friends don't let friends go to ryerson.
cheap ed pills / April 6, 2011 at 12:59 pm
user-pic
Honestly I say it way to much your probs not even paying for it
cheap ed pills / April 6, 2011 at 01:00 pm
user-pic
Honestly I say it way to much your probs not even paying for it
http://treat24.com
Mark Dowling / April 6, 2011 at 02:19 pm
user-pic
Where's the rendering for when they plaster it in aluminium like the ROM?
Torontonian / April 6, 2011 at 02:20 pm
user-pic
Seven storeys at Yonge and Gould.
That's really going to overwhelm
that intersection.
Even the new building at Yonge and
Dundas has a three-storey streetwall
on the Yonge Street side.

Can't the building have an upper\
level setback and be a little kinder
to the neighbourhood?
Student replying to a comment from Torontonian / April 6, 2011 at 02:25 pm
user-pic
Lol, kinder to the neighbourhood? ryerson is making valiant efforts to turn this area from a substandard red-light district to a beautiful and rich environment.
tweet / April 6, 2011 at 02:29 pm
user-pic
Ralph Malph / APRIL 6, 2011 AT 11:28 AM


It's certainly striking. Speaking of striking, i see a thousand
dead birds a year in this design.
------
Uh, no.

Birds have problems when the windows are clear and lit at night.
This design has art/accents/whatever you wanna call them ON the windows.
Lit at night, birds will see the wall of glass as a wall, as opposed to nothing.
Birds will have no problem with this building.
tweet / April 6, 2011 at 02:31 pm
user-pic
Torontonian / APRIL 6, 2011 AT 2:20 PM

Seven storeys at Yonge and Gould.
That's really going to overwhelm
that intersection.
Even the new building at Yonge and
Dundas has a three-storey streetwall
on the Yonge Street side.

Can't the building have an upper\
level setback and be a little kinder
to the neighbourhood?
--------
Ridiculous.
It's the center of downtown in Canada's largest city and you think a building is too tall?

The crap surrounding Dundas Square is 7-8-9+ storeys high, for chrissakes.
qwerty / April 6, 2011 at 03:52 pm
user-pic
That design clashes with Zanzibar.
Dun / April 6, 2011 at 04:26 pm
user-pic
The real question is why Ryerson had to go to a Norwegian firm to get a design? Are the Ryerson Architectural Science grads not good enough or something? Serious question, not meant to be sarcastic or condescending.
RaviB / April 6, 2011 at 04:52 pm
user-pic
YEA !! BOI !!!!!!
Sean replying to a comment from Dun / April 6, 2011 at 04:57 pm
user-pic
I do not think that is the real question at all.

Why put unnecessary limitations on the design process?

Is everything in Toronto designed by people from Toronto?
Bobby replying to a comment from Hmmm / April 6, 2011 at 05:07 pm
user-pic
RE: Not sure why a poly-technical school needs such an elaborate "library". from HMMM

In June 2001, the school assumed its present name as Ryerson University and currently offers programs in chemical, civil, mechanical, industrial, electrical and computer engineering. The university is also one of only two Ontario universities to offer a program in aerospace engineering. Ryerson offers the only stand-alone biomedical engineering program in all of Canada. It also offers a faculty or arts, communication and design, architecture, and community services.

bob / April 6, 2011 at 05:08 pm
user-pic
ps. ecstatic to finally see a giant stairway in the city!
JAW replying to a comment from Hmmm / April 6, 2011 at 05:11 pm
user-pic
Possibly due to it no longer being a polytechnical school
Dun replying to a comment from Sean / April 6, 2011 at 09:17 pm
user-pic
I guess I didn't do a very good job at getting my point across. No, I don't think everything in Toronto needs to be designed in Toronto.

The point I was trying to get across is that Ryerson is a University. Most Universities primary objectives are to further our understanding of the world we live in through research, as well as to educate the next generation. I've never heard of a University where its mission is to pay millions to put up pretty buildings in order to help gentrify its surroundings.

In my opinion, and its only an opinion, it would've been a great opportunity for Ryerson Alumi to sort of say "Hey Ryerson did me good, look what I can do now". Like it or not, Ryerson has a bad rap for being everyones back up school, justified or not. This could have been a great opportunity for them to start reversing that stereo type. After all the purpose of the building is to be a place for students, who knows what a student needs more than former students.

That being said I know realistically this would never happen. Especially since government money is being used, there would have been a bidding process.

Just raising questions is all. Not to be confused with complaining or whining.
totemyoates / April 6, 2011 at 09:33 pm
user-pic
I love this!

I attended a school abroad where a similar design was created for the bottom two floors of their library, where it also functioned as a large student study space. It was always busy and a good meeting place to study for group work. Very successful and modern.

The next few generations of Ryerson students are lucky to get all these new buildings.
rachel replying to a comment from Hmmm / April 6, 2011 at 10:15 pm
user-pic
Ryerson became a university with degree granting status in 1994. The polytechnic in the name was dropped some years after that.
meeeeeeeeeee! / April 7, 2011 at 12:42 am
user-pic
I love the look of these renderings, especially the exterior. Hopefully, they won't cut costs and produce a bargain basement version of this.
Jibbly replying to a comment from Dun / April 7, 2011 at 01:11 am
user-pic
I think Dun is absolutely right to question why we can't get a local architect on this. It's beautiful, no question - but I honestly wonder why in a city teeming with creative people, we're not calling on them more often. As a tour guide, it's nice when I can point out work by Alsop, Gehry, and Libeskind - but it fills me with so much more pride to show stuff by locals. Who's going to be our next E.J. Lennox if every contract is awarded to out-of-towners?

As to the question of the SAM sign - I'm all for it going back up if it makes sense, and it frankly doesn't. Not with this design anyway. Yonge Street needs some real direction, because it's already brick-a-brack nonsense in this area, and it's not getting any better.

I'd love to see the sign back. It's not about nostalgia, or about how it could have been saved. It's about space memory. We're too quick to write over our history. Take a page from the states and build a monument or two.
LJ replying to a comment from Bonnie / April 7, 2011 at 08:22 am
user-pic
won't somebody please think of the songbirds!
Sean / April 7, 2011 at 09:41 am
user-pic
CRAP!

Tourist will just laugh at this like they have laughed at the ROM.

Yeah, Ryerson is just CRAP!
Rapper Sumo / April 7, 2011 at 10:07 am
user-pic
I love it.

Yonge is currently a toilet. Everyone is all screw-face. I'm glad Ryerson brass is taking the initiative to pour acid rain all over that neighbourhood and spend real $$$ to clean it up and at the same time, provide new amenities to students who are paying serious $ to go to school.

I wish they'd give a hot dose to all the low-lifes in the area. Or maybe send them north of the city.
gould be gone / April 7, 2011 at 10:16 am
user-pic
Now that the building next door mysteriously burned down, I don't know why they don't just close off Gould Street at Yonge and have the new building stretch further south. This design was made with the other building in mind, but, yo!, it just aint there anymore. The vultures are circling for that new open space.

Oh, and by the way, anyone who still thinks that the vibrant, ever-expanding new Ryerson isn't a real rival to York is totally out of touch: that strike-ridden mess out in the boonies is in real trouble.
the lemur replying to a comment from Jibbly / April 7, 2011 at 10:35 am
user-pic
There IS a local architects' firm working on this, alongside Snøhetta: Zeidler Partnership, which has done many projects outside Canada.
Jordanna / April 7, 2011 at 10:51 am
user-pic
I love it! Way to go Ryerson
ttraveller replying to a comment from Jibbly / April 7, 2011 at 12:32 pm
user-pic
There is nothing wrong with Toronto architects. They're excellent at doing the critical backroom gruntwork and dealing with the nightmare of a micromanaging City. But if the client wants creative, out of the box, forward thinking design, local architects are the first to partner with the best who are mostly outside Canada.
Eric26 replying to a comment from Bonnie / April 7, 2011 at 03:14 pm
user-pic
Considering the height of the proposed building and all the decorative white... things on the glass, I don't see this building killing hundreds of birds. Birds are not THAT stupid that they'll simply fly in to anything taller than ten metres and die.
kn / April 7, 2011 at 03:53 pm
user-pic
it is about time we support progressive design in our architecture in toronto. this building looks stunning. it's light, delicate and shows a wonderful gesture to the long tradition of having a decorative "screen" for the occupants. it responds to it's surrounding with a sensitivity rarely found in toronto. too bad the same can't be said for 90 percent of the development we have seen in the past decade.
sad / April 7, 2011 at 07:33 pm
user-pic
sigh.. why?
o.k. / April 7, 2011 at 10:15 pm
user-pic
Great project for my school! I only have 3 beefs with it though.


How it meets young is garbage, that concrete ridge or whatever is a total barrier and shouldnt be so isolating.

Where the F! is the Sam the record man sign! I'm new to Toronto I've never gotten a chance to see it, they promised they would work it into this building!

And Lastly, I hope this doesn't end up like the Engineering building which was supposed to be a lot taller and nicer then the current but they couldn't raise the full amount (surprise surprise) and had to downscale it (surprise surprise) lets hope this doesn't happen with this project too.

All in all though it's nice, won't be a student to see it but ryerson needed this lets jsut hope they can secure the oppostibe property where the old hotel was and make something nice there too.
PdLoadeR replying to a comment from Hmmm / April 7, 2011 at 10:52 pm
user-pic
Who said it's a poli-technical university? Haven't you head of Ryerson's Ted Rogers School of Management? One of the world's leading business schools???
kn replying to a comment from Dun / April 8, 2011 at 11:15 am
user-pic
it's good to have foreign firms design for toronto. snohetta is doing some incredible work worldwide. in fact, the city of toronto should be holding international design competitions for all of the work that is going to be done in redeveloping the TCHC and other city properties. toronto developers have proven that they have little interest in design. (re: "the wall" along Yonge st. i would be very surprised if that is a concrete wall facing yonge st. i am sure there will be some shops on that first level.)
the lemur replying to a comment from kn / April 8, 2011 at 11:44 am
user-pic
Agreed about foreign firms working in Toronto. I don't get why some people are all 'oh noes, <i>foreign</i> architects' as if that's one more reason to dislike a building. Foreign firms get work here because they have experience designing and building things that don't often get built here; Canadian firms get work overseas doing the kind of things that just don't come along very often here. This is a good example of combining those strengths. Plus there is money from outside Canada behind many developments currently being built.
Andrew replying to a comment from qwerty / April 9, 2011 at 01:31 pm
user-pic
lol. my thoughts exactly.

also: it's convenient that the beautiful building that Salad King was in burnt down because now, with this design in place, they have more space to make it work with the (in my opinion) awkward little intersection.

I do love the design though, and the progress it will inspire in that strip.
Wojciech Pianka / April 10, 2011 at 10:46 pm
user-pic
This is going to be interesting redevelopment of the site. Lets just hope it wont be an eye sore like the new ROM. For more information on local developments and real estate news check out www.wojciechpianka.com
Fantomex replying to a comment from Marsha / April 10, 2011 at 10:57 pm
user-pic
To the dustbin of history, where retail firms that can't keep up with the times and who are housed in unsafe buildings go. Where do you think that all of the other old neon signs went?
Fantomex replying to a comment from Rapper Sumo / April 10, 2011 at 11:02 pm
user-pic
I kinda wish that assholes like you could be sent back in time, where your racist, classist, bigoted attitudes belong, and where they can't affect the rest of us.
nick replying to a comment from Hmmm / April 11, 2011 at 02:00 am
user-pic
i am pretty sure it is not a polytechnic school anymore..
iSkyscraper / April 13, 2011 at 12:26 pm
user-pic
Hesitant to wade into the muck of comments without much info yet being released, but two points:

1) All the fuss on how the building meets Yonge is hogwash. The rendering makes it look like a solid wall but those are clearly just the sides of the window mullions you are seeing. This will be glass storefront all along Yonge, exactly what you would expect. They will play with grades a bit to try and sink the retail floor, but if the storefront is open and glassy it just might work. And what the building does for Yonge on the corner with the large staircase will be a shot in the arm for street vitality. This is not a building hostile to Yonge.

2) Regarding the insecurity complex about using "foreign" architects, please. This is not about the overall quality of local architects. You want the best for a specific use (in this case, ultramodern urban institutional building), you use the best, wherever they are from. I don't care if a firm comes from Quebec, Qatar or Kuala Lampur - if they show up in Architectural Record enough and have done great things for their clients, ok. Talk to any informed architectural observer and Snohetta is clearly on that list for the kind of building Ryerson is aiming for.

(And by the way, if I was in the US or Norway or Dubai and looking for a highrise condo architect, I would call a Toronto firm because that's what this city excels at in the architectural trade.)
clutz replying to a comment from skeeter / December 17, 2011 at 06:36 pm
user-pic
your dad couldn't wait for you to get home
ModernTHeorist replying to a comment from Hmmm / June 26, 2012 at 10:38 am
user-pic
Maybe because it is no longer a poly-technical school?

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal