City
Frank Gehry's childhood home faces demolition
When Frank Gehry - the architect of what some people think is the world's most impressive modern building - was working on his renovation of the AGO, it was often noted that he had grown up around the corner. From 1929 until 1947, young Ephraim Goldberg ("Frank Gehry" came later) lived at his grandmother's house at 15 Beverley Street. But like so many that have come before it, the house is facing demolition. And once again, it's for a condo.
It's not, however, all bad: the condo planned for the site has many positive attributes. 12 Degrees, from the developer BSAR, is a ten-storey building that fits into the context of the streetscape pretty well. It also features an intriguing, twisted design that's unique for condo architecture. The firm responsible, Core Architects, has designed several of the recent additions to King West.
And if it weren't for the Gehry connection, it's unlikely there would be much fuss about this particular building. When 15 Beverley was listed as a heritage site, its immediate and identical neighbours 17 and 19 were specifically not included. All of the buildings are fairly non-descript, and they have been altered since their original construction in 1858.
But the Gehry connection is powerful. The architect's formative years were spent in Toronto, and he has said that specific memories from his Toronto childhood - such as the fish his grandmother kept in their bathtub before she prepared them for the Sabbath meal - have inspired the glittery, fish-like appearance of some of his work.
The original zoning by-law amendment for the site was turned down due to the heritage issues, the elimination of rental units, and some privacy and shadowing concerns.
Since then, the developer has continued to work with the city. When I spoke to the city planner, Christopher Dunn, about the status of the development, he said that the developer had adopted a slight southward shift of one portion of the building to deal with the shadowing and privacy issues. The rental issue is also being addressed.
Dunn says that the heritage issues had also been addressed, but he would not go into specifics. Further details will be available when the recommendation for approval is presented to city council on August 17th. But since the home is only listed as heritage and not designated (a stronger form of protection), there is relatively little the city can do to prevent its eventual demolition if the developer wants to fight over it.
So, until we hear otherwise, the future for 15 Beverley does not look good. Although it's difficult to see much of Gehry in this humble house, will the loss of this connection to one of the world's most-esteemed architects be something we regret in the years to come?
All images by Matthew Harris except rendering of 12 Degrees from Core Architects.


Discussion
48 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Who the hell cares where so-and-so lived. If it's a truly striking building, or part of a heritage neighbourhood (*cough* 204 Beech *cough*), save it. If not, lose it. Our problem in Toronto is we let the developers take out good buildings while wringing hands about bad ones just because they think tourists might give a crap about a ramshackle edifice which sheltered a celebrity for a few years.
there's nothing worth saving here and frankly the 12 deg building is about a suitable a tribute as we can expect in the core of downtown.
a progessive like FG would never call for an unredeemable house like this to be kept in lieu of progress.
Preserving this home might be of some importance if, say, Gehry had begun his career as an architect from this home, or worked on famous designs while there, but he didn't.
If we are worried about losing a connection to a famous architect, we should feel comforted that there is a piece of his work just up the block.
Has anyone consulted him for his thoughts on the project?
I'm a lot more worried about the the Gloucester Manions off Church St., or the semi-collapsed Yonge and Gould building, or the warehouse at 253 College being threatened by that proposed U of T high-rise rez building. (Christ, we sure do seem to be on a tear-it-down spree this summer.) I'm getting pretty damn tired of the army of condos marching across the city with their poke-your-eye-out glass facades and demographic whitewashing of the inner city.
On the other hand, this one's not bad. And the houses are unremarkable. So... I want to be up in arms, but really, I think we've got more pressing heritage concerns.
The house itself isn't very interesting either. I'm pretty sure it looked very different when it was originally built. Unlike the Gloucester Mansions, 204 Beech and the old Empress at Yonge and Gould among others that have oodles of character and should be preserved, I wouldn't be saddened to see this one go if it was replaced with something more realistic like affordable (and decent sized) housing.
Tear it down.
Let's focus on making sure the new condo building is built efficiently, and built to last. Let's put our energies into forcing builders to construct places to *live* in. Instead of a place to *sell*.
I think the 12ø building is indeed a perfectly suitable tribute -- just add a plaque! The irony being only that he grew up in architectural blandness.
I love the architectural rendering of this new place - it's not another 40-60 story phallic glass structure like most everything else going up these days downtown. That's getting boring already.
It's not a remarkable building - nor one he designed. There's a certain absurdity in commemorating anything a person touches or has been in or near. Frank Gehry should be remembered for his architecture - not the home he once lived in. And sure enough, he has a giant building right up the street from here that is completely his own.
I'm sure if you asked Frank himself, he wouldn't have a problem with it's redevelopment either. He is the master of starting things afresh - I mean, look what he did to the AGO! It's become a great building thanks to his renovation. And more importantly, look to his attitude when building the AGO. Barton Myers - the architect of the previous incarnation of the AGO, wanted to completely stop Gehry's renovation from occurring. Frank's response to Myers - 'I'm going to destroy your building.'
Toronto has precious little pre-confederation architecture remaining—grand or modest—and despite that these buildings have undergone "alterations" during their lives, they are still worthy of "rescue".
I would say keep them even if no notable person had ever lived there.
Beverley Street has a certain character from bottom to top, and replacing a row of charming, if simple, row houses for another glass box (no matter how <i>au courant</i>) is not my idea of good planning.
I don't have a particular recommendation for what to do with the existing buildings, but I do think they're worth saving, regardless of their past celebrity occupant.
Think of Campbell House, who wouldn’t have preferred it to remain where it was? But if moving it meant saving it, then it was a worthwhile compromise. And the legacy was an interesting museum.
Too bad Gehry himself didn't design the new condo build.
In all seriousness, Frank Gehry is an international figure of significant importance in architecture. Just because his childhood home isn't anything to look at doesn't mean it should not be considered an important building and therefore bulldozed. In fact, it is the city's failing for not making it visibly recognizable (via plaque, preservation, etc) that he was raised there. <br><br> However, I am not exactly surprised. Toronto couldn't give a sh!t about its history. As much as I love this city, I am perpetually at odds with it in this department.
That would be a challenge for creative architects to turn this into a potentially extraordinary project.
Why have museums at all? Heck, why teach history anymore?
As an architect, Gehry is right up there with Frank Lloyd Wright and Charles Eames, Michael Graves, Meis Van Der Roe, Corbusier, etc. -- even if you haven't heard of him. And no, he can't just buy what is not for sale.
If you are going to comment, then know something about the process of designation.
Teh idea of making the architects stretch to incorporate his home would make him happy, I think, knowing him the little I did.
—Frank Gehry
with respect to the new - well, beauty is always in the eye of the beholder. this one seems on par with most what's 'offered' to the buying public in TO currently.
we currently seem to be in love with glass, and at that with window wall construction instead of curtain wall. likely a price question why we see so little curtain wall construction in highrise condos. wonder which this one will use - the website talks of "European inspired kitchens" etc. - but little else by way of hard facts.
in any event, shares of Pilkington or Saint-Gobain should be safe bets fifteen to twenty years hence....
Frank Gehry did not start afresh at the AGO - he built another addition on a museum that has had over 8 addition since it's first purpose-built galleries were constructed in 1912. Barton Myers' last addition from 1993 (with local heroes KPMB) might have been the most damaging (although I would contend the concrete additions from the 1970's were faaaar worse), but Gehry actually saved a lot of Myers' interior spaces. He did not "destroy [his] building" anymore than he destroyed Darling and Pearson's building (1912, 1926) or Cleveland Architect's building (1935), or John C. Parkin's building (1974, 1977).
Regardless, I think it's worth pointing out that Mackenzie House (a City of Toronto owned heritage house that belonged to our own Rebel Mayor William Lyon Mackenzie) is also from 1858. It's a great example of a mid-19th Century urban row home that many lower-middle class families would have lived in during that time. It's also a style of building that is becoming increasingly rare in downtown Toronto.
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/851020--tenants-complain-they-are-being-pushed-out
http://adamvaughan.ca/?page_id=44
The proposal goes to council tomorrow. Get your opinion in before then!
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2010.TE36.8
Take special note of what will be replacing these century-and-a-half-old rowhouses:
"Townhouses with separate entrances are proposed along Beverley Street at the base of a 3-storey podium with a residential building above."
This seems like an appropriate way to spend our cultural and historic capital. I'm sure you agree.
http://unruhbobcatservice.com/