Saturday, May 26, 2012Cloudy 23°C
City

The origins of SlutWalk Toronto

Posted by Derek Flack / March 22, 2011

SlutWalk Toronto 2011SlutWalk Toronto might be one of the more provocatively named events of 2011, but that's the whole point. Founded shortly after a police officer participating in a safety forum at York University's Osgoode Hall remarked that "women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized," the protest seeks to re-appropriate a term that has been used historically not just to limit and stigmatize female sexuality, but as a rationalization for sexual assault.

Although the officer later apologized, according to the walk's organizers, the breach of trust represented by the initial statement — and the attitude that underwrites it — can't be patched up quite so easily. "As the city's major protective service, the Toronto Police have perpetuated the myth and stereotype of 'the slut', and in doing so have failed us.... Being assaulted isn't about what you wear; it's not even about sex; but using a pejorative term to rationalize inexcusable behaviour creates an environment in which it's okay to blame the victim."

In response to this, SlutWalk organizers and supporters will gather at Queen's Park on April 3rd before marching over to Toronto Police Headquarters with the message that they've had enough sexual-based judgment, slut-shaming and of being made to feel unsafe. I caught up with Sonya Barnett, one of SlutWalk's co-founders, to chat about the event and what she hopes it accomplishes.

I've already heard a few people make rumblings about the name of the walk, and yet to a great extent, this idea of reclamation is the most important part. Can you explain why you and your fellow organizers chose to call your event SlutWalk Toronto and how you hope you might be able to re-appropriate the term?

It was an easy decision. Within minutes of hearing about the incident at York, it was the first thing that popped into my mind. And co-founder Heather Jarvis was in quick agreement. With both of us being sexually confident people, we already associate with the modern terminology surrounding 'slut.' We use them term positively to define someone who isn't ashamed of their sexual, consensual proclivities, and this incident seemed like the perfect launching point to spread this definition. If you're going to throw out the word 'slut', be prepared take backlash -- and that goes for both the officer and the members of SlutWalk. We knew we would offend people with the use of the word, but we'd like people to understand that language can be re-appropriated for contemporary use. Sticking to archaic terminology just isn't logical as society moves forward.

We've heard a lot of backlash against us that the officer's heart 'was in the right place' when he made that remark. As much as we understand that he may have been trying to be helpful, he should be expressing his information from statistics that show sexual assaults have nothing to do with appearance, and that it more often occurs in instances where people know each other, or it's abuse of physically or mentally disabled people, or children. There are heavier stats on these instances of sexual violence than the misguided idea of people walking down a dark alley wearing fishnets, 'asking for it.' To be helpful, officers should be working within more relative forms of discussion instead of throwing around sexual epithets.

Do you worry that there's a danger in trying to guide this re-appropriation process? Put differently, is there a concern that an event like this could actually further ingrain problematic stereotypes, and thereby lessen its positive impact?

If we don't guide re-appropriation, who will? Using language pejoratively shouldn't be taken lightly, as it does a lot of damage. With the stereotypical idea of 'slut' comes the mindset that such a person is less deserving of respect, and in this instance, a safe environment. Of course there are people who will hold on to the word, because it's hard to unlearn years of societal training. But it's been proven with words like 'queer' and 'fag' that if you work hard enough, you can take a word and redirect its purpose. I may be naive, but I find it hard to believe that a cause that became 2000-strong within 4 weeks would actually hinder our mission. If you just look at all the intelligent and considered conversations on our Facebook page, you can see that people are determined to spread the word and help educate those who need it. But there is a catch, as we've discovered: this education is certainly easier when someone is open to hearing what we have to say. We know it's not going to happen overnight, as we're certainly not the first people to take up a heartfelt cause against sexual violence. But we're willing to try our damnedest.

What would the ideal response from the police be when you arrive at their headquarters on April 3rd?

Although some people think that our mission is to vilify the Toronto Police and ask for the offending officer's head on a plate, that's definitely not the case, and wouldn't help anybody. What we want is an open discourse with our Protective Services so we can discuss retraining against slut-shaming and sexual profiling, and we want certain aspects of that training to completely change direction: to move the onus away from someone who does not want to be victimized, and onto those who intend to victimize. As Hilary Beaumont so eloquently said 'Society teaches don't get raped, rather than don't rape.' This needs to change.

We've actually sent an invitation to Bill Blair to speak at the event once we land at Police HQ. We hope he accepts.

Do you see this as a potentially annual event?

Initially we thought not, as it was really a response to one event that moved us into action. But the attention we've been getting is fantastic, so who knows what the future holds for SlutWalk. There are already Satellite SlutWalks happening and in planning, so it's great that others are motivated to keep the word spreading.

How many people are you hoping will participate?

Funnily enough, when we first started up, we had planned to be happy with 50. But because we've touched so many people and sparked so many conversations around the city and now around the world, it would be great if all 1217 people who have so far RSVP'd to our Facebook event actually showed up. Strength in numbers.

For updates on the walk, follow @SlutWalkTO on Twitter check out their Facebook page.

Photo by Shi on Flickr.

Discussion

20 Comments

Twerq / March 22, 2011 at 11:53 am
user-pic
No woman should be assaulted, no matter what they wear. There is no excuse for sexual assault. It is never the victim's fault.

Yet, you are insane to ignore the fact that there are things you can do to protect yourself against the known dangers in the world. There will always be social norms, and if you choose to exist outside those norms (I acknowledge some things are beyond choice) then it is not unreasonable to consider that maybe you may be attracting the wrong sort of attention.

My mother taught me not to count my pocket money in public, because there are pickpockets lurking. Was she wrong? Should I try to make a point by brandishing my money, because it is completely within my rights to pin my $20 bills to my coat instead of keeping them in my wallet.
John / March 22, 2011 at 12:07 pm
user-pic
How is advice to 'not walk down dark alleys, unlight areas' any different than advice to 'not dress like a sl*t'? They are both recommending changing your behaviour to meet the reality of the situation to reduce the risk of sexual assualt.

No woman 'asks for it' by dressing in overtly sexual manner BUT if you are dressing in an overtly sexual manner you are inviting others to view you more sexually and not all the advice will be welcome. I heard so many female friends say 'Let's slut it up tonight' and then complain when men are overtly sexual to them.

As 'Twerq' says " Yet, you are insane to ignore the fact that there are things you can do to protect yourself against the known dangers in the world. There will always be social norms, and if you choose to exist outside those norms (I acknowledge some things are beyond choice) then it is not unreasonable to consider that maybe you may be attracting the wrong sort of attention."

RKMK / March 22, 2011 at 12:07 pm
user-pic
"My mother taught me not to count my pocket money in public, because there are pickpockets lurking. Was she wrong? Should I try to make a point by brandishing my money, because it is completely within my rights to pin my $20 bills to my coat instead of keeping them in my wallet."

The difference being, of course, that should your pickpocket was caught and brought to trial, the defense wouldn't be allowed to use "but you could *see* the money, so they deserved it!" or "s/he's given to charity before, so this couldn't have been theft!" as justification.
Twerq replying to a comment from RKMK / March 22, 2011 at 12:12 pm
user-pic
> The difference being, of course, that should your pickpocket was caught and brought to trial, the defense wouldn't be allowed to use "but you could *see* the money, so they deserved it!"

Can you please refer me to instances of this determining judgements in court?
RKMK / March 22, 2011 at 12:15 pm
user-pic
Quick question: why do you people hate men so much? I mean, do you realize you're painting the entire gender with the brush that they are unthinking animals, incapable of both self-control and distinguishing between right and wrong? If this is honestly the case, and men are so naturally violent and uncontrollable as you all seem to think, then perhaps we should think about restricting their mobility, and instill a curfew. Maybe not let them walk around after dark?

</ Modest Proposal>
RKMK replying to a comment from Twerq / March 22, 2011 at 12:25 pm
user-pic
... Are you serious? Here's the most recent I can find a link for, but are you ignorant of the history of everything, or just institutionalized injustice in violence against women?

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/rape-victim-inviting-so-no-jail--rape-victim-inviting-so-no-jail-116801578.html
Sean replying to a comment from RKMK / March 22, 2011 at 12:26 pm
user-pic
"Quick question: why do you people hate men so much?"

I am sorry but, can you tell me why you are under that impression? Nothing about this strikes me as man hating.
RKMK replying to a comment from Sean / March 22, 2011 at 12:34 pm
user-pic
I was being tongue-in-cheek, in a Jon Swift way. But really, I don't understand people who seem to think that women are supposed to operate under the assumption that no man is capable of self control in the least.

I mean, I can't speak for you, but I've managed to make it to nearly 30 without committing a violent crime against man nor woman, even while completely hammered. But people above seem to think that if you wear a cleavagey top or a short skirt, men will have little choice but to lose total control of themselves and commit a violent crime. That seems like they have a low opinion of men, personally.

And finally, http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/faq-what%E2%80%99s-wrong-with-suggesting-that-women-take-precautions-to-prevent-being-raped/
Heather replying to a comment from Twerq / March 22, 2011 at 12:43 pm
user-pic
In case you're of the tl;dr type, her "slutty attire" was a tube top and high heels.
Elyse Coriander / March 22, 2011 at 12:47 pm
user-pic
Slutwalk is the dumbest initiative I have heard of in a LONG time. Don't you people have something more productive to do with your time? There has already been media coverage about what this police officer said, and I'm sure he feels badly about it. I really don't see how walking down the street in objectifying attire helps anyone. If anything, it further objectifies women and undermines the progress we have made to date.

The reality is that some girls dress like sluts, which turn causes whoever is looking at them to think sexual thoughts. Thats what our brains are wired to do. All things equal, if a rapist sees 2 women on the street, who will they choose to rape? The girl in sweatpants and a hoodie or a girl tottering in 6 inch heels with almost no clothes on? GIVE ME A BREAK.

Why don't you people work on a fundraiser for the people of Japan? Or help the homeless in Toronto? Or better yet, actually do something that somehow pertains to reducing rapes in Toronto! Work on improving security, or improving the community surrounding york so that there is less crime. Maybe you guys should adopt an unwanted pet, it seems you have the time to do it!

AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO THINKS THIS IS TOTALLY MISGUIDED?
RKMK / March 22, 2011 at 12:52 pm
user-pic
"The girl in sweatpants and a hoodie or a girl tottering in 6 inch heels with almost no clothes on?"

Actually, the former was what my friend was wearing when she was raped. By her "friend." #rapemyths #commentFAIL #humanbeingFAIL

And, with my iPhone I can both donate to Japan AND participate in awareness walks! SIMULTANEOUSLY, EVEN. In fact, THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I WILL DO! \O/
Zalda replying to a comment from Elyse Coriander / March 22, 2011 at 12:53 pm
user-pic
Sex-positive feminism - Google it.
Sean replying to a comment from RKMK / March 22, 2011 at 12:59 pm
user-pic
Oh, okay. I completely misinterpreted what you originally wrote.
fn replying to a comment from RKMK / March 22, 2011 at 01:02 pm
user-pic
I think it's more about hating cops and their bullshit attitude than men.
I consider myself a feminist and I love men! They are so much fun to hang out with.
skeeter / March 22, 2011 at 01:27 pm
user-pic
Little Old Lady: Oh, hello, there. Are you two heading for Las Vegas?
Beavis: Yeah. We're gonna score.
Little Old Lady: Oh, well, I hope to score big there, myself. I'm mostly gonna be doing the slots.
Beavis: Yeah, yeah. I'm hoping to do some sluts, too. Yeah. Do they have a lot of sluts in Las Vegas?
Little Old Lady: Oh, there are so many slots, you won't know where to begin.
Beavis: Whoa. Hey, Butt-Head, this chick is pretty cool. She says there's gonna be tons of sluts in Las Vegas.
Butt-head: Cool.
Little Old Lady: It's so nice to meet young men who are so well-mannered.
Beavis: Yeah. I'm gonna have money and a big screen TV and there's gonna be sluts everywhere. It's gonna rule.
Little Old Lady: Well, that's nice.
a Man / March 22, 2011 at 01:39 pm
user-pic
Underlying all of this hoop-la there seems to be some very ignorant and insecure individuals (on both sides of the spectrum). First off, I don't buy the whole, we are not trying to vilify the Toronto Police statement. I by no means think the officer's comments were in any way sensitive or educated, but leave the ignorant bastard alone already. He made a mistake, he apologized. What a load of BS that you are not just trying to make yourselves feel better by seeking public revenge for his idiotic comment. I actually found his comment quite enlightening. I thought to myself, 'hmm.. people like this still exist in the world, this is insane.' So, as an advocate of free thought and individuality, I thought to myself (again), 'hmm.. I guess it's a good thing that so many people have witnessed this episode and the media backlash because most people have brains (I think) and will be driven to conclusions that this is wrong, somebody shouldn't speak out so ignorantly.' We should be allowed to draw our own conclusions. and I know there are people who may believe him, but guess what, as idiotic as that may be, they still have the right to think so. Don't you agree? There are things that I believe that are in complete disagreement with society's norms, I do not want to be persecuted for that. I deserve to NOT be persecuted for that, unless I am doing somebody harm. Is somebody doing you harm by holding on to ignorant thoughts? Maybe somebody who blurts them out during a public talk while wearing a police uniform. But, the issue is of pushing your believes on another individual, even if it's for the best, in my opinion is wrong. I trust my personal judgement higher than any of you, and I would hope that you do the same (trusting your personal judgement, not mine). If we were all to take a step and look at this issue and consider why it is happening, I believe (and I won't push this on you) some would realize that it's a simple case of passive aggressive retaliation. Forgive and forget, and if that can't be done, then just outright forget. Don't let these idiots take up so much of your precious brain power. They don't deserve it. really.

and as for the re-appropriation of the term slut to define a sexually free and liberated woman (I like those, especially when they are smart), I don't like it. but, again, that's just my opinion.


MelS / March 22, 2011 at 02:46 pm
user-pic
This initiative is completely misguided and reactionary. Why waste your time and actually do something worthwhile.
Natalee Brouse / March 22, 2011 at 03:05 pm
user-pic
I'm quite baffled by these assertions that this walk is intended to vilify the police and all men ever. For starters, in very few instances is the particular officer named, because it's his attitude and the prevailing attitude in the TPS that is being protested. No where has this group called for this officer's job. We just want this issue to be seriously considered by the TPS and for them to retrain their officers to diminish this culture of victim-blaming. If we just let it slide and forget about, how likely is it that this attitude would rectify itself?

As for the man-hating... zuh? Again, where? Men are actively encouraged to participate. In my opinion, it's in men's best interest to participate because these attitudes that men are unable to control their urges to rape do them a great disservice as well. Lets not infantilize them and perpetuate this myth that their sexual prowess defines their masculinity. Lets engage them in this conversation and stop this polarizing, men vs women attitude that rape culture and slut-shaming perpetuates.
Heather / March 22, 2011 at 03:23 pm
user-pic
Why I'm walking:

There is a problem when the services that are meant to help victims of crime are using a victim-blaming models of thinking. This is not about the actions of one single police officer. It's that, plus the media coverage on the gang-rape of the 11 year old, or the repeated sexual assaults on reporter Lara Logan; plus the Winnipeg judge that decided a convicted rapist should be excuse from any jail time because the woman he raped was wearing heels, a tube top and make up, and said she wanted to party. Saying "I want to party" is not saying "I want to have sex with you." Those examples are all pulled from the past 2 months - and there are so many more. It's these problems in the justice system and in society that keep sexual assaults - both female, male, and trans an underreported crime.

I'm walking because this is not okay.

I'm walking because our government doesn't think sex workers deserve to work in the safest environment possible.

I'm walking because I want every woman to know she as has much right to freedom of sexual expression as a man does.

I'm also walking because I think it's important that people think critically about sexual freedom, sexual expression and sexual safety.

I'd love to hear the reasons behind other people's choice to walk as well - I hope you'll share them.
Beau / March 24, 2011 at 11:07 am
user-pic
This event is by no means man hating.

It is the opposite. We respect the men that respect us. The ones who know that no means no, and if we want it we will communicate it in such a way that it is made obvious.

We know that the majority of you won't become ravening beasts at the suggestion of a pushup bra, won't lost control of your humanity when flashed thigh.

What we are unhappy with is the notion that if/when rape happens, any part of the blame lies on the victim.

We are uncomfortable with the notion that a judge can decide that if he perceives us to be "slutty" the fault of the rapist, the assalter is lessened.

We like sex, consentual, satisfying sex.

We hate rape. It is ugly and the two should not ever be confused for one another because "she said no but her clothes said yes".

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal