Tuesday, February 14, 2012Cloudy -1°C
City

Mayor David Miller announces higher than expected surplus and move to two year operating budget plan

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / March 10, 2010

mayor david millerDavid Miller announced this morning that the City of Toronto has a larger than expected revenue surplus for 2009 and is making moves to work with improved financial foresight by adopting a two-year operating budget plan going forward.

"I'm announcing today that the City of Toronto is taking the first step toward a two year budget plan," announced Miller, in what amounted to a rather over-hyped, anticlimactic press conference.

The city of Toronto is seeing an unexpected additional $100 million surplus for 2009 (via effective cost containment, the city's good investment performance, and strike savings), and as a result, we can expect some good things in 2010 and 2011 including lower taxes, no TTC fare increase, and no service cuts. The news comes not long after the recently announced 4% property tax increase, which will be apparently be reduced to 2.9% for residential and less than 1% for businesses.

Furthermore, Miller has expressed optimism that the province and city can continue to work towards a partnership that will provide better solutions to the chronic underfunding of the TTC (i.e. getting more from the provincial government).

Why create so much hype for something as mundane as budget strategy changes?

Kevin Sack, the City's direct of strategic communication was quoted as saying, "When we say something is important, it's not a word we take lightly." Despite the fact that this is, indeed, an important announcement, it's tough not to feel underwhelmed. The mysterious pre-annoucement yesterday, which instructed news agencies to arrive early to set up camera cables, had speculation at fever pitch leading into today's 9:30 a.m. press conference. Many thought that the advertised "importance" of the announcement hinted at the possibility that Miller would be announcing his entry into the mayoral race or that he might be stepping down before the end of his term.

This raises further questions: Is it possible that Miller is working on his legacy? Or perhaps he's auditioning for his next job, whatever that may be?

Update: March 10, 11:40 a.m

The City has just released a copy of Mayor Miller's full remarks, which are pasted below.

--

Thank you very much for attending today for this announcement.

I will be announcing today important plans for 2010 and 2011.

Building a great City takes commitment, partnership and sacrifice - from all of us.

It continues to be my privilege to bear witness to the great things that are achieved when all of these attributes come together.

As Mayor, I see the traits of commitment, partnership and sacrifice coming together everyday as collectively we work to build an even greater Toronto.

When I introduced the City budget in February, I said that you can't have a great city for free.

In fact, I said and I quote:

"This is important.

Anyone who tells you that they can freeze or cut your taxes and provide the vital services we all rely on, including:

• Helping the most vulnerable among us
• Public transit
• Emergency services
• Safe communities where crime continues to decline
• And protecting the environment

..is simply not telling you the whole story.

Helping people live a good quality of life - where local services are delivered effectively and at a reasonable cost - and building a safe city where there is opportunity for everyone is the role of local government.
The support we give to fund these services is what makes our communities strong and it's ultimately the hallmark of an inclusive and compassionate city." End of quote.

I know that Torontonians share that vision of a prosperous, liveable City where everyone has real opportunity, and they have supported the City - and me - in implementing that vision through two municipal elections and seven City budgets.

Those budgets are far more than just balance sheets.

They are the blueprint we use to implement the many programs and services that keep this City liveable, prosperous and provide opportunity for every single resident of this city.

We have achieved many great things over the past several years as Toronto's quality of life, our business environment and the actions we are taking to protect our natural environment continue to win accolades both here and globally.

As I said last month, our current budget must be set within the confines of the City's financial constraints.

Because, unlike federal and provincial governments, the City cannot run a deficit, even during a world-wide recession.

At the same time, the City must strive to meet the needs of Toronto's residents and businesses alike.

We face structural financial challenges - such as the need for a return to shared funding for the operation of the TTC - that need to be addressed for the City's long term financial stability. And I am pleased at the Premiers agreement to begin those discussions, ones that we at the City would like to resolve by December of this year.

In 2009 the City undertook a number of measures designed to improve our ability to afford to deliver the programmes Torontonians need and want, including wage constraint, prudent and efficient management, and restructuring debt, that produced an estimated surplus included in the proposed 2010 operating budget of $250 million. I want to thank City Manager Joe Pennachetti for his effective leadership and management for producing these results.

It is in this context that I am making today's announcement.

I am announcing today that the City of Toronto is taking the first step towards a two year operating budget plan. Due to prudent fiscal management, the City can have a balanced budget for 2011, and a tax increase this year lower than previously estimated without major cuts to services.

When the budget was announced almost a month ago, the preliminary estimate of our surplus was 250 million dollars. I am pleased to announce today that more accurate year end accounting only available now estimates the surplus to be over 100 million dollars higher. Details will be in the variance report before budget committee on Friday.

I have spoken with the Chair of the budget committee, Councillor Shelley Carroll, and have recommended to her, based on what we have heard from Torontonians, and on the principles of sensible financial planning, that the surplus be allocated to produce the following result:

1. Lower taxes by lowering the proposed tax increase to 2.9 per cent on residential property and less than one per cent on business;
2. Better services by using funds carefully to address concerns about user fees and service cuts where it can be done in a sustainable way;
3. A balanced 2011 budget by placing the remainder in a tax stabilization reserve that will allow for a balanced 2011 operating budget with no TTC fare increase, assuming of course a 3% tax increase in that year and the successful conclusion of the agreed upon negotiations with the Province regarding its long awaited re-assumption of the sharing of TTC operating costs.

These results will be achieved by placing about 75 per cent of the additional surplus in this reserve, with the remainder used in 2010.

I don't mind telling all of you that when I started as Mayor I wish there was a Property Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund with about $75 million in it and I am delighted that we may be able to do this for the next Council.

The result of this prudent and effective management is lower taxes, better services, and a balanced budget for the City of Toronto in 2011. Torontonians already have the lowest residential taxes in the GTA; today we are able to assure them that the lowest taxes, and unbeatable services, will continue in 2011.

Now, some of you may be asking about the surplus. While City spokesperson Kevin Sack will be available later today to respond to specific questions, I can say:

The growth in the surplus comes from several areas, including:

• cost containment measures implemented by the City Manager in 2009 to build a surplus that could be used to offset 2010 pressures
• wage constraint on management and front line staff
• higher than expected interest and investment earnings as a result of careful financial management during a very challenging time in world markets
• parking revenues which were higher than expected
• increases in supplementary taxes - those are revenues from new development
and new construction
• reduction in assessment appeals.

Others may say that the whole surplus should be used to provide services, and some will be say to use it all to avoid any tax increase. To all of these, I say, prudent responsibility is needed as neither of those strategies is sustainable. A great city is not built for free. Too much spending this year, or too little revenue, and the City will not be able to balance next years budget with no service cuts, no TTC fare increase, and no major tax increase as I have proposed today.

One final point: the surplus is traditionally used to pay into a capital reserve, not to, in effect; pay the provincial share of transit operating costs, and you will see this reflected in the staff report available later today.

Notwithstanding that we now have a somewhat larger surplus than first estimated it remains just as important to solve the City's structural operating budget challenge through a return of cost sharing with the province for the operation of the TTC. Everyone agrees that this continues to be one of the single largest budget issues facing the City - the one for which no amount of reductions in parks, forestry, recreation, road maintenance, homes for the aged or social services can ever overcome. In an ideal world, the City would not be using surpluses - which are not a permanent source of funding - to pay the Provincial share of the costs of one of the City's most critical services.

Our Budget Committee will meet on Friday this week to receive an update on the City's Long Term Fiscal Plan and I would invite the media and interested members of the public to attend the meeting to see first hand how we have been dealing with various budget issues and also hear about future proposals.

Thank you again for being here today and once again I want to thank the Chair and Members of Budget Committee and all of the City of Toronto public servants for their continued hard work in bringing forward a budget that protects our City this year and next and delivers the services on which we greatly rely.

--

Photo by motionblur, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

Discussion

36 Comments

John Bowman / March 10, 2010 at 10:21 am
user-pic
Sorry, _who_ created the hype? The media went nuts with speculation and acted disappointed when Miller didn't announce he was Iron Man or something.
MillerOut / March 10, 2010 at 10:22 am
user-pic
I was hoping for a resignation. Surprised I didn't see his lapdog Giambroni holding Millers crotch during the presser.
Mike / March 10, 2010 at 10:24 am
user-pic
This is important - doesn't it change the nature of the current mayoral campaign?
Jerrold / March 10, 2010 at 10:29 am
user-pic
Couldn't City Hall have announced yesterday that Miller would be making an important announcement <b>_about_the_city's_finances</b>?

They dangled a carrot, remained as vague as possible, and wouldn't respond to queries about the nature of the announcement. This all adds up to inevitable hype creation in the media and public, and in my opinion, it's unnecessary!
Adam / March 10, 2010 at 10:57 am
user-pic
It's kind of nice to see a sitting mayor make an announcement about government and not about politics.
Bruce Stewart / March 10, 2010 at 11:00 am
user-pic
Multi-year planning is important, although the type wasn't required surrounding this.

Still, something to hope for is that politicians eventually realize they don't have to use hype when they deal in reasonable substance.
valerieinto / March 10, 2010 at 11:02 am
user-pic
Jesus, the city finally has good news about its finances and therefore our taxes, etc., and all we can do is bitch about the tactics it took to get us to listen. Maybe we deserve the bad news we get.
Nexus / March 10, 2010 at 11:12 am
user-pic
Great.. now that Miller's gone and told everyone that we're running a surplus, the unions that control city hall will be sure to pony up to the bar to grab their share of the $$$; because, after all, we're running a surplus. . . .
Dave / March 10, 2010 at 11:15 am
user-pic
lotta hype - big disappointment
ST / March 10, 2010 at 11:22 am
user-pic
SEX?

OK, now that I have your attention...
strike / March 10, 2010 at 11:26 am
user-pic
it is good news for everyone.

But now i am sure we are gonna hear from TTC union how they now deserve higher wages and a strike is coming because the city can afford to pay them now.
jamesmallon / March 10, 2010 at 11:28 am
user-pic
Anyone who uses the corporatist catch-phrase 'going forward' should have their article deleted.
Jerrold / March 10, 2010 at 11:33 am
user-pic
Would you prefer "in the future," or "from here on," or "hence forth"? Jebus.
cocoa / March 10, 2010 at 11:41 am
user-pic
Should've spent it paying down debt. Who cares about an average of $20 less on everyone's property tax bill? The debt will cost more in the long run.
Joel M replying to a comment from Jerrold / March 10, 2010 at 11:52 am
user-pic
Hahha, who cares? He had the media in suspense for what...6 hours?

It is a big deal, people bitch to high hell over property taxes in this town...despite the fact that they are the lowest in the GTA.

I talked to my father in London Ontario, who said that a 4% property tax seemed reasonable, but on here you would have thought he finished the 4% announcement by skinning a puppy on city hall's steps.

Now there is a $100 million surplus and the hike has been cut by a further 1.1% and the big story is: "OUTRAGE OVER UNNECESSARY HYPE!"

If you think a $100 million surplus and cutting a property tax hike by over 1/4 is "unimportant" then we're really heading in the wrong direction with this city.

If he said "we've got a story about the budget" it would be buried somewhere on page 6. He wanted to have us talking about it, and it worked. You'll have to keep your imaginations in check next time.
Jerrold replying to a comment from Joel M / March 10, 2010 at 12:45 pm
user-pic
Not only did he have the media in suspense, he also had them sending their staff and equipment resources to City Hall for what amounted to a sham announcement. Had they, in the very least, done everyone the courtesy of providing the nature of the announcement in advance, media outlets would have been able to make more informed decisions about how to allocate said resources.

Mark Dowling replying to a comment from Jerrold / March 10, 2010 at 12:46 pm
user-pic
He probably wanted to keep pressure on Police Board who passed their budget yesterday. That said, he could have at least trailed the 2-year budgeting etc.

Lame duck announced long(er) range plan - something wrong with that picture.
J-rock / March 10, 2010 at 12:52 pm
user-pic
There hasn't been a lot of good news out of city hall lately, so this is very welcome. Still, a lot of it is likely due to strike savings, as mentioned above, and also the fact that there hasn't been a lot of snow this year, which will have left a lot in the snow removal budget.

The reaction to this announcement however, is pretty indicative of where we are right now as a city. Despite announcing a surplus, the VAST majority of the comments in various papers and blogs have been negative. It doesn't matter what Miller says or does anymore. He's a lame duck who has lost the support of seemingly everyone in this city. I'm no fan of the guy, but any announcement of a surplus from any politician, at any level, shouldn't generate such negativity - and people in Toronto should really take a look at what others in the surrounding suburbs pay in property taxes.
Mike W replying to a comment from jamesmallon / March 10, 2010 at 01:07 pm
user-pic
Literary snobs should have their comments deleted going forward.
randy / March 10, 2010 at 01:51 pm
user-pic
I find it strange that the city has been broke for so long and just as Pantalone is going to be running for mayor they "Find"
a $300 million surplus??? wonder where Miller and The Pants
stashed this until now??? and Pantalone saying that City Hall has been broken for years and we need someone like him with his 30 years of experience to tackle the problems at City Hall
Well what was he doing for the last 30 years if City Hall is so corrupt and broken now????
Brennan replying to a comment from Jerrold / March 10, 2010 at 02:06 pm
user-pic
Yeah, but the thing is that if you give the media too much information, sometimes they don't show up. Again, it IS an important announcement. I don't understand what's so underwhelming about this. I think a bunch of people just decided to speculate before the event. *Shrug*
Walter / March 10, 2010 at 02:07 pm
user-pic
"we can expect some good things in 2010 and 2011 including lower taxes, no TTC fare increase, and no service cuts"

Wait...my metropass went up in January 2010. Was I the only one?
m / March 10, 2010 at 02:35 pm
user-pic
I, for one, will be sad to see Miller go and would vote for him in a heartbeat if he decided to run again. I know I am not alone. He is an eloquent, intelligent, passionate and sophisticated politician who could have continued to spearhead our city into the 21st century and rid it of certain provincial and parochial attitudes.
handfed / March 10, 2010 at 02:56 pm
user-pic
WAIT! you're all missing the point! The real announcement is encoded in Miller's published remarks. Just look at the first characters of the bulleted items he cited: H P E S A. Think about it!
Spunky / March 10, 2010 at 03:17 pm
user-pic
I have expected this morning's announcement to consist of a curtain dramatically drawn back, with Miller on his knees feltching Giambrone.
jameson / March 10, 2010 at 03:49 pm
user-pic
The unemployment rate in Toronto is 10% and they managed to save $100 million bucks.

That's pretty remarkable, if you fail to see the success in that you need to get a clue and think for yourself. If you think the public good isn't a concern for yourself can you please move to Alberta.
jeff / March 10, 2010 at 04:34 pm
user-pic
This is a crock! Suddenly they 'find' a 100 million? Sure.

This is a set up for 2 items. First, protect Miller's legacy because, after all, that's the most pressing issue for city hall.

Second, sets up the possible re-entry of Caroll to the mayor's race because she has what it takes to handle the finances.

BTW this bit of magic is brought to you by Miller counting on several millions, hundreds of millions coming from the province. Of course if that doesn't materialize neither does this budget.

The type of clear, transparent discussion Miller has become famous for. Reminds me of when he announced the end of the strike and the 'elimination' of the sick bank!

realitycheck / March 10, 2010 at 06:19 pm
user-pic
Is this $100m surplus or found money (or whatever you want to call it) good news? Yes. But it's also bad news. How? Because coming less than a month after City's budget it highlights the Mayor's utter lack of credibility with respect to fiscal matters. Miller and his supporters can try as hard as they like to spin this as a straightforward good news story. But while the surplus itself is positive, the timing of this announcement (mere weeks after the budget) speaks to the Mayor's incompetence or manipulativeness or both. This is not the way that you maintain credibility with the senior levels or the electorate. I basically consider myself to be "progressive" and I do not look forward to Smitherman (or Rossi) becoming Mayor. But it's stunts like this that have made Miller (or anyone he is seen as endorsing) un-electable.
gadfly / March 10, 2010 at 06:24 pm
user-pic
This is a crock: with the $100+ million he's soaked license tags for, the raises in TTC fares, the property sales tax, etc. - $100 million? Good grief: it's akin to finding an extra toonie in your pocket while waiting in line at Tim Horton's, considering the size of the city's budget (not to mention deficit!)
It's amazing how starved people are for 'good news' that they will swallow anything. Now, Mr. Miller, what about the $350 million in road repairs the city is behind and don't forget about the lack of snow this winter - how much money did that save. Better hope we don't get a nice blizzard before May. There goes your savings.
<rolls eyes> Where's the stage hook? Someone get him off the stage.
hyburg / March 10, 2010 at 07:12 pm
user-pic
The addition of Kevin Sack, the city's Director of Communications, on the advisory should have indicated to media that the announcement was not about a Miller campaign.
EricM / March 10, 2010 at 09:47 pm
user-pic
Can't count up and count count down. What an incompetent buffoon.
Jenny P / March 10, 2010 at 09:49 pm
user-pic
Awesome, I save a total of $2.00 or less a month on my taxes. lol I feel like sending them a cheque for $12 and saying please do better.
John replying to a comment from m / March 10, 2010 at 10:21 pm
user-pic
HAHAHAHHA!
James / March 10, 2010 at 11:32 pm
user-pic
This is sick sick sick.
There was a surprise $33 million in savings due to the garbage strike...the city stole that money...there is the windfall from the new car registration tax..there is the new transfer tax...and then to claim that they couldn't budget for this...wasn't there a requirement for all mpac reviews to already be submitted? how could they not calculate what tax revenues were going to be?

and then he suggests it was a result of keeping wages in check?? didn't they 'council'all take raises last year??
and then suggesting that the surplus be reserved so that the province pays their fair share of the ttc shortfall?? perhaps the province would be inclined to help if it weren't for the ttc being so poorly managed. the ttc has not broken even since 1976. maybe if we weren't paying ttc drivers the equivalent of 100K plus (taking into consideration their lucrative pensions) the ttc might be in better shape...as would the city's finances. omg...then there was the ticket agent that made 125K for all the overtime he worked...talk about mismanagement...and it looks like he is about to retire...with 25 years of service he will have a 84K pension if he had 4 years of overtime like this. So here is a ticket taker making the equivalent of 200K per year in the private sector.
This city is completely mismanaged and this latest budget is just another prime example. A surplus and we still raise taxes...and mr. miller...our property taxes may be the lowest in the gta...but our city land transfer taxes...garbage taxes...license taxes remain the highest...oh wait..none of the other municipalities charge these additional cash grabs. the cost to live in the city of toronto is by far the most expensive!
LCBO / March 11, 2010 at 09:07 am
user-pic
Somebody at city hall finally took back the empties.
Randy / March 12, 2010 at 09:51 am
user-pic
Based on the photo of Mayor McCheese above, the expression "Shit-eating grin" comes to mind.

Correction: "CORRUPT shit-eating grin."

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal