Saturday, May 18, 2013Mostly Cloudy 20°C
City

New Data Bank is a fascinating portrait of GTA housing

Posted by Derek Flack / February 2, 2011

Toronto Regional Housing Data BankThe CivicAction Alliance (perhaps still better known by its former name, Toronto City Summit Alliance) has recently released a fascinating document on housing in the GTA. Called the Toronto Regional Housing Data Bank, its purpose is to "support reports, recommendations and public education" that might "enhance strategies that are focused on improving social and economic vitality of the [GTA].

Perhaps surprisingly, prior to the creation of the Data Bank - which has been unveiled in anticipation of the Greater Toronto Summit in February 10th - there wasn't really one source that offered such a comprehensive overview of statistics related to the rental market, social housing, poverty, and population trends. Now that there is, the hope is that it'll be easier to track the GTA's housing needs in the years ahead.

Here's a sample of some noteworthy (and scary) stats from the Data Bank (read the full report here PDF):

  • By 2036, the region's population is expected to grow to 9.1 million (over half of Ontario's population) and be home to an increasing number of seniors, new immigrants, young families and working-age people.
  • 322,415 or 19% of households are in core housing need -- housing that is too small, in need of repairs or is too expensive.
  • One in five Canadian households in core housing need is located in the Toronto region.
  • In 2006, some 26% of owners and 46% of renters were spending 30% or more of their income on shelter.
  • In order to afford average rent for a two-bedroom apartment in the Toronto region, a household would need to earn $42,440 per year. Some 25% of couple families, 53% of single parent families and 69% of single persons do not earn enough to afford average rent for a two-bedroom apartment.
  • Across the region, the percentage of female low-income households is greater than male households.
  • Single persons are most likely to have incomes below the amount needed to afford average rent in the region.
  • Average rents increased by 11.3% from 2000 to 2010.
  • In 2009, only 7% of new housing construction was for the purpose built rental market - still the highest amount in 10 years. Out of 24,103 units built, 1,816 were rental.
  • The least expensive rental units are disappearing. From 2000 to 2008, 17,308 were lost to demolition, conversion and inflation. The majority ( -66,069) were at the lower end of the market (rents between $600 and $900) while the upper end (rents between $901 and $1,500) experienced growth (+48,760).
  • Vacancy rates decreased from 3.1% to 2.1% in the last year. There are only 6,421 vacant apartments available for rent out of 306,091 in the region.
  • There are 1,554 aging apartment towers in the region totalling more than 300,000 homes. In Toronto alone, this makes up 48% of the rental housing stock.
  • The number of people relying on the Rent Bank to avoid eviction grew by 300 from 1,566 in 2008 to 1,870 in 2009.
  • People accessed food banks 150,000 more times from 2009 to 2010.
  • The social housing wait list grew by 9,974 active households from 77,228 in 2009 to 87,175 in 2010.
  • The Toronto region received more than $670 million in new government investments for housing and homelessness programs from 2009 to 2011.
  • The Social Housing Renovation and Retrofit Program (2009 to 2011) investment totals $291 million. More than 1,000 buildings were repaired through this program.
  • Investment for new affordable housing through the Affordable Housing Program totals $307.9 million. This has created more than 2,200 homes in the region.
  • More than $32 million is being provided for rent supplements/housing allowances to 4,827 tenants in private buildings in 2010.

Photo by Jonathan Castellino.

Discussion

31 Comments

Lucas / February 2, 2011 at 09:31 pm
user-pic
"In order to afford average rent for a two-bedroom apartment in the Toronto region, a household would need to earn $42,440 per year. Some 25% of couple families, 53% of single parent families and 69% of single persons do not earn enough to afford average rent for a two-bedroom apartment."

Wow.
asad / February 2, 2011 at 09:55 pm
user-pic
renting in Toronto has become in unaffordable for students and most people under 30 . I haven't seen a single apartment building built in the 23 years Ive been alive ,but every week a new condo tower goes up .
Kevo / February 2, 2011 at 10:17 pm
user-pic
Does TO have a stipulation that a certain % of all housing units built must be geared to income? I think NYC has something like that and it's helped take people off the streets there (I'm sure there are also other programs supplementing it like career stuff, etc.). People here would call it communist/a Miller idea, but it's a Republican mayor who's done it.

Some scary stats though, that's for sure.
Krys / February 2, 2011 at 10:26 pm
user-pic
The average 2 bedroom on the downtown area and west end is more like $1500-$1800/month plus utilities. You need to have a household income of at least $80k or more to afford that. There should be rent. Landlords should have to get a license for every unit they own if they are charging this much there should be some guarantee the unit is in repair to a certain standard.
Ola replying to a comment from Krys / February 2, 2011 at 11:32 pm
user-pic
Glad that you noticed that too Krys! I was just about put up the same comment. Maybe somebody else could explain to me how a household with 42k of annual income, so roughly $2.5k per month, could afford even a $1.5k/month apartment.
chephy / February 2, 2011 at 11:54 pm
user-pic
I don't usually lash out on west end hipsters like this (I sorta like them), but sometimes those living downtown do seem to lose a sense of perspective...
GL / February 3, 2011 at 12:09 am
user-pic
I propose that the city force developers like Brad Lamb to contribute to renovate, subsidise and repair the old apartments. 2 for every $2000/mth monstrosity he builds.
Um replying to a comment from Ola / February 3, 2011 at 12:13 am
user-pic
Maybe you missed the part where it said between 900 and 1,500. Maybe the 42k earners are paying in the middle of that range as opposed to the maximum. The statement that the average rate is more like 1,500 to 1,800 is one person's guess against a thorough qualified study which says 900 and 1,500 is the actual average
Jessica / February 3, 2011 at 01:39 am
user-pic
To Um: I just finished scoping out apartments in Toronto, and honestly, a 2 bedroom for 900 means you're probably moving into a slum.

Which means it's not what anyone would willingly choose for themselves or their partner, or their children. Put 2 and 2 together from the qualified study to get the whole picture please - 900 a month for a 2 bedroom means it's in one of those buildings that really needs help and repair but probably hasn't seen it yet.

So despite making 42k a year, that theoretical family would have a pretty shitty quality of life.
Just sayin that you
Jessica / February 3, 2011 at 01:40 am
user-pic
Uff. I meant "just sayin'".
michael / February 3, 2011 at 02:36 am
user-pic
"There are 1,554 aging apartment towers in the region totalling more than 300,000 homes"


how old is "aging" considered? interesting facts btw.
Um replying to a comment from Jessica / February 3, 2011 at 07:32 am
user-pic
There is a lot of room between 900 and 1500. It's not top or bottom. I pay 1200 for a nice stacked townhouse sandwiched between two great parks in riverdale I make 42k I'm quite happy with my quality of life. I also work in a building that has small 2 bedrooms for 900 and great 2 bedrooms for 1100. It's in etobicoke but that's still Toronto. The situation is not that bad. If you want a great place for a great price it takes patience but it's still very possible in this city.
chephy / February 3, 2011 at 08:03 am
user-pic
Hmm, deleted comment? I guess it's offensive to point out that Queen West is not all of Toronto? Or is it the mention of $5 lattes that offended the sensibilities?
Really!?! replying to a comment from GL / February 3, 2011 at 08:22 am
user-pic
GL? Really? We should make successful developers clean up this city? What about the owners of those dumpy buildings? Where is their responsibility?

Also, how many people on this site know at least one person living in co-op or assisted housing that shouldn't be?
Shamne on them!
andrewS / February 3, 2011 at 08:22 am
user-pic
The problem with arbitrary rent cutoffs is that renters are an exceptionally diverse group, far moreso than the homeowners that these rules were originally designed for.

Take a single 20-something that lives and works downtown, after rent and food there are virtually zero other essential costs. Tell the 25 year old single person that pays 50% of their income in rent they can't afford it and you'll be met with raised eyebrows. I pay 55% on a 1-bedroom myself and I don't even have to think about it if I want a steak dinner or a night out. Relocating out of downtown to find lower rent doesn't even figure into it.

However, once you start throwing cars and children into the mix, the cutoff gets a bit dicey the other way. All of a sudden even 30% of income on rent becomes a crushing burden when you have to feed your kids, especially in this era of increasing costs of living.

There are better ways to measure shelter cost stress than a simple cutoff that's designed for mortgage qualifications.
Derek replying to a comment from chephy / February 3, 2011 at 08:51 am
user-pic
That comment went into moderation and I manually published it just minutes after it was left, but apparently there was some technically glitch. I'll see if I can get it up for you.
Shannon replying to a comment from Jessica / February 3, 2011 at 08:53 am
user-pic
Not true.

I live in central etobicoke, in a very nice, quiet, low crime neighbourhood and no city buildings near by and rent a two bedroom apartment for 950 a month. The includes a living room, dinning room, and a parking spot. The apartment building is well kept, and repairs are done when needed. So not sure where you are getting your facts, but your are way off.
Stefan replying to a comment from Kevo / February 3, 2011 at 09:00 am
user-pic
I think you're thinking of rent controlled buildings, which is a very old policy in New York City (as well as some other cities in the U.S.). It'd be great to see something like that in Toronto.
Stefan replying to a comment from Kevo / February 3, 2011 at 09:02 am
user-pic
"In 2006, some 26% of owners and 46% of renters were spending 30% or more of their income on shelter."

Isn't it fairly standard to devote close to 1/3 of one's income to housing costs? That, of course, doesn't make it any more or less affordable, but it would be interesting to place this statistic into a wider context.
TB / February 3, 2011 at 09:06 am
user-pic
Rent is getting rough. I just realized that a little more then half my income, goes to just rent. If you include my other bills (internet, and phone etc) it jumps to 75%. I only pay $725 a month, and I work two 30 hour jobs every week. The rent is getting to be a bit crazy in this town. It's making it hard to get ahead when you just seem to be scraping by. It is next to impossible to find anything near downtown for less then this. Am I crazy? Is it just me? Or am I just too poor?
Matt replying to a comment from TB / February 3, 2011 at 09:59 am
user-pic
Are you sure? According to these numbers, that means that despite working 60 hours a week, you pull in less than $1,500 a month.

If that's correct, you'd have a hard time in any town or city in this country.
AndrewS replying to a comment from TB / February 3, 2011 at 10:09 am
user-pic
@TB:

You work 60 hours a week and net less than 1500/month? At minimum wage you should be grossing around 2600/month, which is 1800-1900/month after deductions. Check your budget because you're missing a lot of money.

Further, if you are scraping by on minimum wage, why are you in Toronto? Go move to Hamilton or something where that 750 a month gets you a decent place!
Ola replying to a comment from Um / February 3, 2011 at 10:31 am
user-pic
I can't really imagine a 2 bedroom for $900 unless in the middle of nowhere in GTA (so that would mean that you need to add the cost of GO train and TTC passes to your monthly budget). Anyhow, my point is: I don't think that a single person making 42k needs a two-bedroom apt, so one can just get a studio/1 bdr and have a fairly decent life. Secondly, no way a household with a total income of 42k can afford a 2bdr apt. Period.
TB / February 3, 2011 at 11:27 am
user-pic
Maybe I am be wrong or just bad at budgeting. I just know that I work 60 hours a week and I find it increasingly hard to get by or better my position.
Um replying to a comment from Really!?! / February 3, 2011 at 11:29 am
user-pic
Really?!? I work in a coop and I live in a coop. Anyone can live in a coop part of the point with co-ops is that they are mixed income. I don't know one person with an Rent Geared to Income who shouldn't have it. I do however know many people who should have it but don't. what exactly is the point you are trying to make?
Um replying to a comment from Ola / February 3, 2011 at 12:38 pm
user-pic
The building I work in is along the lake shore, a short walk from schools, hospitals, grocery stores, theaters, nice restos, the works, hardly the middle of nowhere. TTC pass, bike or car; same poisons as anywhere in Toronto. Because you can't imagine it does not make it not exist Ola. $960 for 680 sq ft. $1094 for 864 sq ft. Someone making 42k doesn't need a 2 bedroom. a family making 42k does. It can be and is done all over the city, whether you choose to believe it or not
jr / February 3, 2011 at 01:15 pm
user-pic
Last place I lived in was $1200 for 2 bedrooms, 700 sq ft, right across from Trinity-Bellwoods park. Rent is really all over the place in the city but it is possible to find affordable rent.
Marc / February 3, 2011 at 11:36 pm
user-pic
Yes, overpriced housing/condos and apartment rent. And yes, while too many condos are being built. Many are asking, where are those condo owners going to work since those buildings being built are condos and not offices or mixed use buildings? Well the fact is that those condominiums are CATERING to foreign investors who have either a share in them, or have purchased units to rent or sell. Again, this is another factor proving that Canada is a weakling and is literally run by the big corporations and business. A fake country, a fake first-world/G7 place.
kn / February 4, 2011 at 10:08 pm
user-pic
i'm not sure why any of this information is revelation to anyone. everyone wants to own their own property and the federal government has obliged. ridiculous 40 year mortgages combined with low interest rates = record debt levels. houses that were 200k in 2000 are now 750k. condos cost 100 a square ft then and now 500 a square ft. and who loves huge debt? all the idiots who want to have everything but not really pay for it and banks. rents simply follow suit.
bob / February 5, 2011 at 01:57 am
user-pic
Don't forget that the apartment vacancy rate in the city right now is something like 2.1%.
barg / February 5, 2011 at 01:57 am
user-pic
AND condo sales are higher than ever somehow

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal