Sunday, February 12, 2012Mostly Cloudy -7°C
City

Toronto's New Free Daily Hits The Streets

Posted by Tim / September 9, 2009

Tonight Papert.o.night, Toronto's new free afternoon daily, launched yesterday. The inaugural issue, 20 pages deep, featured the expected mix of local, national and international news, business, sports, events, gossip, sudoku and, on page 8, three stories contributed by blogTO. Our daily page of local news will be just one of the ways t.o.night is aiming to distinguish itself from competitors Metro and 24 Hours, the latter of which took the opportunity to unveil a new look of its own yesterday.

Tonight NewsiesThe big buzz leading up to the debut of t.o.night, aside from the questions about whether now is a great time to launch anything in print, was the strategy to distribute the paper using retro-branded "newsies". In a twist from convention, there are no t.o.night boxes littering our sidewalks, but instead a number of guys and girls with yellow t.o.night branded mail sacks handing out copies outside Union Station, the Eaton Centre and other transit and TTC hubs.

NewsiesWalking around the downtown core yesterday, I spotted them everywhere, some taking the time to explain to curious pedestrians what the paper was all about.

While not everyone took a copy, those who did seemed genuinely intrigued to check out whether the pages inside offered anything new and exciting to their commute home from work.

John CameronJohn Cameron, the young publisher of the paper, was handing out copies at the corner of Yonge and Front. Most passersby wouldn't have had a clue who the guy was that gave them their first issue, but perhaps connected the dots later when they found his mugshot (and welcome message) inside on page 3.

Have you picked up a copy of t.o.night yet? What do you think? Watch out for issue number two this afternoon. 100,000 copies are distributed daily between 3:30 and 6:30PM.

Tonight paperTonight paperTonight paper

Discussion

33 Comments

Ryan / September 9, 2009 at 10:18 am
user-pic
Were they around King station? at Union and Queen? lol
Ryan / September 9, 2009 at 10:19 am
user-pic
There should be an "or only" before the at
Tim / September 9, 2009 at 10:25 am
user-pic
Yeah. I saw some outside King St. station
Jacob / September 9, 2009 at 10:28 am
user-pic
I picked it up, and was disappointed with the quality of the layout. I hope they refine it a bit more, and take some better pictures, because it currently has the feel of a school newsletter.
Peter / September 9, 2009 at 10:37 am
user-pic
Uh, shouldn't a story like this on BlogTO at least acknowledge somewhere that BlogTO is itself a business partner of T.O.Night?!
Tim replying to a comment from Peter / September 9, 2009 at 10:43 am
user-pic
I'm not sure what you mean by "business partner", but we are a content partner and I mentioned this in the first paragraph.
Chris / September 9, 2009 at 10:57 am
user-pic
It still seems like a bit of a blowjob piece, and to refer to the "big buzz leading to the debut of T.O. Night" and then link to YOUR OWN STORY seems a little heavy-handed, if you ask me.
Tim replying to a comment from Chris / September 9, 2009 at 11:05 am
user-pic
Tonight has a link to press mentions on their web site:

http://tonightnewspaper.com/press.html
DS / September 9, 2009 at 11:15 am
user-pic
Maybe it's the mooon but the T.O.Night logo reminds me a lot of McDonald's old Mac Tonight campaign.
ddt / September 9, 2009 at 11:20 am
user-pic
Oh stop being such a bunch of pissers and looking for ways to shine a negative light on the efforts of others.....the paper's free for Christ's sake....Just read it and shut up, if you don't like it too bad....
Mr. Hate / September 9, 2009 at 11:21 am
user-pic
Dailies are garbage. A waste of paper. A simple ad revenue grab.

BOO-URNS.

"full-colour on coated, magazine paper"

DOUBLE BOO-URNS.
Greenie / September 9, 2009 at 11:22 am
user-pic
Yay!!! More crap to sit on/step on/slip on/trip over. Especially on the TTC! I'm all for newsPAPERS - but ppl could be a little more courteous by putting their garbage/recycling in the appropriate receptacles.
Mark / September 9, 2009 at 11:23 am
user-pic
Were 100,000 copies actually handed out, or was that how big the print run was? How many got recycled?
james / September 9, 2009 at 11:35 am
user-pic
With t.o.night claiming fresh coverage, I was disappointed to see the cover articles with either from AP or CP and the blogto pieces being summaries of articles I had already read during the day.

john / September 9, 2009 at 11:56 am
user-pic
The last thing the city needs is another analog source for reprinting CP, AP, Reuters, etc.

I'd be behind this paper if it actually employed some journalists.
JM / September 9, 2009 at 12:03 pm
user-pic
@ ddt... I agree that there are some negative people out there, but I agree with having the right to critically think, critically respond to objects, ideas and media that do not seem to be thought through.

Do we REALLY need another free daily? Is the news coverage REALLY that different from the rest? How many quickly designed, quickly produced, quickly thought out ideas will we have to put up with before people begin to realize that there is a such thing as QUALITY. No, 'magazine style paper and colour' doesn't mean quality.

How much money is being poured into the editors, producers, 'designers', PR, advertising, printing etc. Could this money have been used to achieve the same goals in a way that actually does something differently, rather then producing what's already out there, just a little 'different'?

Copying copies to achieve the same level of mediocrity.

Blah.




Jo replying to a comment from john / September 9, 2009 at 12:27 pm
user-pic
I completely agree on the actual EMPLOYMENT of journalists and not continually using them as 'portfolio builders', while the publisher & partners are the only people reaping in any sort of dollar. This new ezine represents everything wrong with our present-day economy.

So no, no thank you to your FREE 'paper'... I prefer to pay a buck or two knowing that its supplementing our economy in creating PAID employment of journalists.
Jason / September 9, 2009 at 01:25 pm
user-pic
Hobos rejoice, you now how more paper to wipe your ass with.
Roger / September 9, 2009 at 01:31 pm
user-pic
I'm not sure if the strategy of getting "newspaper boys" to hand out the paper is working. They look good there with their poorboy hats. But observing them for about half an hour yesterday in front of the Queen St. entrance to the subway, I noticed that only about 3 in 10 passersby at best actually took the paper when offered.

I thought they'd be shouting out the day's headlines? Maybe if they weren't so passive, people would take notice and come to them to check out what's new.
Desperately Seeking Transparency / September 9, 2009 at 01:52 pm
user-pic
This is great news for the writers and photographers at BlogTO! It means that they'll get more money for the content they produce, seeing as how their efforts are being republished (and BlogTO is getting paid for it). Right?

Right?

(Do I hear crickets?)
No Printciples / September 9, 2009 at 01:57 pm
user-pic
It's an embarrassing first issue. But more so, it's a tragedy because the rag completely forgoes the use of paid journalists, writing actually fresh content.

BlogTO does itself a disservice being in a "content-sharing" deal with this amateur insulting handout. Shame on you. But then again, BlogTO has always felt like a marketing vehicle with content fluff anyway.
S. / September 9, 2009 at 02:38 pm
user-pic
Why don't they have their own boxes? Budget, perhaps? The newsboy concept is cute, but I probably wouldn't take a free paper (or anything) if it was almost shoved in my face.
Crap / September 9, 2009 at 02:56 pm
user-pic
Another Dose of news we dont need.
Like people havent read the internet 5 of their 8 hours anyways.
To hell with "newspapers".
Riverdale / September 9, 2009 at 02:59 pm
user-pic
Where the hell were Archie, Jughead et al?
When handed it I thought it was a comic book.
jo replying to a comment from Crap / September 9, 2009 at 03:32 pm
user-pic
NOT to "hell with newspapers"! you're pretty much trying to disregard a whole sector of employment that's been around for ages. newspapers are a tangible form of art. if not art, then a tangible form of news. it seems nowadays that bloggers/ezines/online shit is drastically lacking in talented writing. when is the last time you compared newspaper writing, such as the globe & mail or new york times or macleans, to online writing?

just saying.
jack / September 9, 2009 at 03:38 pm
user-pic
don't we all get our news from blogto.com?
Phooey replying to a comment from jo / September 9, 2009 at 03:48 pm
user-pic
Its 2009. Not 1909. We want out news yesterday.
There is a reason all these dailies are going tits up.
I'll have my morning cup of coffee with milk and wifi please.
Ali / September 9, 2009 at 03:51 pm
user-pic
wow so much negativity! Ok I haven't seen the paper and won't get a chance for a while but keep in mind...a local company is breaking into this market, which is a great thing...and they're serving up local news that is fresh from new sources..must be better than the garbage metro and 24 print..I agree with DDT ON this one...
JM / September 9, 2009 at 03:59 pm
user-pic
It's def. 2009, but enjoying a newspaper doesn't mean we're living in the past.

I don't think the argument is print vs. online, it's the quality of either. I love opening up a copy of the NYT Sunday edition, being able to actually touch pages, seeing images and words, beyond a pixely glow. I also like being kept up to date and that's why I read online. Both have different aesthetics, pluses/minuses. It's when either is made cheaply, doesn't employ actual journalists, photographers, and designers/art directors, it's evident.

Denouncing this paper isn't a comment on the need to banish newspapers, its a comment on banishing a lack of creativity and awareness of the times that we live in.

choppery replying to a comment from Desperately Seeking Transparency / September 9, 2009 at 05:19 pm
user-pic
Hahahahahaha. Crickets indeed.
Christopher King / September 10, 2009 at 10:32 am
user-pic
I want one of those hats
Peter replying to a comment from jack / September 10, 2009 at 10:55 am
user-pic
Get news from BlogTO? I don't think I ever have. I've always run into a given news story elsewhere first. But that's okay, there can still be good articles here once in a while.
Lori / September 14, 2009 at 02:04 pm
user-pic
How come I haven't seen these anywhere? I was hoping they would have newsstands. I really want to read this paper.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal