City
Another idea to revitalize the Gardiner Expressway
There's been no shortage of ideas about what to do with the Gardiner Expressway. Whether it be tearing it down and replacing it with tunnel or a widened Lake Shore Boulevard or its conversion into an elevated park reminiscent of New York's High Line, it's one of those pieces of infrastructure that continually sparks debate amongst architects, city planners, politicians and residents.
Although a Waterfront Toronto environmental assessment to evaluate the proposed removal of a portion of the expressway that runs between Jarvis Street and the DVP got underway in March of 2009, that hasn't put a stop to the novel alternatives that continue to be tossed around.
Last year, Les Klein's Green Ribbon plan (pictured above) to turn the expressway into an elevated park was cause for much discussion -- both positive and critical -- but another plan from around the same time has flown a bit under the radar. In an October 2009 article in The Bulletin, Michael Comstock, president of the Toronto Association of BIAs, wrote about architect Peter Michno's proposal to enclose the Gardiner in a glass dome. Without many renderings readily available online, however, it never garnered the attention that Klein's idea enjoyed.
But with an article about the proposal published in the Star today, that might be set to change. Unlike Klein's plan, Michno still envisions that expressway as a corridor for vehicular traffic. But his enclosed tube-like structure would, he suggests, have the following benefits:
- Improvement of aesthetics -- from both above and below the expressway
- Noise reduction
- By reducing/eliminating snow and rain build up, maintenance costs would be lowered
While the architect doesn't have a specific estimate for the cost of his project, he thinks that road tolls would make sense as a funding source. I suspect that that alone might turn many off the project, but I have to admit it's all rather intriguing, if unlikely to go very far. It reminds me of a vehicular version of Chris Hardwicke's velo-city, which while spectacularly ambitious, represents a way of thinking that I've always thought Toronto could use more of. And besides, in that Michno's proposal still envisions the expressway as, well, an expressway, it's really more realistic than Klein's High Line-like plan.
Here's a look at some of the sketches.





Discussion
37 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
trapping vehicle heat/pollution in a greenhouse in the 30+ degree summer weather? seriously?
"maintenance costs would be lowered"?! right - because maintaining kms of a glass/steel structure will be cheaper that plowing roads?
i'll leave it up to others to point-out the glaring lunacy/irresponsibility of this 'proposal'
And since was "rain buildup" an issue that is of budgetary concern? Have we not figured out the snow removal issue? Is snow removal even an issue these days with global warming reducing the amount of snow we get every year?
Stupid.
That last sketch looks ridiculous. A giant monstrous tube running over Toronto.
Another ridiculously impractical proposal.
I just came back from Germany. Granted their population density is higher on the average, but their cities are way smaller and have infinitely better mass transit. Even a town of 160K has a large train station that has trains running to all nearby cities every 45 minutes, 7 days a week.
I work in Mississauga next to Meadowvale GO station, and live next to Union, but I have to drive. There is no way for me to take a train to work because they only go into the city in the morning, and out to the burbs in the evening. Instead I'm forced to sit in traffic every day for 45 minutes in each direction. Running the same trains, in the opposite direction, on the same rails they already have would decrease traffic measurably and cost little.
Saying the answer to any traffic problem is bigger and fancier highways is like saying the answer to a cocaine addiction is more and better cocaine.
The largest problem with the Gardiner (and one this plan fails to address) is that it remains a visual, psychological, and physical barrier to the waterfront.
We need to focus on making it easier and more appealing to walk, bike, or take transit south of the Gardiner so that Torontonians can re-discover their waterfront. Until we expand transit down there and make it safer for pedestrians, this road will continue to cut us off from the lake.
Not too mention the cleaning of all that glass. Or does this guy know of some magical kind of glass that doesn't get dirty from millions of cars worth of exhaust and road grime?
GO doesn't own the right of way that services the Milton Corridor and since there is so much freight traffic on the line, CP isn't open to allowing all-day traffic. With that said, there IS an express bus that runs from Yorkdale to Meadowvale so if you don't want to drive, you don't have to.
Also, Lucy's Seafood Kitchen is awesome.
Sorry but to ugly to big, and no developer in their right mind would build under the Gardiner. Fugly ugly!
Status quo is not good enough.
As for the Gardiner, I don't think tearing it down is a practical solution. Besides, it is the rail bed that is the true barrier and removing the Gardiner isn't going to change that.
We can't handle the traffic we have now.
Even still, I doubt personal vehicles/truck transports/etc. will go away, even with the uncertain future of oil. Hybrids, new fuels, electricity, and possibly even solar powered automobiles will populate our future streets no doubt. I think society can get over gasoline powered cars, but people won't want to give up personal vehicles.
Alone, it just looks plain silly - futuristic pipes with trees all over? This isn't Avatar.
Toronto already has (or will have?) an angular, sleek aesthetic that needs to be taken into consideration.
Our wealth and influence is slowly migrating west and all we do is squabble about streetcars, highways and gravy trains.
Just a total dearth of leadership these days. An unattractive highway is the least of our problems.