City
Human Train Wants to Electrify City Rail Plan
Keith Brooks is at pains to explain that the Clean Train Coalition is not trying to stop the planned expansion of mass transit through the west end rail lines known as the Georgetown corridor. "We're all supporters of public transit," he says. "We're the clean train coalition, not the no train coalition."
The message that the group is hoping to hammer home at the walking demonstration being held tomorrow is that there's probably a better way of seeing Metrolinx, the new GTA transit authority, double or even quadruple the frequency of GO trains along the route, and that's with electric trains, not diesel.
"Based on a study - I don't remember if it was Metrolinx or GO - done on the Lakeshore line, they said that the cost of electrifying is considerable, but in ten years they'll have recouped the cost, based on the wear and tear on the trains and the lines, and on the cost of fuel, because electric trains are more efficient. That's based on ten years. Metrolinx' big plan is a 25-year plan. They should invest in the right thing up front."
The "Human Train" protest will kick off early tomorrow morning in Weston, and make "whistle stops" at the neighbourhoods adjacent to the Georgetown corridor, with musical performances and speakers at every stop. Politically, the coalition's star guest isn't performers like Andrew Cash or Oh Susanna, or speakers like councilor Gord Perks or MP Olivia Chow, but Dr. David McKeown, the city's Medical Officer of Health.
This week, Metrolinx released a statement saying that Dr. McKeown had "revised his opinion on the Metrolinx study of the Georgetown South Service Expansion and Union-Pearson Rail Link project," and that "additional technical information" had convinced him that his earlier concerns about the health effects of the diesel traffic were overstated. McKeown's appearance at the Human Train rally suggests otherwise, but James O'Mara, Executive Lead, Environmental Planning and Policy for Metrolinx, said in an e-mail that he "would not want to speculate on what Dr. McKeon will have to say at the event."
In answer to the coalition's insistence that electrification of the Georgetown line is the only way to assure that no one living nearby will suffer possible adverse health effects like leukemia or asthma, O'Mara said that the corridor "cannot be electrified without a proper plan in place. Metrolinx is in the process of developing a Terms of Reference to study options to conventional train technology, such as electrification, as well as other fuel technologies for the entire GO Transit rail network."
With an Oct. 4 deadline looming for a Ministry of the Environment approval of Metrolinx' plan, Brooks is at a loss to say what the coalition will do if it's approved without conditions. "If they don't listen to us, I'm not sure who we have to go to."


Discussion
26 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Electrification would actually be worse for the environment without massive increase in Ontario's nuke fleet, which isn't likely to happen soon. So if it is electrified, it's the "let The Beaches die" coalition (lots more area for a few additional NG plants at the Port.
Shocking that NIMBY environmental activists are malicious ignoramuses who just want to screw the other fella behind the tree.
Note: I live 200 feet from the amalgamated west bound train corridor (Georgetown and Oakville lines) and 500m from the Gardiner. You get air pollution living in a city, but this will reduce it for the city overall as well as improving accessibility for the city and airport.
Here's my idea for even cheaper transportation. Horse and buggy. Hay is cheap to feed the horses. The horses would work year round and there would be no 'designated' stops. Just say where you want to be dropped off or wave where to be picked up.
Less car and people collisions too. Horses are generally smarter than most politicians and stop if someone or something cross their paths.
The buggies could use the existing train and subway tracks and transportation would flow within the existing infrastructure.
Don't worry about the manure either. Great compost for the city gardens. A win-win idea.
At last! It's time to look outside the box.
Given that speeds along the corridor aren't particularly high, simple variable tension catenary can be used (half the cost of modern constant tension catenary).
Electric outages would knock out both diesel and electric trains, owing that the signalling system would be disabled regardless. Shouldn't even be an argument.
The diesel-electrics in use today put out a fraction of the pollutants that their predecessors did: this is not 18th Century England and these are not coal-fired locomotives.
Baby steps, my friends. We will get there soon enough. There's plenty of time to get cancer from your cellphone that is glued to your head night and day so I wouldn't be worried about living next to a rail corridor (other than the constant racket!)
The metrolinx plan as stated in their own technical documents is an increase in pollution and a sifting of it from one area to another. I don't see how this is a win for anybody. In a worst case scenario, as envisioned by people who actually study transit this plan will actually make room for more cars on the road.
Electric is the better and cheaper choice and has a much smaller systematic carbon footprint than dirty diesel. period.
Why do people believe everything Metrolinx says? At the large rally today even Gerard Kennedy went over the litany of things that Metrolinx has said that are not true.
A diesel train is more polluting than a car.
I live about 50m from the Lakeshore Line, at a GO station, with almost constant trains through the rush hour. Most of my pollution does NOT come from trains. It comes from the constantly idling city buses (day and night) and illegally stopped and idling cars. The trains just don't produce that much pollution. The only thing you smell from the trains is the brakes.
The trains should be electrified but not because of pollution. They should be electrified for better acceleration and quieter operation. The fact that they'd be powered by environmentally friendly nuclear is a bonus.
Oh yes, and the Lakeshore line should be electrified first. Electrifying the Georgetown line makes no sense from an economic perspective.
Electric has so many advantages - if the economics in the Metrolinx scenario works, why would anyone object?
Those who are unhappy with the CTC's lack of extreme or radical opposition should feel free to start their own fringe group, rather than cry about how the CTC is trying to play by the rules.
People who have nothing better to do than complain about hippees eating bark and hugging trees.. FYI - everyone generally ignores your stupid commentary.
I think you need to bone up on your science a bit. Carbon footprint and pollution plus operation cost is exactly why nobody is building new diesel commuters lines anymore.
Also people are asking for more trains so this isn't a nimby issue, its a health issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr4e99oBhv4&feature=player_embedded
No one has the right to disrupt neighbourhoods with construction twice- once for diesel, and once again for electric- and no taxpayers should be forced to pay for infrastructure twice.
I am astonished at the pettiness of the term 'NIMBY' when the Chief Medical Officer of Health has gone on record to say that asthma will go up astronomically in the rail corridor. Are parents, homeowners, businesses and taxpayers NIMBYs when they say that they do not want to be poisoned by diesel emissions? The toxicity of ultra fine particulate of diesel emissions cannot even be measured scientifically, so is not part of the Environmental Assessment.
Also, there is no cause to criticize the Clean Train Coalition. Metrolinx has millions of dollars to spin their lies through their public relations department- the Clean Train Coalition has dedicated volunteers. If you want to help the cause, do something productive- like write your own blog. I did at http://railroadedbymetrolinx.blogspot.com
Be part of the solution instead of the problem. There is not a neighbourhood in any city that deserves to have their environmental rights for clean air taken away by a transit project that serves the 905 at the expense of the 416 to enable urban expansion for McMansion developers.
The rally yesterday was fine, but 500 people and some weekend news coverage is not going to change the government's mind and the Environment Minister is going to have no reason to think twice before signing off on the Metrolinx proposal next Monday. I am not attacking the Coaliton or its efforts, just the inept strategy that has not yielded any change in government policy after six months of working on it. It is time to stop be so damn nice about it and pull the alarm!
By the way, over 1000 people took part in the march and rally yesterday.
I'd acknowledge the McGuinty government as the "Education" government -- but they sure seem resistant on environment...
http://www.torontosun.com/news/torontoandgta/2009/07/21/10202501-sun.html#/news/torontoandgta/2009/07/21/pf-10202501.html
It would be nice if you researched before you criticized. Still looking forward to your protest. It will have to be soon as we will hear from the Minister of Environment this Monday, so you have a day to organize it. Let me know- I will be the first to support you.
We all want the same thing - clean trains.