Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 22°C
City

60 Richmond Street East

Posted by Guest Contributor / February 27, 2010

60 Richmond Street EastIf you've driven or walked along Richmond Street East lately, you've probably noticed it: a strange grey and white cube. The building looks like it has been plonked here from Europe, or perhaps, crashed here from outer space.

The building is the 60 Richmond Street East Housing Co-operative, and it's one of the first purpose built co-operatives to be added to the city in years. It was originally planned to be standard low-income housing for 59 residents from Regent Park who were having their home demolished in the current revitalization, with an additional 26 units for other people who needed affordable rental housing. However, city councillor Pam McConnell encouraged the city to make it a co-operative.

60 RichmondAs a result, the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) partnered with the Co-operative Housing Federation of Toronto (CHFT). Since CHFT had planned to work with UNITE HERE local 75, a hospitality union, the decision was made to make the building a housing option for low income downtown hotel workers.

In 2006, TCHC chose Teeple Architects for the design of 60 Richmond after a standard RFP. The choice of Teeple was part of a concerted move by the development head of TCHC, Mark Guslits, to improve the architectural image of the corporation and the city as a whole. "We happen to have people here at the corporation who really, really like good architecture, so we just decided we would push architectural excellence."

The design Teeple produced for 60 Richmond won a 2007 Canadian Architecture Award of Excellence.

60 Richmond StreetAs well as being visually interesting, the design is environmentally forward-thinking: it was built to receive Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design's (LEED) Gold rating. The building will feature a large cistern to capture rainwater. The cistern will help irrigate the building's green roof and green walls. Food from the green roof, such as plants and herbs, will be used in what is planned to be a restaurant on the ground floor, and that will be staffed by some of the building's residents.

Still, 60 Richmond poses some questions. Can the building's complex ecosystem be maintained for years, or is it just a trendy design addition? How many former Regent Park residents will eventually move into the building? Some of the more unusual design elements also seem questionable. For example, one of the judges of the Canadian Architecture Award of Excellence pointed out that even the design drawings show that there is a "certain gloom at the lower, deeper levels of the internal courtyards and north facade where daylight only dimly penetrates."

60 Richmond TorontoNevertheless, the building is visually interesting, provides more affordable housing for the city, and is moving in the right direction for environmentally sustainability. All of these things are a lot more than many condo makers can boast.

Unfortunately, if you are a hospitality worker who was interested in living here, you are out of luck. The building does not currently have any vacancies.

Writing and photos by Matthew Harris

Discussion

5 Comments

Joel / February 27, 2010 at 02:11 pm
user-pic
I think we have to be careful here-- the buildings that comprised the original Regent Park were state-of-the-art modern design as well. While TCHC should be congratulated for striving for architectural excellence, they should also be careful to avoid the design elements that contributed to the failure of Regent Park I, i.e. wonky layouts and lots of dark places.
donna / February 27, 2010 at 02:20 pm
user-pic
I really like it, actually.
Robert R / February 27, 2010 at 02:30 pm
user-pic
I think this building looks fantastic. I appreciate the respect it gives to the historical building next door (visible in photo #3). The final product looks even better than the renderings visible on the Teeple Website http://www.teeplearch.com/ . I think what's most important about the project, is that it is proof that we don't need elaborate buildings for great architecture. The only thing I would change would be to add a foot or two of height to the ground level.
gadfly / February 27, 2010 at 11:16 pm
user-pic
I like it, except for the green glass along the bottom. I'm not to sure how well it will age, though.

I can't say much for the power lines and crap ruining the shot: is this Kiev in 1950 or a First World city in the 21st Century?
chephy replying to a comment from Joel / February 27, 2010 at 11:52 pm
user-pic
Unlike the isolated enclave of Regent Park, this building is right on a major street, which is a good thing. But then it's Richmond Street, which is a bit of a desert - that may be a bad thing. Let's hope that "low income downtown hotel workers" are not a bunch of criminals and troublemakers. At least the phrase "hotel workers" implies that they are employed.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal