Saturday, May 26, 2012Cloudy 23°C
City

Behind the big mess on St. Clair West

Posted by Rick McGinnis / February 1, 2011

282 St. Clair West, late 2010There's nothing out of place about construction in Forest Hill, a neighbourhood that seems to be replacing itself house by house, upgrading every merely spacious mansion into a boundary-line-hugging monster home with furious intent. The fenced-off building site at the corner of St. Clair West and Parkwood Avenue just by Spadina Road is an exception, though, inasmuch as it's been sitting unfinished for at least two years now, as if workers downed their tools and drove away one afternoon, never to return.

Which is basically what happened, to the distress of locals. Robert Boltman knows; his office is just in front of the derelict site, where steel I-beams jut into the sky like dead trees and dirty plastic tarps, shredded by the seasons, flap sharply in the winter air. Boltman and his business partner Alex Bartlett work in a converted storage container perched on the uneven dirt between the sidewalk and the building's half-demolished frame, in what looks at first glance to be a site office, which would explain the sign.

"WE'RE NOT THRILLED ABOUT IT EITHER," reads the vinyl banner mounted on what was once the frame for a sales sign, just to the west of Robert's office. "It's kind of like having a neighbour who's never cleaned up their front yard, painted or renovated ... we have absolutely nothing to do with this STALLED CONSTRUCTION PROJECT."

A view of BSQ Design's signThe sign is an ad, of sorts, for Boltman and Bartlett's landscape design business, B Sq., as is their presence on the bare earth of this eyesore, in the converted shipping container that they turned into their office for another promotional opportunity. It's a simple case of opportunity knocking, and ultimately forcing them to do a lot of explaining.

Boltman and Bartlett built their portable office for the 2009 Interior Design Show, where they were invited to submit a project to fill a ten-by-twenty-foot plot - too small for all but the most basic garden design, but a priceless opportunity to get some attention. They had regretted all the waste they'd created creating displays for gardening shows, and wanted to do something different.

BSQ Design's container office"The concept was that we wanted no waste, that we wanted a space for Alex and I to work, and we wanted to be environmentally sensitive. So we ended up with a container office, and we plopped it down at the 2009 Interior Design Show and we won a design award, and we were beside ourselves. It was the most popular thing there - it was really neat for people to see. We ended up picking it up, and dropping at the Green Living Show, then Canada Blooms, then the National Home Show. So we ended up in four or five places that year ... it was kind of this little box that keeps on giving."

In the spring of 2009, they had an office but nowhere to put it, until they heard about the derelict site on St. Clair. "Currently we're sitting on a brownfield site - that's the way we see it. We don't know what's happening with the building. It was a condo and we believe the land was bought by an American company to run some sort of chain of retirement homes, and when the bubble burst there in the US so did this project. We know one of the guys who were managing the site, and he said 'we've got this piece of property here on St. Clair - you can leave your box there.' The deal was that we'd pay a small amount of money for rent, and that's how it's been. We don't spend more than $240 a month."

Irritated neighbours reasonably assumed that they had something to do with the increasingly dilapidated building site behind them, which led to the sign, which they put up last November. "Alex wanted to take the signs off the box and the truck and take ourselves away from here, and I said when are we going to get another opportunity to be on St. Clair again? We do want to leave, but we don't know where to leave to, not at the moment, so let's inform people."

"People look at the negative and we said look at the positive - here's a site that unfortunately isn't being developed, and that could be anywhere in Toronto. It just happens to be Forest Hill. It's a site that isn't being developed and we can use that with a very low environmental footprint. We can move in, we can move out. We saw it as a real opportunity. It's walking distance to a few of our clients' homes, we don't operate with much power, and we can store things on the site."

A view west of the unfinished site at 282 St. Clair WestA quick Google search of the address turns up a name - Village Park Retirement Residence - and a disconnected phone number. The owners had managed to get the project listed on a number of retirement home websites and apply for a parking lay-by from the city before it went under, though Boltman says that there have been a number of recent site visits checking on the structural integrity of the building carcass. With its prime location and commanding view of Winston Churchill Park, it's a mystery why it's been in limbo for so long, but the city's real estate market frequently produces these curious anomalies.

"An interesting possibility is that a company does buy that site and we end up working for them, Boltman speculates, wishfully. "We just want people to look at it as us doing the right thing, not the wrong thing."

Discussion

17 Comments

laurie / February 1, 2011 at 10:29 am
user-pic
thanks for this; that sign raised more questions than answers so this was great. i hope something comes of it soon.
nb replying to a comment from laurie / February 1, 2011 at 10:53 am
user-pic
i'll second that thanks.
i've been going by this monstrosity for several years now, and it really hadn't occurred to me that it STILL isn't done after all this time. and that little green office with a patio on top, which i figured was the site office, always looked so sad and lonely out in front there.
good to know what the heck the deal is with that place!
marioncobretti / February 1, 2011 at 11:10 am
user-pic
The sign is clever, but I'd say too wordy and confusing for an outdoor ad. I read it a few times in passing and thought it was some kind of protest sign - like the builder griping about some by-law or whatever. Difficult to take take that much copy in while driving by. Thanks for the clarification.
jennifer / February 1, 2011 at 12:35 pm
user-pic
It took me about 5 streetcar trips past that sign to make out all the copy, and I was still somewhat confused by it. I had thought that the company was on site to landscape the finished project, but it seems that's not the case.

While this project has sat empty, the Russell Hill retirement complex went up in record time.

Hopefully they get building soon, it's an eyesore.
Justin replying to a comment from marioncobretti / February 1, 2011 at 01:33 pm
user-pic
... I think because it's meant for people to actually read. Oh, and also because it's not an ad.
Yolaine / February 1, 2011 at 01:48 pm
user-pic
Thank you so much for this. I live next door to this building and we've all had questions for years as to why development was discontinued. I also agree that the sign is confusing. I would often walk by at night and see the lights on in the small portable and I thought maybe the developer had lost everything and was living out of this portable because it was the only thing he had left. Lol.
James / February 1, 2011 at 01:52 pm
user-pic
The sign needs to be more concise. I too thought they were the landscapers for the project. But I guess they had to get in all their accolades rather than just address the issue at hand.
Regina / February 1, 2011 at 03:27 pm
user-pic
Not sure if this is an advertorial...
Marion Cobretti replying to a comment from Justin / February 1, 2011 at 04:20 pm
user-pic
Justin, I don't want to get into an internet argument, but I've been in the business for many years and that is an ad if I've ever seen one. They are using this unique opportunity to brand themselves as eclectic, creative yet serious enough on delivery to be "award winning". The whole thing is a novel idea, but their message could have been better communicated in half the words.
Joe Clark / February 1, 2011 at 04:25 pm
user-pic
Unusually good photos for a BlogTO post.
Fig / February 1, 2011 at 04:48 pm
user-pic
Thanks Rick - I wondered about this place every time I drive by.
Alex / February 1, 2011 at 10:04 pm
user-pic
Initially all we wanted to do was to make use of a “brown field" site or an underutilized site with our mobile, recycled support office.

We found after many months on this site that we were being associated with the stalled development project.
Understandably it was an easy enough association to make and we really started to worry what people were thinking about our company. We figured if a dozen people were angry enough to call us to complain about this site then there must be thousands who did not bother to but who would still associate us with this project. How would they know that we were just renting that little bit of space and that was the end of our involvement with the site?

We put up the sign as a 1st step towards leaving the site.
It was important for us to let people know that we were not responsible for this project and if we left one day it would not be because we were bankrupt or finished as a company.

The sign does function as an ad and it is a bit wordy as well. It was our best attempt to inform the neighbourhood with an explanation and to do a bit of damage control.

Hopefully the next site we find we can actually make a positive tangible contribution to it such as planting new trees, creating gardens and being able to keep the area clean and vibrant.
We are working to find a much more appropriate site that we could either rent or lease for this little green office.
We still believe in the concept of the little office and we are proud of its recycled content and its ability to function so well with minimal impact as a support office. We just need to choose our surroundings a bit more carefully next time!


KC / February 1, 2011 at 10:41 pm
user-pic
There's a similar eye sore on Goodwill Ave., right near Wilson Station. I believe the story there is that the owners were trying to get away with building a 3-storey house, which contravened the by-laws. So it's just been sitting there in its unfinished state. You can take a look on Google streetview. It's the 1st property on the south side of Goodwill, just east of Wilson Heights Blvd.
Ron / February 2, 2011 at 01:33 am
user-pic
That sign really is confusing.
If its reflective of the quality of their work - ugh.
You don't know who "we" are - the landowner or the developer?
There's also a disconnect because of the spatial separation between the sign and the trailer.
What they really need to say is "We're just renting a pad for our bright green trailer".
Tanja / February 3, 2011 at 01:40 pm
user-pic
Hmm I don't think the company got it "listed" before they went down. I'm pretty sure it was a retirement home all these years, before they came along with failed big plans.
Donny / February 11, 2011 at 11:52 pm
user-pic
Still, when you look at the building then look at the little bin in front of it, you're first reaction is "Why haven't they finished this?" Sign or no sign, you still see a half torn down building and it looks awful. Something should be done
shelagh delves broughton / April 11, 2011 at 12:35 pm
user-pic
And now this portable has vanished. I just noticed it yesterday as i walked by.
It truly is an eyesore and something needs to be done about it quickly.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal