Saturday, May 26, 2012Cloudy 23°C
City

What Toronto-based newspaper websites looked like a decade ago

Posted by Derek Flack / December 2, 2010

Old Toronto Web pagesHere's a fun way to waste a few minutes. Go to the Wayback Machine Internet Archive and pop in a few of the major websites that you visit on a regular basis. The results should lead to a bit of nostalgia and certainly a smile or two. For me, the archive searches that are the most fun involve those sites that have 1.) been around for a long time (obviously) and 2.) undergone radical change over the duration of their existence. Needless to say, Toronto-based newspapers certainly fit this bill.

I'm by no means a web designer, but it's not hard to tell that there's been a significant evolution in the way that the mainstream media displays news. Along with the heavy reliance on the left sidebar, in the past images were either small or non-existent, and the layouts just looked painfully boring. But that's not really a criticism so much as an observation of how much things have changed -- and for the better. I may not be a fan of the current designs of all Toronto-based news sites, but to say that they've improved over the years would be an enormous understatement.

Here's a quick glimpse back into a past when newspapers didn't really have to worry about the web so much. If it proves interesting, I'll grab a few more captures from various redesigns to show how they progressed over the years (though the Globe recently did this for their publication after their last redesign).

2000
Toronto Sun web 2000

2000
Globe and Mail Web 200

2001
Toronto Star Web 2001The lead image depicts the National Post's website in 2002.

Discussion

16 Comments

cultureshot / December 2, 2010 at 05:32 pm
user-pic
Good god the Star website from '01 is dreadfully hilarious!
Andrew / December 2, 2010 at 05:34 pm
user-pic
And what did those drop-down menus look like running Windows 95, or Mac OS 8 for that matter? I'll wait :->

Jeremy / December 2, 2010 at 06:55 pm
user-pic
There are a couple of things to keep in mind when looking at old designs like these. One is that, regardless of the skills of the designers back then, browsers didn't support nearly what they do now, so it simply wasn't possible to make the pages as fancy as now. Also, bandwidth and page loading speed would a major reason to limit the number of images, not only photos, but also layout images (this blogto page has over 40 images, only a fraction which are really pictures in any sense of the word).

Lastly, it's entirely possible that your browser is not rendering the page as the browsers of yore did so what you're seeing might be worse than it actually was. 10 years of backwards compatibility for such poorly standardized technology as the web is a lot to ask.
Michael / December 2, 2010 at 07:08 pm
user-pic
These sites need more animated gifs!
Brandon / December 2, 2010 at 07:31 pm
user-pic
Wow, those are all hideous!
grimey / December 2, 2010 at 07:38 pm
user-pic
You mean they don't look like that anymore?! I haven't been on a newspaper website since grade 7 and we had to do research for some social studies project during our library period.
Prof / December 2, 2010 at 08:03 pm
user-pic
Another bit of newspaper website history is that, at various times along the way, all of the above (except the Star) were kidnapped by their parent companies as part of some kind of convergence scheme.

Lots of grumbling about this all around. And none have fully recovered from it ... interestingly, as a result, the Star went from being the worst of the bunch to the best.
Prof / December 2, 2010 at 08:04 pm
user-pic
Another bit of newspaper website history is that, at various times along the way, all of the above (except the Star) were kidnapped by their parent companies as part of some kind of convergence scheme.

Lots of grumbling about this all around. And none have fully recovered from it ... interestingly, as a result, the Star went from being the worst of the bunch to the best.
Nicole replying to a comment from Jeremy / December 2, 2010 at 09:56 pm
user-pic
Thank you!
HUK / December 2, 2010 at 09:57 pm
user-pic
In five years, I hope blogTO is around so we can nyuk nyuk nyuk about how bad it looked today from our mobile phone brains.
Kenny replying to a comment from Jeremy / December 2, 2010 at 10:19 pm
user-pic
Exactly.

People also gotta remember, we were all using 28.8 or 36.6 or 56k baud modems back then, and even then those pages took forever to load.
Elizabeth / December 2, 2010 at 10:48 pm
user-pic
Despite the fact that technology isn't what it was, it is still pretty finny to look at these websites!
Piero / December 2, 2010 at 10:52 pm
user-pic
Derek, you have the best ideas!
Long Gone / December 3, 2010 at 09:37 am
user-pic
I'm so old that during the early nineties I was on line at the NASA site reading real time telemetry from Voyager II as it passed Jupiter. My connection was dial up. We received information as text only. NASA was doing experiments regarding the planet's mass, temperature and elements.

It was a Sunday morning in the Beach. We viewed this with amazement on a 14" monochrome Mac II computer. Eventually it was time to go watch football at Captain Jacks and we were impressed by the emerging new power called internet.
Saajid / December 3, 2010 at 10:09 am
user-pic
thats just sad.
Chino / December 5, 2010 at 10:46 am
user-pic
That's amazing.

I work in the online media industry so it's great to see what the medium looked like before my time, and before it was even a revenue generating business.

We should take pride that The Star actually had the instinct to but thestar.com versus thestar.ca or thetorontostar.com as you should imagine how many other "star" publications around the English language world would want that URL.

Anyhow, thanks for sharing!!

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal