City
Top Five Cycling Hazards in Toronto
With the recent cyclist tragedy, near Bloor and Avenue Road, burnt into the minds of Torontonians, the motorist vs. cyclist debate is on once again. Regardless of which side you may agree with, neither form of transportation will disappear from the streets of Toronto any time soon. Although the facts from Monday's incident aren't exactly clear just yet, the notion of safe biking in the cycling has definitely emerged.
Maintaining your bike is a no-brainer. The brakes, chain, gears, etc. should all be checked and in good working condition. Trust me, you don't want to find out you have no brakes going down a steep hill. Unfortunately, as a child, I learned the hard way. Once you've made sure your bicycle is road worthy, it's time to worry about urban utility biking.
Most people downtown aren't biking for recreation; they're biking with an objective in mind. Whether it's getting the groceries, or meeting a friend for coffee, the bike is simply another mode of transportation. As safe as someone's bike can be, the cyclist must always remember that there are other road hazards that can pose a threat. The following is a list of the top five bicycle hazards in our city.
5) Street Car Tracks
This danger varies depending on the width of your tires. Many cyclists that bike in Toronto for the first time usually aren't aware of this hidden danger. I've seen a few people get stuck in the tracks, some of which end up flying over their handlebars. It can be easily avoided - just remember to cross diagonally to avoid getting wedged in the
tracks.
4) Debris/ Pot Holes
Garbage on the road, and potholes can be a nightmare when commuting in tight situations. In fact during the garbage strike I avoided biking in busy areas because of the amounts garbage spilling over into bike lanes. You can usually avoid these
obstacles; just make sure you have enough space around you to do so.
3) Intersections
I think intersections are one of the largest reasons why motorists can be spiteful of bikers at times. Most close calls that I've seen take place here. As a cyclist, it is important to hold respect for road regulations. Cutting across red lights at intersections and not following turn restrictions put both the cyclist, and motorist in danger. When a car in front of you is signaling to turn right, and slows to stop, so should you.
2) The Infamous 'Door Prize'
It's fairly difficult to be vigilant and avoid this one. This occurs when a vehicle is parallel parked with the bike lane to the left of the car. As the cyclist approaches the car, the driver will open his/her door into the bike lane before the biker can react. I've had a few close calls myself - the only thing you can really do is to watch for brake lights of parked cars and be ready to react at any moment.
1) Traffic
Any road traffic can pose a risk in numerous amounts of ways. Being aware of the vehicles and other cyclists around you is the best way to avoid accidents. Personally, I like to avoid traffic when I can, but will always deal with it at one point and another. Being decisive and having respect for other commuters is the key to a safe commute while in traffic.
Being a utility cyclist and motorist myself, I have a good idea of the dangers for both modes of transportation. Keeping a safe distance and being aware of your surroundings are some of the easiest ways to avoid accidents. Experience also plays an important role. An inexperienced biker shouldn't test their first commute on congested streets. If commuters on both ends become more aware Toronto will surely reduce the amount of bicycle related incidents on its roads.
Images by Mike Manalang, Sam Javanrouh, & tomms.


Discussion
94 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Also the better door prize strategy, is watching to see if you can see a person in the driver's seat in the side view mirror, if you watched just for brake lights you would still get dinged by someone who has shut off the car and is getting out, which is most often when you get door prized.
If you've seen incidents specifically being caused by fixed gears, please share - I'm not trying to contradict you, I just haven't heard of any so I'm interested to know about them before I decide if I want to flip my single speed to fixed.
Pedestrians, for the most part aren't an obstacle to cycling, but there are some that seem to see right through cyclists, looking for cars but not us. Jaywalking isn't illegal, and I don't think it ever should be made so, but crossing outside of crosswalks means you have to look out for everyone... or feel the wrath of my bell!
And taxis, with their constant u-turns (I'd never call those a 3-point turn), unpredictable right hooks, passenger drop offs in the middle of the road, vulturing along curbs for possible fares and pressure tactics at intersections all add up to one big danger. Many cabbies are respectful... but I'm keeping my third eye on you whenever you're near me!
Stop turning this into a cause for more bike lanes. Why aren't you talking about the homeless problem in this city, he did after all beat one up. Or maybe alcoholism, because its clear the guy has a serious case of it.
Darcy Sheppard was a criminal thug who was a fugitive from alberta. Our justice system needs to be fixed, so society can be protected from these low life scumbags.
I have been riding fixed/brakeless for 2 years, 8 hours a day mon-fri in all weather conditions. It's my job.
There are idiots moving around on all modes of transportation. Freewheeling, fixed, brakeless or licensed to drive cars, trucks and busses.
There's a guy I've seen on a freewheel with no brakes. I think he just wills his bike to a stop or flinstones it when no body is looking.
The only way to do it is to slow traffic down while there is only one tight lane so that no one can pass you. As soon as it opens up again to a double lane, every frustrated idiot behind you opens the turbo charger up and swishes by your left arm. Frightening.
Oh, and I think service vehicles, movie shoots, stopped cars and recently joggers (WTF?) in bike lanes is another one.
Job Listing: "fixed-gear cyclist wanted. mon-fri; commensurate salary, + benefits"
ha. sweet gig.
* Wear a helmet.
* Stop at a red light.
* Don't speed up and try and swerve in front of a car that is turning right. Pass him on his left or wait.
* Use your bell AND SIGNAL!
* Don't talk on your cell phone.
OTHER cyclists are one of my greatest hazards on the road. At least cars are predictable in their potential to do strange things so I'm always riding on the defense but cyclists are supposed to be on my side! They are worse than cars with their antics, aggressive behaviour and entitlement on the road or on the side walk.
On bike paths it would do pedestrians well to stay in their marked walk ways and know that a bell means: move over and clear some way for a bike to pass rather than walking five abroad NOT stop and turn around and stare blankly.
Crossing legally at a crosswalk should not become a chance to be hit by a bike. Cars are almost always courteous here, so why can't cyclists? Please watch out for pedestrians at all times and just follow as many of the rules as a car would. That's all I ask.
But lets get real for a second - just like drivers there are people that shouldn't be on bicycles, at least not on city roads.
Car traffic is something you deal with in the city, but terrible cyclists are quite hazardous!
1) Don't ride in the door-zone.
That's it. You'll never be doored if you don't ride where the doors are. Take some more space for yourself and save your life.
I realize this is a bit harder to do in some situation, such as when there are shitty narrow bike lanes right in the door-zone. Make sure you ride on the left side of those door-zone bike lanes, if there's room to do it without being doored. It's it's too narrow, ride outside the bike lane.
A trickier situation is when there's a row of parked cars to the right, and streetcar tracks to the left. Ride as far left as possible. If you're still within dooring range, ride VERY slowly, or carefully cross into the middle of the lane with the streetcar track. You might get honked at, but hey, it's better than being doored.
GOING THE WRONG WAY ON A ONE WAY
Driving up Clinton St. last night I passed no less than a dozen cyclists riding southbound. Some of them were even riding on my left, directly in the way of incoming traffic.
One girl, ironically wearing a helmet and coming the wrong way at an intersection nearly crashed right into me as I turned left.
Motorists may get distracted at times, but some cyclists are just bloody clueless.
Zing.
What is UP with joggers in the bike lanes??? Is this a new thing? I ride uphill on Poplar Plains to go home every day and there are idiot joggers doing hill training in my lane!! They get pissy when you try and tell them they shouldn't be there too.
I believe we need SEPARATE bike lanes in Toronto - like in Montreal and major European cities - that provide us safety from motor vehicles. And I wish major media outlets would stop villanizing bikers for trying to get around in an eco-friendly, class-defiant and healthy manner.
I also agree with Duncan - my life has been threatened many times by cabs trying to get the next fare. Those guys can be extremely dangerous.
BTW, cyclists pay taxes too.
Sounds like someone has an issue with immgration now too.
Geez...you bikers just love to complain.
Toronto has some terrible cyclists compared to Europe. I hate to sound like a granny about this but a bit of public education re. safe and reponsible cycling habits wouldn't hurt. Motorists need some education about the rights of cyclists too.
> hazard to themselves.
This is illegal in California, and should be everywhere. I have worn an iPod while motorcycling, but my bike was so annoyingly loud that combined with the wind noise you couldn't hear a damn thing over 60km/h anyway. Lame excuse I suppose, but nonetheless...
I wish I had a bumper sticker that said this. Just the other day I was turning right into a parking lot. I signaled, braked, checked my blind spot, started turning, and slammed on the brakes as a cyclist flew through the tiny gap still remaining. He's really lucky I saw him on time, or he would have been creamed. WTF? It's not like it was a last minute turn or that I didn't signal. Sigh.
Many cab drivers are aggressive drivers (read as making sudden u-turns on busy streets, speeding past stopped streetcars and erratic driving) due to the fact the make their livelihood picking up fares.
This means stopping at red lights and at least slowing down at stop signs.
This means riding on the right side of the road (I can't believe how many people I see riding on the left).
This means approaching a left turn from the left lane.
This means not going on/off the sidewalk.
This means not trying to jump ahead by passing stopped cars on the right.
This doesn't eliminate the problem of a lot of bad car drivers, but it at least helps if bikes behave predictably.
Bikers and drivers both want to whine about it.
So be it. All bets are off. Dont follow safety rules, etiquette, etc.
Lets see how long till our streets are piled 10 high with bloody biker carcass.
That will make bikers think twice everytime they mount their two wheelers.
If a driver hits you and you bounce it's a very different charge, morally and legally, then if you die of a head wound.
Also, it's pretty Two faced to demand that motorists care so much about your safety, if you clearly don't.
I'm a cyclist and pedestrian, I don't drive. And frankly, my biggest concern is other cyclists.
Just the other day my daughter and I were walking through a cross walk, and were just about creamed by a cyclist ignoring the fact that all the cars are stopped, and the lights are flashing, and darting out from behind a truck. He missed my 5 year old by less than an Inch, and flashed us the finger when I yelled "Hey, Buddy, watch it!"
Your ignorance is pathetic. I'll leave it at that.
I understand the complaint about a team of them running down the street (or up the hill or whatever) but I can't imagine that happens all that often.
Downtown dwellers don't have a lot of options for cycling or running for fitness/pleasure. It's easier on the body to run on ashphalt than on concrete and there are fewer pedestrians, poles, mailboxes etc to avoid.
I do run on the road but on less busy streets at off hours - and even if I am running to the waterfront, the other option is to run on pedestrian-busy sidewalks. It just always isn't possible to get to a park to run.
Ha, so true, I think the police should be prepared with garbage bags for scooping up their horse poop.
Motorcyclists are required to wear helmets and it's appropriate to require them on cyclists as well.
You only have to crash test your skull once to change your mind forever. Trust me on that one: I speak from personal experience.
What a stupid argument. Do you smoke? Drink alcohol? Jaywalk? Speed?
I guarantee you do things that I think are stupid and may result in my tax money paying for your medical bills.
We all make stupid and dangerous choices, and shouldn't care about what others are doing that don't affect us.
If there are no bicycle lanes, then the curb lane (the entire curb lane) can be used by bicycles, since they are also vehicles.
Also, I LOATHE bike couriers. At best they are un-conscientious, at worst they are total a**hole road warriors, weaving in and out of traffic and cutting people off at a VERY fast clip.. they make all cyclists look bad.
.. I'm not siding against Michael Bryant just yet.
The biggest risk for central Toronto are: 1) dooring, 2) motorists overtaking, 3) intersections. I'm getting these facts from the City of Toronto website: http://www.toronto.ca/transportation/publications/bicycle_motor-vehicle/index.htm
I think that makes perfect sense: there are a lot more motorists out there, a lot of pedestrians and plenty of intersections with heavy, steel boxes speeding through. You're bound to have some close calls eventually.
Source: http://www.toronto.ca/transportation/publications/brochures/2008_ped.pdf
And the rest of us subsidize drivers by paying more in health care for all the pollution they cause. Source: http://ibiketo.ca/guide/who-pays-roads
As a consequence of her hospitalization and treatment, she won't be able to work for a while, and thus earn any income. The cyclist had no insurance, nor the funds to compensate her.
Hit me with a car.
As for cyclists, please learn to signal, both when turning and stopping. Especially during rush hour and we're all riding single file in the bike lane. I really don't want to hit you when you abruptly break to pop into a store.
@Jennifer - Sorry to break the news, that hill's a designated Running Room hill training spot. I agree, no running in bike lanes - except in the winter, when the sidewalk's not ploughed. (And please, runners - wear lights.)
I've seen it happen a few times, but have been lucky enough to avoid the catastrophe myself.
Being somewhere between the car and the bicycle, I think the perspective I have gained on the issue is that we all need to slow our lives down and look out for each other.
I still feel a little mad when seeing people riding without lights during night, but I believe if we do the right things more enough, others will notice and learn, as well.
If you chose to not wear a helmet I suggest we leave your body there and let your parents/loved ones come scoop you up.
That's just flat out ignorant of both Emergency Services and the people around that my have to deal with such a gruesome accident.
Have some basic human respect beyond the selfish.
You mean us as a society right? The "us" that care about other people? The "us" that put certain rules in place since it seems that some members of society are too stupid (or stylish) to take care of themselves?
The "us" that have seen friends badly hurt as a result of their vanity and other friends who's lives have been saved as a result of the use of a helmet.
Chris Murphy. The lead singer of the band Sloan was hit by a car and rammed headfirst into the back of parked vehicle. I'm sure his daughter is happy that he was wearing a helmet at the time. I'm sure all his friends around that held his hand until the ambulance came felt exactly the same way.
Why argue against something so simple that can save lives? Shame on you.
he also wasnt on a crime spree as you said (like you have a clue anyways) it started when his gf and him brokeup and he moved out, he was taken off the lease at her house, the night he died he had returned after a few drinks she let him in to sleep it off but when the landlord caught wind of it he called the police. because darcy wasnt on the lease he was concidered a squater and made to leave against his gf wishes. as for this attack on a homeless man i dunno, its news to me. you mustve been there... like i said he had NO criminal record, not even a traffic ticket. that being said its hard enough losing a friend, it only makes it tougher to read comments with no supporting evidence that just run our friend through the mud.
ps i wonder what your opinion of Al would be if he had hired a public relations firm hours after the accident
and if it was the bikes fault s/he would have gotten a ticket witch is a sure thing.. just so you know. I hope she feels better
The my father-in-law smokes, and has already had such an operation (circulatory related) both annoys me and motivates me further. I think he's being an idiot, and I don't see why I have to pay for his future healthcare when he's not taking basic fundamental care of himself.
Similarly, I think if cyclists are injured while not wearing a helmet the public healthcare system shouldn't fund care. If the driver is found responsible, the driver's liability insurance can fund the costs of the cyclist's care.
Oh, by the way...I'm a bleeding heart liberal who can recite the Charter of Rights at you if you'd like. Civilized society is full of compromises, and spending $50 on a helmet to protect your skull is one I'm willing to think people should be compelled into. Why should cyclists be treated fundamentally differently than those other two wheeled vehicles: motorcycles? There are differences in the TYPE of helmet, but there's little doubt that helmets save lives on both.
As for door prizes, your supposed to report it to the cops and that driver lose 2 demerit points and a $110 fine for interfering with a cyclists movements by carelessly opening your car door.
As for bells... I can't seem to bring myself to attach one. And the horns, they just sound weird. I'm not a clown!
I DO see the reason for them and can say that I have had some times where I could use one but anytime I want to use one I end up yelling at the driver who cut me off, nearly clipped me, or the pedestrian who walks out between two parked cars. The bell is to happy of a sound. If i'm making noise it should be a more agressive sound.
That, or if everyone rode around with a bullhorn ...
http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/pubs/cycling-guide/section5.0.shtml
Try using a whistle if you don't like bells. I use both: when I'm in heavy traffic I'll use the whistle - a good sharp blast on that gets far more attention than the 'ding-ding' ever does!
http://www.amazon.com/Delta-Airzound-Bike-Horn/dp/B000ACAMJC
up to 115 decibels! (volume is adjustable.)
Seriously, why is the bicycle the only vehicle sold without the mandatory safety accoutrements? You buy a car, a motorcycle, an ATV - they all come with standard safety items according to the law. A bike also requires items like a bell, lights, reflectors - and yet it's up to the rider to purchase and use them.
http://www.copenhagenize.com/
I also agree that horse dung is a hazard.
2. Turns. For turning right, both cars and bikes should be over to the right and signalling. Cars should not be turning right from the middle/car lane just because they don't know that the dotted line marking off the car lane from the bike lane means it's "shared." It's shared because people may want to turn. For turning left off a one-way street: same business - turn left from the left of the street, not from the centre. Duh.
3. Happy to see that this comment section has beneficial effects and that Eric will be considerate enough of his mother to get a helmet. Way to go, man!
4. Bells. It might be true that bells are of little effect on busy, noisy traffic streets. They are useful, however, on bike trails in parks when other cyclists are dawdling and day-dreaming in the centre of the trail and one wants to pass them safely. They are also useful when toddlers are wandering around bike trails, unwatched by their loving parents. I'm watching for them, and I ding, and then we're all safe.
5. Supposedly the "Rules of the Road" apply to bikes and cars. How come, then, it is not illegal to bicycle drunk? And I hear that the no hand-held cellphone law, coming soon, will not apply to bikes. If not, why not? Why are the rules said to be the same but yet are different?
because bikes are not 3,000 pound cars moving at 50kph and they are not pedestrians. They are something distinct and different from both and therefore deserve to be taken seriously enough to warrant a third set of road rules. human powered vehicles. reasonable rules of course, that work for everyone. but the simple fact is BIKES ARE NOT GODDAMN CARS.
http://www.copenhagenize.com/2009/08/walking-helmet-is-good-helmet.html
I don't know about "most" motorists, but like Pixie, I've certainly been honked at for following the very rules that motorists love to tell cyclists to follow. Cyclists are often in a Catch-22. Break a rule and get honked at--or follow the rule and get honked at. I've certainly been honked at for turning left in the manner of a car. Some motorists seem to resent the fact that it takes a few miliseconds longer for a cyclist to start up from a dead stop.
But the situation is worst when I want to go straight through an intersection but the bike lane suddenly gives way to right-turning motorists. On one hand, if I try to inch by on the right (not zooming through, but acting like a pedestrian and going no faster than the average motorized wheelchair), I'm breaking the rule but staying safe. Still, it annoys a lot of motorists and pedestrians, and I can understand that. On the other hand, when I take my life in my hands and go around the left of the turning cars, signaling all the while, I've often been honked at by cars in next lane of traffic. So what should we do? Just wait behind every single car that turns right? That makes bicycle commuting prohibitively inefficient. It's a bind.
Social scientists have recognized that Internet-facilitated communications (with a near-instantaneous speed that almost discourages thoughtful consideration) have slowly eroded the quality of human interactions. The word they use to describe this: cyber-disinhibition. Add the veil of anonymity given by screen names, and it's easy to see how the vast unmoderated swaths of the Net have turned into the lawless Old West.
I see a lot of that same attitude on the streets, so maybe we can call it "cycke-disinhibition" -- everyone's so caught up in their little bubble (all of us) that we can't seem to grasp that everybody just wants to get to their destination in one piece with a minimum of fuss. Maybe if we stopped treating the highway like the information superhighway, we may actually find we get along.
As to going the wrong way on a one way street, you are endageringing pedestrians who will not always anticipate your law-breaking and you are endangering yourself as drivers will not always anticipate your law-breaking.
ringing a bell will wake up daydreaming pedestrians. the truth is there are many places in this city where it is completely absurd to go all the way around to a point where you can approach according to car-laws. as for cars, do they really need to hug the sidewalk? bikes are pretty small.
http://www.wheels.ca/articlecategory/columns/article/781736
It's a no brainer. I purchased mine at www.safetybikesignals.com
"Woman, 56, dies after being struck by bike on sidewalk"
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/678179
I don't mean to defend cycling on the sidewalk. They're for pedestrians who have the right to feel safe in spaces allotted to them. Cyclists, for the most part, have no safe place allotted to them, which is a large part of the problem but two wrongs don't make a right.
Nonetheless, as someone mentioned above, bikes are not the same as cars, and are a lot less likely to seriously injure or kill a pedestrian. Comparing them is fine, but equating them is silly.
http://www.vimeo.com/4964539
Is this called safe riding? Then I may as well chose another city to live in.