City
Kyle Rae expresses concern over Gould Street demolition
After following the coverage of the Gould Street wall collapse on Friday, I decided to make way down to 335 Yonge Street to take a look at the state of the building for myself. I was fortunate (if you can call it that) to arrive just as construction crews were tearing down a large chunk of the building's façade, apparently for safety reasons.
Crews were smashing it with a large crane-like machine, and the old building looked like it was about to collapse entirely. A nearby police officer did, however, reassure me that it wouldn't and that only loose segments of the wall were in danger of falling.
There was a sizable crowd at Yonge, watching as large pieces of the building came crashing down to the street. The mood was that of calm curiosity, with a hint of excitement every time a large segment fell.
But Kyle Rae, city councillor for Ward 27, was not very happy as he watched the construction crew. "I would have preferred this being a more informed process," he told me.
"A heritage architect should have been onsite, with building plans...someone with far more knowledge than someone with a demolition machine."
"There's no perspective for preserving heritage among this group of people," he said, as he waved towards the crew.
Rae secured a heritage grant for the owner of the building three years ago to fix the building's façade, but he said that the owner never took it.
What's more surprising is that a building on one of our city's busiest streets could be in such bad shape. I never made point to look at it closely, but when I did today, I noticed how dilapidated it looked--maybe that should have raised an eyebrow somewhere.
It remains unclear what will happen to the building as crews work to address the threat it poses to public safety, but it's not tough to see Rae's point. Despite its state of disrepair, it'd be nice to see steps taken to preserve what remains of the historic facade.
Writing, photography and video by Tomasz Bugajski.


Discussion
28 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
We should not be jumping the gun here until the engineers have a chance to look over the site. Everyone is so quick to suspect foul play! Old buildings are, well, OLD! They were built to different specs and refurbishments don't always account for all the deficiencies. Let's just see how this plays out, and be happy that no one was hurt or killed, like when the Backstage Theatre was being torn down a few years back.....
It's more likely that the owners (a Mumbai-based company called Lalani Group) just don't give a shit about heritage considerations, and let the building be altered and abused until an accident like this was inevitable.
Hopefully the city can force Lalani to pony up to repair and restore this building, which will obviously cost a lot more now than if they'd just taken care of it all along. And hopefully this is a wake-up call for the future.
Quoting "Rae secured a heritage grant for the owner of the building three years ago to fix the building's façade, but he said that the owner never took it."
As far as this building the owner can do what he wants, when he wants including creating a parking lot or a condo to park your assets... Gee what a bunch of whining socialists!
======================
Address: 335 YONGE ST
Ward: 27
Status: Listed
List Date: Mar 15, 1974
Intention Date:
By-Law: N/A
Part IV Date:
Part V Date:
Heritage District: N/A
District Status: N/A
Heritage Easement Ag:
Registration Date:
Building Type: Residential
Architect/Builder:
Construction Yr.:
Details: William Reynolds Block, 1888, (including Empress Hotel) at Gould St. (SE) -adopted by City Council on March 15, 1974
Demolition Date:
Primary Address: 335 YONGE ST
=======================
So, it's got some kind of heritage status, whether you, or the owner, likes it or not. Better a whining socialist than a lying sleazebag...
This building is listed on the heritage property inventory, so I'm sure it won't be torn down completely. I can't see a condo being slapped up here either, I don't even think this block is zoned for residential. Hopefully the building owners are forced to completely restore it, as well as I hope to see this event setting a precedent for the rest of Yonge Street's rotting heritage properties.
Get excited Torontonians, for the time is near when the big bu77 comes along and squeezes out another blob of concrete beauty!
but judging from the pics above, I'm astonished this brick shithouse didn't collapse earlier
My understanding is that being "identified and listed" as a heritage property is not the same as actually being designated as a heritage site.
While many buildings are identified as having a historical significance, unless there is an agreement put in place it is not designated as such.
So the taxpayers did not pay for the maintenance and restoration of the property nor are they willing to.(nor should they in my mind but that is just my humble opinion)
Everything is for sale at the right price... even buildings with slightly damaged facades.
Therefore if they never put up they should shut up!
Meanwhile everywhere the city owned infrastructure is certainly crumbling...if public transit wasn't installed prior to this generation...we'd be walking!
We should not throw stones when we live in a glass house...
And look: we've been through this before with something with even *less* heritage status upon its moment of fate: the 7 Austin Terrace disfigurement-in-preparation-for-demolition-and-weaseling-out-of-heritage-status-in-the-books last year. All technical legality aside, the property owners wound up looking so low on the neighbourhood-ethics scale, the *province*--with a little prodding from the mayor--took action (and with a then-culture minister with an otherwise-record of leadfootedness on heritage issues, yet.
So, maybe this pointy-headed heritage business is a means of soaking internet-comment-troll taxpayers like David until they can't afford their beer and hookers anymore and have to R. Budd Dwyer themselves out of their misery--a kind of "reverse personal slumlording", if you will. Them's the breaks...