City
Hockey Players vs. The City of Toronto
While it's tempting to dismiss the ongoing dispute over city ice rinks as a symptom of citywide midwinter cabin fever, there's a lot more going on beneath the complaint launched by the Leaside Girls Hockey Association against North Toronto Memorial Arena in December, alleging discrimination in their denied attempt to get ice time.
What was unusual up front was the obvious commitment the mayor demonstrated over the issue of equitable distribution of ice time, and the rapidness with which he urged council and city bureaucracy to move on finding a solution - one that would inevitably see city administration folding the running of the eight community-run rinks into the 40 they already oversee. For anyone with a skate on the ice, however, it was a scenario that galvanized them into action.
Mark Evans is a patron of the William H. Bolton Arena in the north Annex, one of the eight community run rinks affected by Miller's crusade. (The other seven, for the record, are Larry Grossman - aka Forest Hill Arena, Leaside Memorial, North Toronto Memorial, McCormick, Moss Park, Ted Reeves and George Bell.) Evans, a social networking and marketing consultant, helped start a petition and a Facebook page to organize Bolton regulars, in the hopes of influencing city policy.
"What we've got at Bill Bolton is a rink that's not regulation size, so it's a smaller rink," Evans tells me. "We have no parking apart from street parking - it lends itself to meeting the needs of the community, but it doesn't lend itself to the needs of people outside the community, who'd all have to drive in, and we don't have the infrastructure to serve their needs. And that's why we think Bolton works well, because it serves the needs of the community - most of us can walk to the rink."
The whole battle began with an article in the Star by sports writer Mary Ormsby, who neglected to disclose that her daughter played in the Leaside girls' league. Peter Kuitenbrouwer of the National Post devoted himself to the story for several weeks, while Ormsby's piece led to a cutting response by Christie Blatchford in the Globe & Mail, where Blatchford admitted her own conflicts of interest, prime among which was that her late father ran North Toronto Memorial for several years.
Blatchford also revealed that two of the mayor's top advisors had Leaside connections, and that one - senior economic advisor Nick Lewis - coached a team in the Leaside girls' league that had threatened a Human Rights Commission complaint. As Blatchford memorably noted, "Ice time properly is an unofficial Canadian right; convenient ice time is not."
Evans points out that the Leaside league could have found plenty of prime ice time if they'd been willing to travel to Scarborough, "where hockey is in decline because of the different demographic community there," though it doesn't take much to infer the spectre of class prerogatives coming into play when you ponder this scenario. He also stresses that the community-run rinks - many of which were built with donations - all turn a profit, and that they can allocate ice time to suit a community's needs more efficiently than a centralized bureaucracy.
Behind it all, Evans points out that there's a larger agenda at play, as the city is also intent on taking over open-air rinks like the one in Dufferin Grove Park, a hugely popular and successful program run by volunteers and a community organized by the formidable Jutta Mason. "If you talk to people from Dufferin Grove," Evans says, "they'll tell you that the city doesn't like the fact that they do skate rentals and serve hot food made by volunteers and have campfires, because those services aren't available at the other outdoor rinks and they don't think that's equitable." To make their point, they recently moved Dufferin Grove's rink manager to City Hall, where he was put in charge of the cleaning staff.
"It's one of these things where they've got bigger fish to fry, rather than trying to fix something that ain't broken," Evans tells me. "My contention is that with the community boards at the community rinks - they should try to extend them all. It's a better model."


Discussion
19 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Never mind that the rinks run by community boards are better, cleaner, and don't run the deficits of the city-run rinks. Miller doesn't care about providing better services, just lining unionized pockets.
I don't play ice hockey nor do I have kids who do, so I have no direct interest in the outcome of the ice time debate, but I damn sure have concerns about rinks that currently don't cost taxpayers a dime becoming run by bureacrats who currently lose a whack of money on all of the other rinks they manage. Not to mention, I have a hard time believing these same bureacrats would be any more effective at equitably managing ice time demands in those areas, where demand is probably the highest in the City, than the community boards who are currently doing so.
I read the proposal to have community involvement at TTC stations and wondered how that was going to work when City Staff seem determined to prevent community involvement elsewhere, which presumably in some quarters is considered outsourcing.
Interested citizens can ask their councillors (http://app.toronto.ca/im/council/councillors.jsp) to compel Parks/Rec staff to preserve community-run boards and to strengthen, not weaken, the relationships between local supervisors and the communities they serve.
Check it out here: http://wp.me/pIDFN-4O
If that's true, that's pretty pathetic. One rink is way awesomer than the average... so instead of following their lead and trying to improve other rinks too, the city declares it "not equitable" and tries to destroy it. Drag everyone down to the lowest common denominator. Dear god, this city is retarded.
But then girls should have their share of ice time.
- more privilege for the Leaside nouveau riche
- more power for city parks and rec czars
Everyone who reads this should go skating at Dufferin Grove this weekend, and ask themselves, "why can't I have this great community atmosphere in my neighbourhood?" You can! It takes a critical mass of volunteers and a city government that will celebrate your success, not attack it!
Besides, anyone who declares that the ice on Grenadier Pond is ALWAYS unsafe, irrespective of its actual thickness, should be reassigned to sweeping up after the Toronto Police Service's Mounted unit.
Daniel .......... Toronto
http://dandmb50.wordpress.com/
- North Toronto Memorial Gardens and Arena is an exceptionally well run facility that serves the North Toronto Community equitably and within the City's ice allocation guidelines.
- The North Toronto Skating Club and the North Toronto Hockey Association serve 2000 youth (boys and girls) with outstanding recreational programs through the allocation of approximately 54 hours of prime time ice weekly.
- North Toronto Arena is blessed with a half-century record of engaging a large community volunteer group, providing tens of thousands of hours to coaching and the organization of best-in-class recreational programs; the Arena Board and Boards of Hockey and Skating groups include male and female representatives who are very sensitive to issues of gender equality and equal opportunity.
- North Toronto Hockey has offered dedicated Girls House League programs on several occasions and continues to develop the offer; girls currently play on gender-integrated house league teams.
- The demand for additional ice time by the Leaside Girls Hockey Association is for competitive hockey programs, which are of secondary priority within the City's allocation policy.
- Leaside Girls competitive programs serve girls from across the City; there is no doubt that Girls deserve ice time and additional recreational and competitive opportunities; the Leaside Girls Hockey Association has done a very poor job (over decades) of identifying and lobbying for additional facilities; instead, they have focussed on tearing down the excellent community-based programs offered at other Arenas.
- the real issue is that Metropolitan Toronto deserves a stronger organization to organize and promote girls hockey programs(recreational and competitive); granted, additional facilities are required, but not to the detriment of existing, exceptional community programs. Leaside has lost the opportunity of leadership in this regard because of their insistence on playing small politics.