Sunday, February 12, 2012Mostly Cloudy -8°C
City

Police trap G20 protesters at Queen and Spadina

Posted by Guest Contributor / June 27, 2010

Queen Spadina g20 torontoQueen and Spadina was one of the epicenters of G20 activity today in Toronto. Jonas Naimark who was there and took the above photo writes:

The last day of the G20, protesters ended up at Queen and Spadina. Soon after stopping the crowd police boxed them in and began grabbing them out 1 by 1 to arrest people. They were standing there peacefully, many people weren't even protesting they were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. I'm not sure what the police's plan was. Shortly after this pic was taken it started to poor rain. Many of these people were forced to wait for four hours in the rain in restraints.

Update: the last of the 600 or so people detained at the intersection have now been released.

The Toronto Star reports:

People released from police custody say they were given no explanation why they were suddenly freed. They'd been told they had been disturbing the peace.

They said there were about 600 people originally detained at the intersection. The ones set free were in the final group waiting to be processed. They said it was just luck that they were allowed to go. They were stunned to be arrested.

They say there was no violence at Queen and Spadina. They say they were walking through the intersection and the majority of people detained were not part of the demonstration.

"We were just walking around with friends," said Sam Wisnicki, 22, of Toronto, who just graduated from the University of Western Ontario where she was studying political science and peace studies.

"Nothing was really happening," Wisnicki said. "Everything was peaceful."

The detainees say they were confused and frightened. They were also very cold - they shivered in their soaking wet T-shirts for four hours.

"We were surrounded," Wisnicki said. "We were told to get down and were rounded up like cattle."

She said she, along with two friends from Western, was meeting friends for dinner and stumbled on the protest and decided to walk with it for a couple of blocks.

"I can't believe I'm in Canada. My charter rights have been trampled. My human rights have been trampled. It's shameful."

Some of the people shivering in the rain with her were tourists.

Discussion

183 Comments

Tyrone / June 27, 2010 at 10:50 pm
user-pic
What a bleak day in our city's history.
Jay / June 27, 2010 at 10:56 pm
user-pic
While it's unfortunate people were stuck outside in the rain for hours, common sense must prevail. People know fully well that after yesterday, tensions were high. There was no way the police would have been able to catch any of those violent individuals without withholding everyone. I watched the live broadcast from about 5pm till 8pm and watched the whole thing happen. The group made it to Queen & Spadina around 5pm and were directed to go north on Spadina. Police only had the south and west blocked. People were free to move out of that area for at least a half hour before being boxed in. Anyone not looking to get in any trouble should not have been there. There was plenty of opportunity to leave that area so people saying they were catching a streetcar are obviously looking for excuses.

While I don't agree with everything the police force does, people make their own decisions. If you didn't want to get stuck in the rain, you should have been somewhere else.
Hawley replying to a comment from Jay / June 27, 2010 at 11:00 pm
user-pic
I agree completely!
shockedguy / June 27, 2010 at 11:02 pm
user-pic
I'm still in a bit of disbelief with today. I was critical of Toronto in the past, but this barreled below even my expectations. I'm ashamed to be Canadian today and the saddest part is what can we do about it?
mary / June 27, 2010 at 11:03 pm
user-pic
i agree. after yesterday WHY would you be in that area? you would have to have rocks for brains. civil rights trampled? you put yourself in a volatile situation, stop being so naive.
rp replying to a comment from Jay / June 27, 2010 at 11:06 pm
user-pic
Jay, r u kidding me? If the city felt it was unsafe for civilians, then why did they allow vehicular and TTC traffic through the area? Why did they not order business to remain closed and issue a public notice to avoid the area?

From what I've seen today, this could have happened anywhere from Bloor to Bathurst to Sherbourne at a moment's notice. All of which were not, the last time I checked, part of the 'security zone", we were under the impression that the rest of the city was open for business and should be supported..
god replying to a comment from mary / June 27, 2010 at 11:10 pm
user-pic
Since when is it illegal to be walking through an area? Since when is it illegal to stand on the street? This is total bullshit. In case you don't know what a police state looks like, this was a great preview. Hopefully there will be some lawsuits so this doesn't happen again so readily.
Jay replying to a comment from rp / June 27, 2010 at 11:11 pm
user-pic
The protest moved it's way down Queen Street and the police stopped the crowd from going south on Spadina and West on Queen. From then on, people knew there were in a crowd of people and common sense would dictate that you should find a way away from that area if you don't want any trouble. Everyone had at least a half hour to move away from that area before the police blocked everyone in. This area was affected yesterday and close to the zone so why bother going down there in the first place?
sehar replying to a comment from Jay / June 27, 2010 at 11:17 pm
user-pic
we live in canada. we have the right to peaceful protest.

people who were walking in the area, completely separate from the protest, were arrested.

is this really what you want canada to look like?

John replying to a comment from Jay / June 27, 2010 at 11:18 pm
user-pic
When is it a crime to take a walk?

While I agree that common sense would say that you don't walk in that area you are are shifting the blame to the victim. My grandfather didn't fight in WW2 so that Canadian public citizens would be rounded up in the streets and arrested without just cause.

Kiro / June 27, 2010 at 11:18 pm
user-pic
I don't know what was going on or how this could have happened all of the sudden. It was such a quiet Sunday. I was playing kickball with mates down at Kensington Market. Left at 6:30 about when this whole thing started, but I took a different route home.(I usually take Queen street and head west). Lucky for me. Hope none of my friends got caught in the fiasco. Haven't been able to get a hold of them yet.
Oscar / June 27, 2010 at 11:22 pm
user-pic
because you are allowed to by law, does that mean you should?
It's not a regular Sunday where you can stroll down Queen street and enjoy the buzz. There was vandalism and violence occurring the previous day in the area, so why go down there to 'watch'? If anything you are helping the vandals by allowing them to blend in with you while you do nothing as they wreck our city. Shut up and stay home if you don't have anything to peacefully protest.

If you look carefully the McDonalds and CIBC are both boarded up. Both of which are well out of security zone, but are aware that protesters are likely to be through the area. Citizens have been warned that the area could be dangerous so if you got caught in the detainment it is completely your own fault.
Jay / June 27, 2010 at 11:24 pm
user-pic
Do I like how things went down? No. Do I want my country to continue being like this. No.

But, when you know there is a crowd that might contain criminals police are looking for, I do my best to avoid getting into that situation.

I completely support peaceful protests but police needed to catch some criminals from yesterday and this was the only tactic they had.

Everyone knew the situation was tense after yesterday so you put yourself in that situation. Nobody forced you to walk there.
mary / June 27, 2010 at 11:25 pm
user-pic
@kiro not sure if you heard, but 'what was going on' was that the previous day involved police cars being set on fire and rampant vandalism in the exact same area. i stayed home...my civil rights remain intact.
Ameer / June 27, 2010 at 11:26 pm
user-pic
http://thestar.blogs.com/photoblog/2010/06/peaceful-beginings-violent-ending-as-g20-protests-grip-toronto.html

Take a look at some of the later photos, many of which were taken near this intersection. They look so peaceful....
HannaBarbara / June 27, 2010 at 11:27 pm
user-pic
I don't understand this whole "wanting to avoid trouble" argument. I think we SHOULD definitely test the police. Now we know what they are capable of. It's good information to know.

bubs / June 27, 2010 at 11:29 pm
user-pic
Public Works Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.55. The Act allows the government to designate areas as “public works.” Once an area has been designated as a public work, police and appointed “guards” have special powers to secure the area. Police and appointed guards can:

require anyone approaching the zone to identify themselves (s. 3(a));
search, without a warrant, anyone who is approaching the zone (s. 3(b));
search, without a warrant, any cars whose driver or passenger attempts (or is suspected of having attempted) to enter the zone (s. 3(b));
use as much force as is necessary to prevent a person from entering the zone (s. 3(c));
arrest anyone who refuses to comply with their directions (s. 5(2)).
Fluff replying to a comment from Jay / June 27, 2010 at 11:30 pm
user-pic
Basic human rights are basic human rights.
rp replying to a comment from Oscar / June 27, 2010 at 11:31 pm
user-pic
so oscar, the folks who live in the area who were walking their dog, or the two elderly tourists doing some last minute shopping are to blame?

I guess if you ever get mugged, remember it's your own fault for having money on you.

I know people who were caught in that, and I was watching it on TV...it did not go down as you suggested, and Jeff McGuire of Toronto Police just admitted at a press conference that no warning was given before the police cordoned off the intersection and detained everyone in it... His words were to the effect of.."I'm not going to apologize for those innocent bystanders who were caught in an indiscriminately cast net"



mary / June 27, 2010 at 11:32 pm
user-pic
who we should be directing our anger toward is the idiots in the federal government to allowed this situation to occur in the first place. this summit should NEVER have been held here, and it's just another example of harper shitting on toronto and leaving us to clean up his mess.
sehar replying to a comment from bubs / June 27, 2010 at 11:32 pm
user-pic
are you really quoting the secretive, illegal law that was passed without public knowledge?
Jay / June 27, 2010 at 11:38 pm
user-pic
Direct your anger at the voting box. Spread the message that your not happy to everyone you know. Maybe then, can we get voter turnout above 50% to actually make a difference.
Oscar replying to a comment from rp / June 27, 2010 at 11:43 pm
user-pic
Yes they are. We have known well in advance what is to happen on our streets and you can see evidence of it from the boarded up buildings. Most of the people who have been interviewed on tv even admitted to being there to photograph the protests, so they should very well be prepared to deal with any police action that would occur.

I cannot predict when someone will come along and mug me, but I can prevent it by choosing what neighborhoods I walk.
Picard102 replying to a comment from sehar / June 27, 2010 at 11:44 pm
user-pic
It's only illegal when the courts say it is. Until it's challenged it's not.
Mike / June 27, 2010 at 11:51 pm
user-pic
So you're saying that it's okay for protestors to break innocent shop windows, light police cruisers on fire, attack CBC media vans while the police watch them, but its not alright for police to arrest (without force) a blockade of people at the protest site so that they can sift through them for criminals?

Direct your anger at the idiotic protestors who just want to wreak havoc...you want peace, justice, law enforcement and security but you're biting the hand that feeds you. It's not like they tear-gassed you or threw you into jail overnight, I hope people grow up and stop whining about every little mosquito bite in their comfortable lives. So you got wet and were 'detained' for a few hours. Let's see how you feel when the store you own gets smashed for no reason for a "cause" completely unrelated, or YOUR car gets set on fire because it somehow proves that they're right.
Mike replying to a comment from Oscar / June 27, 2010 at 11:52 pm
user-pic
This is what seems to be lost on some people.

Do I condone some of the actions taken by police this evening? No, but I also question those who were detained and pleading ignorance as to why it all happened. You chose to be in the epicentre of what was only 24 hours removed from rioting. You knew police presence would be high and tolerance for any kind of demonstration would be low. Rightly or wrongly, that's how it was going to be and you're utterly naive if you thought otherwise.

These people wouldn't have been detained had they not put themselves in a potentially volatile situation.
shockedguy / June 27, 2010 at 11:59 pm
user-pic
The whole "why would you be down there?" idea is valid, to a point. It's why people like us are commenting about it on the internet, because we had the sense to avoid the area.

At the same time, you still can't just arrest people and detain them in this way. You just can't. Whether or not it's stupid for them to be there to begin with.

Not to mention, a lot of these people were just walking through, not part of any of it.
Laura replying to a comment from rp / June 28, 2010 at 12:02 am
user-pic
RP - I completely agree. This is what I have been telling people who told me I was an idiot for being there. We were coming out of a restaurant and all of a sudden we were being chased by riot police, corralled and surrounded. We were told to put our hands on our heads and they arrested some people.

I think most people were under the impression that they protests would be localized. They were happening as far east as pape for goodness sake! How can you avoid that? We couldn't leave the city... leave to where?
amy replying to a comment from Mike / June 28, 2010 at 12:03 am
user-pic
people live there. this isn't taking place in some unpopulated section of town.

as was already mentioned, this could have taken place in any part of the city. yes, queen street was where the black bloc were, but police were everywhere and could have at any time corralled and arrested people who were in the streets.

people live downtown, and because I live in canada I have a right to walk in my own streets. if you don't want that right, you have many countries you can choose to live instead.
Ryan L. / June 28, 2010 at 12:03 am
user-pic
<i>""We were just walking around with friends," said Sam Wisnicki, 22, of Toronto, who just graduated from the University of Western Ontario where she was studying political science and peace studies."</i>

So a polysci and peace study major from London decided to travel to Toronto despite the difficulty in bypassing the traffic issues and headed downtown to the epicentre of the rioting....and they were just taking a walk with friends....Give me a break!
Declan / June 28, 2010 at 12:07 am
user-pic
2nd paragraph:

"Shortly after this pic was taken it started to poor rain."

Pour rain?

Awww... the poor rain. It had to touch those stupid protesters.
Mike replying to a comment from amy / June 28, 2010 at 12:10 am
user-pic
No, Amy, it didn't just happen in some random part of town. That's naive extrapolation to think that. Clearly, the police chose that area for a reason. If these random passersby were at Dufferin/St. Clair, chances are they don't have hypothermia right now.

I understand that people live in the area. My girlfriend lives literally metres from there, but you know what? She wasn't detained. Do you know why? She had the good sense to get out of the area for the weekend.

Again, I'm not debating whether the police actions were right or wrong. My issue is with people pleading ignorance and acting like this wasn't going to be a possibility.
Nick replying to a comment from Jay / June 28, 2010 at 12:17 am
user-pic
Jay, you are a douchebag. To say that because something happened there yesterday...and a totally different group...IN costume and organized gives the police the cause and evidence that the same would happen today in a group nothing to do with the anarchists is ludicrous. Also to say that tourists or workers should not have been in the area and it's their fault is completely moronic. You are a total tool. You sound like a 12 yr old.
mary replying to a comment from amy / June 28, 2010 at 12:17 am
user-pic
i'll state the obvious here. today, you should have stayed home. even if you had a valid cause to protest, to think, that after yesterday, anything would be achieved, you are an idiot.
mary replying to a comment from Laura / June 28, 2010 at 12:19 am
user-pic
laura, you have poor judgement for going to a restaurant in that part of town today. NOT the day for a pleasant sunday brunch.
Nick replying to a comment from Jay / June 28, 2010 at 12:19 am
user-pic
Also Jay, what about the people that lived there? Huh? What were thy supposed to do? Avoid the area too? Sleep on the street somewhere outside of the city. Man, you make me sick you simpleton. I'd love to demonstrate all over you.
god / June 28, 2010 at 12:20 am
user-pic
Just like those hikers taking a stroll on the Iran-Iraq border who were bewildered as to why they got arrested, the vast majority of those detained tonight probably were either protesting or rubber necking. They should have know what was in store. They lucked out because thanks to the police there wasn't a riot. Would they have rather have been caught in a riot for 4 hours? But again maybe tey were hoping for that so they can get some cool pics up on their facebooks,
Mike replying to a comment from Nick / June 28, 2010 at 12:22 am
user-pic
Nick, how were the police to know that it wouldn't happen again?
How was anybody supposed to know that it wouldn't happen again? The remote possibility that we could see a repeat of yesterday would be enough for people with an iota of common sense to avoid the area completely.
Dong / June 28, 2010 at 12:25 am
user-pic
I wish they would have shot the puppies in that crowd. I'm glad that the arrested mostly the women in the crowd too, wouldn't want the detention center going under it's 70% women percentage.
Ryan L. / June 28, 2010 at 12:25 am
user-pic
"IN costume"

They weren't costumes. Their choice of clothing was tactical. They would don the black clothing so everyone would be indistinguishable from one another then remove it, discard it and return to the main group of protesters to blend in.

It is appearing that many of the protesters in black had originated from Montreal. The chartered bus supposedly from Montreal and the ones housed at the graduate centre all speaking French to each other when arrested.

mary replying to a comment from Nick / June 28, 2010 at 12:26 am
user-pic
nick, thousands of people live in the trinity/spadina area. less than 600 were arrested over a total of two days and spread out over different areas of demonstration. you have no argument.
Oscar / June 28, 2010 at 12:29 am
user-pic
Nick, it won't kill someone to stay home for one day. I live in the area myself and chose not to go outside today and guess what? I am home, warm and well relaxed.
mary replying to a comment from Ryan L. / June 28, 2010 at 12:30 am
user-pic
@ryan l.
that pisses me off so much. out-of-town hooligans come here just to wreak havoc, and the world sees it as representative of toronto.
Steve replying to a comment from Ryan L. / June 28, 2010 at 12:31 am
user-pic
I stepped outside last night near Dundas & Parliament. Protesters (who I should say were simply marching peacefully and singing songs) suddenly showed up and in a matter of seconds, we were boxed in on the street... in my own damn neighbourhood I wasn't allowed to go and grab some milk or even return back home. Same thing today at Dundas & Broadview were protesters suddenly showed up.
I didn't see media personnel either time so how are most people expected to know which places to avoid. Not everyone is glued to the news all day... people go to work, have to run errands, or simply want to do whatever it is they (peacefully) want to do. The day I'm told I'm not allowed to stand on the street and take pictures is the day I hang my head in shame.
sparky replying to a comment from sehar / June 28, 2010 at 12:35 am
user-pic
Because you have to have permit. It's that easy. Kind of like 1+1. I think you can figure it out.
Jay replying to a comment from Nick / June 28, 2010 at 12:35 am
user-pic
Nick, I live in the area. I was in the zone. I knew enough to not get involved or to wander along the streets and let my curiosity get the best of me. Sure, I was angry about having to become a hostage in my own home, but I knew it was better that getting detained or dealing with the police. I made it a point to watch the news, and watch the weather to know I shouldn't be getting involved in any dangerous areas.

I did my due diligence.
boohoo / June 28, 2010 at 12:36 am
user-pic
Everybody had plenty of opportunity to leave northward.
They didn't.
They all wanted to hang the f around just to see what happened so they could maybe get a cool shot for their f'ing blog.
Here's the world's smallest violin playing just for you.

Were the Black Block so stupid that they rented rooms at U of T? Really? F'ing idiots.
Ryan L. / June 28, 2010 at 12:36 am
user-pic
Just last night I hung out with friends that live around the corner. They walked around the protest area and got to my house in the east end a little later than usual, but with no real difficulties. Getting home was even easier. Today, again, no real problems. They just avoided the area with the protesting group. Very easy to do considering the noise level of the protesters made it easy to know where to avoid before even getting close and the crowds at the protest making it tougher to try to cross through than just walk around.

I really don't buy the 'just passing through' excuse. Oldest excuse in the book. That polysci major quoted above? It's funny because two of their classmates were also interviewed by TorStar and they had similar excuses, but might have hinted as to why they were <b>really</b> there.

<i>"they tried to cross the intersection at Queen St. W. and Spadina Sunday afternoon. They were meeting friends and spontaneously joined the march for a few blocks."</i>

So one classmate claims to have just happened to be in the area of the protest and trying to pass by while others admit to being part of the protest (albeit as a spur of the moment decision). Could it be *gasp* that the person is downplaying their involvement to exaggerate the police action against them?
Tom / June 28, 2010 at 12:44 am
user-pic
The situation in the street is irrelevant. Mass arrests and detentions occurred. Our politicians suspended the constitution and the police were more than eager to be taken off the leash. If you can't see that, you are complicit in Canadian fascism.
TG / June 28, 2010 at 12:46 am
user-pic
Why didn't the police step in as soon as the vandalism started? Could it be that the mayhem was required to justify the gross expense, the illegal arrests?
Ryan L. replying to a comment from Tom / June 28, 2010 at 12:48 am
user-pic
It's not irrelevant; it's two different topics. You can't dismiss one by referencing the other. It's comparing apples and oranges.
openeyes / June 28, 2010 at 12:50 am
user-pic
Canadians are the only people who bitch and complain when a small margin of their rights have been compromised. Open your eyes people-even after this sad weekend in Toronto, you are still living in one of the most democratic and blessed countries in the world. Research photos from the recent several months long protest in Thailand. Yes, peaceful protesters were held in a city block for a period of time. Same with innocent bystanders. Yes, it was raining. But here is the thing- as someone who lives in the city and didn't go out today, I feel like MY rights are being protected by the police. After the sad events of yesterday and this morning, this civilian is happy that my city is being protected by these 20 000+ police officers (and military for that matter). I would THANK them for holding this group because it means that if even ONE person in the crowd was looking to start trouble, they were stopped.
Also, for people who don't do, the Black Bloc is not an anarchist group. It is a tactic used my anarchist groups.
Another thing-a more effective place to protest would have been on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. The sad fact is that these protests went unnoticed within the walls of the Summit. Make your presence known in front of Harper everyday if you want to make a point. Because the police are just doing their job and obeying commands from the federal government. The military-obeying commands. It's their JOB.
Harper is the problem. So go complain at his home, not mine.
Ryan L. replying to a comment from TG / June 28, 2010 at 12:52 am
user-pic
Because protecting property is the last thing on the list for one of the riot police. That simply isn't their job. Their job was 1) Keep the g20 delegates safe and 2) keep the public safe and 3) protect property being a very, very distant third.

They did #1 extremely well Saturday. At one point the vandals were south of queen, near the fence and with little in the way of arrests or interference, the police forced protesters north and east, ending up towards college and yonge. It wasn't until they had pushed them far enough away from the fence that the police broke formation and started making arrests.
Mike replying to a comment from TG / June 28, 2010 at 12:53 am
user-pic
Yeah, man. It's a total conspiracy. I hear they came up with the idea in the same room that they faked the moon landing.
mary replying to a comment from Tom / June 28, 2010 at 12:56 am
user-pic
the situation on the street is 100% relevant. go move to the next best country then, if it's so horrible here. i hear north korea is nice this time of year.
Dean Footstink / June 28, 2010 at 01:01 am
user-pic
Nick, you are an a##$wipe, get off your mom's couch and go back to school. My question: How can anyone call any of these middle class thrill seekers 'protesters' - against what exactly? I've yet to experience - on the street and elsewhere - no organised effort to target a specific issue in a concentrated and committed manner.
openeyes replying to a comment from TG / June 28, 2010 at 01:04 am
user-pic
It had nothing to do with justifying spending. Like Ryan L. said, their job was to protect the G20 delegates which meant keeping people away from the fence. Their job was to keep Canadian citizens alive while also keeping themselves alive. A few $25000 police cars are a small price to pay if the alternative means an officer getting killed or a civilian getting killed or critically injured. Deaths would look a lot worse to the world than vandalism and burning cars (as sad and haunting as those images are).
I imagine that a lot of people will wonder who will pay for the new police cars and for the stores that were vandalized. The federal government has said that they will not be paying for the damages but I would expect that over the next month or two there will be huge backlash from municipal and provincial government who will want to protect the store owners who did not ask for this Summit to take place in their city.
Pedro replying to a comment from Jay / June 28, 2010 at 01:08 am
user-pic
You had to be there. There was no warning whatsoever. You could not move north on Spadina cuz the police forced people back south. Don't make shit up.
jay / June 28, 2010 at 01:18 am
user-pic
I was in it walkin on queen and all of a sudden every way was blocked none of this we had time to leave!!!!!
One min walking to a friends next min protest walking down queen behind me then next min cops everywhere circled us in and would not tell us anything for over 3 hs in the rainthen said were ALL geting arrested then 25-35 min later let us go up spadina
And yes it was freezing and wet but wrong place wrong time for me i guess
Some of the fun about livin in the city
jay / June 28, 2010 at 01:18 am
user-pic
I was in it walkin on queen and all of a sudden every way was blocked none of this we had time to leave!!!!!
One min walking to a friends next min protest walking down queen behind me then next min cops everywhere circled us in and would not tell us anything for over 3 hs in the rainthen said were ALL geting arrested then 25-35 min later let us go up spadina
And yes it was freezing and wet but wrong place wrong time for me i guess
Some of the fun about livin in the city
jay / June 28, 2010 at 01:18 am
user-pic
I was in it walkin on queen and all of a sudden every way was blocked none of this we had time to leave!!!!!
One min walking to a friends next min protest walking down queen behind me then next min cops everywhere circled us in and would not tell us anything for over 3 hs in the rainthen said were ALL geting arrested then 25-35 min later let us go up spadina
And yes it was freezing and wet but wrong place wrong time for me i guess
Some of the fun about livin in the city
jay / June 28, 2010 at 01:18 am
user-pic
I was in it walkin on queen and all of a sudden every way was blocked none of this we had time to leave!!!!!
One min walking to a friends next min protest walking down queen behind me then next min cops everywhere circled us in and would not tell us anything for over 3 hs in the rainthen said were ALL geting arrested then 25-35 min later let us go up spadina
And yes it was freezing and wet but wrong place wrong time for me i guess
Some of the fun about livin in the city
jay / June 28, 2010 at 01:18 am
user-pic
I was in it walkin on queen and all of a sudden every way was blocked none of this we had time to leave!!!!!
One min walking to a friends next min protest walking down queen behind me then next min cops everywhere circled us in and would not tell us anything for over 3 hs in the rainthen said were ALL geting arrested then 25-35 min later let us go up spadina
And yes it was freezing and wet but wrong place wrong time for me i guess
Some of the fun about livin in the city
jay / June 28, 2010 at 01:18 am
user-pic
I was in it walkin on queen and all of a sudden every way was blocked none of this we had time to leave!!!!!
One min walking to a friends next min protest walking down queen behind me then next min cops everywhere circled us in and would not tell us anything for over 3 hs in the rainthen said were ALL geting arrested then 25-35 min later let us go up spadina
And yes it was freezing and wet but wrong place wrong time for me i guess
Some of the fun about livin in the city
jay / June 28, 2010 at 01:18 am
user-pic
I was in it walkin on queen and all of a sudden every way was blocked none of this we had time to leave!!!!!
One min walking to a friends next min protest walking down queen behind me then next min cops everywhere circled us in and would not tell us anything for over 3 hs in the rainthen said were ALL geting arrested then 25-35 min later let us go up spadina
And yes it was freezing and wet but wrong place wrong time for me i guess
Some of the fun about livin in the city
Marlon replying to a comment from Ryan L. / June 28, 2010 at 01:22 am
user-pic
Can you possibly be serious? I give you two completely different topics. 1 a group of university students who came from Quebec to smash windows and cop cars who were arrested early Sunday morning. 2 22,000 cops who came from all over Canada to smash people for chanting and holding cameras. Apples and oranges? How about twenty year olds breaking windows compared to 40 year old gassing beating intimidating and confining innocent people for demonstrating rights?
Pedro replying to a comment from Jay / June 28, 2010 at 01:24 am
user-pic
Listen idiot. As someone pointed out the area was not off limits and even streetcars were running. I was coming from the jazz fest at city hall and walking a routine route back to where i live. I observed the protest along with many other bystanders and passerby in the area and there was no violence or challenges to the police. This protest was so much smaller than anything yesterday and was dying down anyways. As mentioned if police wanted people to disperse then they should have used a megaphone and tell people to do so.

IMHO this was retaliation for incidences from Saturday and over reaction cuz there was critiscism for lack of police action yesterday. They say they were looking for Black Bloc members amongst the group. Bullshit. They could have used many undercover personnel to get into this crowd and remove any such people.

Belive me i was pro security and pro police and this incident has really shook me up. Heads will roll for this. Harper, McGuinty or someone in the police leadership.
j / June 28, 2010 at 01:48 am
user-pic
I voluntarily entered the danger zone to observe and found myself surrounded by my peers of unaccredited media peoples who were there to catch a piece of the action.

I was held for 5 hours, with half of that time spent in hurricane weather, but I think that this was an extremely eye opening experience, watching hundreds of people being arrested without warning, for no reason other than being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Just like so many thousands of people living in the 3rd world.

If anything, I feel a stronger solidarity with the rest of humanity now, and will use this experience to strengthen my life.
uaro / June 28, 2010 at 01:51 am
user-pic
8:45 p.m. Five observers from Canadian Civil Liberties Association arrested

Five observers from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have been arrested this weekend.

The four men and one woman are volunteers, trained to take notes to document both police and protesters’ behaviours at the demonstrations during the G20 Summit, said Nathalie Des Rosiers, the general counsel for the Association.

Des Rosiers said that the first two observers were arrested on Saturday night in front of the Novotel hotel on the Esplanade when a peaceful protest turned into a mass arrest. The other three were arrested late Sunday afternoon at the Queen St. W. and Spadina Ave. standoff.

“We are quite distressed by these arrests,” said Des Rosiers.

All were wearing their white uniform, including a white hat with CCLA on it. They also have cards identifying them as impartial onlookers, said Des Rosiers, who confirmed that the Integrated Security Unit is aware of the observers’ presence at the protests.

“We have no idea what they have been charged with,” said Des Rosiers. “And that’s the concern.”

One of the observers was released after being detained for 16 hours. “He is still in shock,” said Des Rosiers, who added that he described his experience as chaotic. He also told her that the cages at the detention centre were full of garbage.

Similar monitors were dispatched at the Vancouver Olympics to watch over the protests there – none of those observers were arrested, said Des Rosiers
samantha pynn / June 28, 2010 at 02:01 am
user-pic
blair need to be fired! turning our streets of toronto into nazi germany. i have no faith in the police after this weekend.
mike / June 28, 2010 at 02:05 am
user-pic
To everyone that is saying that people in other countries have it much worse and that we should stop complaining or move to North Korea: Guess what? If we don't stand up for our rights and a little thing called democracy and freedom of speech, soon we might not have it so good.
roland hughs / June 28, 2010 at 02:13 am
user-pic
Typical Canadian attitude BLAME THE VICTIM. A woman gets raped and you say her skirt is to high. Those people could have been your mom or your dad just walking home from the grocery store. This is the year 2010 when did Canada become a police state, where cops are above our civil rights.
Matt / June 28, 2010 at 02:48 am
user-pic
Police are one of the worst things about Toronto.
Spencer / June 28, 2010 at 03:22 am
user-pic
If the police didn't want anyone further south than Queen, they should have put the fence up at Queen.
If police have declared an area a 'public works' area, they should clearly define where that area is. And it should be clearly indicated to you that you are now entering a zone where you have little to no rights.
ThanksForNotBeatingMe&StealingMyStuff / June 28, 2010 at 03:56 am
user-pic
Many people came to Canada to avoid the corruption of their corrupt home countries and torture of its citizen. I'm disillusioned as a Canadian. I'm not sure why Harper would condemn the actions of Iran against its protestors when it uses the same tactic of assaulting innocent people here in Canada. I'm sure the rulers of the world are proud of Canada after this weekend.

It doesn't take a detective to know the difference between regular people and an anarchist group who wears all black and cover's their faces. The black bloc was allowed to freely roam Saturday despite already knowledge of the group's existence and their tactics.

A cast net tactic should have been used Saturday against known vandals who were present and left to roam.

Someone should be held accountable for both of these day's mishaps.

Also where does the number a billion come from for security. All of these officers who have come in from other provinces were already on the pay roll and are performing their jobs just like any other day. Fancy dinners, limousines can't cost that much. Someone is 900 million dollars richer after this weekend.

I'm sure the leaders enjoyed the chaos of one day, and the trampling of civil liberties the other. The rich and powerful continue to rub it in the face of everyone and the regular person loses again. I'm sure the rulers of the world are proud of Canada today.

TG / June 28, 2010 at 04:05 am
user-pic
Lots of apologists for the fascist pigs out there. The fact is that the world media is calling the actions of the cops a disgrace. Wake up--G20 delegates agreed to massive austerity measures so that Goldman Sachs can keep the money they stole. This week rubber bullets--next week real ones.
Max / June 28, 2010 at 04:30 am
user-pic
Peoples constitutional rights were violated....the fact that people shouldn't have been there is a horrible deffence....under this premise the police would have the right to detain and search everyone that walked into a high crime area....uh oh Jane and Finch had another shooting so let's arrest the whole block.....haha yeah we can raid every building in a 5 mile radius and make them sit in the rain for hours or cages without food or communication....IDIOTS!!!!
Sigma / June 28, 2010 at 05:11 am
user-pic
It's easy not to be worried about your rights if you never exercise them. The attitudes here are so amazing. Holy sh--, you sure wouldn't ever want to have a principle or stand up for anything, what would you need freedom of assembly for? It's that slack, lazy, cowardly Canadian PRAGMATISM that is just so, and has always been so sickeningly vilely submissive. You cowards can go rot for all I care. "Shouldn't have been there?" Who gives a damn where they *should* have been, you've completely missed the point. People were exercising a Charter right, and it was arbitrarily taken away, whatever your vile pragmatism tells you. That right exists because it's been defended assiduously by people who march for it, and originally, written up by brave people with principles who had the courage to DIE for it when cowards just like you told them the fight wasn't worth the trouble, and if it were left up to cowards like you, it wouldn't exist at all.

Crawl back into your holes, apologists. Crawl back in there and grow a f---ing spine.
jayy / June 28, 2010 at 05:17 am
user-pic
George Orwell is rolling in his grave.
Sigma replying to a comment from jayy / June 28, 2010 at 05:21 am
user-pic
Orwell's not rolling in his grave, he's pointing at these contemptible, worm, coward quislings and going, "see? I told you about these guys."
Ryan L. replying to a comment from Marlon / June 28, 2010 at 06:08 am
user-pic
You don't seem to understand. You're taking two items which happened in a chronological order then rationalizing the events of the first because of the existence of the second (which only exist as a response to the first).

It would be like if I punched you in the face and you retaliated by pushing me. When someone asks me why I punched you I wouldn't say "Oh, it's okay, because you pushed me back", because that would be just retarded. You cannot blame or rationalize something that happens in the past on something that happens in the future. It's a complete violation of logic.

Reasonable topics could include discussing things as they happen chronologically or each of the items as they happened independently. 1) "Did the police use too much force?" 2) "Was it okay for the protesters to break things?" 3) "Was it okay for the police to use that force given that the protesters broke things?" Those are your three options to have a discussion and not just sound like an anchor from Fox News.

Jay2 / June 28, 2010 at 06:21 am
user-pic
Jay,

You are the perfect police state citizen.

Common sense is NOT The Law, Jay. "If you don't want trouble" is the warning of bullies.

I don't want trouble, I am just strolling around.

Exercising.My.Rights.
Ryan L. replying to a comment from TG / June 28, 2010 at 06:26 am
user-pic
Have you looked at what was discussed at the G20? That definitely wasn't on the agenda.

Things on the agenda at the G20 meeting:

-introducing taxes for banks so if there were to be financial collapse the money from that tax would be used to save the financial institution and government bailouts of taxpayer money wouldn't have to be used (pretty much the opposite of what you were claiming they were discussing)

-part of that would also include discussion on if there should be taxes for all banks in all countries and the answer was no, because countries like Canada weren't as affected by the crisis because their banks didn't make stupid investments and shouldn't be punished for something they didn't do.

-reducing debts to help make sure things like Greece's financial crisis don't happen again.

-fixing high unemployment

-reduce global poverty

-reducing subsidies for fossil fuel

Jay2 replying to a comment from god / June 28, 2010 at 06:38 am
user-pic
Unlike the 3 hikers who broke international law by illegally crossing a border, the citizen of Toronto were only in violation of the "New Law" of Fiat Money Capital Groups and their lackey "public servants".
Sigma replying to a comment from Ryan L. / June 28, 2010 at 06:49 am
user-pic
And, of course, this is all listed here to point out the resounding success of the one day they spent together this time, at the cost of a billion dollars of (taxpayer) money, and how they actually came to an understanding on those issues at a cost of a billion dollars of (taxpayer) money, in order to, well, you know, uh, fix the world and all that, and that was what we got at the expense of a billion dollars of (taxpayer) money and . . . well, the suspension of our rights.

Oh wait. That didn't happen. Basically they just took a lot of pictures of each other, wove canoe seats and ate chocolate paddles, and we got our rights stomped on, a billion dollars torn from our pockets, and a major city shut down so the police could play with some toys they got with our money.

Good stuff. Good thing the reasonable, pragmatic people are here to tell us what the good guys are up to. Thanks.
HUK / June 28, 2010 at 07:36 am
user-pic
I have trench foot from dancing in wet shoes.
marlon replying to a comment from Ryan L. / June 28, 2010 at 07:44 am
user-pic
Ryan, I think a fairer comparison would be if I punched you in the face and you pepper sprayed a completely different group of people who had nothing to do with me.
fiveteamer replying to a comment from Ryan L. / June 28, 2010 at 07:49 am
user-pic
Actually, the job of police is NOT to keep the public safe.

Nobody is quite sure what the job of police is. To make the union stronger perhaps? Create more dues?

Warren v. District of Columbia
Xavier / June 28, 2010 at 07:49 am
user-pic
I think the truely distrubing part of this, is that people believe what they read in the star.
Steve / June 28, 2010 at 07:53 am
user-pic
Sad to see people are sticking up for the police. Amazing.
UWO / June 28, 2010 at 08:03 am
user-pic
Interestingly I know Sam, and her facebook status said she was going to Queen's Park, presumably to be part of the protest. Then suddenly she was just going for dinner? This whole group's MO is "let's incite the police up until a point to try and make them act - then when they do, we'll prove how we're living in a police state." So let's get this straight - a day after people torching cop cars, smashing stores and sending dozens of police officers to hospital you're surprised when people give you a hard time as part of a "protest" group? The only thing that should be surprising is that they weren't charged.

Don't be fooled - these are activists pretending to just be innocent bystanders. They create a situation only to lament that same situation by squealing about some supposed rights violation and muttering something about democracy - get real. Kudos to the police - they have a hell of a lot more restraint than I would have.
Sigma replying to a comment from Xavier / June 28, 2010 at 08:05 am
user-pic
Umm, yeah, I guess it's easy to mistake them for people who were (unlike you) actually there. After all, they're saying the same things.
Sigma replying to a comment from marlon / June 28, 2010 at 08:06 am
user-pic
Oh dear. . . I could kiss you. :)
Jordan / June 28, 2010 at 08:07 am
user-pic
For those that say people shouldn't have been in the area - I would like to point out that queen and spadina were not part of any security zone. The fence was at least two city blocks south - the protestors were no where near the security traffic zone, and even further away from the the fence.

If it is illegal to be on one of the busiest pedestrian and traffic intersections in the city, I'm truly baffled.

Steve / June 28, 2010 at 08:39 am
user-pic
If you build a fence, or a wall, and you line that wall with full riot geared goons, armed with clubs, shields and rubber bullets...that is a message, and that message is, “Know your place, nothing to see here, just go about and do some shopping and mind your own f**king business...this doesn't concern you, anyway.
Question us, and we will put you down."
Xavier replying to a comment from Sigma / June 28, 2010 at 08:42 am
user-pic
You know what they say about assumptions
Shayre replying to a comment from Jordan / June 28, 2010 at 08:44 am
user-pic


I encourage you to read the provisions set forth in the Public WOrks Protection Act. I will make it easy for you to find, ok? Here's a link: http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90p55_e.htm



Hunter / June 28, 2010 at 08:48 am
user-pic
Boohoo. Cry me a river. Just as bad as the thugs smashing windows were all these amateur photographers with their $100 pocket cameras getting in the way of the police.

These losers got so much less then they deserved. A good boot to the side of the head would have been much more appropriate then just detaining them for a few hours. Crybabies.
Shayre replying to a comment from Steve / June 28, 2010 at 08:50 am
user-pic
Who should I be sticking up for instead? Those who insisted on not leaving the area, thus provoking the police?
Realist (mostly) / June 28, 2010 at 08:54 am
user-pic
My wife and I walked down that way just before they closed it up. To be honest, it almost seemed normal. The street cars were running in that direction when we bought some cherries on Spadina, but by the time we got past Sullivan they'd started turning them back and blocked off the crowd.

I avoided the protests for the most part, but I am not impressed with the police response.
oinkoink / June 28, 2010 at 08:59 am
user-pic
PIGS WILL BE PIGS
Feldwebel Wolfenstool / June 28, 2010 at 09:01 am
user-pic
A Pig lOVE-iN....FEEL THE CLUBS....fEEL THE LOVE...
WorkingShirt / June 28, 2010 at 09:02 am
user-pic
It's an awful situation. However, I usually walk away when I see trouble happening. I don't like to get stuck in the thick of it. Natural protective instinct, I guess.
The police have never had to deal with the violence on such a massive scale - they did their best.
However, try protesting in a 3rd world country and then getting locked up. The jails are much worse and you might not get locked up overnight because you just might not make it to jail. They strike with their sticks to kill and then they shoot with real bullets to kill. Then, if you do by chance make it to jail, you'll probably be tortured or beaten first, a couple of times. Perhaps you'll be raped.
Jails in Canada, are more like staying at the Hilton if you compare to 3rd world jails. You could also say, that our cops are first class when you compare them to the thug cops in the 3rd world.
My conclusion about Saturday... I'm not sure what they were protesting about in the first place. and, I hardly heard anything about the discussions at the table of the G20 Summit.
Sonia replying to a comment from Jay / June 28, 2010 at 09:21 am
user-pic
Sorry, but you you really have no idea what you're talking about. I was one of the people arrested and detained, and when the police were cornering us in, everyone was trying to leave. We were even chanting "let us leave" for god's sake. It was obvious nobody in the crowd wanted any violence to occur. They could have easily given us a warning or given us the option of leaving before they arrested us. People walking by and asking the police how to avoid the mass of people would be led INTO the protest area and then trapped.
And your comparing Canada to a third world country is laughable. Last time I checked, Canada isn't a third world country and most people don't want it to be. That's the point, and that's why this is so appalling. And the conditions we were kept in were not what I would expect from a first-world country anyway. We were detained in a paddy waggon cell in a car for 4 hours, handcuffed, overstuffed with people, not answering any of our questions or even letting people out to urinate. The detention centre is even worse, it's freezing cold, there's urine and feces everywhere, people are held for 20 hours with no phone call, no food, and only 6 cups of water.
Yes, tensions were high yesterday, but citizens need protection from the Black Block too. Just because there is some small group of anarchists, doesn't mean you can just treat every single citizen who isn't a cop as though they are a criminal. Not only is it a waste of money and time (and an obvious violation of human rights) but it's completely counter productive. The people involved are going to be angrier now than ever.
Sonia replying to a comment from Shayre / June 28, 2010 at 09:23 am
user-pic
Again, we tried to leave. They wouldn't let us. People were trying to avoid the area and the police herded them into the protest area to be trapped.
Before the riot police came, people were singing O Canada, there wasn't a shred of violence occurring. Then they surrounded us and started hitting their stupid little sticks and bosing us in closer and closer, it was obvious that they were trying to provoke us into violence so that they would have a reason to arrest someone. Even though we were packed in like sardines and confused, no one responded violently. Then they arrested everyone anyway.
marlon replying to a comment from Ryan L. / June 28, 2010 at 09:23 am
user-pic
also they did not happen in a chronological order. the police where assaulting people who were protesting in a designated protesting area at the exact same time that the students from quebec were breaking windows. the students were all arrested sunday morning and sunday afternoon they were still beating pepperspraying and abducting peaceful torontonians for holding cameras.
marlon replying to a comment from Sigma / June 28, 2010 at 09:25 am
user-pic
:)
Caitlin / June 28, 2010 at 09:40 am
user-pic
"Those who would give up an essential liberty to obtain temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security" - Benjamin Franklin

People do not think clearly when they are afraid which is the only reason I can think of that people are possibly defending this type of action by police. It is entirely ILLEGAL to arrest an entire crowd of people who were acting in accordance with the law.

The sad part is that, if you had talked to me on Sunday morning, I would have said I was very proud of Toronto police. They remained calm and collected and I felt that, overall, they did a great job on Saturday. Yes, there was property damage. But, there were no serious injuries and the security zone was protected. They protected "The People", and to me, that is what is important.

Then, they went and pissed away all that goodwill by pulling this shit. Shame.
Mike W / June 28, 2010 at 09:41 am
user-pic
Weird, I walked right beside the fence sunday afternoon snapping cops and the fence and nothing happened.
marlon replying to a comment from Hunter / June 28, 2010 at 09:43 am
user-pic
hunter why does it please you to see people hurt? did someone hurt you? do you feel angry and powerless in this world? is it easier to root for the winning team? do you direct your anger at the losing team because the reality of evil corporations destroying the planet, turning natural resources into big business where you have no money you get no education and in some countries no water, and if you disagree you get beaten and arrested, is that too hard a pill to swallow? you direct your anger at the people who stand up and get put down because at least that way you can feel like you won?
Laura / June 28, 2010 at 09:52 am
user-pic
To the person who told me I shouldn't have been out at all... what the hell? I was far away! Was I to hide in my house? Were people supposed to just run away?
JLankford / June 28, 2010 at 10:23 am
user-pic
"Out and About", so what about the people that live in the area? I suppose they have no right to even step foot outside, lest they want to be arrested and detained without cause.
Mr replying to a comment from openeyes / June 28, 2010 at 10:29 am
user-pic
Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.

I was down on the ground on queen street on Saturday during "the violence" The police abandoned their police cars in a crowd of less than 50 peacefull people, half an hour passed and 3 people began joking around and hitting the car, including a 12 year old boy. Half an hour after that and it was on fire and the crowd had grown to hundreds, and only after black plumes of smoke grew from the cars did the police bother showing up.

The police allowed the violence so that they could justify the billion dollar security expense and rouse up douchebags like you who buy into the image they created.
Marc / June 28, 2010 at 10:37 am
user-pic
Exactly! When the images and video of the burning police car appeared, it became so obvious and so stupid that the police most likely intentionally allowed that to happen, just to show that there is violence and ruin happening. If you saw those images and didn't think "so many police (grandest situation) and that was able to happen?" then you need help!
Boe replying to a comment from mary / June 28, 2010 at 10:47 am
user-pic
Mary, Mary, quite contrary.

We have the RIGHT to peaceful protest. We have the RIGHT to assembly.

Just because our safety is possibly in jeopardy is NOT a reason to violate human rights.

Those people had a right to be there. The streets belong to them as well. They paid and contribute to this community like you and I. But they defended their streets against a police invasion, frankly mostly made of officers that ALSO don't live in Toronto. You stayed at home and watched it unfold on TV. Your civil rights only remain intact because you stayed far away, and you didn't show any disagreement with the guys with the big guns. That's civil rights to you?? That's called fascism.

THANK YOU to those who showed the courage to go out there and take photos, videos and provide eyewitness accounts of what happened this weekend. If it weren't for you, we would be left with only state-biased media messages.
JA replying to a comment from Jay / June 28, 2010 at 10:56 am
user-pic
As someone who was actually present, I can tell you that I never heard any calls for dispersal or a single warning that if we did not leave we would be surrounded by hundreds of riot police and held out in the pouring rain for 4 hours.

I mean, I know watching it on television makes you pretty much an expert and everything, but maybe you should speak to some of those who actually experienced this.

This was a completely peaceful protest and we were corralled between lines of armed police like confused cattle. Soaked to the bone and numb from the cold, we weren't told what was going to happen to us or when we would be able to leave. It was terrifying, confusing, and 100% excessive. We have the right to demonstrate and I certainly feel like my rights as a citizen of this country have been violated and abused. I have lost a lot of trust and respect for the police.

But again, you DID watch it on TV, so maybe you should just disregard my comments.
JA replying to a comment from Jay / June 28, 2010 at 10:57 am
user-pic
As someone who was actually present, I can tell you that I never heard any calls for dispersal or a single warning that if we did not leave we would be surrounded by hundreds of riot police and held out in the pouring rain for 4 hours.

I mean, I know watching it on television makes you pretty much an expert and everything, but maybe you should speak to some of those who actually experienced this.

This was a completely peaceful protest and we were corralled between lines of armed police like confused cattle. Soaked to the bone and numb from the cold, we weren't told what was going to happen to us or when we would be able to leave. It was terrifying, confusing, and 100% excessive. We have the right to demonstrate and I certainly feel like my rights as a citizen of this country have been violated and abused. I have lost a lot of trust and respect for the police.

But again, you DID watch it on TV, so maybe you should just disregard my comments.
Sonia replying to a comment from Mike W / June 28, 2010 at 11:01 am
user-pic
Hurr durr, good for you buddy. Doesn't change the fact that it happened to dozens of people I was detained with, and the fact that hundreds of people were arrested and detained for no reason. If you like the way this situation played out move to North Korea, they arrest innocent people all the time you'll get a good kick out of it.
Jon / June 28, 2010 at 11:16 am
user-pic
People, this is not about freedom, this is about mob tactics and minimizing impact on people and property.

Black bloc tactic > infiltrate an innocent crowd > incite them > cause as much damage as you can > run away/change appearance > repeat.

Police tactic > try and spot dangerous elements in crowd > lock it down > identify and arrest criminals > eventually release the rest. (See London's May Day protest 2001 after huge damage in May Day 2000 riot.)http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1307173.stm

The outcome of Sunday was much preferred over Saturday. Sorry a few of you got wet... exercise your freedom to choose to be anywhere else in Canada. My relatives have and are fighting for you to be able to do that... they are not fighting for thugs to have the right to destroy property in a city that we have all collectively paid for.

To the few on here that are angst filled and want to fight for a cause... join the peace corps and go do something positive. This weekend was embarrassing for humanity and justified the need for the occasional and temporary suspension of our rights and the $1.3Bn spend.

Going for a Starbucks now because I like good coffee with my freedom of choice.
Nick / June 28, 2010 at 11:22 am
user-pic
This tactic doesn't surprise me at all. Riot cops (all around the world) employ this strategy. It's a way to contain and suppress mass amounts of people. I had friends visiting Barcelona who just happened to stroll on La Ramblas when a riot broke out. They were cornered, arrested and thrown into a makeshift holding cell. Wrong place, wrong time. No-ones fault. Just unfortunate luck and circumstance.

It's a shitty experience, and shitty that it happened but to give TO cops the benefit of the doubt, it's a tactic employed widely by ALL authorities...not just "bad" Toronto cops trying to impose a "police state".
Max / June 28, 2010 at 11:43 am
user-pic
Ok people end of discussion....Jon says it's ok for the police to temporarily suspend our rights....if anyone apposes these comments vindicating the police of all actions, you will all be arrested....that's right, any further comments against the polices actions will have you thrown in jail without trial or cause....I am being fully serious people so do not even try it!!!'
RP / June 28, 2010 at 11:44 am
user-pic
i'm appalled that so many ridiculous comments have been posted, and while I respect your right to your opinion, you are ignoring the fact that all of those people, whether they be demonstrators, or innocent passers by, or lookie-loos (which, the last time I checked was not a crime) were all on a public street with the RIGHT to be there.

And while the police may have (TBD) had the legal right to use drastic measures, there is no reason that a 5 to 1 ratio of police to civilians could not have determined who was a threat and who could be released...people walking their dog? Tourists trying to get back to their hotels? C'mon, it's not rocket science.

Plus, the fact that the press release last evening from Staff Sgt McGuire indicated that NO WARNING WAS GIVEN and that it was a split second decision made on the street.. He essentially said that he would not apologize for innocent people being caught in a widely cast net...Then Bill Blair's statement, indicated that a warning was issued, however, in the same breath, he also indicated that he wasn't there and doesn't know all of the details.

I have lived in this nutty, wonderful, town 22 years and have to pass by some type of march, or rally or protest on a weekly basis...I don't plan on it, it's just there...Not once did I ever imagine that I could be detained for simply trying to get from one side of the activity to the other and carry on my way...



JA replying to a comment from Mike / June 28, 2010 at 11:45 am
user-pic
I can tell you were obviously nowhere near the protests this weekend because I have been watching the news and you are reflecting the message that the media has been peddling constantly.

How many times are they going to play clips of the same police car burning? Why is that their main focus, when the VAST majority of protestors were peaceful? Oh, I suppose because sensationalism sells and because a clip of 2 thousand unarmed civilians chanting "You are sexy, you are cute, take off your riot suit" isn't quite as jarring as cop cars burning and black shirted hooligans (the vast MINORITY) smashing windows.

And as for that, the only windows smashed were those of chain stores, whose insurance will easily cover the damage. I did not see or hear of any small businesses being attacked.
Sean / June 28, 2010 at 12:10 pm
user-pic
Aren't Canadians allowed to protest?

People seem to think that the protestors needed to be arrested, therefore it was okay to corral bystanders.

There were protestors, they have every legal right to protest, whether you agree or disagree with that decision.

These protestors were sitting on the ground, from what I understood they had hoped to join up with fellow legal protestors near Trinity Bellwoods. For some reason the police found this unacceptable and without warning corralled and arrested people.

It seems people are missing the basic point that regardless of the situation people ARE allowed to protest and at no point was there any indication that any of the protestors were violent in any way. The only ones threatening violence where the army of people dressed in black, weilding weapons and shields.
kn / June 28, 2010 at 12:11 pm
user-pic
I am a professional filmmaker and a witness to all three of the protests this weekend. For the most part the demonstrations were very peaceful. Unfortunately, a very small group of hooligans on saturday decided to run amok and distract the public from the very important issues being raised by the protestors. As a result, the police response was overwhelmingly unprofessional and poorly coordinated. I was shoved and told not to film by the police. I watched hooligans destroy property while police herded peaceful demonstrators. I have shocking images of police forcibly detaining innocent people for over 4 hours without explanation. In fact there could be no adequate explanation as to why people were detained for over 4 hours while the police seemingly had no idea what to do with them. It was a mindless act. I would like to give the benefit of the doubt to most of the officers involved, who they themselves appeared bewildered as to why this was happening. The police chief must take full responsibility for this action and if he had a inch of decency and respect for the public he would step down in shame. This is Canada people not China or North Korea. These people had a right to peacefully demonstrate and express their views and that was clearly trampled yesterday. To all of the people criticizing the demonstrators, if you were stopped for speeding and the officer kept you standing outside of your car cuffed in the rain for four hours what would you do?
Will / June 28, 2010 at 12:14 pm
user-pic
Jay's right. You didn't want to get caught, stay the hell out of trouble. Oh boo hoo when is it a crime to take a walk. It's not a crime by civil laws, it's a crime of stupidity though.
Stay home, stay out of angry drunk protesters' way if you don't want to get lumped in with them.
And most of all, stop whining like little bitches.
Marc / June 28, 2010 at 12:16 pm
user-pic
http://thestar.blogs.com/photoblog/

Look at those G20 photos, they're just so weird and almost unauthentic in a way.
mary / June 28, 2010 at 12:30 pm
user-pic
i love how everyone's got all the answers on how to control and detail a MOB. sure, i'm sure the police had all the time and resources in the world to invividually talk to EVERY PROTESTER and determine which were the troublemakers and which were not. how about using YOUR BRAIN? not being able to walk downtown for a weekend isn't some horrible burden you need to rail against.
mary / June 28, 2010 at 12:33 pm
user-pic
has it occurred to any of you that the black bloc tactics deployed inevitably always results in the same strong response by police, thereby getting the result that fits their agenda perfectly? one bad apple does spoil the whole bunch. get over it. the fact that no one was seriously hurt is a victory.
Really Mary? replying to a comment from mary / June 28, 2010 at 12:47 pm
user-pic
mary, since you are so intent on blaming the victims in this situation, i have to ask, albeit at the risk of offending everyone I know...

Does a woman in a short skirt deserve to be raped?
Does a black man walking through a white neighborhood deserve to be lynched?
Does a battered wife deserve to be beaten?

Because, a belief such as yours can't be adjusted to suit your purpose, depending on how you see fit......
Chris replying to a comment from Oscar / June 28, 2010 at 12:50 pm
user-pic
So much for freedom of assembly. I was shocked and angered by the sloppy job of police this weekend.

Saturday I witnessed police running from the mob and then Sunday they cracked down on peaceful protesters and people just watching.

As a Torontonian, I'm ashamed.
SF / June 28, 2010 at 12:51 pm
user-pic
While I support everyone's right to protest peacefully without being detained or arrested, I have very little sympathy for the gawkers and onlookers who decided to tag along with the protests and ended up running into trouble. Anyone with half a brain who DIDN'T have a political purpose in being at the protests stayed the hell north of bloor this weekend. For all the people milling around, taking photos and soaking in the protester vibes: what did you expect?
Chris replying to a comment from kn / June 28, 2010 at 12:52 pm
user-pic
I agree 100%.

Completely sloppy job. If one were suspicious in nature you could almost believe they allowed the mayhem on Saturday to happen.
Chris replying to a comment from SF / June 28, 2010 at 12:59 pm
user-pic
Are you joking? From what I observed people were walking in their neighborhood, people actually live on and around queen. The police response on Saturday was pathetic, followed by an obvious over reaction on Sunday evening. A non violent protest (which is allowed and should be celebrated), turned into an abuse of power and a mistake. Anyone with an ounce of common sense could see these people were not protesters, violent or requiring detention.

Again, I'm ashamed of their actions. Seems we have allowed the black bloc to win.
jesse ship / June 28, 2010 at 01:04 pm
user-pic
I was stuck in the midst of the blockade with hundreds of other onlookers, you can check out my first person report from the inside

http://news.aol.ca/ca/article/in-the-wrong-place-at-the-wrong-time-held-hostage-at-g20-protes/19533757
Max / June 28, 2010 at 01:06 pm
user-pic
That's it I warned you all....you are ALL under arrest....now ALL the people that are commenting on the protestors behalf MUST ALL turn yourselves in immediately to your closest police station
Dennis Marciniak / June 28, 2010 at 01:11 pm
user-pic
I was also in the security zone.

http://www.denmarblog.com/2010/06/inside-g20-detention-zone-queen-spadina.html

It sucked, but I knew what I was doing there.
Chris replying to a comment from jesse ship / June 28, 2010 at 01:16 pm
user-pic
I would suggest you contact a lawyer. What I saw last night was an unlawful police action.
SF replying to a comment from Chris / June 28, 2010 at 01:42 pm
user-pic
As I said, I fully support protesters' constitutional right to peacefully protest, and I think there are serious questions that need to be answered about the police response this weekend. But as a local, you would have had to have been a serious moron to take a leisurely stroll down Queen and Spadina on Sunday afternoon. I mean this from a practical perspective. I have friends who live on Queen West too, and they all either stayed home or went out of town for the weekend. When I hear about Western students who thought it would be fun to tag along with the protest, or photographers who wanted to "see what it was all about", they get no sympathy from me. After seeing images all day Saturday of protesters clashing with police and getting beaten and arrested, how anyone could think they could casually observe the protests without becoming involved is completely beyond me. It takes a special kind of idiot to do their grocery shopping in the middle of the biggest showing of police force in Canadian history.
lola kuzman replying to a comment from SF / June 28, 2010 at 01:48 pm
user-pic
ummm...well i didn't expect i would be arrested and detained barefoot for 8 hours for stopping to look for a few minutes.
Jay / June 28, 2010 at 02:00 pm
user-pic
Here's what I take from this whole weekend. Exhaustion. Unrest. New and scary problems most police in Toronto and the surrounding areas may have been trained for - but never in reality experienced.

I'm not a cop, but I am a person. I can't imagine how scary it would be to have thousands of people trying to break down a line of a bunch of cops. And to have such an important job for one weekend - don't let anything happen to a world leader. Man the perimeter and hopefully no one, politician or protester, gets killed.

Because as crazy as this sounds, what do you think would happen if something did befall a world leader? Do you think Japan could let it go? What about the US? No country would forgive Canada. I'm sorry wouldn't cut it.

No one was killed or seriously injured in what was most certainly a war zone at times - and Toronto wasn't even as intense as London 2009. Everyone did the best they could under EXTREME situations.

This isn't something that is black and white.



John Locke / June 28, 2010 at 02:12 pm
user-pic
Good to know that someone profited from this mess. The CBC recently reported that some RCMP officers were getting paid $100+ plus per hour this weekend, and many were working 15 + hour days. Out of town officers were also put up in nice hotels, all expenses paid. You do the math. For once in my life, I wouldn't mind being a cop. I realize that the situation was "tense", but if you are getting paid upwards of $1000 dollars a day, you can bloody well show some restraint and respect for the basic rights of everyday citizens - many of whom are not so lucky as to be rolling in that much cash,

In my mind, $1 billion taxpayer dollars spent on a summit where the G20 can agree to unilaterally cut spending to education, health care, research, and social services is reason enough to protest. Respect to everyone that was out there in the streets this weekend.
UWO / June 28, 2010 at 02:20 pm
user-pic
Ha - now people were detained "barefoot for 8 hours." In two days they will have been detained for 12 hours, naked in a snow storm.

I was down there in the midst of things, and nothing happened to me because I wasn't being an asshole. These people are pretending to be to be innocent bystanders going for dinner while the reality is that they are all activists - in fact many, including the young lady interviewed here, are trained in a pseudo-academic discipline called "Social Justice and Peace Studies," at King's University College, an affiliate of UWO. And they claim to be just going for a walk? Apparently one of this program's tactics is lying to make the police look bad.

The only other I learned from this is that our protesters are WEAK! You'd think Canadian protesters would be sorta tough or something - wrong. "They kept us outside - in the RAIN!"

Lame!
Chris replying to a comment from John Locke / June 28, 2010 at 02:27 pm
user-pic
The fact is, the police stopped the peaceful protests on Sunday and didn't stop the violence on Saturday.

People have the right to assemble and observe...those who are quick to throw away those rights for a little safety, don't deserve those rights in the first place. It's the principal...not the practicality.
Mandy Brown / June 28, 2010 at 03:03 pm
user-pic
There should be another peaceful protest on Canada Day. everyone bring there children and grand parents. A billion dollars wasted so balding middle aged white guys could play cops and robbers...ridiculous!
mary replying to a comment from Really Mary? / June 28, 2010 at 03:12 pm
user-pic
while no one can ever control what befalls them some of the time, the choices you make most definitely play a part in a given situation. i have no sympathy for stupid people who put themselves in stupid situations. who provoke and then cry wolf. security always trumps all other ideals you want to cling to. period.
disgusted / June 28, 2010 at 04:00 pm
user-pic
has anyone not even realized that if the cops really believed a dangerous, armed individual was at Queen&Spadina, what they actually did was put innocent people at risk by locking them in with someone who could cause those people harm?

I was defending the cops all week, until I saw what was going on at Queen&Spadina...talk about closing the barn door after the horse has gotten out...
Comply and Obey / June 28, 2010 at 06:07 pm
user-pic
If you don't believe in freedom of assembly freedom of speech and freedom of press anymore I am deeply sadden as a Canadian.
Fantomex replying to a comment from Jay / June 28, 2010 at 07:16 pm
user-pic
Typical pro-police ass-kissing from yet another idiot benumbed by the mainstream media. Were you there, Jay? Or do you like to just brown-nose authority all of the time?
Fantomex replying to a comment from UWO / June 28, 2010 at 07:18 pm
user-pic
Oh look, the fascist is opening their mouth and talking shit. How much ass have you kissed, UWO?
UWO / June 28, 2010 at 07:27 pm
user-pic
Fantomex: grammar buddy, GRAMMAR!

Ps wonderful, thoughtful and articulate response to what I said. I guess life is easier when you're stupid, can't spell and hate police for no reason. Enjoy your sad, angry, meaningless existence!
candie / June 29, 2010 at 12:03 am
user-pic
I was there.

Let me make this clear...those people were told to leave the area THREE times or something would happen.

They were given a whole HOUR to leave. If you can't use your brains within that timespan then maybe you should be in a mental hospital. There's no way anyone got "stuck" there. they were given AMPLE time to leave and parked their asses there and spat in the officers faces. Peaceful my rear.

Keep drowning in the media's lies. You all look like a bunch of sheep!
marlon replying to a comment from candie / June 29, 2010 at 09:19 am
user-pic
you are a liar candie.
Lara replying to a comment from Ameer / June 29, 2010 at 09:46 am
user-pic
Those photos were taken the day before.
kn / June 29, 2010 at 02:34 pm
user-pic
Candie, OWO. I was there all three days shooting a documentary. As with most of the media, I was there to simply document what was transpiring.

Regardless of whether or not you thought people's "rights" were trampled or not, the police looked like bumbling idiots and bullies all three days. They made no attempt to target the small group of hooligans who were intent on being violent. On the contrary, from day 1, the police seemed intent on taking a very heavy handed approach with all the protesters. I personally was shoved on three different occasions, completely unprovoked. The police should have shown a lot more respect and maybe they would have garnered more support from the people. Yes, the police need to respect the people. It's a two way street.

Holding a crowd of people out in a torrential downpour was completely unprofessional. It was quite obvious they had no plan, otherwise they would have sorted through the crowd looking for specific people to arrest. It doesn't take four hours to do that, especially when you had hundreds of officers on site. In the end, it was the complete lack of coordination and direction from above that was the biggest issue. Somebody should be losing their job and his last name starts with Blair.
GC replying to a comment from mary / June 29, 2010 at 02:49 pm
user-pic
That's a lot of commas!
Sonia replying to a comment from candie / June 29, 2010 at 04:02 pm
user-pic
You either weren't there or you're lying. Every single person who was there can corroborate that we were never given any warning. The only times we were told to "move" was when we were already surrounded. Even the journalists who were stuck with us were reporting that they were given absolutely no warning.
Sonia replying to a comment from mary / June 29, 2010 at 04:05 pm
user-pic
They arrested us one by one, asked us for our information, and searched us. So yes, actually, they were perfectly capable of sorting through who was violent and who wasn't. As a group, we were just sitting or standing there, it wasn't difficult to see that we didn't have any plans to be violent.
candie / June 29, 2010 at 04:13 pm
user-pic
I was there. I was in the front of the march. What did you think was going to happen when the riot squad showed up? Did you think they were going to escort you home.

The group was also welcomed to walk North on Spadina and chose not to. Instead they thought it would be better to watch a fool throw monopoly money and burn $5 dollar bills and scream "let us through". maybe next time you should spend less time chanting like a moron and more time listening to instructions.

I was there, in front, and didn't get arrested.

If you did...you're an idiot. Have you no brains? Or is it easier to blame your stupidity on the Police?
Sonia / June 29, 2010 at 05:11 pm
user-pic
I did nothing to deserve my arrest. You seem to be the only one who 'was there' that claims hearing instructions to leave, even journalists for CP24 reported not being given a chance to leave. You're making shit up. There's tons of video footage showing the police blocking us in, telling us to "exit," so we would turn around only to be blocked in by more police telling us to turn around and "exit." We were not physically allowed to exit, we were surrounded.

Setting all of this aside, we had every right to be there. If you think arresting people for standing around and chanting is constitutional, you're the fucking moron.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aohGLp00MmU

Watch the end of that video. The police funnel through the crowd and grab random, unsuspecting, completely innocent people, without giving them a chance to leave. To say anything else in the face of all the evidence is idiotic.
Marc / June 29, 2010 at 11:42 pm
user-pic
That situation is NOT Canada nor Canadian at all. It really looks more like some third-world country or some North Korea. It is so corrupt, unjust, uncivilized, barbaric and stupid. Those police members involved in this Queen/Spadina case should be found out and exploited, since this seems to be what they were aiming for. The videos of that should be sent to all immigrants or those hoping to immigrate here (tell them not to bother trying), as this is what happened.
M / June 30, 2010 at 01:49 am
user-pic
Not when your rights infringe upon the rights or safety of other people

The police are in a very complicated situation where they have to protect everyone from each other and themselves: themselves from protestors, peaceful protestors from violent ones, residents from protestors, G20 staff from protestors, city from protestors, but yes again, protestors from protestors. You don't think they choose to detain peaceful protestors just because they want to make a scene? Do you think that detaining violent protestors is any better/worse? They make their decisions based on the optimal amount of safety.

"Police attack peaceful protestors" is so bullshit, they were just detaining them with minimal force. The reason for the "secrecy" I would say is just to incite a little bit of fear and precaution to those who want to take violent action, to show them that something COULD happen to them and they won't always stand idly by watching you smash windows.

The objective of the police is to prevent a mass riot and needless destruction of the city while finding those who are readily about to do just that. They don't give a rat's ass about G20 or the protest, they are there for one reason and that is to maintain public peace. And there are lots of people in the city who are afraid of the protestors. And in my book if you're letting those vandals and plotters walk amongst you then you share the same fate as them.
Sigma / June 30, 2010 at 03:02 am
user-pic
In the wake of a number of tremedously insensitive comments, I'd just like to label the whole whack of you cowards.

Well, just the whole whack of you citizens who are more worried about those decoy cars (The police actually told the CBC they had left the cars there as 'decoys') and a couple of storefronts that are being completely bailed out by more of your tax dollars right now, than you are about your fellow citizens and their Charter rights.

Yes, the Black Blocs practice violent protest (Black Bloc is a *tactic*, not a group, you idiots! Of course they're not organized, they came out individually to engage in a TACTIC) . No, nobody is 'glossing over' that, it's just not central to what this issue is about, for Chrissake. When I write an article about Space Travel, I don't tend to discuss the monkeys more than the humans. It's not the effing point. I think you'll find that the vast majority of activists don't let those stupid kids bother them, because there's little to nothing they can do about them. When I catch one at it, I tend to tell him how stupid I think his idea of vandalism as radicalization is. I've been threatened by them more than once.

Who sanctions their behaviour? Well, clearly the police do, because they gave them a few storefronts and police cars to play with (and even helped them along by joining in, undercover, as Agents Provocateur), and then you cowards, who don't go to these things and obviously don't know SHIT about what happens at them, did just what your part of the Miami Model is; you came in here like a bunch of gutless 'useful idiots' and spewed your weak cowardly pablum all over the place.

Let me point something out to you: The anarchists, obnoxious as they are, smashed up some property. That is against the law, making them criminals who should be prosecuted to its full extent. In order not to be accused of 'glossing over,' you intellectual midgets, I will repeat it in caps: THEY ARE CRIMINALS AND SHOULD BE ARRESTED AND TRIED. Guess what? They arrested 900 people, and very, very few, if any, of the people they arrested were involved in any vandalism. The police DID NOT ARREST THEM. THEY STOOD BY AND WATCHED THEM, JOINING IN AS PROVOCATEURS, AND ABANDONED CARS AND STOREFRONTS TO THEM, and best of all, YOU BOUGHT IT.

Then, after spending a billion dollars of YOUR MONEY (when the UK had one of these in London last year and spent under 30 million), they bailed out the damaged property owners, as they had intended to all along. Not only are you moral cowards (because as long, I guess, as you aren't exercising your rights, you apparently don't need them), you're also the biggest bunch of gullible suckers I've ever seen.

So we've established that the Black Blocs, *criminals that they are*, didn't physically hurt *anyone*, but neither did they get held to account by the authorities you are actually giving a blank cheque for abuse to. Furthermore, we've established that there were about 150 of them, at the most (with probably 15 or 20 active at any time) in a crowd that may have been as large as SIXTY THOUSAND that was acting COMPLETELY PEACEFULLY.

The police, on the other hand, beat up a blind man and an old guy, punched reporters, hospitalized people, ran over somebody with a horse (hospitalizing her), violated the charter rights of thousands of Canadians, and sexually assaulted and verbally abused innocent people in a detention centre made up of DOG CAGES, all for an actual billion dollars of your own misappropriated money, DURING AN ECONOMIC CRISIS, to protect people who just further misappropriated billions of dollars of your own money, and sat calmly inside that cordon weaving canoe seats and eating chocolate paddles, taking pictures of each other with each other's wives.

I strongly suggest that you A: grow a pair of balls, and B: apply for a degree in Rocket Science, you cowards.
Sigma replying to a comment from M / June 30, 2010 at 03:20 am
user-pic
"Not when your rights infringe upon the rights or safety of other people"

Since when does exercising the right to peaceful assembly infringe on that of others?

I know you think this is a reasonable bit of writing, and you do have a point, but you're misapplying it in a big way. Personally, I try very hard not to ascribe to malice what I can more easily ascribe to incompetence (Ockham's Razor, and all that, you know), but that was a pretty clear case of entrapment, and I don't care how scared the police are, with their TWENTY THOUSAND heavily armoured, highly drilled people, making potentially a thousand dollars a day of my money to be there. Their job is to uphold the law, and our rights, and do do it without violating me. They are NOT ALLOWED to engage in mass arrests! It's against the law, and it's a violation of our charter rights.

They got more than twice the amount that any other security force has gotten for any other summit (they're usually done for about thirty million dollars), and they did it with thousands more men and women than almost anyone else uses (3000 is more than adequate), and they used a Public Order Policing model that has been known for years to be dangerously incendiary. It was irresponsible and wrong. I would say bungled, but it wasn't bungled, because it went the way they wanted it to, on top of all of that. Especially since here *you* are, like so many other people, with obviously good intentions, perfectly willing to let them walk all over the rights of thousands of Canadians, and fail do their job properly.

For a billion dollars, with twenty thousand people, they can hire the right people, do proper intelligence, arrest the guilty and not the innocent, and let the bulk of the march run itself out all over the city without breaking a sweat. I've seen other police forces do that for next to nothing. Please, you're well intentioned, and you have a point, but please apply it where it's valid.

To the guy who said something like 'don't listen to them they're all activists,' Umm. . . the right to peaceful assembly in the Charter is designed to defend *activists* against exactly what this video shows. That's why it's in there. To reiterate: this is why we have that right. Should we amend the charter to remove that right, or just ignore it? I say again, and again, MASS ARRESTS ARE ILLEGAL. THEY SIMPLY CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED under what is quite simply our nation's most basic, most important legal document, and it does not fucking MATTER whether you think they ought to have been there or not, or whether there may or may not have been someone with a brick somewhere in that crowd. It simply DOES NOT FUCKING MATTER. That is the nature of the Charter.

Maybe you don't want your right to freedom of assembly, but please, for God's sake if for no other reason, shut the hell up about mine; do me that favour. I'm not asking you to step in front of a rubber bullet (if you were willing to do that, we wouldn't be having this discussion, after al), I'm just asking you to understand how your rights work, and that if you don't exercise them, they actually do disappear.
Sigma replying to a comment from M / June 30, 2010 at 03:32 am
user-pic
"in my book if you're letting those vandals and plotters walk amongst you then you share the same fate as them."

Whoa, horsey. You walk around with criminals all around you and, if you're in a crowd in a city, 'among' you all the time. You don't know who they are. That's what police have to contend with every day. IT'S THEIR JOB to make that distinction. Much as you might think so, nothing changed the other day. The police are still required to arrest people who have committed crimes or that they have a reasonable, provable suspicion may imminently commit one. They don't have the liberty, ever, to apply what you just did. I don't care about your book, that's not how this country works. The police don't go around picking up groups of people and sifting them for criminals. I can at any time refuse to identify myself to them, refuse to allow them to search me, or even touch me, and I can refuse to answer their questions all I want. In fact, if I question them, they are required to answer certain things, and I AM NOT. That's how it works, unless they either possess a warrant, or can prove, afterward, in a court of law, that I was doing something dangerous and illegal. They're my servants, and yours, and they exist to protect us, and according to words EXPLICITLY written in the Charter, they are ESPECIALLY REQUIRED to protect us when we are exercising rights ensconced there.

Does that make it harder for them to do a difficult job? Yes. It makes it hard, but that's why it has to be written in the freaking Charter! Because violating fundamental rights does actually make it easier to catch crooks--the problem is, nobody wants to live like that (Except the bunch of you, apparently).
Sonia replying to a comment from Sigma / June 30, 2010 at 04:31 pm
user-pic
Really well said. It upsets me that people are blaming their fellow Canadians for a completely unlawful detention and arrest.
Mark Veil / June 30, 2010 at 07:47 pm
user-pic
Anyone who suppors arbitrary and illegal detention of innocent and peaceful citizens in this scenario is going to get what he or she is promoting --loss of all freedoms. You will end up with the same rights as livestock. It begins with depriving innocent people of medical care, washrooms, water, food and holding them in the pouring rain for hours. It will not stop there!

The G20 are merely puppets of the trillionnaires who actually rule covertly. They held the summit in Toronto so that they could flex some muscle. Their agenda is to wipe out the middle class and that includes millionnaires. Millionnaires are only middle class.

The fact is that these Bilderberg group rulers are working effectively to destroy anything that is protective of the individual: nationalism, family, religion, first world life. They promote anything that is destructive. Do an internet search and do not jump to the conclusion that all regimes care about those they rule.


How could our demographic shift under Trudeau have taken place if this were really a democracy. Would Canadians have chosen to stop having immigrants from Europe and instead favour those of the third world. The policy of welcoming masses of immigrants used to repressive regimes and poverty ruins nationalism and replaces our first world population with third world. If our rights and freedoms are eroded, these newcomers may not notice or care to take a stand. And, of course, we have a veritable tower of babble of languages so that people cannot understand what is going on, anyway and do not tend to participate as they might if they had mastery of our languages. I have nothing whatever against other cultures and races, but they will need to care about rights and freedoms and standard of living if we are to preserve these.

Fantomex replying to a comment from UWO / June 30, 2010 at 07:47 pm
user-pic
Enjoy <i>yours</i>, police ass kisser! You love this kind of thing, of course-but what else is new?
Fantomex replying to a comment from Sonia / June 30, 2010 at 07:57 pm
user-pic
People? <i>PEOPLE</i>? The 'people' who have been saying these things are <i>sheeple</i>, <i>not</i> people. People understand things, and try to think for themselves, like you, Sonia, and you, Sigma. The 'people' who made the comments they made don't deserve to be called people at all, but are what Sigma called them. and are what I've called them.
Cathy / July 2, 2010 at 02:42 am
user-pic
Honestly, I'm so sick of hearing people should have stayed out of the area! Since when is peaceful assembly illegal? The cops should have stayed at their fence!
Jean-Jacques / July 2, 2010 at 09:26 pm
user-pic
First off, no one should be deprived of their rights of mobility. All of the idiots who claim, one should've stayed home and blah blah blah, should shut it. Second, this was a spectacle on the part of the police and the government, a show of force, I.E. a tactic, meant to intimidate the crowd with the use of "terror". On that day, the protesters came face to face with an army detail of full body armoured personnel equipped with guns, tanks, cavalry and helicopters. Do you understand the breadth of such an undertaking on the part of our police forces vis a vis average joe six pack protesters? The police knew that their actions would be broadcast and that they'd wanted to become portrayed as a tough guy in the media. And to the idiot with a grade 8 level education, who'd made mention of the fact that Canada is such a great country and that we should stop whining... These are all signs of things to come. Third, some idiot made mention of the fact that the police had acted in accordance of law unless their actions be brought into question before a court of law. Its about time that the police stop touting the law they are sworn to defend. Why aren't they being punished? They are always testing the waters by bullying and abusing the rights of uneducated or frightened members of the electorate. No one wants a conviction, no one wants to splurge thousands on a lawyer. This is wherein lies their power.
LISA TRANG replying to a comment from Jay / July 3, 2010 at 01:49 pm
user-pic
I live at the intersection and was coming home from work.
Tom / July 4, 2010 at 04:19 pm
user-pic
Folks, what the police did at Queen & Spadina was to detain people without a warrant and without probable cause. The McGuinty law covered only activity around the fencing down at the conference site.

It was blatantly illegal, but do you really think anything anybody says here will result in any change? The police chief & the politicians have said they don't care on the issue and they intend to stonewall.

The only thing that will get results is if people detained illegally launch lawsuits. Once you have a lawsuit in place you can start subpoenaing police records and start deposing officers. Being hauled into court is the only thing that will get the police & politicians to pay attention.

Of course, that takes money, or needs pro-bono legal help, and the truism that justice is only for the wealthy comes to the fore.

But what about it? Any law students reading this- would you help out someone who was detained illegally?
Patrick / July 4, 2010 at 06:02 pm
user-pic
THIS IS WHAT A POLICE STATE LOOKS LIKE.

Those Black Bloc weren't random youth, they were police officers. Look up Montebello, they had their protest infiltrated by cops wearing dark clothes and inciting the crowd to violence.

Don't believe what the spin doc's are feeding you. Our rights our freedoms and our COUNTRY is at stake here.

Now is the time you must decide where your place is, on the sofa watching the tube or is it being proactive in teaching yourself and others the hidden truths.

One day you will find yourself bleeding on the street alone with angry cops around you and you will wonder how it came to this. Don't say I didn't tell you so.
Betty replying to a comment from Sigma / July 11, 2010 at 09:53 pm
user-pic
Sigma - you claim:
"The police, on the other hand, beat up a blind man and an old guy, punched reporters, hospitalized people, ran over somebody with a horse (hospitalizing her), violated the charter rights of thousands of Canadians, and sexually assaulted and verbally abused innocent people in a detention centre made up of DOG CAGES"
Do you have any names for these people - any posts by them - any uncut and complete videos of their abuse? If so please post that information.
"(The police actually told the CBC they had left the cars there as 'decoys')" - the CBC is a corporation - do you have the name of the person who received this information for the CBC?
Re the Black Clad Anarchists you say "Who sanctions their behaviour? Well, clearly the police do, because they gave them a few storefronts and police cars to play with (and even helped them along by joining in, undercover, as Agents Provocateur)
DID NOT ARREST THEM. THEY STOOD BY AND WATCHED THEM, JOINING IN AS PROVOCATEURS, AND ABANDONED CARS AND STOREFRONTS TO THEM"
Do you have any proof of this - maybe a storeowner who was given a nice bit of cash to have his front window broken. Maybe the sister of a cop who was actually dressed in black and doing violence? Anybody?
I am searching for people who were truly and purposefully hard done by through no fault or stupidity of their own.
If this is such a Police State I guess you will soon be locked up and sent to god knows where for how long? I think the cops could trace your email address pretty easily if they were so inclined? Frankly I am more worried about mini anarchists taking over our city than I am about the police taking over. I am not a big fan of the police but in this case I think they did a pretty good job. I couldn't have taken a lot of shit I watched them take. Now a lot more of my tax dollars will be spent investigating a group of people who wanted their 15 minutes of fame and another group who were to dumb to stay home and e-mail politicians which would have made a real difference. BTW do you pay taxes?
I take it all back if you can supply me with names and videos to prove me wrong.
Max / July 12, 2010 at 01:20 am
user-pic
Who the hell doesn't pay taxes???....hst just went up 8%, have you heard???....yeah everyone in Canada pays taxes so they can spend billions of dollars a day on events like G20....those people actually payed to be deprived of their constitutional rights....that was just one day....can you imagine how many more people a day have their rights depraved of them???....everyone seems to think that if the police say it's right then it must be right but that is completely false....if the police knew everything about law, there would be no such thing as courts or judges....the police are not the law....they only oversee the law....police lose in court every day....and police are constantly proven to go beyond the means that they are allowed to arrest people every day as well....police are needed but so are consequences to those that cannot properly do their jobs
GoAwayOfficerJay replying to a comment from Jay / July 13, 2010 at 12:01 pm
user-pic
The police had the north blocked too, who are you trying to fool, with these lies?
GoAwayOfficerJay replying to a comment from candie / July 13, 2010 at 12:07 pm
user-pic
You are a liar.
GoAwayOfficerJay replying to a comment from Jon / July 13, 2010 at 12:09 pm
user-pic
Telling stories about imaginary soldiers, then telling others to join the peace corps, while you sit in your moms basement on your 350 pound ass..... is cowardly at best.
KL / July 13, 2010 at 12:18 pm
user-pic
Never forget Queen and Spadina. It was like the Kent State Massacre. Bodies dropping dead everywhere, clearly at the hands of the man.
marlon replying to a comment from KL / July 13, 2010 at 02:49 pm
user-pic
great point KL! as long as there are people being murdered elsewhere we should all just shut up and enjoy what we have.
shawn replying to a comment from Jay / July 18, 2010 at 08:57 pm
user-pic
Jay,

you seem to think that because a fraction of a percentage of the protesters from the day before with extreme views that nobody else agrees with decided to be violent the day before that 1. law abiding citizens who care deeply about many issues that face our civilization should no longer have the right to express those views in a legal public demonstration 2. that the police no longer need to follow the constitution or the law and can detain anyone without a warrant of just cause 3. that the best way to catch a tiny group of people is to detain everyone in the are. i would hate to think of how you would want to deal with a shoplifter in a mall. Sorry shoppers but you're going to have to stand under the sprinklers for four hours until the shoplifters confess.

If our laws and those trained to enforce them can't stand the stress of a few petty vandals then we are in more trouble than I thought.
Paid shill / August 8, 2011 at 12:12 am
user-pic
A billion spent beating up innocent tax payers is stupid. The cops made a ton of tax payer cash on overtime. Yet even as their masters lined their pockets with borrowed money I knew they would have to wake up to reality a year later when contracts and budgets came up. Lack of fiscal responsibility = layoffs. Please enjoy responsibly. Thank-you.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal